NPR's Liasson played clip of McCain ad without noting its distortions
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
SUMMARY: NPR's Mara Liasson uncritically reported that Sen. John McCain's campaign is "running this ad claiming she's [Gov. Sarah Palin] been the victim of sexism by Obama." In fact, the ad distorts each of the three Obama campaign statements it uses to make its "claim[]" as FactCheck.org and The New York Times have noted.
On the September 17 edition of NPR's Morning Edition, national political correspondent Mara Liasson uncritically reported that the campaign of Sen. John McCain is "running this ad claiming she's [Gov. Sarah Palin] been the victim of sexism by Obama." In fact, the ad to which Liasson was referring distorts each of the three Obama campaign statements it uses to make its "claim[]" as FactCheck.org and The New York Times have noted.
On the September 12 edition of Morning Edition, Liasson falsely asserted that the ad "catalogued all of the false or sexist or awful things that Democrats and Obama supporters have said about Sarah Palin." In fact, the ad did not "catalogue[]" any "false" statements the Obama campaign or other Democrats have made about Palin.
Liasson also asserted on September 17 that "liberal feminists" had "questioned whether Palin could raise her children and run for vice president." But Liasson provided no examples of "liberal feminists" questioning whether Palin could juggle career and family. Indeed, National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy, a feminist whom Liasson cited making a different point, issued a press statement when McCain named Palin as his running mate saying that Palin's challenges as "a mother of five who has a 4-month-old baby, a woman who is juggling work and family responsibilities, will speak to many women."
From the September 17 edition of NPR's Morning Edition:
LIASSON: Alarmed at polls showing a shift of white women to McCain, Barack Obama is rolling out a series of events targeting female voters. This weekend his campaign will hold rallies and go canvassing in beauty shops around the country. Meanwhile John McCain appeared on The View and cooked ribs with Rachael Ray. The McCain campaign is also continuing to wield its most effective weapon in the battle for women voters, Sarah Palin. They're running this ad claiming she's been the victim of sexism by Obama.
[begin audio clip]
NARRATOR: He was the world's biggest celebrity --
CROWD: Obama! Obama!
NARRATOR: -- but his star's fading. So they lashed out at Sarah Palin, dismissed her as good looking. That backfired, so they said she was doing "what she was told," then, desperately, called Sarah Palin a liar. How disrespectful.
[end audio clip]
LIASSON: The role reversals in this campaign are head-spinning, and so are the charges of hypocrisy. Just as conservative women reacted angrily to liberal feminists who questioned whether Palin could raise her children and run for vice president, liberals, like the National Organization for Women's Kim Gandy, are now tweaking Republicans for their newfound sensitivity. Gandy held a press conference yesterday.
GANDY [audio clip]: I love it that the Republicans have discovered sexism in the media [laughter], because they didn't see any of it when it was being directed at Hillary Clinton, but once Sarah Palin got a dose of it they were all over it.
OBAMA [audio clip]: Nobody actually believes that these folks are offended.
LIASSON: Obama himself at an event last week in Virginia described the Republican attacks as cynical.
OBAMA [audio clip]: Everybody knows it's insincere. The media knows it. I mean this is a game that we play. It's a game, it's a sport.
LIASSON: But it's a game McCain's been playing with some effect, drawing attention away from Obama's message. This week the Obama campaign has settled on a new approach to Palin, focusing not on Palin herself but on her positions. Here's Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill, one of Obama's top surrogates, on ABC calling Palin a great role model for women.
McCASKILL [audio clip]: I mean I'm talkin' as a woman who took my breast pump to work for all three of my children, so it's terrific, but if women of America are going to kick the tires in the next 55 days, and they're going to find out that this is a ticket that wants to put women in prison for having an abortion after they have been raped. This is a ticket that has --
LIASSON: But Carly Fiorina, the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard and one of McCain's top surrogates, appeared alongside McCaskill and insisted that sexism will drive women to McCain.
FIORINA [audio clip]: There are a whole host of women in the Democratic Party who believe the Democratic Party does not understand what sexism is, routinely underestimates the impact of women, and they are coming in droves to the Republican Party, because they think the party and John McCain get it. That's a fact.
LIASSON: Not so fast, says Mark Blumenthal, the publisher of Pollster.com. There's no poll data showing large numbers of Democratic women moving to McCain, but there has been movement of white women to McCain. Right now McCain has an average 13-point lead among white women, so he's back up to the same margin President Bush had when he beat John Kerry in 2004. Sarah Palin has certainly helped McCain there. But Blumenthal says there may be an even more important Palin effect.
BLUMENTHAL [audio clip]: It's the change in the middle, the movement among independents, that is as much responsible for this modest but critically important shift to McCain. Her selection along with John McCain's speech helped to convey to independents that McCain is really the maverick that they thought he was, reminded them of the things that they liked about McCain.
LIASSON: That's the good news for McCain. But the good news for Obama is that these independents are swing voters, and their preferences are not locked down yet, which makes the four upcoming debates critical for this narrow but decisive sliver of the electorate. Mara Liasson, NPR News, Washington.

















Anda one:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/beverly-davis/palin-pregnancy-mother-da_b_123101.html
Anda two:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/beverly-davis/palin-pregnancy-mother-da_b_123101.html
Pretty much every female anti-Palin blogger on HuffPost is a feminist.
Which is funny, because even NOW will defend Palin against these notions, like those perpetrated by Kurtz at WaPo, whom MMfA can't decide is a credible source or not:
http://www.now.org/news/note/090508.html
Palin is being attacked because she's more of a threat to Obama than McCain is, and the Obama campaign and the left blogosphere know it.
PS. Even though my opinions are incredibly unpopular here, I wouldn't mind hearing how to change the links into readable ones. I'm highlighting the link and pressing the link icon, which gives me a chance to rename it, but then nothing happens after I hit ok.
Palin is being attacked because she's more of a threat to Obama than McCain is, and the Obama campaign and the left blogosphere know it.
Just don't tell McCain, he'll throw a total fit if this info somehow gets back to him.
It's not "renaming the link". That's where you're having difficulties.
1)Highlight the text you want to become a link
2)Hit the link button
3)Insert link
Sometimes it's hard to remember, but it is good form to make it so it appears in a new window, particularly when threads get long.
Dex wrote:
>>Palin is being attacked because she's more of a threat to Obama than McCain is, and the Obama campaign and the left blogosphere know it.
When you can show me how Palin is being "attacked" (that is, not just justly criticized ), I'll consider your notion. At this point it is shown that Palin cannot tell the truth, nor can she answer questions. She agreed to cooperate with the investigation in Alaska into her alleged wrong-doing, and now the AG (her apointee) is telling employees not to obey suponeas. She is Cheney all over: hiding from the press, already under investigation.
Do you literally only read MMfA? I gave two links on how she's being attacked. She's being attacked by fine, upstanding Democratic citizens like Madonna and Lindsay Lohan. She's being attacked by USWeekly while they publish a family photo album of the smiling Obamas. She's being attacked for taking the VP, for not being "experienced" enough, for "Troopergate" (which the media is completely ignoring in terms of the actual DETAILS of the incident and the trooper involved). Do you really need me to find examples for you?? Go to cnn.com! Go to HuffPost.com!
Palin is being attacked because she's more of a threat to the constitution as well as good government due to her complete lack of experience, and the Obama campaign and the left blogosphere know it.
There, I fixed your post.
Palin is being attacked because...
Not true...she is not being attacked. Palin is being scrutinized because she is a VP candidate who most people had not heard of until about 5 minutes ago. What apparently upsets you is that the picture of Sarah Palin that is emerging is one of a petty, vindictive woman who shades the truth to make herself look good...and, most importantly, someone who is laughably unqualified to serve as either VP or President. Her selection was purely political, with no regard for the welfare of this country.
Irony,
Please explain coherently why Sarah Palin is more experientially unqualified to serve as VICE president than Obama is to serve as PRESIDENT.
So, your argument that Palin is unqualified is based on your opinion that she isn't smart enough. It has nothing to do with her level of executive and/or legislative experience. That's fine, just wanted to clarify.
Sarah Palin's experience does not qualify her for VP or President. She was a mayor of a tiny town and then governor for a short while of one of the least populated states in the union. It appears to me that she has spent a great deal of her time as governor dealing with personal and family matters. Her interview with Charlie Gibson was embarrassingly (for her) revealing with respect to her knowledge of world affairs. She is shallow. And she brings to the table the ignorance and narrow-mindedness of a modern day American fundamentalist Christian.
I do not need to go into Barack Obama's experience as you are well aware of his service and experience. If you believe his resume is thin I say that whatever may be absent in years is more than made up for in his intelligence, vision and judgment.
He is most certainly as ready as any candidate has ever been to lead the country.
Let me know when Gov. Palin has stood up to the barrage of media criticism that Obama has. Let me know when the Governor outlines her plan for the country. Let me know when she's ready to answer questions.
She's a creation of the RNC. They've designed the package long before they created the product. So far the product details that have leaked out are a disappointment. It seems they've taken Sinclair Lewis's warning and added a lipstick and a dress to make fascism more palatable to Americans.
You're right, Obama has done an excellent job convincing a lot of people. Here's his resume:
Harvard Grad. (I can't believe in such a terrible America, a half-black man that wasn't a legacy could do that!!)
Chicago community organizer.
Illinois state senator.
Half-Term US Senator.
...
.....
The fact that this guy even had a chance in the primaries is amazing.
We elect leaders, not followers. The present administration refused to lead and chose to follow the Neo-conservative platform set up in the PNAC.
McCain had been more independent than most Republicans are used to but he came to the realization that he'd never get the nomination unless he went against most of his principles and accepted the Neo-con wet dream. He could have been a leader, but chose to be just another follower of failed policies. Even that wasn't enough for the Reublicans. They needed proof that he was willing to put part above country. To prove that he was willing to do this, he chose Sarah Palin.
Country first, my ass!
But you're just upset because you disagree with her politics. Repeatedly in this thread, no one has said anything but Obama's "leadership, judgement.." etc is what makes him "better" than Palin. So, he doesn't really have MORE relevent experience to be President that Palin has to be VICE president (remember, vice president). It is truly country first if you care about energy independence, a culture of life, strong national security, and a light tax burden. If you're more welfarist, socialist, etc, then I can see why Obama is the better choice.
But don't play like Obama will be "better" at gov management than McCain or Palin...you have nothing to back that claim up with.
How about he has experience in Washington, and has served on the following committees: Foreign Relations, Environment and Public Works, Veteran's Affairs, Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Homeland Security and Governmental Affaris. Acting on these committees he has directly been involved with creating legislation that guides our country - a long w/ all the other Senators on the committee. So he has experience creating legislation for Foreign relations, the environment, veteran's, health, education, working class people through labor and pensions, homeland security (for the nation). Not to mention all of the other legislation he has co-sponsored. In the Illinoise government he would have participated in state legislations. As a community organizer helped people who desparately needed it.
Sarah Palin's experience: request earmarks, get friends hired to important jobs cause they like cows, fire librarians, fire people who don't agree w/ you, ban books, request more earmarks, deny request for earmarks, reform government spending by spending less than your previous govenor, oppose sex education, make women pay for rape kits, believes that rape and incest victims should carry pregnancies to term (cause they haven't already been violated), and I could go on.....
Could you please provide some concrete evidence to how Palin's experience even comes close to equaling Obama's? Or is it just your personal opinion that will get her through the election?
Here's an idea. Pay your share of the taxes needed to live in a civil society. Lock your doors and don't have an abortion.
Your side seems to think that putting self first is putting country first.
We don't have to explain ...
Well, there ya go ... the perfect liberal response.
MM: " ... as FactCheck.org and The New York Times have noted."
Not very convincing, MM, considering the left-leaning nature of both organizations.
That makes me ecstatic.
I worked for one of Ambassador Annenberg's (Nixon's Ambassador to the UK) companies and the Annenberg foundation was partially funded by money he never paid his employees when he put them out of work.
I'm glad my money is now going toward good causes.
I think I'll stick to my original assessment that Righties cry biased whenever they get called on their BS with the facts to back it up....
Just testing.
If Obama had that nebulous amount of experience that would be sufficient to a wingnut the complaint would be that he is a part of the problem because he's been a part of the liberal power structure for so long. And unable to bring a change to what he's been a part of so long. That Micky might be the same would never be acknowledged.
This is what buying the ideology does to you. No sale!