About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Media have repeatedly asserted Palin faces "low" or "lowered" expectations in debate, despite praise of her debate skills

October 01, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Several media figures have asserted that Gov. Sarah Palin faces "low" or "lowered" expectations in the upcoming vice-presidential debate and that she therefore faces a lower bar for victory than Sen. Joe Biden. They have made these assertions despite criticism by at least one member of the media over the media's setting of a lower bar for Palin and despite praise of her performance in the Alaska gubernatorial debate by others in the media and by McCain campaign surrogate Mitt Romney.

36 Comments

Several members of the media, including MSNBC anchors and guests and an NPR reporter, have asserted that Gov. Sarah Palin faces "low" or "lowered" expectations in the upcoming vice-presidential debate and that she therefore faces a lower bar for victory than Sen. Joe Biden. They have made these assertions -- that she will win if she simply beats (lowered) expectations -- despite criticism by at least one member of the media over the media's setting of a lower bar for Palin, despite praise of her performance in the Alaska gubernatorial debate by others in the media, and despite McCain campaign surrogate Mitt Romney's touting of her debate skills. Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, stated on the September 29 broadcast of NBC's Today: "I think if you looked at her debate performance as the governor of Alaska, you're gonna see a person who can hold her own. She's a very competent, well-spoken, thoughtful individual, and I think she's gonna do real well." Nonetheless, Romney also remarked on the benefit to her of the "creat[ion of] low expectations."

Examples of media figures asserting or suggesting that Palin stands to benefit from low expectations:

  • During a discussion of Palin on the September 28 edition of Fox News Sunday, NPR national political correspondent Mara Liasson asserted: "But for this debate, no one is going to benefit more from low expectations than Sarah Palin. She has got about the lowest expectations. People think she's going to come on and babble incoherently, and I think she's going to do just fine."
  • During the 8 a.m. ET hour of the September 28 edition of MSNBC Live, anchor Alex Witt asked, "How about this: Are expectations so low for Palin that she can't help but do better than what people expect?" Reuters Washington correspondent Jon Decker replied, "[E]xpectations are extremely low for her going into the Thursday night's debate. You like expectations low going into a debate, that's for sure. And if she can beat those expectations, it will be a good night for Sarah Palin."
  • During the 9 a.m. ET hour of the September 28 edition of MSNBC Live, Witt asserted of Palin: "Lowered expectation because of some critical reviews of her network interviews. Do you think that lowered expectations will actually help her and might the campaign folks be micromanaging her now and not letting her personality come out?" Roll Call reporter Emily Heil replied: "[C]ertainly, those lowered expectations, if she does kind of well, I think most people will call it a success."
  • During the noon ET hour of the September 28 edition of MSNBC Live, Witt asked: "[W]hen you talk about the expectations being lowered for Sarah Palin, and that certainly seems to be the consensus that we've been hearing throughout this day here on MSNBC Sunday, does that mean that she just has to go out there and be herself, as many have suggested, showing her personality?"
  • During the 11 a.m. ET hour of the September 29 edition of MSNBC Live, after anchor Tamron Hall asked if "low expectations actually help" Palin and "on the flip side, is it fair that Joe Biden might be held to a higher standard," Newsweek correspondent Suzanne Smalley replied, "Well, I think that you're right to mention low expectations. That is something Sarah Palin has going for her."
  • During 3 p.m. ET hour of the September 30 edition of MSNBC Live, NBC News correspondent Savannah Guthrie said of the McCain campaign's expectations regarding Palin's performance, "If she just survives on Thursday, I think they'll be pleased." She also reported that the "party line I'm hearing today, which is to keep those expectations low, to say, 'Let Palin be Palin. She's not running to be head of the debate club, and that's not what Americans want.'"
  • As Media Matters for America documented, CNN senior political analyst Gloria Borger asserted that "the bar is, first of all, on the floor for Sarah Palin" for the debate, to which senior legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin responded that "it's not our job" to "sort of create these expectations."

Notwithstanding claims by these media figures that expectations are "lower" for Palin, some in the media have praised Palin's debating abilities based on her performance in the 2006 Alaska gubernatorial debate. National Review White House correspondent Byron York wrote in a September 8 post to the National Review Online blog The Corner: "[A]ll I have to say is that Palin was good -- really good. It wasn't a debate in which the candidates were in each other's faces or throwing out zingers, but Palin clearly outshone her rivals -- especially [former Alaska Gov. Frank] Murkowski, the longtime senator who played the role of the experienced statesman." Similarly, in a post to the Time.com blog Swampland, national political correspondent Karen Tumulty described Palin's gubernatorial debate performance as "impressive," adding that Palin "is also very good on her feet." Tumulty went on to write: "That's why Joe Biden should be wary, especially since she will have expectations very much in her favor."

In addition, MSNBC Live's Hall asked Newsweek national correspondent Suzanne Smalley if the vice-presidential debate, which Hall said will have "more structure" than the campaign trail, will "help Governor Palin." Smalley replied, in part:

I think that the structure may be harder. It's easy when you're talking off the cuff to take a moment and think, but when you're under the glaring lights of a national TV audience and millions of people watching and having to speak for an hour and a half nonstop against somebody like Joe Biden, who's been doing this for so long, it's a really tough position for anybody who's fairly new on the national political scene. So it's gonna be a challenge for her.

In asserting the purported benefit to Biden of the "structure," Smalley did not note that the McCain campaign reportedly "fought for and won a much more structured approach for the questioning at the vice-presidential debate." According to a September 20 New York Times article:

At the insistence of the McCain campaign, the Oct. 2 debate between the Republican nominee for vice president, Gov. Sarah Palin, and her Democratic rival, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., will have shorter question-and-answer segments than those for the presidential nominees, the advisers said. There will also be much less opportunity for free-wheeling, direct exchanges between the running mates.

From the September 28 edition of Fox News Sunday:

JUAN WILLIAMS (Fox News political contributor and NPR news analyst): But with regard to Palin, let me just say, they wouldn't even put Palin in the spin room after the debates. Joe Biden was out there in the spin room.

BRIT HUME (Fox News Washington managing editor): Right.

WILLIAMS: And I think that, you know, when Bill [Kristol] says that they're mismanaging her -- the idea they put her out there with the world leaders of the U.N. -- she looked bumbly. She wouldn't even talk to reporters then. She goes on with [Fox News host] Sean Hannity, our friend. And what happens? She can't even talk about the bailout effectively. And with [CBS Evening News anchor] Katie Couric, it was an implosion.

LIASSON: But for this debate, no one is going to benefit more from low expectations than Sarah Palin. She has got about the lowest expectations. People think she's going to come on and babble incoherently, and I think she's going to do just fine.

CHRIS WALLACE (host): Brit, you get the final word about Sarah Palin.

HUME: My guess is she'll do fine, but I think Bill's right. They've got to let her be herself, and she'll do fine.

From the 8 a.m. ET hour of the September 28 edition of MSNBC Live:

WITT: How about real quickly, the VP debate is Thursday. Lots of talk in this media -- in the media, rather, this week -- about Sarah Palin following her latest major interview. How about this: Are expectations so low for Palin that she can't help but do better than what people expect?

DECKER: You know, I know, Alex -- I'm gonna miss it -- but I know you're going to play a lot of Saturday Night Live from last night. The clips from Saturday Night Live last night, this morning. And, you know, there's this image that's been presented of her, pretty much through SNL, but through other venues as well, as a person who is not up to it -- not up to being the person who's a heartbeat away from the presidency. And as a result, expectations are extremely low for her going into the Thursday night's debate. You like expectations low going into a debate, that's for sure. And if she can beat those expectations, it will be a good night for Sarah Palin.

WITT: OK. Always a good morning with you being here. Thank you so much, John Decker.

DECKER: Thank you, Alex.

From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the September 28 edition of MSNBC Live:

WITT: Emily, a lot of attention has been focused on Sarah Palin. Lowered expectation because of some critical reviews of her network interviews. Do you think that lowered expectations will actually help her and might the campaign folks be micromanaging her now and not letting her personality come out?

HEIL: Well, there is certainly a lot of pressure on Sarah Palin for this debate performance. You know, she's going up against Joe Biden, who's, you know, considered a very, you know, good speaker. He's gaffe-prone, for sure, but he's a old hand at this, and she's not. And I think that's causing a lot of concern for her handlers. And I think there was some thought that maybe it was over-handling that had caused this bad performance. We're going to have to see.

But you know what? The debate format is actually, I think, going to work in her favor to a certain extent. The questions are doing to be shorter, and also the topics are going to be very wide-ranging. She's much more well-versed on economic issues, on domestic issues, as opposed to foreign policy issues. So to the extent that it's wide-ranging and to the extent that she can focus in on what she knows, I think that's where she might do better. But certainly, those lowered expectations, if she does kind of well, I think most people will call it a success.

From the noon ET hour of the September 28 edition of MSNBC Live:

WITT: But Molly [Hooper, CQ political reporter], you know, when you talk about the expectations being lowered for Sarah Palin, and that certainly seems to be the consensus that we've been hearing throughout this day here on MSNBC Sunday, does that mean that she just has to go out there and be herself, as many have suggested, showing her personality? That is what a lot of the American public has, you know, clamored onto. Or the fact that she is debating Joe Biden, who's been in the Senate for so long, that he -- you know, there on Capitol Hill. He's going to have some nuts and bolts to offer.

HOOPER: We'll see. And that's the thing about Senator Biden: He does have the nuts and bolts, but he doesn't do the talking points. And he's so, like I said, intelligent and knows what he's talking about, that he'll start to get into these arguments that are very temporal and almost beyond people. I mean, I went to Berkeley, I was a history major, I love listening to Biden, but sometimes it goes over my head. And, you know, if Palin gets out there and she's herself -- when I say that, she just is plainspoken, keeps the answers short, sweet, and to the point, you know, a little, kind of Tina Fey. We laugh and everything, but, you know, people want to hear that.

WITT: Yeah.

HOOPER: They want to be reassured. They want those flat-out statements. They want that assurance. And Biden, like I said, he likes to talk.

WITT: Yeah, he does. And Molly, to what extent does he have to worry, though, about coming right up to what is probably a pretty fine line over being mean or condescending or anything, should Sarah Palin throw something that he vehemently disagrees with?

HOOPER: Well, here's the thing about Senator Biden, and this is one of the reasons I love watching him on the Senate floor -- this is why I love my job, because I can go out and see him speak, sitting on the Senate floor. And, you know, he has this way about him. He can sound sort of condescending, but it's not con-- he can be kind of condescending, but it's not condescending. And that -- it's almost sort of a Palin-esque kind of quality he has, but in a very 20 dollar kind of word way.

WITT: Yeah. Yeah. Well, you know what? I'm going to say, from my experience with him, interviewing him, he's just a really nice guy.

HOOPER: I know.

WITT: I'm just going to say that. You know, he absolutely is.

From the 11 a.m. ET hour of the September 29 edition of MSNBC Live:

HALL: But could low expectations actually help Sarah Palin heading into this VP debate? And on the flip side, is it fair that Joe Biden might be held to a higher standard? Suzanne Smalley is a national correspondent for Newsweek. And so Suzanne, who has the edge going into the debate here?

SMALLEY: Well, I think that you're right to mention low expectations. That is something Sarah Palin has going for her. Nonetheless, Joe Biden has been in Congress for decades and is a very skilled debater, and no matter how low the expectations are, that matchup is gonna be tough for her. And it's going to be -- the stakes are very high for this campaign, especially after Saturday Night Live.

I think you can argue that the [ABC World News anchor] Charlie Gibson interview, the Katie Couric interview, all of that inside the Beltway has a big impact, but once it hits Saturday Night Live and you get a roasting like that from a show that many low-information voters are watching, that's a portrait that's gonna start to stick of Governor Palin, and she really needs to do well in this debate.

HALL: It's interesting. On ABC's This Week, John McCain was asked about Sarah Palin's answer to a question that the U.S. military should cross the border from Afghanistan into Pakistan. We know they've been talking about this, they talked about it in a debate. And that was essentially agreeing with Senator [Barack] Obama. So here's how Senator McCain responded to it.

McCAIN [video clip]: This business of, in all due respect, people going around and sticking a microphone while conversations are being held and then all of a sudden that's a person's position -- it's a free country, but I don't think most Americans think that that's a definitive policy statement made by Governor Palin.

HALL: So to backtrack a little bit so our audience knows what's happened, someone kind of approached her with a mic, and they ask her and that was her off-the-cuff, if you will, explanation. In the debate, more structure -- will that help Governor Palin in that -- it's a lot of information, but to whom much is given, much is expected.

SMALLEY: Right. And, you know, I think that, first of all, the "off the cuff" defense from Senator McCain is really -- I mean, they have to have some kind of defense, but his campaign's gone after Joe Biden for off-the-cuff remarks. I mean, it's the nature of the game, and it is striking that she did disagree with her running mate's position on this issue.

Beyond that, you know, I think that the structure may be harder. It's easy when you're talking off the cuff to take a moment --

HALL: Right.

SMALLEY: -- and think, but when you're under the glaring lights of a national TV audience and millions of people watching and having to speak for an hour and a half nonstop against somebody like Joe Biden, who's been doing this for so long, it's a really tough position for anybody who's fairly new on the national political scene. So it's gonna be a challenge for her.

From the 3 p.m. ET hour of the September 30 edition of MSNBC Live:

NORAH O'DONNELL (anchor): Savannah, John McCain just said they don't expect her -- they don' t -- "their appreciation for her is not because she's got a Ph.D. from Harvard. She doesn't." It sounded like a backhanded compliment, but nevertheless, are there Republicans that are concerned about her performance and what this means for John McCain's candidacy? And, I mean, doesn't it say something, the fact that all of his top advisers are with her there now? They've left John McCain by himself, and they're with Palin to get her ready.

GUTHRIE: Well, that's true. I mean, to that point, we just heard [NBC News correspondent] Ron [Allen] that David Axelrod [chief political strategist for Obama] and others are with Biden now. So these debates are important, and so you do put the full-court press.

There's no question that Republicans -- many of them will tell you privately they're very concerned about Sarah Palin. And now, some of them are peeling off and even saying so publicly. I mean, we've seen some prominent writers come out and say, "Palin isn't ready for prime time."

But what you heard John McCain tell Kelly O'Donnell this morning is very much the party line I'm hearing today, which is to keep those expectations low, to say, "Let Palin be Palin. She's not running to be head of the debate club, and that's not what Americans want." And also to point out, "Hey, Joe Biden's been doing this for 30 years. Of course Sarah Palin -- she's going to do the best she can, but let's not overstate the case." If she just survives on Thursday, I think they'll be pleased.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (October 01, 2008 4:58 pm ET)
         
      MMFA has a point to the extent that the elitist msm's patronizing coverage of Palin is endemic. Time and again the msm has dismissed her accomplishments, polluting the airwaves with bs skepticism regarding her competency to be vp. The lowering of the bar is due singularly to the media's biased coverage against the McCain campaign in general, and Palin in particular
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SouthTexScott (October 01, 2008 5:40 pm ET)
           

        Accomplishments? Competency to by VP?  Surely you jest.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Max Dharma (October 02, 2008 4:48 pm ET)
             

          I propose we change the MMFA charter from:

          Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

          TO

          Media Matters for America is a Web-based, political advocacy and secular progressive research tool for the far left dedicated to the justification and active promotion of a liberal philosophy and comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and manipulating conservative information in the U.S. media.

          PS. There is no conservative misinformation being presented here, it's just MMFA pushing their political adgenda.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (October 01, 2008 5:44 pm ET)
           

        What accomplishments? She hasn't had any, aside from being elected Governor. Sportscaster? She was once part of the media. Taking 8 years to get her bachelor's degree? What do we call someone who went to school for 8 years? Doctor... Not in Palin's case.

        What BS skepticism? It's not BS, it's actual, you know, real world skepticism. Why? She's dumb as a rock, and is an extreme right wing relgious fundamentalist. Maybe if the McCain campaign allowed her to be questioned, and had her do events where she would, you know, answer questions, maybe said skepticism would be eliminated? Although, the times she has been interviewed, she has not done well at all, and looked to be, well, not very bright. She and McCain are doing this to Palin. It's not as if the media are making this stuff up about here.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (October 01, 2008 6:20 pm ET)
             

          What accomplishment's you ask?  Why she can see Russia out her window by gum!  Where do you think Putin goes when he rears his head?  Alaska.  That's where.

          Oh and also, it seems she can field dress a moose, which can come in mighty handy in the Whitehouse.  You know who else could probably field dress a moose? How about Teddy Roosevelt!  There you go now.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (October 01, 2008 6:48 pm ET)
             

          Magnolialover:  I agree with everything you posted except for one thing:  Palin is NOT dumb as a rock.  She knows how to get power and keep it by littering the snowy landscape with the bodies of her opponents. Don't let that cute air-head pose fool you.  She is fully prepared to destroy Biden tomorrow night.  Karl Rove and god knows who else have given her expert coaching.  That, combined with her highly professional "dumb bunny" act will surprise us all.  She was playing with Couric and Gibson.  They fell for it, big time.  Obviously, so have we.  (Well...not me.) 

          Report Abuse
        • Author by thomp.steve9098 (October 02, 2008 8:40 am ET)
             

          Well, we'll find out tonight whether all the left wing smears and dismissiveness are unfounded. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by historygeek001 (October 02, 2008 11:50 am ET)
               

            I think you don't understand your own claims.  "Smears" implies untruths; pointing out reality, even when you don't like it, is not "smearing" anybody.  You are already defending claims that are so weak that a simple google search disproves them, and claiming "smears" weakens your argument even more. 

            Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (October 02, 2008 8:30 pm ET)
               

            I'm sure with all the left wing smears out there, you should be able to show us where and who in the media have been smearing Palin. Please, be specific and use links to educate the rest of us. I mean, if there are so many out there, this should be easy right?

            And for the record, the definition of "smear" is:
            • Charge falsely or with malicious intent; attack the good name and reputation of someone; "The journalists have defamed me!" "The article in the paper sullied my reputation"
            wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

            Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 01, 2008 7:12 pm ET)
           

        The lowering of the bar is due singularly to the media's biased coverage against the McCain campaign in general, and Palin in particular

        On what planet have you been...?  Sarah Palin has herself revealed how uninformed she is on national and international matters...and when she tried to fake it she got busted.  I'll bet even I know more about foreign affairs than she does...or at least did until the neocons started giving her a crash course in spreading freedom through military world domination.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by carlileb5935 (October 01, 2008 10:48 pm ET)
             

          No one has pointed out, either, that in these Alaska debates she's said to do so well in, she's using written notes in front of her-- CHEAT SHEETS. She's constantly rifling through them.

          That makes it about 10,000 times easier for her. So how come nobody in the MSM has mentioned this? -- there's a photo of her using them, in the NYT today.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (October 02, 2008 9:01 am ET)
             

          I never thought I'd see it...... but looking at Charlie Gibson's (Define the Bush doctrine) and Katie Couric's (name a Supreme Court ruling other than Roe v Wade) faces upon Sarah's 'deer in headlight look'! Yeah....she's worthy, my ass!

          Using just these two clips alone should be enough to rally the crazy rightwing base to try and come to her rescue.....

          "How dare Charlie and Katie be so mean to Sarah.... I'd love to have a beer with her while shooting lib.......er moose, so that's good enough for me!"

          All the more reason for those of us that live in reality to get up, get active (in getting everyone to vote) ..... and as Thom Hartmann always says.... Tag, Your it!

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (October 02, 2008 12:35 pm ET)
               

            Yes, but Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric are just shameless 'gotcha' journalists who practice their evil 'gotcha' style tactics throughout the liberal elite MSM because they are beholden to Hollywood pinko socialist commies and gay mexican immigrants.

            Duh!

            Report Abuse
      • Author by knowlies (October 01, 2008 7:24 pm ET)
           

        Oh, cut the media bias crap. Anytime any ineptitude is pointed out by the media you guys scream "liberal bias". It's old. This is a candidate that can't get through a simple interview without it turning into a Beckett play and somehow it's the medias fault. 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (October 01, 2008 7:34 pm ET)
           

        You have a point, though not exactly what you claim. It's equally true that the mccain camp really hopes that the general populace is underestimating Palin. The lower the bar, the better she'll star...

        Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (October 02, 2008 8:50 am ET)
           

        "Time and again the msm has dismissed her accomplishments,"

        Ok thomp.steve9098, since you brought it up..........

        Why don't ya list them and show the 'msm' how to do their job!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by bruce1ace (October 01, 2008 5:14 pm ET)
         
      It's common knowledge that most reasonable people expect Palin to do poorly in comparison to Biden. The people of this country have set the bar low for her based on what she has done so far in the campaign. This is a very weak point by MMFA because the fact is that the public expectations for Palin ARE LOW.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (October 01, 2008 6:25 pm ET)
           

        They should both be held to the same standard and not measured against some silly set of expectations IMO.  This is what has failed in the politics of our country.  People spend much time driving down expectations just to make anything look like a victory.

        I think Palin is going to surprise everyone by actually sounding like she knows what she is talking about.  She has had a week or so to prepare.  It really isn't that difficult to avoid sounding like you are a moron.

        Palin was also a journalist in Alaska.  She has had experience in front of cameras.  People are going to be too focused on her not making an arse of herself to even pay attention to the answers.  Palin is going to win this one hands down and never be seen much until after the election in an unscripted situation.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (October 01, 2008 6:33 pm ET)
             

          "It really isn't that difficult to avoid sounding like you are a moron"

          Not to nitpick, but didn't you just drive down Palin's expectations? :) 

          In any event, I agree with you, she will be prepared and there is probably more hype than will ever materialize.  What we need is for her to give a press conference, let her defend her views and positions like every other politician running for office does.  But she won't, you are right, they will keep the bubble around her and hope she rallies enough of the right's base to eek out a victory for McCain.  Pretty sad, isn't it?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (October 01, 2008 8:05 pm ET)
               

            No tommy, I hold that record. It's mine, and mine alone! Bwaa-haa-haa-haaaaah!

            Obama Pictures and McCain Pictures

            Report Abuse
          • Author by roundhouse (October 01, 2008 9:14 pm ET)
               

            "But she won't, you are right, they will keep the bubble around her and hope she rallies enough of the right's base to eek out a victory for McCain.  Pretty sad, isn't it?"

            If only you were as aware of this kind of manipulation in 2000 and 2004.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (October 02, 2008 10:53 am ET)
           

        The right is trying to keep the bar low so any performance will be considered a success. That and they get to attack "snooty elitist" Biden.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (October 01, 2008 5:26 pm ET)
         
      So the ' No Child Left Behind " program is shelved ??????
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (October 01, 2008 5:36 pm ET)
         

      Off topic, but I love this, only on Fox...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTkqosRiyYo

      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (October 01, 2008 5:47 pm ET)
         
      THursday night is comedy night.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 01, 2008 10:21 pm ET)
           

        Here are a few suggested drinking games. Chug a beer each time Sarah Palin says... (Choose one)

        Freedom...

        The terrorists...

        Eye-Rack...

        Proud...

        Russia...

        Any word ending in the letter "G" which she pronounces with the  "G" silent...

        Chug a

        Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (October 02, 2008 9:10 am ET)
             

          Irony,

          You forgot:

          In what respect... (as in, her answer to Gibson asking her to define the Bush doctrine)

          or

          Canada

          Also..... remember.... this will be Sarah Palin tonight...... not Tina Fey! Although.... we might not be able to tell?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (October 02, 2008 9:49 am ET)
               

            I hope Sarah will not be able to resist going into her adorable act...animated facial expressions, girlish voice inflections, etc. That alone pegs her as a lightweight...a conniving one who uses her gender to charm people, to hide her shortcomings and to pass off bullshet as truth.

            In focusing on her shallow depth of knowledge, one thing people have forgotten is how Palin lied about her own record to make herself look good. The Bridge to Nowhere...and how she tried to paint herself as being against earmarks when in reality she was the earmark queen? I hope she goes that route tonight. Sarah Palin's lack of honesty is just as important as her cluelessness.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by funnymanpants (October 03, 2008 1:22 am ET)
                 

              Irony wrote:

              >>I hope Sarah will not be able to resist going into her adorable act...animated facial expressions, girlish voice inflections, etc. That alone pegs her as a lightweight...a conniving one who uses her gender to charm people, to hide her shortcomings and to pass off bullshet as truth.

              You got your wish. She actually winked at the audience at one point. Tina Fey is going to have some material to work with. Apparently, the people in the snap polls thought she came across as authentic; but the same polls show Biden winning the debate handily.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by redrhino56 (October 02, 2008 12:52 pm ET)
         
      this would be funny if Palin was on the the game show "Who's Smarter Than a 5th Grader"...but this is for the VP of the United States of America...YIKES!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Brian in FL (October 02, 2008 1:03 pm ET)
         

      Yes, let's have low expecations here. After all, we're only talking about Vice President of the United States, and the possible leader of the free world if something happens to John McCain, who has already had cancer 4 times.

      Let's vote for "Ms. Joe Six-Pack" because she's the candidate I'd rather have a beer with. That worked out so well with George W. Bush, didn't it?

      If you dare point out Palin is unintelligent, you're just being "elitist". In other words, Palin should just get a free pass. If you hold the female candidate to the same exact standards as every other candidate, that is being "sexist" apparently.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Neolib88 (October 02, 2008 1:34 pm ET)
         
      What Palin will likely do is follow the techniqes "W" used against Anne Richards. Stick to a handful of points, regardless of what the questions are, needle and attack the opponent and get Biden to attack her, and then play the victim of an elitist attack against mainstreet America
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eniobob2631 (October 02, 2008 3:35 pm ET)
         
      Hot Off The Press:just In.Palins spokesperson just said that the reason she didn't answer Courics questions was,in regards to the reading part"she felt that If she had left out any newspaper that she reads that paper would have gotten offended".And in regards to the Supreme court she would have mentioned"Exxon/Valdes" decision by the Supremes,but she didn't want to bring that up.Even though that affected her state Big Time.The spokesperson said that the governor is always"thinking ahead to the next question" that is why she didn't have an answer.Makes sense to me.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brian in FL (October 02, 2008 7:28 pm ET)
           

        What a joke. Why didn't she just say she didn't want to offend any paper by leaving them out as the reason for not answering the question? Why not mention one of the many Supreme Court decisions we all learned about in school? Was the Exxon-Valdes decision the ONLY other court decision she could possibly mention or something? Why not just throw out Brown vs. the Board of Education, or Plessy vs. Ferguson, or the Dred Scott decision, or even recent cases like Hamdan or Bush vs. Gore.

        Nice attempt at damage control by the McCain-Palin camp. It might work for people completely biased towards their side.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (October 02, 2008 8:27 pm ET)
           

        Nice try at spin right there of course. Normal intelligent people can see right through that BS.

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.