CNN contributor West misled on Raines' and Johnson's purported roles in Obama campaign
SUMMARY: On CNN, Diana West claimed that former Fannie Mae CEO Franklin Raines was among Sen. Barack Obama's "most trusted campaign advisers ... deeply implicated in the mess at Fannie and Freddie [Mac]." However, both Raines and the Obama campaign have denied that Raines is an adviser. Further, West did not note that Sen. John McCain's own "most trusted campaign advisers" have served as lobbyists for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or both.
During the September 21 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs This Week, Washington Times columnist and CNN contributor Diana West claimed that "two of [Sen. Barack Obama's] most trusted campaign advisers are deeply implicated in the mess at Fannie and Freddie. And I'm speaking of Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson. ... It is just a political fact that Senator Obama must explain." However, both Raines, a former Fannie Mae chairman and CEO, and the Obama campaign have denied that Raines is an adviser. Additionally, West did not note that McCain's own "most trusted campaign advisers" have served as lobbyists for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or both, as Media Matters for America has documented. Furthermore, McCain campaign manager Rick Davis previously served as president of the Homeownership Alliance, a Washington-based advocacy group whose founding members included Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and which "defended the two companies against increased regulation," according to Politico.
Johnson, who had been selected to head Obama's vice presidential search team, resigned from the campaign on June 11.
In a September 18 blog post, Politico's Ben Smith posted denials from Raines and the Obama campaign that Raines is an adviser to Obama:
Raines said in the statement through the campaign, "I am not an advisor to Barack Obama, nor have I provided his campaign with advice on housing or economic matters."
Obama spokesman Bill Burton added an attack:
This is another flat-out lie from a dishonorable campaign that is increasingly incapable of telling the truth. Frank Raines has never advised Senator Obama about anything -- ever. And by the way, someone whose campaign manager and top advisor worked and lobbied for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shouldn't be throwing stones from his seven glass houses.
During a September 20 speech, Obama said of the purported Raines connection:
The same day my opponent attacked me for being associated with a Fannie Mae guy I've talked to for maybe 5 minutes in my entire life -- the same day he did that -- the head of the lobbying shop at Fannie Mae turned around and said, wait a minute, "when I see photographs of Senator McCain's staff, it looks to me like the team of lobbyists who used to report to me."
Mother Jones reported on September 17 that the following McCain campaign officials have lobbied for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or both: chief political adviser Charlie Black, national finance co-chairman Wayne Berman, congressional liaison John Green, Arthur Culvahouse, who reportedly headed McCain's vice-presidential search team, and William E. Timmons Sr., who reportedly "has been tapped by the McCain campaign to conduct a study in preparation for the presidential transition." According to a Media Matters search of the Senate Office of Public Records' Lobbying Disclosure Act Database, Black lobbied for Freddie Mac from 1999 to 2004; Berman for Fannie Mae from 2004 to 2008 and for Freddie Mac in 2004; Green for Fannie Mae from 2004 to 2007 and for Freddie Mac in 2003; Culvahouse for Fannie Mae in 1999, 2003, and 2004; and Timmons for Freddie Mac from 2000 to 2008.
A September 22 New York Times article -- headlined, "Loan Titans Paid McCain Adviser Nearly $2 Million" -- reported that Davis "was paid more than $30,000 a month for five years as president of an advocacy group set up by the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to defend them against stricter regulations, current and former officials say." From the article:
But last week the McCain campaign stepped up a running battle of guilt by association when it began broadcasting commercials trying to link Mr. Obama directly to the government bailout of the mortgage giants this month by charging that he takes advice from Fannie Mae's former chief executive, Franklin Raines, an assertion both Mr. Raines and the Obama campaign dispute.
Incensed by the advertisements, several current and former executives of the companies came forward to discuss the role that Rick Davis, Mr. McCain's campaign manager and longtime adviser, played in helping Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac beat back regulatory challenges when he served as president of their advocacy group, the Homeownership Alliance, formed in the summer of 2000. Some who came forward were Democrats, but Republicans, speaking on the condition of anonymity, confirmed their descriptions.
"The value that he brought to the relationship was the closeness to Senator McCain and the possibility that Senator McCain was going to run for president again," said Robert McCarson, a former spokesman for Fannie Mae, who said that while he worked there from 2000 to 2002, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac together paid Mr. Davis's firm $35,000 a month. Mr. Davis "didn't really do anything," Mr. McCarson, a Democrat, said.
From the September 21 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs This Week:
KITTY PILGRIM (guest host): What's your reaction to Senator McCain's approach to this crisis?
HANK SHEINKOPF (Democratic strategist): It's called center-right populism. He's got everything in place. He's trying to create an inspirational moment. He's found the enemy. He's -- needs the -- he's got Palin for religion, and he has got an economic drum to beat. Welcome to America. Not much has changed since the 19th century.
PILGRIM: All right. Diana?
WEST: Well, you know, I think that it's -- it is political, of course, but I think that a lot of what this crisis will ultimately shake out, because I think the polls, as we can -- more closely resemble EKG measurements than actual political sentiment. But Senator Obama's -- two of his most trusted campaign advisers are deeply implicated in the mess at Fannie and Freddie. And I'm speaking of Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson.
I don't know how Senator Obama distances himself from that, and I think that's exactly a very important point politically for Senator McCain to hit home. But it doesn't strike me as simply a matter of partisan politicking. It's just a political fact that Senator Obama must explain.
PILGRIM: Well, Senator Obama also came out and, in fairness, let's put up his comments that he had to say about a plan for his -- for the financial markets.
OBAMA [video clip]: We cannot only have a plan for Wall Street. We must also help Main Street. I'm glad that our government's moving so quickly in addressing the crisis that threatens some of our biggest banks and corporations, but a similar crisis has threatened families, workers, and homeowners for months and months, and Washington has done far too little to help.
PILGRIM: Now, this seems more like standard political campaign talk. He did not have as many specifics about what he would do. In fact, he actually took a step back and said, "Now is the time for the Treasury and the president to take the lead on this" and offered very few specifics. Errol, thoughts on this?
ERROL LOUIS (New York Daily News columnist): Yeah. I -- well, I mean, that -- yeah, that reflects the reality that he doesn't have a perfect, or even decent, information about what to do. This is not a time to start, you know, trying to make policy for one of the biggest crises that hit the economy in a generation.
But, you know, I gotta address something that Diana said. I mean, it is true that people who are involved in the mess are close to the Obama campaign, but it's nothing nearly like what's going on, on the McCain side, where he's -- lobbyists for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, all of the -- AIG -- all of the groups that are being bailed out are right there at the top of this campaign, and he himself, as longtime chair of the Commerce Committee, was part of the oversight mechanism in Washington.
So, if it's broken, you know, the guy who was there for years and years and years, I think, has to take at least as much, if not more, blame for what has gone on.















This deserves a repost...
Fannie Mae vet protests McCain ad
By: Politico Staff
September 19, 2008 06:28 PM EST
A former Fannie Mae executive has written to The New York Times in an effort to escalate Democrats' pushback to a McCain campaign ad accusing Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) of guilt by association with former officials of the mortgage giant.
The McCain ad, called "Advice," says: "Fannie Mae collapsed. Taxpayers? Stuck with the bill. Barack Obama. Bad advice. Bad instincts. Not ready to lead."
The former executive's letter, not yet published, was provided to Politico:
To The Editor:
Yesterday, Senator John McCain released a television commercial attacking Barack Obama for allegedly receiving advice on the economy from former Fannie Mae CEO Franklin Raines. From the stump, he has recently tried tying Senator Obama to Fannie Mae, as if there is some guilt in the association with Fannie Mae's former executives.
It is an interesting card for Senator McCain to play, given that his campaign manager, Rick Davis, was paid by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac several hundred thousand dollars early in this decade to head up an organization to lobby in their behalf called The Homeownership Alliance. ...
I worked in government relations for Fannie Mae for more than 20 years, leading the group for most of those years. When I see photographs of Sen. McCain's staff, it looks to me like the team of lobbyists who used to report to me. Senator McCain's attack on Senator Obama is a cheap shot, and hypocritical.
Sincerely,
William Maloni
Fannie Mae Senior Vice President for Government and Industry Relations (1983-2004)
Isn't the media great? How the rightwing has been able to convince their flock that the 'liberal' media is out to get them will never cease to amaze me.....
When a 'media' type purposely keep out half the story.... it is a blatant distortion of the facts.
They make up crap about Obama having (what we know are non-existing) ties to a crumbling economy.... but ignore the fact that Grampy has surrounded himself with lobbyists that have been part and parcel to the FannieMae/FreddieMac meltdown.
One more thing on that....... isn't it interesting how these same financial geniuses have been clamoring/demanding the removal of government regulations the last 30 years because those regulations allegedly stamped out and/or killed off innovation and what not and yet when they are given what they wanted all along they drive all that innovation down to the ground via wanting unheard of profits..... but when that fails.... they demand that government step in to save them..... at We the Peoples expense..... from both ends!
The least these ass-clowns could have done was at least offer up a little vasaline!
I have no sympathy for any of these rat-bastards! They deserve all that happens to them and hope that President Obama sends his DOJ after each and every one of them!
I think it worth an extra point to note that the "free market" only applies when republicans are making money. They shut down short selling on purpose because it would take money away from them. Republicans just proved that they are really socialists in conservative clothing.
That's why it's a free market. Because they get everything for free.
Even more disturbing, news reporting today indicates the sec of treasury has complete control where the 700 Billion dollar bailout can be apportioned. that is a lot of power given to the Bush governance.
Actually, we seem to have the WORST of both worlds evidenced here. The robber barons get to privatize (for themselves) the profits of their endeavors and, if needed, socialize the losses.
They inflated this bubble until NO ONE would buy into it any longer, recognizing that these assets were greatly over-valued. Then, they turned to 'we the people' whose representatives lacked the cojones to regulate them - to take this junk off of their hands.
Perhaps even sadder than the $700 BILLION ( that's $2,000 for each of the 350 million Americans ) going down a rat hole is that by 'saving' them this time, we are only encouraging them to get right back to it. Why NOT make long-odds bets if you know you can collect if you win and turn to Uncle Sam if you lose?
McCain just hired another lobbyist to work on his presidential transition team should he win the election. A guy named William E. Timmons, Sr. I find these two paragraphs from the post quite ironic:
Timmons is the chairman emeritus of Timmons and Company, a small but influential lobbying firm he founded in 1975 shortly after leaving the White House. According to Senate records, he registered to lobby in 2008 for a wide range of companies and trade groups, including the American Petroleum Institute, the American Medical Association, Chrysler, Freddie Mac, Visa USA and Anheuser-Busch.
His registrations include work on a number of issues that have become flashpoints in the presidential campaign. He has registered to work on bills that deal with the regulations of troubled mortgage lenders Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, a bill to provide farm subsidies and bills that regulate domestic oil-drilling.
McCain just threw honor under the bus with truth and justice...
McCain just threw honor under the bus with truth and justice...
Snoop, the former POW did that a long time ago... Now, he just keeps backing up over all those things under the bus every day to try to get some traction. And it's about as pretty as road kill...
Speaking of, I just read an interesting piece about bush's bailout request over at huffpo. This part really caught my eye:
Section 8 ... of this legislation is just a single sentence of thirty-two words, but it represents a significant consolidation of power and an abdication of oversight authority that's so flat-out astounding that it ought to set one's hair on fire. It reads, in its entirety:
So if this is right, Bush is asking for unfettered power to give away that $700 billion with no oversight and no control over any hopes of recouping the taxpayers money, right? Is that for real?
That crap should be the front story for every news agency out there!
Snoopy,
That is for real:
http://cunningrealist.blogspot.com/2008/09/blank-check.html
It's been noticed, but whether or not the press will pick up on it is another story.
Thank you, Snoopy. I knew it was bad, but had no idea it was this bad. No wonder Bush and them are in such a hurry to get it passed before anyone has a chance to study it and realize the full extent of what they are trying to do. This would be an unprecedented power grab, the equivalent of an economic dictatorship, governing by decree. Remember the Patriot Act, and how quickly it was rammed down our throats ? Back then, it was "we must act right now to prevent another attack"; now it's "we must act right now to prevent an economic collapse". I agree with what you said earlier, this is just a transfer of wealth from us to the Wall Street Robber Barons.
How far south in texas, may I ask?
Kinda far - Victoria.
I thought you were gonna say Harlingen! ;)
This is OT but is anyone else getting calls and or mailings from the Republicans to pick up an absentee ballot?
I received one a few weeks ago from the New Jersey Republicans and I just got a call from the Republican Party in Virginia offering to send me an absentee ballot to vote in VA.
I've heard there're been reports in other states too.
Are you a registered Republican? If not, isn't this illegal?
No, I've never been a Republican. I live in New Jersey and was registered to vote in Virginia five years ago, but even in VA, i was a registered Democrat.
I've heard about these mailers. There must be a way to send those responsible for this misdirection to prison where they can work in the mailroom and dig some ditches. Maybe contacting the sec. of state in New Jersey?
I emailed the secretary of the Democratic Party in my county. I threw the application they sent me in NJ in the trash the day i received it. i didn't find out until later about how the Republican Party in FL and other states was attempting to suppress the turnout by getting people to apply for absentee ballots.
I'm forwarding my VA mail to my NJ address. I'm going to hold onto the one they promised to send from VA.
Illegal to be a Republican? :-0) Yes, it should be!
Leave it to a Moonbat to write that ;-)
What else should be illegal Miz Julia? Having an opinion that differs from a Dem/Libs?
No Jeter honey, but YOU should be illegal though! Damn dangerous stuff ya got there handsome fella. :-0) And I ain't talking about a differing opinion.
Got an Obama sign in yer yard yet, matey?
Got an Obama sign in yer yard yet, matey?
Hey beautiful not only do I have an Obama sign, I'm willing to convert from Con to Lib for you.
Heck I'd even become a Moonbat to win your love Miz Julia ;-)
I'm willing to convert from Con to Lib for you
Well, of course, if we're gettin' hitched, that wouid be a requirement. Especially since we'll be raising the little rascals as liberals :-0) I see we're having a cyber weddin'!
Now Julia, you only confirm the worst about libruls, they want to take your guns and your convention away and put you on another planet...maybe one where the rivers have already dried up and the air is unbreathable ;-)
maybe one where the rivers have already dried up and the air is unbreathable ;-)
Hmmn, sounds like a good place for those illegal Republicans. :-0) A librul version of Australia back in the day when the British used it as a penal colony. :-0) Damn law breakers and constitution shredders.
"maybe one where the rivers have already dried up and the air is unbreathable ;-) "
Oh no you don't. We don't want them in New Jersey either.
That's too funny. and I thought Jersey was the Garden State :-)
It is the Garden State.
It's really a beautiful place, but we do love how the rest of the country has stereotyped us.
Two of my very favorite people are from the Garden State. However, they both left there as soon as they could ;-)
I've heard that it has many beautiful areas (like everywhere on this planet)
I've read several reports and there is also a democratic lawsuit against the GOP on this. If you don't send it back, your name gets added to a list of ballots the GOP intends to challenge on election day. See here and here and here.
Snoopy, voter caging at it's finest.
Unlike Jeter, who's raging to de-flower our finest? ;)
Guilty as charged Snoop :-)
But it's ok, Miz Julia & I are planning a cyber wedding here at MMFA.
If you need a best dog, I can be there for ya bud! And as a dog, I can fetch and retrieve that wedding band as often as necessary for our running bride and groom!
Excuse me... I'm not sure how I got into this AOL chatroom - I don't know if was some kind of 56k harmonic time jump or something. But I'd appreciate if someone could point me toward the exit door.
Thanks, much obliged...
Just make a sharp turn to the right.
Yeah, that's always a good idea for an exit strategy, Oscar. Boo-Yah!
Hey Neon, sorry about my part in the AOL chat room kerfuffle :-0) I assume you'll be asking for the exit when the colonel and Tommy get married here at long last? It's about time for those crazy kids to tie the knot. :-)
Obviously this is a ploy by the Obama campaign to frame the Republicans and make it look like they engage in dirty tricks.
</sarcasm>
West didn't "mislead." She LIED!
I wonder what my progressive friends here think of the salaries paid to these three fine Democrats while heading Fannie Mae? :-)
Raines $90 Million
Goerlick $26.4 Million
Johnson $21 Million
I don't know, what do you think of McCain's 87 wall street lobbyists - oops, make that 88 now - who are working for his campaign?
Most logical progressives think that as long as they're paying taxes on those salaries, more power to them.
I realize that's hard to fathom, Barney, when your whole outlook is based on the stereotypical strawman characterization of liberals in which one of their traits is having an aversion to success. But anyone who isn't a slave to the neoconservative paranoid narrative would already presume that answer, and not even ask such an inane and rhetorical question.
I enjoyed this response in a Think Progress thread to another right wing talkingpointer over there:
"most of us are aware that SOME Dems have SOME tendencies toward the toxic economic policies that most Republicans happily wallow in. (See, for instance, John Judis: http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/09/15/looking-backward.aspx .) So can you please stop trying to distracting us from the party that overwhelmingly bears primary blame for the mess — and which now seems willing to use that mess as leverage to turn the US into a classic Crony Capitalist state?"
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/09/mccain_ill_pretend_to_reign_in_ceo_pay.php?sortby=toprated
It seems that I've misjudged conservative fiscal policy all these years. I never realized the depths to which it sank.
For years we've heard from conservatives about how the astronomical incomes made by some is warranted by the big risks they take when investing their capital. Turns out that - surprisingly - limpaugh et al have been misguiding their audiences about that level of risk.
In fact, considering that nearly 1 trillion tax dollars are going toward hedging the unwise bets the upper 10% has been making, I'm thinking our progressive tax structure that conservatives whine about being unfair isn't progressive enough.
And now we're seeing real-world proof that trickle-up economics works a lot faster and more realiably than trickle-down economics.
You can say that again. Cash for trash; meanwhile the taxpayer gets nothing.
Nice post, and very concise, Neon. But don't worry, all of those "risk-takers" on Wall Street getting their Gubmint checks will still be able to convince the working stiff zombies to just keep pulling up those bootstraps, and they'll get the same treatment. Suckers.
Say, AA, I'm quite sure you have a link showing that these guys are all democrats. Care to share?
"I wonder what my progressive friends here think of the salaries paid to these three fine Democrats while heading Fannie Mae? :-)"
How much money did they lose when "these three fine Democrats" were running the company? Is it as much as now?
I guess Raines will have to write every single cultic screwball personally and tell them that he didn't advise Obama.
Mary, I love you. I really do. Especially now that you entered into posting political cartoons. My fave realm...
I return the love, thanks. You're my favorite doggie ever.
I meant to attribute that cartoon to The Funny Times. http://www.funnytimes.com/
My son has a subscription: it comes in newspaper format once a month & contains a wide variety of political cartoons and satire (progressive, naturally)
It's hard to compete in the humor department with jokers like McCain, who now pretends he hasn't been for deregulation of every safeguard that would prevent these big biz disasters...