About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Corsi again falsely claimed "there is no substance to the allegations" that his book "contains lies"

September 17, 2008 2:33 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: Obama Nation author Jerome Corsi again falsely asserted that "there is no substance" to claims from Sen. Barack Obama's campaign that his book "contains lies," despite the fact that Corsi previously provided a list of 11 corrections to the next printing of the book -- many of which correct falsehoods documented by the Obama campaign, Media Matters, or both.

33 Comments

In a September 16 "WorldNetDaily Exclusive," author Jerome Corsi wrote: "The Obama campaign, in its 40-page 'Unfit for Publication' commentary, alleged my book, 'The Obama Nation,' contains lies, but as I documented in a rebuttal published on WorldNetDaily on Sept. 7, there is no substance to the allegations." In fact, while Corsi asserted in his September 7 "rebuttal" that "Unfit for Publication" "failed to prove a single falsehood contained in pages of the book," as Media Matters for America documented, Corsi went on to provide a list of 11 "corrections to the next printing of The Obama Nation" -- many of which correct falsehoods documented by the Obama campaign, Media Matters, or both.

In his September 16 article, Corsi also wrote:

Moreover, I assume the Obama campaign took its best shot with "Unfit for Publication," refuting every point in "The Obama Nation" that the Obama campaign considered false.

The result here is the chapter-by-chapter arguments from "The Obama Nation" that were not disputed in "Unfit for Publication." Because the Obama campaign did not even attempt to refute these substantive arguments, I now assume the Obama campaign is conceding their truth.

In fact, under the heading, "Factual Inaccuracies in Corsi's Book," the Obama campaign specifically asserted, "While these are certainly not all the inaccuracies in the book, they include some important points we thought should be pointed out." Indeed, Media Matters identified several other Obama Nation falsehoods not cited in the Obama campaign document, including:

  • Corsi writes of Obama campaign blogger Sam Graham-Felsen, "After leaving Harvard, Graham-Felsen published an article in an avowedly socialist magazine" [Page 148]. In fact, the article Corsi presents was actually published in April 2006 in The Nation, and reprinted by the Socialist Viewpoint; that edition of the Socialist Viewpoint also reprinted articles from the Detroit Free Press and London's The Guardian. Graham-Felsen's article also was reprinted at CBSNews.com.
  • Corsi writes of Obama's March 14 meeting with reporters from the Chicago Tribune to discuss his relationship with convicted Chicago businessman Antoin Rezko: "The transcript of the question-and-answer session clearly shows the Tribune staff had a hard time believing Obama. Yet Obama persisted, denying he coordinated the purchase with Rezko [Page 168]." But Corsi did not reconcile his assessment that "the Tribune staff had a hard time believing Obama" with the subsequent publication of an editorial in which the paper asserted that Obama had "offered a lengthy and, to us, plausible explanation for the presence of now-indicted businessman Tony Rezko in his personal and political lives."
  • Corsi writes that "higher capital gains tax rates tend to produce less capital gains tax revenue, not more. The economics of this principle have been proved repeatedly in the two decades since [Ronald] Reagan was president [Page 245]." In fact, as Media Matters has documented, numerous economists have challenged the assertion that cuts in the capital gains tax raise revenue in the long term. Additionally, Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation estimated in June 2006 that the 2006 extension of the 2003 cuts on capital gains taxes would result in decreased revenues of $20 billion over 10 years.
  • Discussing Obama's "antiwar ... foreign policy," Corsi conflates Iraq and Afghanistan to falsely suggest that Obama supports "de-escalat[ing]" troops from Afghanistan. But Obama's January 2007 bill -- the Iraq War De-escalation Act of 2007 -- establishes a timetable for the withdrawal of most troops from Iraq, and calls for "appropriate units of the Armed Forces" to be redeployed to Afghanistan and elsewhere in the region, "to meet urgent United States security needs." As Media Matters has noted, Obama has been calling for an increase of U.S. troops in Afghanistan since at least 2006 and began specifically calling for the addition of at least two combat brigades there in 2007.
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (September 17, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
         
      Well, since Corsi is lying about lying, doesn't that mean he's telling the truth?  Two lies = one truth, right?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (September 17, 2008 3:08 pm ET)
           

        Well...... I wrote an essay in class on the Bush regime's destroying our country and her Constitution....... handed it in and received a 94% out of a posible 100%......

        If I had gone with the premise that since I wrote it, it could not be wrong or full of crap...... I get the feeling that I might have been given a 0%!

        So Corsi thinks that by claiming that his book is truthful.... that suddenly... his book is beyond recourse by everyone else.....

        Only in a world where rightwing corporate thinking is rampant in the media could this kind of idiocy be allowed to be spewed or the author not being laughed into obscurity........

        oh wait.........  nevermind

        Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 17, 2008 2:52 pm ET)
         
      This is the NEW republican mantra: When called out (finally) on your lies, simply deny that they're lies.  No evidence or argument needed.  It seems that just saying "They're not lies." is enough to confuse the press long enough for the public to forget that you lied.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (September 17, 2008 2:55 pm ET)
         
      Useless, dishonest smear artist with a PhD.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (September 17, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
         

      Corsi again falsely claimed "there is no substance to the allegations" that his book "contains lies"

      If Corsi told the truth, that headline would read as follows:

      Corsi claims there is no substance to his book

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (September 17, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
         
      Yea, yea, Corsi...keep whining. Your book didn't gain any traction and judging from the stacks of them I saw this morning at the bookstore it's headed right for the bargain bin. Couldn't happen to nicer guy...  ;>)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (September 17, 2008 2:58 pm ET)
         

      Corsi must spend most of his time with his fingers in his ears shouting "LA-LA-LA-I-Can't-Hear-You-LA-LA-LA!"  No wonder he never does any proper research for his books.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (September 17, 2008 3:06 pm ET)
           

        No wonder he never does any proper research for his books.

        I wonder if he even did the proper research when preparing his dissertation when he got his Ph.D.  It would be interesting if someone were able to look into that......

        Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (September 17, 2008 3:14 pm ET)
             

          "It would be interesting if someone were able to look into that......"

          Um...... MMfA staff???? I think you've been asked to perform a task here... looking for Corsi's disertation for his PHd and reporting on it?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (September 17, 2008 3:17 pm ET)
               

            Um...... MMfA staff???? I think you've been asked to perform a task here... looking for Corsi's disertation for his PHd and reporting on it?

            Could you IMAGINE the reaction if it turned out that Jerome Corsi is as much of a fraud as his books??

            Report Abuse
    • Author by Marker (September 17, 2008 3:23 pm ET)
         
      Corsi is just another repug liar.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (September 17, 2008 3:25 pm ET)
           

        Corsi is just another repug liar.

        And so many of them seem to write crap for World Nut Daily.....

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Sueelldd (September 17, 2008 3:41 pm ET)
             
          World Net Daily is as credible as the National Enq. The GOP liars love these smear machines.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (September 17, 2008 4:10 pm ET)
               

            Actually, the National Enquirer is more credible than many of the mainstream papers.  They've actually broken a few stories in the past few years, such as information about the anthrax mailings and the John Edwards scandal.

            World Nut Daily, OTOH, is a worthless cybersewer.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (September 17, 2008 4:27 pm ET)
                 

              Agreed.  WorldNutDaily makes the National Enquirer look like The Economist.

              WND is more like Weekly World News, catering to the lowest common denominator.  WND published an article last week that the world is going to end in 2013!

              Any WND readers out there want to buy end-of-the-world insurance?  It only costs $500 per person, and if the world ends it pays out $1,000,000,000.  Just send me a check, and you're covered.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by wzwriter (September 17, 2008 4:35 pm ET)
                   

                Any WND readers out there want to buy end-of-the-world insurance?  It only costs $500 per person, and if the world ends it pays out $1,000,000,000. 

                But you don't get a lump-sum payment if the world ends - it's paid out in installments over the next 20 years.....

                :-)

                Report Abuse
            • Author by Sueelldd (September 17, 2008 4:44 pm ET)
                 
              True, I was more talking about the stories of man with three heads lands plane and nutthy things like that.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by wzwriter (September 17, 2008 5:06 pm ET)
                   

                True, I was more talking about the stories of man with three heads lands plane and nutthy things like that.

                Those stories were usually in the sleazier tabloids, such as Weekly World News

                Dick Cheney robot heart Weekly World News

                Report Abuse
        • Author by RoberttheP (September 17, 2008 4:32 pm ET)
             
          Actually Corsi has claimed he is not voting for McCain, not even a registered Republican.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by RoberttheP (September 17, 2008 4:34 pm ET)
               

            He also wrote this hit piece against McCain, yet never heard a word about it.

            http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57354

            Report Abuse
            • Author by skeptical (September 17, 2008 4:47 pm ET)
                 

              Bob,

              What part of that is a hit piece?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by RoberttheP (September 17, 2008 4:53 pm ET)
                   

                John McCain's personal fortune traces back to organized crime in Arizona, through his father-in-law, according to a report published by a multi-news agency team called Investigative Reporters and Editors Inc.

                First of all Corsi claims McCain has a personal fortune? His wife does, second he uses the history channel as one of his sources , Corsi lies about Obama, i think we all agree, can we not have a bi partisan comment that Corsi lies about everyone? He attempted to smear McCain back in February when McCain was running for the nomination. Even back than slime like Rush and Mark Levin were attacking McCain, Mark Levin used to call Huckabee "Huckaphony " for staying in the race to help McCain and hurt Romney.

                 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by RoberttheP (September 17, 2008 4:56 pm ET)
                     

                  I mean Corsi wrote this garbage also that George Soros was bankrolling McCain? I mean come on

                  http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56177

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by skeptical (September 17, 2008 5:46 pm ET)
                       

                    Bob,

                    I have no problem saying Corsi lies about everything and everyone.  The Problem is, the right wing media and other liars use him to further the Conservative Agenda.  No one on the left used his piece against McCain as if it were true.

                    Yet the right wing noise machine continues to prop this guy up.  Maybe you should direct your comments towards the scumbags that have this guy on their shows!

                    Report Abuse
                • Author by jeffro (September 17, 2008 7:32 pm ET)
                     
                  Rush and levin are slime? When did you have this about face?
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by jeffro (September 17, 2008 7:29 pm ET)
               
            doesn't mean he isn't a paid shill.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (September 17, 2008 4:36 pm ET)
         
      Anyone else notice that Jerome Corsi looks like Mel Torme with a bad hangover???
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (September 17, 2008 4:50 pm ET)
         
      Is this guy still hanging around? Get lost Corsi, your old news.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (September 17, 2008 4:53 pm ET)
         

      Factcheck.org recently released an article on the book. They think it sucks too.

      Here's a few parts that really put a smile on my face:

      In fact, on four occasions, Corsi cites himself as a source...A comprehensive review of all the false claims in Corsi's book would itself be a book. Our review touches only on a few of the more blatant examples.

      Logically, any argument should rise or fall on its own merits, not the reputation of the person making it. A logical fallacy – known as the "genetic fallacy" – occurs when someone rejects an argument based on its origins. The correctness of a claim should be judged by the relationship the claim has with the rest of the world.

      Nevertheless, a practical rule of thumb for everyday living is to rely on sources that have proven themselves to be trustworthy, and to check even on those when an issue is in dispute.

      In Corsi's case, we judge that both his reputation and his latest book fall short when measured by the standards of good scholarship, or even of mediocre journalism.

      Source: FactCheck.org - Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation" is a mishmash of unsupported conjecture, half-truths, logical fallacies and outright falsehoods.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (September 17, 2008 5:03 pm ET)
         
      I agree with Jerome Corsi on this one. "There is no substance to his allegations."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mari2jj2970 (September 18, 2008 2:04 am ET)
         
      Surely we all know this guy is a compulsive liar about any progressive but some just assumes he wo writes a book and gets it printed ahs to be telling the truth.  But, we all know what that is between u and me.  He is not believable at all and even the far right media is identifying his trash as lies.  Thank God for the fact check site Air Americaa and MSNBC this go round because they have shamed the mainstream media in to calling this super liar out for the les he has tried to push on unsuspecting people.  Sadly, tere is a small fringe that still drinks his Kool Aid.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by historygeek001 (September 18, 2008 3:57 pm ET)
         

      Even the apologists aren't defending him anymore. 

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.