About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Even after Wash. Post "Fact Checker" called ad "dishonest" and "deceptive," paper uncritically quoted it

September 15, 2008 12:17 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: A Washington Post article uncritically reported a McCain campaign ad's false assertion that Sen. Barack Obama's " 'one accomplishment' on education has been to support 'comprehensive sex education' for kindergarteners," even after Michael Dobbs, the Post's own "Fact Checker," wrote that the McCain campaign's claim is "wrong," and that the ad is "dishonest" and "deceptive."

14 Comments

In a September 15 Washington Post article about the presidential candidates' positions on education, staff writer Maria Glod uncritically reported a portion of an ad by Sen. John McCain's campaign that mischaracterized Sen. Barack Obama's position on sex education. Glod wrote: "A McCain television advertisement says Obama's 'one accomplishment' on education has been to support 'comprehensive sex education' for kindergarteners." Glod did not note that the ad's assertion is false, even though the Post's own "Fact Checker," Michael Dobbs, wrote on September 11 that "[t]he McCain ad is wrong when it claims -- in a voice dripping with sarcasm -- that Obama's 'one accomplishment' in the education field was a sex education bill for kindergartners." Dobbs also called the ad "dishonest" and "deceptive."

Contrary to the characterization of the bill that Glod uncritically quoted, Dobbs wrote in the September 11 article headlined, "McCain's 'Education' Spot Is Dishonest, Deceptive," that "the principal purpose of the bill" Obama supported -- but did not sponsor -- was to make children "aware of the risk of inappropriate touching and sexual predators":

The McCain ad is wrong when it claims -- in a voice dripping with sarcasm -- that Obama's "one accomplishment" in the education field was a sex education bill for kindergartners. While it is true that Obama supported the bill, he was not one of the sponsors. As far as kindergartners were concerned, the principal purpose of the bill was to make them aware of the risk of inappropriate touching and sexual predators. Other states, including California and Massachusetts, have passed similar legislation.

[...]

Nobody expects television ads to be fair and objective analyses of public policy. Almost by definition, the ads are partisan sales pitches, designed to promote one political brand while running down the rival brand. But they should not misrepresent the record of the other side and should clearly distinguish quotes from nonpartisan news sources from standard political rhetoric. The McCain "Education" ad fails this test.

In addition, FactCheck.org called the McCain ad's assertion "simply false," and also noted that Obama "can properly claim a number of real accomplishments" on education:

A McCain-Palin campaign ad claims Obama's "one accomplishment" in the area of education was "legislation to teach 'comprehensive sex education' to kindergarteners." But the claim is simply false, and it dates back to Alan Keyes' failed race against Obama for an open Senate seat in 2004.

Obama, contrary to the ad's insinuation, does not support explicit sex education for kindergarteners. And the bill, which would have allowed only "age appropriate" material and a no-questions-asked opt-out policy for parents, was not his accomplishment to claim in any case, since he was not even a cosponsor -- and the bill never left the state Senate.

[...]

The ad claims the bill was Obama's "one accomplishment." This is doubly false. Obama was neither a cosponsor nor a sponsor of the sex education bill, which never got past "go" in the Senate. So it was not an "accomplishment" at all. Furthermore, Obama can properly claim a number of real accomplishments.

He was a cosponsor of what became the Chicago Education Reform Act of 2003, which allowed for an increase in the number of Chicago charter schools and required the Chicago Board of Education to enter into a formal partnership with the Chicago Teachers Union to "advance the Chicago Public Schools to the next level of education reform." He was also a cosponsor of a bipartisan bill to help Illinois high school graduates be eligible for in-state college tuition rates even if they weren't U.S. citizens.

On the federal level, Obama sponsored three amendments to The America COMPETES Act, which became law in 2007. All three amendments were passed in the Senate by unanimous consent and became law. One amendment proposed language that would create a mentoring program for women and minority groups during their studies in Department of Energy programs. He also proposed language to support summer learning programs and boost their math curricula. And he put forward a requirement that women and minorities be represented in the President's Science and Technology Summit. Whether or not one considers any of these measures earth-shaking, they're accomplishments nonetheless.

From Glod's September 15 Washington Post article:

McCain is squarely for teacher merit pay based on test scores; Obama supports pay for performance but only in cooperation with unions. Obama supports a significant expansion of early childhood programs. McCain supports the creation of more online schools and classes.

In recent days, as millions of parents sent their children back to school, the campaigns kicked up the rhetoric on education, each accusing the other of lacking a reform record. A McCain television advertisement says Obama's "one accomplishment" on education has been to support "comprehensive sex education" for kindergartners. Recently in Norfolk, Obama said McCain "has not done one thing to improve the quality of public education in our country, not one real law or proposal or initiative. Nothing. It has not been a priority for him."

The next iteration of the No Child Left Behind law, now overdue in Congress, could have major effects for millions of students and teachers. The law marked an unprecedented federal foray into public schools, requiring a dramatic expansion of testing. It aims to boost the achievement of students from poor families who have long trailed those who come from the middle and upper classes.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (September 15, 2008 12:24 pm ET)
         

      When even FOX's Megyn Kelly ackowledges that McCain's sex ed claim is false then you know the claim is so blatantly false it should not be repeated without noting that it is false.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/15/foxs-megyn-kelly-works-ov_n_126473.html

      Report Abuse
      • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (September 15, 2008 1:35 pm ET)
           
        IRONY, I see that the rainy weather has kept us from doing much of anything but posting an MMFA. The amount of outright lies from the right (McCain) has been growing and growing. The mind reels! Some of the old cliches come to mind: "Let's just throw it on the wall and see if it sticks." Do you, like me, ever contemplate what would happen if politicians told the truth?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 15, 2008 3:16 pm ET)
           

        Irony, I happened to catch that segment this morning before leaving for work. It shows how low the bar is set at Fox when it's noteworthy that one of them is at least mentioning outright lies.

        The McCain mouthpieces take ewas pretty funny, defending his claim that Obama will raise taxes by saying he knows he will based on his record.

        Can we assume that if McCain is elected, he'll see the damaged, tired nation he's inheriting, and go off looking for a younger more attractive nation to replace the US? ( I'm thinking that hussy East Timor might get more than a glance)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wolf kotenberg (September 15, 2008 3:30 pm ET)
             
          I am sure Mrs palin will get a spot, let's say Nov 5, 2008 should Mccain go down in flames for the second time ????
          Report Abuse
        • Author by skettle2000 (September 16, 2008 2:36 pm ET)
             
          In all honest I'm not sure anybody really wants this presidency due to the economy being so messed up. 
          Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (September 15, 2008 2:59 pm ET)
         
      I heard that assertion being discussed last evening ad infinitun, even analysis of inflections. Amazing what happens when you have to fill up a 24/7 news cycle.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (September 15, 2008 9:44 pm ET)
         

      wuffkittyburg,

      Gee, the messiah sponsors bills to help the teacher's union improve schools, keep their pay overseen by its union?  Helped illegal aliens get cheap tuition in Illinois?

      Yeah verily, go forth and trumpet thy stupendous work on behalf of leftism.  Then, verily be dumbfounded as those that pulleth the levers, runneth from thee and thine beliefs!  Amen, Awomen.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (September 15, 2008 10:08 pm ET)
           
        explain this messiah title ? If you are refering to Obama, you are mistaken, If Rush is using that terminology and you are also using it, then be more creative. and by the way, if you have to tell people you are conservative, that is probably because the observing public cannot figure that out by your actions.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by obama4prez (September 16, 2008 10:59 am ET)
           
        Verily, go forth and banish thyself from this forum. Hide thine eyes and cower under thy troll bridge until 5 fortnights have passed.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ufleirx (September 15, 2008 11:51 pm ET)
         
      When Rove says your ads have gone too far that is saying something.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 16, 2008 12:09 am ET)
           

        I just saw the clip of Rove stuttering, stammering, euphemizing and double-talking in an attempt to admit that McCain is lying. It was like when Fonzie had to say "I'm wrong" or "I'm sorry" and couldn't force the words out.

        Too many years of full-time lying for the old boy, he recognizes others' lies, but the ingrained party loyalty makes it physically difficult to tell the truth.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Great American (September 16, 2008 7:24 am ET)
         

      http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/07/sex-ed-for-kind.html

      The article above contains Barack Obama's quotes and explanations to back up his intentions for the legislation.  The reason this became such a big issue is because Obama used the words "sex education" without giving more clarity and context. 

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by BillJ-MN (September 16, 2008 11:52 am ET)
           
        I found plenty of clarity and context in Obama's words.  I think you're wrong.  The reason this became such a big issue is that conservative politicians and pundits had no qualms about misrepresenting what Obama very clearly stated.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Great American (September 16, 2008 9:18 pm ET)
             
          I learned something many years ago from a wise person.  It's not what you "mean" but rather what you "say" that counts.  Obama could have chosen his words better so that the Republican's couldn't use them against him.  I don't support Obama but I am able to see the good intentions of the legislation he supported.  The Republican's are going to use everything possible against him and twist his intentions if at all possible. 
          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • The Washington Post
    The Washington Post
    The Washington Post
    1150 15th St. NW
    Washington, DC 20071