KSFO's "gentleman" Rodgers lashes out at Media Matters
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
SUMMARY: On his KSFO radio show, responding to a Media Matters item documenting his comments that "the female leadership of the Democratic Party" consists of "ugly skanks" who "hate" that "Sarah Palin's good-looking," Lee Rodgers stated that "one of the little left-wing websites" "inferred that I had said that these women, prominent women in the liberal movement, are prostitutes. And of course I didn't say any such thing as that because I am a gentleman." Rodgers also said that "left-wing bloggers ... are men in their 30s and 40s who are single and likely to stay that way" and are "[s]till living at home with one or both parents." He added: "And, of course, handwriting analysis has revealed that ... they have to use tweezers to masturbate."
On the September 18 broadcast of San Francisco radio station KSFO's The Lee Rodgers Show, Rodgers responded to a Media Matters for America item documenting his September 17 comments that "the female leadership of the Democratic Party" consists of "ugly skanks" who "hate" that "Sarah Palin's good-looking" by asserting: "[O]ne of the little left-wing websites apparently took note of the fact that I did, absolutely, proudly, made disparaging remarks about some of the top women of the Democratic Party -- they expanded it to say all Democrat women, which is fine with me, because if they're insulted and demeaned by this, mission accomplished as far as I'm concerned." Rodgers stated of "left-wing bloggers": "For the most part, they are men in their 30s and 40s who are single and likely to stay that way," and who are "[s]till living at home with one or both parents." Rodgers added: "And, of course, handwriting analysis has revealed that -- well, how can I put this kindly? Regarding their masculinity, they have to use tweezers to masturbate."
Referring to his "ugly skanks" comment, Rodgers said of Media Matters: "[A]pparently, they had led these few crackpots who emailed me -- they had led them to believe -- or they inferred that I had said that these women, prominent women in the liberal movement, are prostitutes. And of course I didn't say any such thing as that because I am a gentleman. I wouldn't say anything like that." Rodgers added: "Besides, you look at most of them, and you'd figure, how the hell are they going to live on $20 a month anyway? So, I wouldn't say a thing like that."
From the September 18 broadcast of KSFO's The Lee Rodgers Show:
RODGERS: I'm worried about the little left-wing bloggers. I'm worried about them because, apparently, they don't have much readership. See, the oldest axiom in show business -- and let's face it, this is a branch of show business -- now, the oldest axiom is: We don't care what they say as long as they get the name right. And apparently, one of the little -- you -- you do a website, you know. It can be read by anybody on Planet Earth who has a computer and access to the Internet.
And one of the little left-wing websites apparently took note of the fact that I did, absolutely, proudly, made disparaging remarks about some of the top women of the Democratic Party -- they expanded it to say all Democrat women, which is fine with me, because if they're insulted and demeaned by this, mission accomplished as far as I'm concerned.
But they've got a website, and it can be read by anybody in the world. And I'm disappointed. I'm worried about them, because they don't have nearly enough readership. I got exactly five -- count them, five from the entire planet -- responses to the little left-wing website, and I'm very disappointed by that, because I was hoping more people would notice that they had attacked me. I don't even know which one it is, because I never read the things myself. I know they do exist, of course.
But they apparently have a very limited readership, limited to the -- just the left-wing nutcases. And I think they need to broaden their market, but that's a problem for the left-wing bloggers, because we have a psychological profile of them. For the most part, they are men in their 30s and 40s who are single and likely to stay that way.
BARBARA SIMPSON (guest co-host): I certainly hope so.
RODGERS: Still living at home with one or both parents. And, of course, handwriting analysis has revealed that -- well, how can I put this kindly?
SIMPSON: Try.
RODGERS: Regarding their masculinity, they have to use tweezers to masturbate. And --
SIMPSON: Lee, you're probably right.
RODGERS: Right. Of course, I'm right. Of course, I'm right, in every sense of the word. But --
SIMPSON: Wouldn't that hurt?
RODGERS: What I -- God, don't ask me. How would I know?
SIMPSON: OK. OK.
RODGERS: But, apparently, they had led these few crackpots who emailed me -- they had led them to believe -- or they inferred that I had said that these women, prominent women in the liberal movement, are prostitutes. And of course I didn't say any such thing as that because I am a gentleman. I wouldn't say anything like that. Besides, you look at most of them, and you'd figure, how the hell are they going to live on $20 a month anyway? So, I wouldn't say a thing like that.
SIMPSON: Of course not. I know.
RODGERS: But you lefties who monitor this program to torture yourselves -- let's see. I've only been doing this here in San Francisco for what now, 20 -- I think this is year 23, and they've been vowing they were going to get me fired every one of those 23 years. You people who are doing this, you poor lonely guys down in the basement there trying to type with one hand, you need -- you need a marketing effort.
You've got to do something to get more people to read these blogs because I figure you owe it to me. After all the material I've provided you, you owe it to me to give me more of this kind of free publicity. So, please, get creative and think of some way of marketing your product to somebody, except, just, you know, the lunatic fringe --
SIMPSON: How about making it readable and funny? I don't --
RODGERS: -- 'cause that might --
SIMPSON: I don't understand people who spend their time, a) writing those blogs, and the people who spend their time reading the blogs. Who cares what a guy like that thinks?
RODGERS: Talk about an empty life.
SIMPSON: Yeah, exactly right.
RODGERS: God Almighty, it's just -- it's just pitiful. But anyway, I just throw that out. It's an appeal to them. For God's sakes, do something to market your product, because I want more free publicity. And I promise you -- I promise you I will give you a neverending flow of material.
SIMPSON: Just spell the name right.
RODGERS: They're so friggin' dumb, they don't even know when I'm jerking their chain. It's crazy. It's the KSFO Morning Program. You can have it straight or you can have it with cream and sugar, your choice.

















Rodgers, your Mommy is calling. Go home.
"What a maroon!" -Bugs Bunny
MM: "On his KSFO radio show ..."
"KSFO"?? If "conservative misinformation" is really the problem that MM claims that it is, why are they scrounging local radio stations to come up with content for their site?
KSFO is tied for sixth in its market. Who outside of San Francisco has heard of, or even cares about, Lee Rodgers?
Doesn't it seem like the wingnuts who go on the loudest about how hot Sarah Palin is "doth protest too much."
She is about as hot as Cher or Madonna is.
Or Judy Garland in her day.
Someone should ask this Rogers guy just how it is that "ugly" gals can be prostitutes...
See, nothing these guys say even makes sense internally in their own little world of hate.
More proof that wingnut-ness is a pathological condition.
Madonna would certainly make a better VP, IMO...
Regarding their masculinity, they have to use tweezers to masturbate...
==================================================
Typical wingnut projection. Go back to your sewer, Rodgers.
It's confession time...which 5 of you made the hit parade?...inquiring minds want to know.
Care to share what you sent?
"because I want more free publicity. And I promise you -- I promise you I will give you a neverending flow of material....... they don't even know when I'm jerking their chain"
The law of unintended consequences.
Not all publicity is good publicity. Even if it's free.
So he and you can pretend that his comments getting wider notice is a good thing for him. It's not.
Tommy just can't stop himself from making baseless and false charges when confronted with the truth.
He said "The law of unintended consequences."
Saying that Media Matters was doing what he wanted them to do. Baloney. Free publicity is not good for someone who spouts the crap that this guy does. He wants Media Matters to go away and leave him alone. There is no adverse consequence to Media Matters for covering this, despite Tommy's assertions to the contrary.
And again we see that when Tommy gets stuffed, he lashes out with what he thinks is damaging information (that I'm some kind of banned poster) but is in fact just a sign that he's flailing away at imaginary demons.
Let's see how out of it he is on Friday - he was pretty crazed yesterday!
Instead of taking personal responsibility for your own arrogance and ignorance, so many of you cons will latch onto any excuse to be idiots. It's always, "I'm just joking," or, I'm just jerking your chain.
Republicans are the party of hate, own it. Admit it or continue your spineless ways.
"because I want more free publicity. And I promise you -- I promise you I will give you a neverending flow of material....... they don't even know when I'm jerking their chain"
"The law of unintended consequences."
That's about as logically sound as McCain justifying has sleazy attacks on Obama because Barack wouldn't do the town hall meetings. You might as well tell us you beat your wife because you love her so much.
Tweezers? Is this a Junior High Radio Show?
MM - Maybe you should consider posting your web stats - ya know since you are a "little" website.
Media Matters has less than 0.006% of Internet traffic. Your call....
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/mediamatters.org
Not enough porn to generate .007% ;)
RODGERS: But you lefties who monitor this program to torture yourselves -- let's see. I've only been doing this here in San Francisco for what now, 20 -- I think this is year 23, and they've been vowing they were going to get me fired every one of those 23 years.
Poor little victimized Lee, I guess you feel there are NO circumstances for denigration speech. Keep pitching baby, and make sure your sponsors don't find out. You never know who makes the decisions there.
Mr. Rodgers: Please shut your mouth.
People know you're a moron.
Why further embarrass yourself?
From the looks of this guy I'd say he knows a thing or two about masturbation.
And tweezers, too-- those little fancy stamp collecting kind.
Finally, MMFA actually reports something that actually represents part of it's mission statement.
There is no need on either side to demean any other groups of people, just because those people hold different political views.
Finally, AnutterAmerican understands an MMFA item without having it explained repeatedly.
Unfortunately, ruins "high water mark" by signing off with painfully obvious childlike platitude.
I have never seen a posting in 9 months that doesn't fit their Mission Statement.
Conservative information that furthers the conservative agenda, i.e. making a conservative look better than what he deserves to look like, or a liberal who looks worse than he deserves to look.
Me:
Dear Mr. Rodgers,
You're too angry to be thought of as your "namesake"! To say that "Female
leadership of the Democratic Party" consists of "ugly skanks" who "hate"
that "Sarah Palin's good-looking" is ignorant and demonstrates that
Republicans have nothing to say about the real issues! Palin might be "good
looking" to some but she's a "Bush-like lightweight" to anyone who has half
a brain! And, what does that make you? A fool preaching to his choir who
can't see beyond God, guns and gays, and their racism! People in your choir
would be willing to lose their homes and jobs for the propaganda you and
those like you dish out on a daily basis! I would call it Fundamentalist
Evangelical Christianity gone mad! And, if your "choir" ever comes to it's
senses, you, sir, will be out of a job. So, you obviously have a vested
interest in doing your hate stuff!
Response from Lee Rodgers:
"If I want your opinion, moron, I'll GIVE it to you."
Me:
Exactly what I expected from an ape brained fool! Oh my, I've just insulted an "ape" who clearly has "evolved" far beyond your intellectual ability! Oh my, I mentioned that evil word ("EVOLVED" FROM THE WORD "EVOLUTION") that you "creationists" hate so much! Let's see now, you guys believe that the world is 7,000 years old and that "today's humans" roamed the earth along with "dinosaurs" and "Chevys"! Is that right? So, if you say it's right, what do we do with Biology, Botany, Microbiology, etc. that all involve the study of the "Theory of Evolution" and the study of "Natural Selection"? I'm sorry, this stuff is way beyond your level of expertise? Have a nice evening jerk!
I may have been too tough on Lee but, from my perspective, he deserved it! I wonder if my tirade prompted Lee to dump on Media Matters?
Where do you think the corporate media gets their material? Guys like this say something stupid, the next con dj picks it up pretties it up a little, then the next and the next. Next thing you know some dork on fox is saying that some people say that liberal women are bitter because they're ugly.