About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Despite long history of political "lipstick" references, AP's Pickler linked Obama's to Palin's

September 10, 2008 7:24 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: The AP's Nedra Pickler wrote that "lipstick" has become "a political buzzword, thanks to" Gov. Sarah Palin's "joke in her acceptance speech that lipstick is the only thing that separates a hockey mom like her from a pit bull," and suggested that therefore Palin's joke had something to do with Sen. Barack Obama's reference to "lipstick on a pig." Yet Obama had previously used the expression in this campaign -- before Palin's reference to lipstick at the RNC -- and as Pickler noted in the same article, Sen. John McCain himself has used it. Indeed, the expression, and similar ones, has been used by politicians for years.

22 Comments

In a September 10 article about Sen. Barack Obama's comment that "[Y]ou can put lipstick on a pig; it's still a pig," Associated Press reporter Nedra Pickler wrote that "lipstick" has become "a political buzzword, thanks to" Gov. Sarah Palin's "joke in her acceptance speech that lipstick is the only thing that separates a hockey mom like her from a pit bull," and suggested that therefore Palin's joke had something to do with Obama's reference to "lipstick on a pig." Yet Obama had previously used the expression in this campaign -- before Palin's reference to lipstick at the Republican National Convention -- as had former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-TN), a supporter of Sen. Hillary Clinton, and -- as Pickler noted in the same article -- McCain himself while criticizing Clinton's health-care proposal. Indeed, the expression, and similar ones, has been used by politicians for years.

Despite numerous examples of politicians using the expression before Palin's September 3 convention speech, Pickler wrote: "What's the difference between the presidential campaign before and after the national political conventions? Lipstick." Pickler continued: "The colorful cosmetic has become a political buzzword, thanks to Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin's joke in her acceptance speech that lipstick is the only thing that separates a hockey mom like her from a pit bull." Apparently based on this assumption of the novelty of "lipstick" in this campaign, Pickler went on to link Obama's "lipstick on a pig" statement to Palin's convention joke:

What's the difference between the presidential campaign before and after the national political conventions? Lipstick. The colorful cosmetic has become a political buzzword, thanks to Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin's joke in her acceptance speech that lipstick is the only thing that separates a hockey mom like her from a pit bull.

Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama told an audience Tuesday that GOP presidential nominee John McCain says he'll change Washington, but he's just like President Bush.

"You can put lipstick on a pig," he said to an outbreak of laughter, shouts and raucous applause from his audience, clearly drawing a connection to Palin's joke even if it's not what Obama meant. "It's still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It's still going to stink after eight years."

McCain's campaign called the comments "offensive and disgraceful" and said Obama owes Palin an apology. Obama's campaign said he wasn't referring to Palin and said the GOP camp was engaging in a "pathetic attempt to play the gender card." Obama's camp also noted that McCain once used the same phrase to describe Hillary Rodham Clinton's health care plan.

As Media Matters for America noted, Pickler provided no evidence for her assertion -- contradicted by other media outlets -- that the audience "clearly" drew a connection between Obama's and Palin's remarks.

The expression is in fact a common one. Indeed, along with reporter Jennifer Loven, Pickler herself reported in an October 9, 2004, AP article that then-Democratic vice-presidential nominee John Edwards used the same expression in reference to statements by President Bush:

Edwards, campaigning Saturday in Detroit, accused the president of distorting the latest employment statistics to make it seem like millions of jobs had been created on his watch.

"They're going to try everything they know how to put lipstick on this pig, but at the end of the day, it's still a pig," Edwards said.

Although 1.8 million jobs have been added to business payrolls in the past year -- the figure Bush's claims are based on -- there are 821,000 fewer jobs now in the country than when Bush took office in January 2001.

"Come November, his time is going to be up and we're going to have a new president," Edwards said.

And Pickler reported on June 1, 2008:

Tina Flournoy, who led Clinton's efforts to seat both states' delegations with full voting power, said she was disappointed by the outcome but knew the Clinton position had "no chance" of passing the committee.

"I understand the rules. ... I can tell you one thing that has driven these rules was being a party of inclusion," Flournoy said. "I wish my colleagues will vote differently."

Alice Huffman, a Clinton supporter on the committee, explained that the compromise giving delegates half votes was the next best thing to full seating.

"We will leave here more united than we came," she said.

Some audience members heckled her in response. "Lipstick on a pig!" one shouted.

Moreover, Pickler wrote in her September 10 article that "McCain once used the same phrase to describe Hillary Rodham Clinton's health care plan." Indeed, in an October 11, 2007, post, the Chicago Tribune Washington bureau blog, The Swamp, reported:

McCain criticized Democratic contenders for offering what he called costly universal health care proposals that require too much government regulation. While he said he had not studied Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton's health-care plan, he said it was "eerily reminiscent" of the failed plan she offered as first lady in the early 1990s.

"I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig," he said of her proposal.

In addition, while discussing health care at a May 2 town hall meeting in Denver, McCain again used the expression. He said: "All I can say is that, yes, in 1993, we rejected the then-Clinton universal health care proposal. It was rejected by the American people. I don't like to use this term, but the latest proposal I see is putting lipstick on a pig, as we used to -- as we used to say."

Also, CNN.com reported in a February 2, 2007, article, that McCain used the phrase while discussing the debate over President Bush's strategy in Iraq:

Another Bush supporter, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, said the Warner resolution would be a vote of no confidence in Gen. David Petraeus, the incoming commander of U.S. and allied troops in Iraq. And McCain, who has blasted the Bush administration's handling of the war, said his proposal is a sign the United States is willing to go "all in" in the now-unpopular conflict.

"It gets down to whether you support what is being done in this new strategy or you don't," McCain said. "You can put lipstick on a pig, [but] it's still a pig, in my view."

According to a September 14, 2007, Washington Post column by Eugene Robinson, Obama used the expression in a phone interview the previous day:

"I think that both General [David] Petraeus and Ambassador [Ryan] Crocker are capable people who have been given an impossible assignment," Sen. Barack Obama said yesterday in a telephone interview. "George Bush has given a mission to General Petraeus, and he has done his best to try to figure out how to put lipstick on a pig."

In addition to McCain, Obama, and Edwards, other political and media figures have made similar "lipstick" comments:

  • Former Texas Gov. Ann Richards (D), reportedly referring to ineffective government programs: "You can put lipstick and earrings on a hog and call it Monique, but it's still a pig.''
  • Former Rep. Bob Schaffer (R-CO): " 'What they want is not change; it's just putting lipstick on a pig,' Schaffer told an estimated crowd of 4,500 people at the Broomfield Event Center." [Denver Post; 5/31/08]
  • Then-Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson: "He also took a swipe at Democrats when he was asked his plan for health care. 'You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig,' Thompson said. 'These health care plans that they're pushing, they're pigs.' " [AP; 1/15/08]
  • House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH): " 'Right now our fundraising sucks. ... There's no other way to put it. ... There's no use putting lipstick on a pig.' " [National Journal's CongressDaily; 4/3/08]
  • Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA): "Barack Obama blames lobbyists. Hunger and environmental groups blame Democratic leaders. Sen. Chuck Grassley calls it 'smearing lipstick on a pig.' The federal farm bill passed by the Senate was a turkey delivered for the holidays. It won't get much better when it is recooked in conference committee when Congress reconvenes." [The Tribune of Ames, Iowa; 12/27/07]
  • Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), on Democrats' changes to a State Children's Health Insurance Program bill: "Rep. Joe Barton of Texas last week compared the changes to 'putting lipstick on a pig. It may ... be a good pig. It may be a nice pig. It might be intended to be the right kind of pig ... [b]ut it's still a pig.' " [CNN.com; 11/2/07]
  • American Conservative Union chairman David Keene, on a 2007 Senate immigration bill: " 'I don't doubt [Sen.] Jon [Kyl, (R-AZ)] has improved the bill, but you can put lipstick on a pig and it's still a pig.' " [Washington Times; 6/27/07]
  • Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO), on a 2007 Senate immigration bill: "Well, of course, most of what you have described is just -- you know, there's an old saying around here about putting lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig. This is the lipstick for it." [CNN's Paula Zahn Now; 5/17/07]
  • Syndicated political talk-show host John McLaughlin, on President Bush's appointment of Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson: "Is this the equivalent of putting lipstick on a pig?" [The McLaughlin Group; 6/02/06]
  • Conservative blogger Bill Crawford: "I never meant to give a comprehensive account of how things are going in Iraq. I'm not, as my grandmother used to say, 'trying to put lipstick on a pig.' " [National Review Online; 3/20/06]
  • Rep. Mark Steven Kirk (R-IL), on 2007 appropriations for Navy and Marines Corps budget: "I think from my inside look, a lot of the problems have been overcome because there is a parallel Navy running, and it is outside the NMCI. I think everybody's laughing behind you. They all know that, and so the question is, how do we adapt and work with that rather than try to put lipstick on a pig?" [House Subcommittee on Military Quality of Life, Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies appropriations meeting; 3/08/06]
  • Vice President Dick Cheney on Sen. John Kerry's (D-MA) military plan: "As we like to say in Wyoming ... you can put all the lipstick you want on a pig, but at the end of the day it's still a pig." [speech at Hawaii Convention Center; 11/01/04; and speech at Hallowed Hills Conference Center in Ohio; 10/30/04 -- also noted by The Dallas Morning News' Trail Blazers blog]
  • Lynne Cheney on Kerry: "John Kerry tries to put a bunch of fancy, fancy talk -- tried to disguise that record, sort of like his fancy haircut, fancy manicure, tried to disguise the whole thing. ... But there is nothing you can do to really -- to really obscure that record. You can try, though. And in Wyoming, we've got a saying for what it is when you keep trying to make something that's not so good look good, we call it putting lipstick on a pig. ... Yes. ... And it doesn't work." [remarks at Embassy Suites Hotels in Coraopolis, Pennsylvania; 10/13/04]

Additionally, in a June 18 piece, The Hill included the following quotes in its "Congress Speak: Making up the pig":

"Let's not perfume the pig here. The Democrats have some seriously deep fissures that they are going to have to mend outside of any formal rules committee."

-- Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway, in a May 29 appearance on CNN's "Larry King Live."

[...]

"You can put lipstick on a pig, but guess what? It's still a pig."

-- Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), discussing in April 2004 a Bush administration proposal to eliminate overtime pay.

"You know the old saying about putting lipstick on a pig? Well, I smell bacon."

-- Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) in a May 21 House floor speech on U.S. trade policy.

"Calling this surrender a 'withdrawal' or a 'redeployment' is like putting lipstick on a pig. No matter what you call it, it is still a pig."

-- Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) during an April 26 speech on the Senate floor about supplemental funding for the Iraq war.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shaggles (September 10, 2008 7:28 pm ET)
         
      But it makes the horse race so much more interesting if they allow the reps to drum up this false controversy.  Who wants to hear policy talk anyway?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sueelldd (September 10, 2008 8:33 pm ET)
         
      Great research by MMFA, thank you. Also Tweety Matthews was using this tonight in his discussion on this topic, he actually was going after the GOP liars. 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sueelldd (September 10, 2008 8:33 pm ET)
         
      Great research by MMFA, thank you. Also Tweety Matthews was using this tonight in his discussion on this topic, he actually was going after the GOP liars. 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (September 10, 2008 9:04 pm ET)
         
      Even if, for the sake of argument, Obama's remark, a common one, was intended as a take off on Sarah Palin's lipstick reference, where's the beef...or pork? By no reasonable or rational construction of Obama's remarks, in the context of his entire remarks, could it be said that he referred to Sarah Palin as a pig or that he intended to. So, if Obama did appropriate Palin's lipstick reference for his own joke, what is Sarah Palin's gripe? That Obama appropriated her lipstick reference? Does she own the rights to lipstick references now? No one can ridicule her lipstick remark? In the context of the insulting and demeaning remarks she's made about Obama, ridiculing his work as a community organizer, for example, is Sarah Palin off limits to any ridicule because she's a woman? IMO Sarah Palin demeans herself by making, or allowing, an issue out of this. It says that, as a woman, she demands kid gloves treatment...she can't be ridiculed. When has a Vice Presidential candidate ever been immune from ridicule? Welcome to Presidential politics, Princess...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dexteritas0071418 (September 10, 2008 9:19 pm ET)
           

        Hi.

        It's not that Obama used the phrase; this post by MMfA is a red herring. The point is that Obama referred to Palin as "lipstick", a crucifixtion-worthy offense if any GOP-voting white mail said it about pretty much anyone ("eh, Sebelius would've just been 'lipstick' for the Obama ticket".)

        It was toward Palin. He didn't call Palin a pig, he referred to her as lipstick on the "pig" though. He did. He paused through the phrase so that everyone "got" it. He was clearly referring to McCain as the old stinky fish.

        Do I think it's worse than what Kerry went through? No. Do I think that Obama and his campaign and supporters are any better than Rovian acolytes? Not anymore.

        The problem isn't that the Obama campaign and the unofficial stormtroopers of Dkos & the HuffPost have resorted to smearing and slurs as well, its that they think they're above the politics or that they still represent "change".

        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (September 10, 2008 9:25 pm ET)
             
          I don't think Obama's remark had anything to do with Sarah Palin...other than his lipstick joke topped her lipstick joke. The insult was directed to John McCain, not to Sarah Palin. What all this tells me is that Princess Sarah is obviously considered off limits to any of the rough and tumble of presidential politics bec ause she's a woman. Hell, they won't even let the press talk to her...how elitist is that? Aaaah...The Princess.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by loonz (September 10, 2008 9:42 pm ET)
               

            The reason why the far right jump to the conclusion that the remarks were about Palin is that they actually believe Palin is lipstick, a pig or whatever else they're pushing.  Why else would they jump to that conclusion so quickly?

            And even if the remarks were about Palin, I don't see anything wrong with them.  If Palin can't take the heat, she shouldn't have entered the kitchen.  All I've heard from her so far is incessant whining.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (September 10, 2008 9:49 pm ET)
                 
              She's the Princess...  Don't play too rough with her...that's sexism. Meanwhile she's trying to rip your throat out a la Dick Cheney. What a bunch of frauds...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by dexteritas0071418 (September 10, 2008 10:17 pm ET)
                   
                Who's whining now?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by loonz (September 10, 2008 10:49 pm ET)
                     

                  Palin.

                  Pay attention next time.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tippy (September 11, 2008 11:26 am ET)
                       
                    Is Palin whining herself?  I've seen the GOP trot out various would-be defenders of her honor, including Jane Swift and a few other women, but I haven't heard Palin say anything.  Did I miss that? 
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by loonz (September 10, 2008 9:27 pm ET)
             

          The point is that Obama referred to Palin as "lipstick"

          Palin is not the lipstick; she's part of the pig.  Palin is a liar, an extremist and possible criminal and the McCain is trying her into something else.  His whole campaign invovles putting lipstick on a pig.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by funnymanpants (September 10, 2008 11:03 pm ET)
             

          Dexterit wrote:

          >>It was toward Palin. 

          Good grief this is an insult towards anyone with intelligence. You don't have the faintest idea that it was directed towards Palin. By context, it clearly was not. Do you have some special mind reading powers that you know what Obama meant?

          Let's play  your game. You said "The problem isn't that the Obama campaign and the unofficial stormtroopers." Oh my God! You just compared Obama to Hitler! Now no matter how many times someone points out that the actual quote didn't comare the two, I can just keep coming back with the line "Oh c'mon, Dex was clearly referring to Obama."

          Do you realize you are forwarding fake outrage that even the main stream media (which tends to let Pols get away with a lot) think is ridiculous?  

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 11, 2008 12:52 am ET)
               

            FMP, if you haven't noticed the behavior of our wingnut friends here lately, I don't think the word "ridiculous" is in their vocabulary any more. They used to have a grasp of it, but something's going very wrong.

            My guess is, even though this election looks like it's going to be pretty close, and they may even take the White House, deep down they know they're being scammed. If McCain & Palin are elected, it may be the biggest hoax perpetrated in history, and I think even some of the hardcore GOPpers can't block that out of their minds.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by funnymanpants (September 11, 2008 3:20 am ET)
                 

              Col wrote:

              >>FMP, if you haven't noticed the behavior of our wingnut friends here lately, 

              Yes, I've noted it, though at the same time they seem  to be not as numerous as in the past, and not as viscous. After you point out the facts, they either disappear or offer a few stupid insults and then disappear. I do think that they know that Palin is lying through her teeth, and that makes their argument look week.

              But have you looked at any of the comments on other web sites? The freepers are out in full force. Palin has really whipped them up. They all say the same thing: I was once a Democrat, but I am so disgusted with Obama...(right!). Or, they all revert to smugness. Obama is in meltdown mode according to them. His campaign is self destructing. Dems are losing.

              They are all getting the same talking points. And McCain is using the same strategy, to make it look like Obama is losing the election, desperate, so he will say anything. I'm talking about the wolf ad, which compares Obama to a wolf stalking Palin, and then says "down in the polls, Obama will do anything to win." (That is actually a paraphrase.)  The smugness of the freepers is unbearable. Remember about 4 years ago, how they insulted us with the message that we were basically losers? I had forgotten that, because, with Bush having such low approval ratings, they had stopped their trash talking. They are back.

              But it will be funny if their smugness and confidence turns out to be ill founded. Clearly, McCain has disgusted the media  and may have used up all of his fake outrage cards. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by JLyons (September 11, 2008 9:10 am ET)
                   
                And the GOP does not seem outraged about the single mother who has 2 kids and no health insurance and one of the kids gets sick, or breaks a leg and she has to pay thousands of dollars in medical bills.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 11, 2008 9:17 am ET)
             

          Would you please pass whatever your smokin over here?  I'd like to see meaningful connections and symbols in everything in my world as well.  Or maybe I could just stop taking my meds and it would start again...

          This is nonsense. It is false outrage to strir a false controversy.  Nothing more.  Obama's response was spot on: All they do is take innocent remarks, take the out of context and twist them into something thet're not to drum up false controversy.  How anyone can't see this is beyond me.  How anyone can still support McCain is beyond me.  You're being lied to.  You have to be blind or insane not to see this.  How can anyone still support this man?

          This country stands on the brink and you people are still 'outraged' about lipstick and pigs?  Well here's some strait talk for you: SARAH PALIN IS AN IDIOTIC RELIGIOUS ZEALOT.  JOHN McCAIN IS A HYPOCRITICAL SELLOUT WHO IS WELL PAST HIS PRESIDENTIAL PRIME, AND HAS NO IDEAS OTHER THAT T OCONTINUE ROVE/CHENEY/BUSH POLICIES, in that order.  No sybolism needed, just the strait truth.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by mrchristophersea7516 (September 11, 2008 10:02 am ET)
             
          Oh boy. I just am amused in a very sad way that people are more concerned with a perceived use of a common phrase by Obama as opposed to the real lying done by Palin and McCain.

          McCain jumped on this as a stupid trick so they could keep on lying.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (September 11, 2008 12:49 am ET)
         
      This is depressing.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Associated Press
    Associated Press

    The Associated Press
    450 W. 33rd St.
    New York, NY 10001

    Main Number
    +1-212-621-1500