Cameron's claim that Palin didn't ask for earmarks is contradicted by Palin herself
SUMMARY: On Studio B, Carl Cameron said, "Fifty-eight days before the elections, and the Obama campaign is accusing the McCainiacs of lying about this 'bridge to nowhere' issue." He went on to claim of Gov. Sarah Palin, "Now, she didn't ask for the bridge, nor did she ask for the money. ... [W]hen people say, 'Sarah Palin asked for earmark money or pork,' it's just inaccurate." In fact, in an op-ed in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, Palin wrote that in 2008, her administration "requested 31 earmarks, down from 54 in 2007" and that "the federal budget, in its various manifestations, is incredibly important to us, and congressional earmarks are one aspect of this relationship."
uring the September 8 edition of Fox News' Studio B, chief political correspondent Carl Cameron claimed, "Fifty-eight days before the elections, and the Obama campaign is accusing the McCainiacs of lying about this 'bridge to nowhere' issue." Cameron purported to "straighten out" the issue by claiming, "She ultimately told legislators in Alaska, 'It's not coming,' " and stating, "It's very important to understand in earmark discussions, Jon, governors and state officials don't ask for federal money. That's done by senators and congressmen. So when people say, 'Sarah Palin asked for earmark money or pork,' it's just inaccurate. It's done by members of Congress." But Cameron's claim that Palin did not ask for "earmark money or pork" is contradicted by Palin herself. In a March 5 op-ed in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, Palin wrote that in 2008, her administration "requested 31 earmarks, down from 54 in 2007" and that "the federal budget, in its various manifestations, is incredibly important to us, and congressional earmarks are one aspect of this relationship."
Moreover, Palin has repeatedly sought and requested hundreds of millions of dollars in earmarks as governor of Alaska, and according to The Washington Post, she hired a Washington lobbying firm to acquire tens of millions of dollars in earmarks while serving as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska.
Further, in claiming that "Sarah Palin can point to a number of things that she did and said that made it very clear that in the end, she was against it. You can't dispute that. She ultimately told legislators in Alaska, 'It's not coming,' " Cameron did not point out, as the Post reported, "the money did not go back to Washington. It stayed in Alaska for a different road project."
From the September 8 edition of Fox News' Studio B:
JON SCOTT (guest host): Well, Barack Obama's campaign says Palin did not stop the "bridge to nowhere" and claims she and McCain will say or do anything to make people believe they can change something besides the person sitting in the Oval Office. Carl Cameron with the news live in Lee's Summit, Missouri. A lot of back and forth. I've already gotten emails from the McCain campaign today over this "bridge to nowhere" thing, Carl. Straighten that out for us.
CAMERON: Oh, it's not an easy one to straighten out at all, Jon. There's a lot of sort of nuance involved in how this plays out. Back when Sarah Palin was the mayor of Wasilla in Alaska and the bridge was beginning to be the buzz of congressional spending, she spoke very favorably about it. When she was a candidate for governor, she said that there needed to be a link between Ketchikan, the city in Alaska, and a tiny little island, Gravina Island, which had about 50 residents and an airport.
She said that it needed to be a link. But the political winds began to turn. This $400 million congressional project, dubbed the bridge to nowhere, became unpopular. The political rhetoric -- the din rose, and as it did, it became clear that the federal government was not going to send all of the money for it, and with that change, so, too, did change Sarah Palin's rhetoric. And ultimately, as a candidate for governor, she began to say that she didn't want Alaska bad-mouthed, but it was clear that the federal government was going to come through with the money. So it was time to look elsewhere.
She did continue to say that there should be some sort of an access, and that is why the Democrats have called this ad a lie. They've used the L word, Jon. Fifty-eight days before the elections, and the Obama campaign is accusing the McCainiacs of lying about this "bridge to nowhere" issue.
But Sarah Palin can point to a number of things that she did and said that made it very clear that in the end, she was against it. You can't dispute that. She ultimately told legislators in Alaska, "It's not coming." But there was a time, before she was governor, as a candidate, where she spoke favorably about it. Now, she didn't ask for the bridge, nor did she ask for the money. It's very important to understand in earmark discussions, Jon, governors and state officials don't ask for federal money. That's done by senators and congressmen. So when people say, "Sarah Palin asked for earmark money or pork," it's just inaccurate. It's done by members of Congress.
SCOTT: Carl Cameron reporting live with the McCain campaign. Carl, thank you.















She took the money. She spent the money. She just didn't get to spend it on the bridge to nowhere.
Here's the context I'd like to see asserted: Whatever you call it, it was US tax dollars taken out of my pocket to be spent on an earmark for Alaska that wasn't necessary.
Sarah Palin fleeced the taxpayers of the US out of nearly $300 Million for pork-barrel spending in Alaska. Is that the kind of maverick you want in the White House?
correction - not "nearly $300 million", just $229 million.
Sarah Palin fleeced the taxpayers of the US out of $229 Million for pork-barrel spending in Alaska. Is that the kind of maverick you want in the White House?
Palin is a liar; McCain is a liar.
It appears to be a requirement to become a GOP candidate.
Anyone see this yet? When I first saw it, I thought that this was an Obama attack ad. As you can see, it's from JohnMcCain.com. What a dynamic duo!
P.S. Go to the second tab entitled, "TV Ad: Mavericks".
That's great, Onionhead. I thought it was a preview of a new Fall cop show.
And the closing shot of McCain reminded me that Thanksgiving's just around the corner. Not the best angle on the turkeyneck.
Yeah, that is great. You made me watch it again to see his turkey neck.
Maybe McCain can claim he has an endorsement from Benjamin Franklin.
LIARS!
When is someone in the Obama campaign going to grow some balls and speak those words?
When she was running for governor in 2006, Palin said she was insulted by the term "bridge to nowhere," according to Ketchikan Mayor Bob Weinstein, a Democrat, and Mike Elerding, a Republican who was Palin's campaign coordinator in the southeast Alaska city.
"People are learning that she pandered to us by saying, I'm for this' ... and then when she found it was politically advantageous for her nationally, abruptly she starts using the very term that she said was insulting," Weinstein said. (Reuters)
But she was for the money that was for the bridge that had a name she didn't like, and for the money after she was against the bridge that had a name she didn't like, and kept the money to build a road to the bridge that she didn't like.....now she has a road to a "bridge to nowhere", but she likes the name now.
"The state, however, never gave back any of the money that was originally earmarked for the Gravina Island bridge, said Weinstein and Elerding.
In fact, the Palin administration has spent "tens of millions of dollars" in federal funds to start building a road on Gravina Island that is supposed to link up to the yet-to-be-built bridge, Weinstein said." (Reuters)
On MSNBC a McCain spokesperson said.... Palin was okay with the bridge to nowhere until it reached 4 million, and then she no, weren’t not going to waste tax payers money.
But then she kept the money for that road now didn't she????
"How can this not be repeated on every news program until McCain tells the truth?"
Good question. To their credit, NPR has mentioned the discrepancy several times since her nomination was announced.
Just wait. When Biden debates Failin' Palin, I'm sure he'll bring it up - and then we can all watch the wicked witch from Alaska tap dance around the truth.
In the mean time, both Obama and Biden need to pound McCain and Palin on these lies.
I just finished watching the blitzer report. He sure isn't buying into any of it.Here are a few highlights he noted after hearing Palin speak again about earmarks:
Blitzer is becoming my hero!
Isn't it amazing that these guys will actually do their jobs when they find out a competitor hs the exclusive that they wanted? It's a pity that it took Palin going to ABC first for these guys to start doing some accurate reporting.
:-{
Snoopy barked:
>>I just finished watching the blitzer report. He sure isn't buying into any of it.Here are a few highlights he noted after hearing Palin speak again about earmarks:
What is bizzarre about this is how poorly McCain has handled this whole affair, first picking someone he didn't vet who is under investigation and courted a sececessionist group. But then, to run around the country repeating a bald face lie strikes me as just plain stupid. Reporters love to catch politicians making factual lies. In contrast, journalist will allow politicians to BS all the time. But they love to catch them on factual lies, the kind that resolve into black and white (I did not have sexual relations with that woman).
Did McCain and his campaign not realize that making an obvious lie central to his campaign would come back to haunt him? I don't understand how Palin will maintain any credibility.
AA,
That's your cue. Please tell us why its valuable to have Cameron reporting his version much like its valuable to have Corsi writing.
"WHAT CAN ANYONE SAY TO DEFEND WHAT HE HAS DONE TODAY?"UKOBSERVER. ------- Nothing, zelch ,nada!!!!
McCainiacs, Obamamaniacs...
And they're all on some sort of "Express"!
It's about freakin' time the Democrats used the "L word". That's all Republicans seem able to do.
Tonight on Hardball, Todd Harris, republican strategist claimed that Palin was for a "some kind of link" but not a $400 million bridge".
Of course the article that Mathews chose to read never mentioned a bridge, but spoke of a "link".....ignoring the many articles that call it a bridge.This lead to Harris who said Palin was for some kind of link, not a bridge. Coincidence that he used that article?
"Yet documents Palin's office released to The Seattle Times on Tuesday show her cuts in earmarks were far more modest than she claimed. Last year, Palin requested $254 million in earmarks, not $550 million, so her cuts this year were only 22 percent, not the 63 percent she claimed." (The Seattle Times)On MSNBC the right is now saying that the "earmarks" for the bridge were actually "highway funds" that all states get, but Palin was against the bridge when she found out how much it would take from their highway funds....and that the keeping the money to build the road to the "what would have been a bridge to nowhere" is what highway funds do.
Gees, I dizzy from all the spin.
here it is
Flashback: In 2006 Debate, Palin Supported ‘Bridge To Nowhere’-Related Earmark
Last night, C-SPAN re-aired the 2006 Alaska gubernatorial debate, in which Sarah Palin expressed her support for an earmark related to the famed “Bridge to Nowhere.”
Congress had already removed earmarked-funding for the Bridge to Nowhere in Ketchikan, Alaska. Despite the fact that the bridge was not going to be built, then-Gov. Frank Murkowski approved the construction of a $24 million gravel “access” road (the Gravina Island Access Highway) that would lead to a nonexistent bridge.
In the 2006 debate, Palin was asked whether she supported this earmark, or whether she would pledge to cancel it as governor. Rather than responding with “thanks but no thanks” to federal funding for this “access” road, Palin said:
Well gosh, it's no wonder the faux pitbull thinks she's being attacked by the media if she thinks that what she did there was to take a strong stand against earmarks.
All this time I thought she was a liar without conscience or remorse and it turns out that she just has a completely different version of reality than most rational people. That must be it, right?
So which is she wingnuts, a liar or a delusional borderline schizophrenic?
Whats the most sickening about all of this is that America is falling for this BS! McCain is ahead in some polls that came out today, even with 2 weeks about her shaky political past in the news.
And as we read MM everyday, no one is calling out the Republican lies and Americans are falling for the bait hook, line, and sinker.
Are we really on the road to electing Bush III?
Not so fast, another poll released today shows Obama already eliminated McCain's surge. Ahead by 1...
Which means it's time for the song...
Where, oh where are my ratings tonight?
Why did you leave me here all alone?
I told everybody that I was a P.O.Dubyah…
But you met Obama and PHPPPHT you were gone.
There was a link, a ferry; afterall, this airport wasn't some private field, it was the Ketchikan International Airport. This was pork, she knew it, she wanted it, she campaigned for it, and now she is stuck with it!
I was particularly struck by Cameron's sneer and head bobbing as he attempted to mock those who would DARE use "the L word" to describe Palin's rather obvious lies.
I get the feeling that he does a LOT of head bobbing down there at Faux News.
vysotsky wrote
>>Doesn't this just boil down to, "She was for it before she was against it"?
Sadly, NO! She was always for it. By using that catchy line, Obama allows Palin to spin, to say that she was once for the bridge, but when she became governor, she realized pork was bad. In fact, she never told congress no. By the time she became governor, the project was pretty much dead, and an embarrassment. She then used that money for another project.
In no meaningful sense was she ever against the bridge to nowhere.
Hey, not so fast -- Mr. Cameron here just told me that whenever I hear someone say that Sarah Palin still supported it, I'm supposed to say,"That's just inaccurate! It's done by Congress!" Wait... he said I should say something else, too.... right! "She didn't ask for the bridge and she didn't ask for the money, and it's very important that you understand that!" Um....there was one other thing...Oh yeah! "You can't dispute that."
vysotsky wrote:
>>She didn't ask for the bridge and she didn't ask for the money, and it's very important that you understand that!"
Yes, it is really outrageous how dishonest Cameron is being. First, he says " Now, she didn't ask for the bridge, nor did she ask for the money." But that's just a clever strawman argument. Palin claimed she was *against* the bridge; that is what she is campaigning on. But Camerson cleverly changes what Palin says to "She never asked for the money." Of course she didn't, because she wasn't governor. But while she didn't ask for the money, she didn't tell congress no, either. Let me repeat that: she never told congress no!
As Cameron concedes, by the time she was governor, the bridge was an embarrassment, and pretty much dead.
Camerson then creates another strawman (or something very similar), when no points out that governors don't ask for earmarks. Well, technically that is true, but she made sure, through lobbyists that Alaska got more earmarks per capita than any other state.
Palin never was against earmarks, and her running around claiming she was is like a coke addict running on an anti-drug platform.
What is the purpose of this myth, after all? To make her Troglodyte worshippers think that she saved the U.S. taxpayers all that money. The fact that the money stayed in Alaska negates any benefit to the cancellation of the bridge. It's a vapid, disingenuous talking point, designed to fool the gullible GOP base..... and it's working like a charm.
http://crooksandliars.com/2008/09/04/jon-stewart-exposes-rove-hannity-morris-palin-hypocracy
SCOTT; Carl reporting live FOR the McCain campaign
fixed
Cameron's on a roll isn't he..,
First with the flag story. Now this?
Can't wait for all this stuff out there about Palin starts to catch fire.