ABC reported McCain's comment that "economy is broken," but not previous day's comment that "fundamentals of our economy are strong"
SUMMARY: ABC's David Wright aired a quote of Sen. John McCain saying during a September 16 speech that "[o]ur economy is broken." But Wright did not note that the previous day -- and many times before that -- McCain made a remark that was flatly inconsistent with that comment, saying that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong."
During a September 16 ABC World News segment on Sens. Barack Obama's and John McCain's recent comments on the economy, correspondent David Wright aired a quote of McCain saying during a September 16 speech that "[o]ur economy is broken." But Wright did not note that the previous day, and many times before that, McCain made a remark that was flatly inconsistent with his assertion that the "economy is broken" -- stating that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong."
Rather than report that McCain made flatly inconsistent comments over the two days, Wright aired a different comment McCain made at the September 15 appearance, saying: "There's been tremendous turmoil in our financial markets."
Additionally, Wright failed to note that, according to several media outlets -- including ABC News senior national correspondent Jake Tapper -- McCain changed his message on the economy after the Obama campaign highlighted the "fundamentals of our economy are strong" comment.
By contrast, NBC Nightly News correspondent Kelly O'Donnell reported that McCain said that the "fundamentals of our economy are strong" and that McCain later "defined -- or perhaps refined -- fundamentals not as economic facts and figures, but as working people":
O'DONNELL: McCain's trouble here is in part of his own making, with these words:
McCAIN [video clip]: Our economy, I think, still, the fundamentals of our economy are strong.
O'DONNELL: But today he defined -- or perhaps, refined -- fundamentals, not as economic facts and figures but as working people.
McCAIN [video clip]: And this foundation of our economy, the American worker, is strong.
From the September 16 edition of ABC's World News with Charles Gibson:
WRIGHT: It's not like they haven't been talking about it.
McCAIN: There's been tremendous turmoil in our financial markets.
OBAMA: We are in the most serious financial crisis in generations.
McCAIN: Our economy is broken.
OBAMA: What we need now is leadership that gets us out.
WRIGHT: But what are the campaigns actually proposing? Both are now promising tougher regulations for Wall Street. McCain's called for a 9/11-type commission, to recommend reforms that would bring greater accountability. Obama has identified six specific reforms, including giving regulators greater enforcement powers.
FRED BERGSTEN (director, Peterson Institute for International Economics): I don't think either has put forward a really cogent or persuasive package.
WRIGHT: But economists say cracking down on Wall Street could well have an impact on Main Street, making it harder for Americans to qualify for a mortgage, for one.
TOM GALLAGHER (economist, ISI Group Inc.): Everyone's for tighter regulation here. The fact of the matter is that's going to make it harder for some people to get credit, compared to the way it was.
WRIGHT: Perhaps the sharpest difference between the two is over the taxes people pay. McCain believes cutting taxes across the board would promote economic growth. He'd make permanent the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, cut corporate taxes, and double the personal exemption for dependents. Obama would raise taxes on the wealthy, people who make more than $250,000 a year, but cut them for most households. He'd give middle-class families a $1,000 tax credit and cut taxes completely for seniors on fixed incomes.
Here in the Rust Belt and across the country, Obama and McCain have been trying to convince voters they feel their pain and will do something about it. On the mortgage crisis, McCain says he'd encourage lenders to refinance loans for responsible homeowners; Obama would rely on a government fund to help people avoid foreclosure and would reduce taxes for low- and middle-income homeowners who don't itemize.
BERGSTEN: Neither candidate has really addressed the cardinal, long-run macroeconomic problems of the economy -- that is, basically, the budget deficit.
WRIGHT: Both candidates frame the economy as a leadership issue: McCain the maverick versus Obama the agent of change. And so far, neither candidate has managed to convince the voters that he has all the answers. David Wright, ABC News, Warren, Ohio.
From a September 15 speech by McCain, aired during the September 15 edition of CNN Newsroom:
McCAIN: As you know, there's been tremendous turmoil in our financial markets and Wall Street, and it is -- it's -- people are frightened by these events. Our economy, I think, still the fundamentals of our economy are strong. But these are very, very difficult time. And I promise you, we will never put America in this position again. We will clean up Wall Street. We will reform government.
From a September 16 speech by McCain, aired during the September 16 edition of CNN's Your World Today:
McCAIN: the working people of the state of Florida and this nation are the most innovative, the hardest working, the best skilled, most productive, most competitive in the world. And this -- this foundation of our economy, the American worker, is strong. But it's been put at great risk by the greed and mismanagement of Wall Street and Washington. I'll give you some straight talk, my friends. The top of our -- the top of our economy is broken. We've seen self-interest, greed, irresponsibility, and corruption undermine the hard work of the American people. It's time to set things right, and I promise to get the job done as your president.
From the September 16 edition of NBC's Nightly News with Brian Williams:
O'DONNELL: This is Kelly O'Donnell, traveling in Florida and Ohio with John McCain and Sarah Palin. And late today, McCain fired back at Obama, matching mocking tone for mocking tone. McCain made a special point of telling voters near hard-hit Youngstown where Obama is tonight.
McCAIN [video clip]: Talked about siding with the people, siding with the people, just before he flew off to Hollywood for a fundraiser with Barbra Streisand and his celebrity friends.
O'DONNELL: McCain spent much of the day arguing his case, that he gets how bad things are and accusing Obama of using hard times for political gain.
McCAIN [video clip]: Senator Obama saw an economic crisis and has found a political opportunity. My friends, this is not a time for political opportunism, this is a time for leadership.
O'DONNELL: McCain's trouble here is in part of his own making, with these words:
McCAIN [video clip]: Our economy, I think, still, the fundamentals of our economy are strong.
O'DONNELL: But today he defined -- or perhaps, refined -- fundamentals, not as economic facts and figures but as working people.
McCAIN [video clip]: And this foundation of our economy, the American worker, is strong.
O'DONNELL: Campaign advisers reject Obama's charge that McCain's idea to create a commission somehow passes the buck by arguing that a bipartisan group that includes outside experts could, quote, "take the politics out of it." During McCain's 20-plus years in Congress, he says he's predicted trouble for mortgage giants, warned about CEO excesses. But he's also been cool to adding more government control, telling The Wall Street Journal in March, "I'm always for less regulation." And this morning with Matt Lauer on Today:
McCAIN: I don't like excessive and unnecessary government regulation -- ask any American citizen who is subject to bureaucracies. But the fact is, I warned about this problem couple years ago.
O'DONNELL: And Brian, when an adviser today was stressing John McCain's economic credentials, he told reporters that McCain, quote, "helped make this little miracle happen" -- the BlackBerry or cell phone -- citing his work on the Commerce Committee. When McCain heard about it, he laughed. Another adviser said McCain's not claiming to have invented anything and said that was a bone-headed comment. Just another day on the trail, Brian.















Well, ol' jukebox john was for the economy before he was against it.
Must suck knowing he voted for phil grahams' legislation that was directly responsible for what happened this week...
However, have you got anything besides incessant attacks? Got any optimism or real solutions?
Whatcha got?
And who got the most from Merrill Lynche? Wouldn't be McCain, would it?
But really, what does that have to do with voting for de-regulation? McCain did, Obama didn't. Guess one guy's lobbyists were much more successful than the other's, eh no-ideas-left?
Fundamentals of our economy are "the workers"???
That pinko! Why doesn't he just go back to Russia where he belongs? Every good Ayn Rand-blooded Republican knows that "the workers" are just resources or tools to be exploited and put away when no longer of any use to the bottom line.
Fundamentals of our economy are "the workers"???
Yea, is that why John McCain has repeatedly voted against an increase in the minimum wage?
Um...I hope you're being sarcastic. That's not Rand's philosophy at all. It's about fair trade. An employer living in the objectivist lifestyle would pay an employee what he determines to be a fair value for his effort, and an employee would only take a job for which he feels he is getting a fair value for his time and skills. If either party feels he is getting a bum deal, he has the right to go deal with someone else. Those not living in the objectivist lifestyle—the "looters"—corrupt politicians and the big corporations that get in bed with them are the ones that trample the workers for their advantage and personal gain. And as far as I can tell, that's both Obama AND McCain. Both of them have entirely too many improper relationships with special interests groups for men who are "in the public service". Unfortunately, that's an unavoidable side-effect of the bastardized form of government we are now existing under—you can't even get into the presidential debates without selling your soul to some corporate goon for campaign contributions (unless, of course, you're independently wealthy and can finance your own campaign). We have a crumbling economy, a huge national deficit, a war that will cause incalculable social damage for many centuries to come (and which we can't even pay for—it's being run on LOANS), and all we're hearing from these two corporate-owned clowns and the media that "reports" on them is 30-second soundbites about lipstick on pigs. This whole election is just a big circus side-show to divert your attention from the REAL problems we're facing. Don't give your vote to the looters in November. Personally, I plan to send in a write in ballot for Dr. Ron Paul. He's the only person who will TRULY cut government spending, reduce the national defecit, get us out of the quagmire that is the Iraq War, and give us back our personal freedoms. RESTORE THE REPUBLIC!
It is really dark outside and the sun is shining very brite. The price of gas is so high but, very inexpensive. McC can't use a computer due to war injuries. I can't use my computer either. I am busy on the key board.
Any body buying McC's brand new shiney BS?
growing up in South India in 1980s, I used to be frustrated that one of all the political parties that promised free everything would win the elections. I knew most political parties were lying but were doing it because there was no other way to get to the rural, uneducated voters.
Eventually there would be the election day and whoever could GOTV, get them drunk, give them money would win but this is beyond the point.
Here I am in the US (as a citizen) in 2008 and I see similar theme recurring. Whichever candidate can dupe the citizen into voting for them will win, regardless of facts.
McCain can be all anti-regulation as he wants his entire congressional life, but if he keeps repeating that he is all for regulation the next month or so, people (hurt by his record) will forget what his votes wrought on them and vote for him because he is a Republican, was a POW, has a Taliban VP candidate (you can put lipstick on a fundamentalist, he/she still is a taliban, his opponent is black, his opponent is not main stream America, whatever.
The day after they vote for him, they will participate in polls and say they disapprove of him.
Hey 4 cents! great post! I've seen you posting here before but didn't know you were Indian. WELCOME TEN TIMES OVER and keep posting Indian common sense. Since you are now a citizen, our problems are yours and our crooked elections ... are also yours. Please keep posting, it's the American Way! And who knows? what will happen if Obama wins in a landslide, it is possible, and possibly probable. This is still the land of opportunity though we may be bankrupted financially for the moment.
BTW what state in India are you from?
" what will happen if Obama wins in a landslide, it is possible, and possibly probable"
A landslide is possible in an ideal world but not in this country. If ideas, qualifications won elections would Obama win Utah? Would McCain win Massachusetts?
BTW, I grew up in AP (the rice bowl of South India).Unless you plan on building support for unions and reconnecting productivity to prosperity, you're full of crap.
The spin is desperate from the wingnuts as far as the economy (Thanks for the support, NoLeftHemisphere) Here are a few things I've heard in the past few days;
Rush Limbaugh: Lehman Brothers was run by a bunch of liberal democrats
Hugh Hewitt:Played tape of Fannie Mae head honcho talking to the Congressional Black Caucus, thanking them for their support. Hewitt admits that he doesn't know if Obama is connected with the CBC ("I think that's more of a house member thing."sez Hewitt), but the connection is clear; Legislative branch and black.
Hewitt demonstrates the traditional wingnut difficulty with cause & effect by explaining that our current economic meltdown is due to Fannie Mae's failures.
Former beauty contest loser and current home sausage producer Sarah Palin: Jettisons GOP Sacrament of deregulation, and hops right on Grampy McCain's "We've always been for regulation" bandwagon, promising that they'll get those regulators back on the side of the American people.
My co-worker (not the usual Republican co-worker, another guy):Damn Democrats!
RightChange (a site I saw a tv ad for tonight, and just had to check out): Damn Democrats!
If you need a laugh, go to Rightchange, check out the "10 things you need to know about Obama's economic plan", then check the "citations". Har!
It would be funny if half of our fellow Americans surveyed weren't buying it. Step right up, suckers!
Pishaw. These people are scared to death of the bold changes we will have to embrace to move us forward. They'd be content to continue the economic inequality producing policies of the right that have put us in this jam.
We have massive problems that will need to be solved in conjunction with effective government acting on behalf of the common good. One item will be to invest in our competitiveness by rebuilding our infrastructure. Put people to work building bridges and parks and start circulating money back into the economy from the bottom, not this trickle down bs. That will not work. Supply side had 30 years to deliver on its promise of broad prosperity and has failed.
It will cost money to pick us back up, though. Taxes are going to go up no matter who the next president is. Good news is that most people don't mind taxes if they get some benefit from paying them.
The question is who will put that money to work for the people and who will keep funneling it straight to the top?
On a good day, he's Full O' Crap...
On a bad day, he's brimming with delusion, naked flip-flops, blind anger and encroaching senility.
With the US Economy in a shamble and McStupid has to top it with his comment "THE FUNDAMENTAL OF OUR ECONOMY IS STRONG", I could not believe this man is running for the highest office in the land. He make us all look stupids in the eyes of the world and a laughing stock among my international friends. I am not running for President of the USA but I know my Macro Economics (Fundamentals of Economic I) at least. How would I expect him to know Micro-Economics if he could not even pass the Macro?
Since when are the " workers" became the fundamental of economic of any society in the world? What an idiot.
Questions on fundamentals of Economics? WHAT, WHEN, AND FOR WHOM
How can McStupid fix a broken economy when he could not even distinguish the fundamentals of the economy?
Again, he has to "coop" the words of Obama.....when Obama said "I will fix the economy when I am President."
McStupid is an insult not only to my intelligence but for all the time and efforts I spent in school learning all these things.
Herman Cain explained the fundamentals of the economy on Tuesday while filling in for the High Priest of the Church of the Painful Truth.
I have that segment saved to my PC. I don't know if I wanna' transcribe the whole thing though...