CNN's Toobin knocks media for "gullib[ility]," which Blitzer and Todd had just demonstrated
SUMMARY: On CNN's The Situation Room, Jeffrey Toobin asserted that the media are "being kind of gullible in falling for" Sen. John McCain's announcement that he was going to suspend his campaign. Minutes earlier, however, Wolf Blitzer and correspondent Brian Todd had repeatedly asserted as fact that McCain "suspend[ed]" his campaign, without noting, as Toobin did, that McCain ads were running; that his surrogates repeatedly attacked Sen. Barack Obama on cable networks; or that McCain gave interviews with the three broadcast networks following his "suspension."
On the September 25 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, CNN senior legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin asserted that the media are "being kind of gullible in falling for" Sen. John McCain's September 24 announcement that he was going to suspend his campaign. Toobin noted that McCain campaign television ads were running and that McCain himself has "been campaigning all day. He gave a speech in New York. He's giving interviews all night. He's raising money. His surrogates are attacking [Sen.] Barack Obama." Minutes earlier, however, host Wolf Blitzer and correspondent Brian Todd had themselves repeatedly asserted as fact that McCain "suspend[ed]" his presidential campaign, without noting, as Toobin did, that McCain ads were running; that his surrogates repeatedly attacked Obama on cable news networks; or that McCain gave interviews with the three broadcast networks the day following his announcement. Nor did Blitzer or Todd give any indication that they had attempted to determine if the campaign had in fact stopped; by contrast, according to reporter Sam Stein, The Huffington Post "called up 15 McCain-Palin and McCain Victory Committee headquarters in various battleground states. Not one said that it was temporarily halting operations because of the supposed 'suspension' in the campaign."
According to a Media Matters for America search* of the TVEyes.com database, McCain campaign ads ran dozens of times on local stations during the three-hour broadcast of The Situation Room, between the hours of 4 p.m. and 7 p.m. ET.
Following an interview with Obama on The Situation Room, Blitzer said: "Happening now: Acting on instinct, John McCain says the nation's economic crisis calls for all hands on deck and suspends his campaign. Barack Obama says the race and Friday's debate should stay on course. Who made the right move?" Introducing Todd's report, Blitzer said: "A very controversial move he [McCain] made yesterday, Brian, to suspend his political campaign, if you will, and to postpone that first presidential debate, unless a deal on the bailout is achieved. Now, what are you hearing?"
Todd then said, "Well, Wolf, John McCain's gamble here is astounding, suspending the campaign with five-and-a-half weeks left in the race." During his report, Todd stated: "McCain's aides say the move to suspend his campaign was made with deliberation after constant talks with experts and party leaders. Others believe this was also bare-knuckle instinct," adding, "We spoke to a man who's been in the room when McCain's made decisions like this. He's Roy Fletcher, deputy campaign manager for McCain in 2000. Fletcher wasn't there on Wednesday, but suspects it played out like this." He then aired a clip of Fletcher saying: "He walked into a room and said, 'Gentlemen, we are going to suspend the campaign and we're also going to -- we're going to suspend the debate, and we're going to go to Washington and we're going to get this business done, and you guys figure out how to handle it.' " Todd also said: "Former aides say in making his boldest decisions, McCain is genuinely motivated by moral conviction -- putting country before self. CNN analyst David Gergen agrees, but says this move on the financial crisis was not without political calculation."
Toobin later accused the media of "being kind of gullible" and said of McCain's actions: "I think this is posturing of being apolitical and, frankly, I think we're being kind of gullible in falling for it. He didn't stop his campaign. He's campaigning."
From the September 25 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
BLITZER: And, to our viewers, you're in The Situation Room. Happening now: Acting on instinct, John McCain says the nation's economic crisis calls for all hands on deck and suspends his campaign. Barack Obama says the race and Friday's debate should stay on course. Who made the right move?
Both candidates joined today's unprecedented White House meeting on a government bailout plan. Only a few weeks away from Election Day, the economy now stands squarely as an issue, the issue. It's issue number one. We'll examine who stands to gain, who stands to lose politically from the downturn -- all of this coming up, plus the best political team on television.
Lots of news happening today. I'm Wolf Blitzer. You're in The Situation Room.
Whether or not you agree with what Senator John McCain did and is doing, there's general agreement on this. It could help or hurt his presidential hopes; it won't be neutral.
Let's go to Brian Todd. He's speaking to people who know Senator McCain rather well. A very controversial move he made yesterday, Brian, to suspend his political campaign, if you will, and to postpone that first presidential debate, unless a deal on the bailout is achieved. Now, what are you hearing?
TODD: Well, Wolf, John McCain's gamble here is astounding, suspending the campaign with five-and-a-half weeks left in the race. If the timing on a deal in the financial bailout doesn't go his way, he could be seen as reckless, desperate, trying to recapture his poll position in this race. If it turns in his favor, it could be a huge political score. So we tried to gain some insight into how John McCain arrived at this decision.
[begin video clip]
TODD: John McCain says he's just tapping into his training.
McCAIN: I'm an old Navy pilot and I know when a crisis calls for all hands on deck.
TODD: McCain's aides say the move to suspend his campaign was made with deliberation after constant talks with experts and party leaders. Others believe this was also bare-knuckle instinct.
We spoke to a man who's been in the room when McCain's made decisions like this. He's Roy Fletcher, deputy campaign manager for McCain in 2000. Fletcher wasn't there on Wednesday, but suspects it played out like this.
FLETCHER: He walked into a room and said, "Gentlemen, we are going to suspend the campaign and we're also going to -- we're going to suspend the debate, and we're going to go to Washington and we're going to get this business done, and you guys figure out how to handle it."
TODD: Fletcher and other former aides say if there was dissent in the room, McCain probably listened to it, then pressed ahead anyway. They describe him as a man willing to do his research and gather consensus. But then, they say, he goes purely on his gut, is willing to gamble, but not recklessly. The selection of Sarah Palin: part of that pattern.
TERRY NELSON (former McCain campaign manager): He is somebody who does have a tendency to kind of want to shake things up a little bit. And the Palin decision, you know, shook things up because she was an unconventional choice, in some respects, and she was, you know, not a choice that, you know, a lot of people had talked about.
TODD: Former aides say in making his boldest decisions, McCain is genuinely motivated by moral conviction -- putting country before self. CNN analyst David Gergen agrees, but says this move on the financial crisis was not without political calculation.
GERGEN: And he's doing this, in part, also to rescue his campaign, because this, you know, financial meltdown was driving him down in the polls and allowing Barack Obama to go up.
[end video clip]
TODD: Now, if this move backfires, don't expect a lot of navel-gazing from John McCain. His former aides back him up on a quote from his 2002 book that's called Worth the Fighting For.
Here's the quote: "I don't torture myself over decisions. I make them as quickly as I can, quicker than the other fellow, if I can. Often my haste is a mistake, but I live with the consequences without complaint," end quote.
Wolf, it looks like we're going to see about those consequences, maybe within a matter of hours.
BLITZER: All right, Brian. Good work. Thank you.
In the long run, whose response to the current economic crisis was right? Would it be McCain's or Obama's? Let's discuss this and more: joining us from New York, our senior political analyst, Gloria Borger; also, our senior analyst, Jeff Toobin; and here in Washington, Steve Hayes, the senior writer for The Weekly Standard.
What do you think about this amazing day -- Gloria? Whose instincts were right? Would it be McCain or Obama?
BORGER: At this point, I'm wondering if John McCain is second-guessing his decision, but as Brian Todd said, he doesn't do a lot of that.
I think this has to play out, Wolf. And I think -- I think House Republicans now hold John McCain's fate in their hands. And House Republicans, by the way, these conservative Republicans, they don't like John McCain very much. They never have. They opposed him on immigration reform. And they're trying to distance themselves from an unpopular president, as well. So they don't like any of the Republicans who are sitting in that negotiating room right now.
BLITZER: Steve Hayes, you know John McCain. You've spoken to him on many occasions. What do you think he's going to do? Vote with the president, with the Democrats, by and large, or go with those House Republicans, those conservatives in the House, who are fiercely opposed to any bailout?
HAYES: Well, I -- it's a good question. Obviously, if I knew the answer, I'd be -- I'd be very smart and probably very wealthy.
I think, you know, one of the things that he's doing is really trying to get -- make himself sort of a proxy for House Republicans. Now, that doesn't mean that he agrees with everything that they're saying, but I think he's trying to take their complaints to this negotiating table, sit down with people and say, "Look, we don't want this bill larded up. We don't want Democrats to add infrastructure spending. We don't want a slush fund for housing advocacy groups." I think we're likely to hear him give voice to these objections from House Republicans.
And as we were talking about 24 hours ago, at the very least, what he's done is sort of press pause, which makes him a popular guy with the House Republicans, who are at the center of this dispute.
BLITZER: What do you think, Jeff?
TOOBIN: Well, can I just quarrel with the premise of this? Who says he suspended his campaign? He didn't suspend his campaign. He's been campaigning all day. He gave a speech in New York. He's giving interviews all night. He's raising money. His surrogates are attacking Barack Obama.
I think this is posturing of being apolitical and, frankly, I think we're being kind of gullible in falling for it. He didn't stop his campaign. He's campaigning. Now whether it's --
BLITZER: I guess the argument --
TOOBIN: -- successful or not --
BLITZER: -- is that he didn't go out to a rally or a town hall meeting today. He addressed the Clinton Global Initiative in New York, then he came to Washington for meetings on the Hill, went over to the White House and is now doing some television interviews.
TOOBIN: That's exactly --
HAYES: He's pulled his ads down, too, Wolf.
TOOBIN: Well, no, he didn't pull his ads down. His ads have been on. And he's done exactly what Obama has done all day. And Obama admits that he's campaigning. It's the middle of the campaign. I don't see why we should treat what he's doing as anything different from what Obama is doing.
BLITZER: Well, let me let Steve weigh in on that. Go ahead, Steve.
HAYES: Well, we should treat it differently because it is differently. There were reports this morning that some of the ads were still running. You can't snap your fingers and get these ads to come down, but I think they've done pretty close to that. And I think these ads have been largely taken off the air thus far.
TOOBIN: But, Steve, this is --
HAYES: What he's --
TOOBIN: -- not campaigning, what he's doing?
HAYES: No, of course, it is. But it's just the same thing as when Barack Obama said yesterday, "Look, we don't want to inject presidential politics into these discussions." The whole -- all -- the discussions have been about presidential politics this entire time.
BORGER: The --
HAYES: So of course both sides are playing politics.















You know, if they just did their job (reported FACTS) and OCCASIONALLY did their homework, maybe they'd still be relevant, and considered an important resource by the majority of Americans. (Giveing them the power to say... have unfettered access to major political candidates, let's say?) And they wouldn't be mocked like this by their own.
(Do you ever remember Walkter Kronkite being mocked like this? Or Edwin R. Murrow? They've let the Republican's make them irrelevant.)
-- if they just did their job (reported FACTS) and OCCASIONALLY did their homework, maybe they'd still be relevant -- eddie
I agree wholeheartedly about the "facts" and "homework" you referred to.
I'll only take a small exception to the "relevant" part. These media types and reporters are basically the same slanted agenda driven people that they've always been. But today, the issue is magnified because there are hundreds and hundreds of them...all jockeying for their share of fame, power, and wealth.
Their calling is not of some higher order...they are all about themselves.
In the "old days"...pre-cable and internet...Kronkite was one of only 3 network anchors reporting on national news...and they had a hammerlock on reporting the news in whatever angle they chose. We had few resources to contradict them or few reasons to doubt them...and in Kronkite's case...he benefited in the trust category because of his soothing delivery and the fact that he reminded many of Uncle Walt Disney.
No, I don't think much as changed in the agenda of the media...they're just more visible today with their slanted journalism.
I would partially agree with you Wes...
There are definitely more of them now. Certainly an illustration of the truth the "more is not always better."
But I would also suspect that the level of journalism itself has declined markedly. I don't know of any studies to back this up, just my opinion.
I find it hard to believe that a piece like the one Media Matters cites here--which is nothing but an infomercial for John McCain--and on the supposedly more balanced CNN, could be found on the airwaves 40 or 50 years ago.
-- I find it hard to believe that a piece like the one Media Matters cites here...could be found on the airwaves 40 or 50 years ago. -- Homes
Agreed...and one of the main reasons is that there were no airwaves to put them on.
The programmers in today's bloated airwaves are scrambling to find someone...anyone...to help them fill this cavernous void of air time...and one of the things it has accomplished is exposing these self-absorbed lightweights...posing as unbiased, truth reporting, intellectuals.
For the proof of that pudding...one need look no further than this site...which has exposed many of them.
Yeah, but it's maddening that this guy Steve Hayes is given equal weight and allowed the last word.
HAYES: He's pulled his ads down, too, Wolf. False
BLITZER: Well, let me let Steve weigh in on that. Go ahead, Steve.
HAYES: ...You can't snap your fingers and get these ads to come down...
Oh, so because he CAN'T stop his ads, it's okay to say "He pulled his ads."
HAYES: No, of course, it is [campaigning]. So he's suspended his campaign, but he's campaigning.
HAYES: So of course both sides are playing politics. Yes, both sides are "playing politics." A) Politics is what's played in a political campaign, so why are you trying to make it sound dirty, and B) One of the participants announced that he was NOT going to be "playing politics." See your last three bumbling comments for verification.
What an ass.
I don't know who this AJW is, but I posted this on the first thread today hours ago...
Sure, Snoop, but did you have a video clip with yours? Quit smearing AJW. ;0)
McCain's wackiness is just getting too out of hand to even believe he's trying to be serious anymore. I'm starting to wonder if he's being used as a rodeo clown while the deals go down re: the bailout.
Oops, you did have the video.I was wrong, but I blame MMFA for allowing somebody as unqualified as I am to post here.
But on a clear day, you can, like, see the city of another commenter, so you ARE qualified to be vice-poster.
Exactly. I have the credentials to post here because I can see the Colonel's house from up here in SF. And I'm sure, if the Colonel tried hard enough, he could see my house. That makes him qualified as well.
Hey, did you know Moscow is closer to New York than it is to Juneau? Gosh, Obama made a fatal mistake not picking Hillary for VP, she actually has a few more miles of foreign policy experience than Palin!
Palin is also an avid scooba diver...
She is now claiming this gives her "special insight into off-shore oil drilling. I know where all the whoppers are!"
Toobin, Cafferty, and Martin are the only three folks at CNN worth their salt.
The rest? Rubbish.
I watched this 4 times. Outrageous! A 5 minute COMMERCIAL for John McCain! It wasn't until Jeffery Toobin got a word in that we heard the truth. Even he, usually cool and collected, seemed to be completely floored by the obvious stupidity of Blitzer (no surprise, there) and the rest. Of course, McCain had his shills sitting around as well. From the visuals to the audio commentary the whole 5 minutes was an "ad" for McCain. Blitzer should take his pencil and his little hand-full of papers and shove them in a very dark place.
You are so right Donaldmaddog...
This is one of the more amazing things I've seen at Media Matters in a while. The goal by Mr. Buttzer and his pals was to provide a "safe haven" for Grampah McCain, as they desperately try to paper over his pathetic groveling, grandstanding and flip flops.
Would have worked completely too--they, or course had shut out all Democratic voices--except that Toobin came in and made them look like a bunch of silly, disgusting, corporate hacks. Which is exactly what they are.
To 8 Homes McCain: I am scared s**tless! With a Main Stream Media THIS STUPID, what chance do we have? Is CNN going to pull Toobin the way MSNBC pulled Olbermann and Matthews?
blitzer probably heard his "facts" from limbaugh. i heard him interview mr. "i did so many pills i went deaf and then lied about it" a few years ago, and blitzer said, when i was listening this afternoon, "as i always do".
I recently expanded my cable for the rest of the campaign. Before that, I've only had the four networks, PBS & CSPAN. Other than those, I've been listening to radio and reading for info. The last two weeks I've been objectively watching CNN, MSNBC, etc, (all except Fox, that is - waste of time).
I've been amazed at the bias that CNN exhibits, the closest thing to CNN on MSBNC seems to be Moanin' Joe & the Slavic Doormat.
Here I thought ABC, NBC & CBS were the one's having the bias issues. It is refreshing to see people like Cafferty, Toobin and a few others than go out of their way to be accurate and correct themselves when wrong.
Some how many of these 'professional readers & cheerleaders' have come to believe that after letting the McLiar campaign spew their lies and specious spin, they are serving the public good by then giving an Obama supporter ALMOST enough time to counter the lies, it's disgusting.
Thank you for confirming the gut feeling I've had for some time that CNN is little more than FOX lite. Without the rare and refreshing intrusion of Toobin or Cafferty, the Situation Room is but another dizzying "no spin" zone! Our MSM has been functioning as a propoganda machine for the corporate world that owns it. Should we be surprised?
This morning I heard some commentators describing the debate and they were talking about JohnnyMacs supposed campaign suspension,and the word that the commentator used to describe JohnnyMac,fits Blitzer to a Tee"drama queen".
I rest my case.
What's up with Wolf Blitzer? After Biden did his interview on debate night, someone asked why Sarah Palin wasn't going on CNN too. Wold chimed in with something like: "She's awfully busy right now getting ready for the debate" as if he inability to do a spot was the most natural think in the world, as though she was a teenager cramming for her SATs.
Again, why does Wolf, cheerfully allow himself to be demeaned in this way? Any theories?