McClatchy uncritically reported McCain claim that Obama "would raise taxes" on Americans like "Joe the Plumber"
SUMMARY: McClatchy Newspapers reported that Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin are claiming that Sen. Barack Obama "would raise taxes on ordinary folks such as Joe the Plumber." The article did not note that Obama has proposed cutting taxes for low- and middle-income taxpayers and that "Joe the Plumber" Wurzelbacher himself has said that he would not see a tax increase under Obama's plan.
In an October 22 McClatchy Newspapers article, chief political correspondent Steven Thomma reported that Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin have engaged in a "concerted effort ... to cast [Sen. Barack] Obama as a tax-and-spend liberal who would raise taxes on ordinary folks such as Joe the Plumber," referring to Sam Joe Wurzelbacher. But Thomma did not note that Obama has proposed cutting taxes for low- and middle-income taxpayers and raising taxes only on individuals earning more than $200,000 per year and families earning more than $250,000 per year. Wurzelbacher himself has said that he would not see a tax increase under Obama's plan.
The Tax Policy Center concluded that compared with McCain, "Obama would give larger tax cuts to low- and moderate-income households and pay some of the cost by raising taxes on high-income taxpayers." Even McCain's own chief economic policy adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, has reportedly said it is inaccurate to say that "Barack Obama raises taxes."
From Thomma's October 22 McClatchy Newspapers article:
On issues, Obama has gained ground among voters across the board, even on issues where McCain still has an advantage and on some where the Republican usually would expect to be ahead.
On taxes, for example, likely voters now prefer Obama over McCain by a margin of 8 percentage points. This is despite a concerted effort by McCain and running mate Sarah Palin to cast Obama as a tax-and-spend liberal who would raise taxes on ordinary folks such as Joe the Plumber, an Ohio man whom McCain cited repeatedly in the last debate and since then in ads and on the campaign trail.
On family values, a subject Republicans have used to court Christian conservatives and suburban moderates since the 1980s, likely voters now prefer Obama over McCain by 8 points. That's up from 3 points in mid-September.
















When will the media start reporting that Joe is not a Plumber? He is not Joe the Plumber. He is Joe the Phony. Just like McCain.
I heard McCain on Imus this morning, he is so bitter (McCain). You can now tell that he is done and so are 8 years of smears and hate.
The media only has to keep this up for a couple more weeks. Keep asserting the lie that Obama will raise taxes on fictional characters like Jose El Plomero,and hope that enough ignorant voters will ignore reality as well as they do and vote for Grampy.
Not that they're all in the tank for McSame, many are just in the tank for an exciting horse race.
They also neglected to mention that though LolaTheHooker will not an increase in her taxes, her employer RufusThePimp will likely see an increase of about 3%. Because of this, combined with the rise in materials for methamphetamine production, employee stimulus packages will become more expensive for Rufus meaning he will most likely be forced to enact an increased beating policy just to keep pace. However, the Obama medical plan will probably cover profession-related surgery, meaning Lola will continue to walk like a woman but may not have to talk like a man. The result will be the possibility of expanding the business beyond the existing specialized customer base.
Its a mixed up muddled up shook up world for Lola unless Obama is elected.
You always have to get kinky.
All day and all of the night...
Someplace where we're all"Misfits"
!0$
8 years of failed policies may be coming to an end, but the smear and hate is going to return to its Clinton-era goldrush days. Regardless of how much good Obama does for the country and for the world as president, there's lots of money to be made portraying him as the embodiment of all evil.
I think it will be worse than their anti-Clinton hatefest .... the racist underbelly of the Republican base will become painfully apparent.
At least it will be a boon for Neofascist Pundits... I understand that Douchebag Glenn Beck is moving to FOX "News", where I'm sure he'll be paid tons of money to spew his nonsense. I also read somewhere that Judith Miller is moving to FOX. The Flying Monkeys are returning to the Castle.
FOX will be the den of hate for the next 4 years, but I do believe the hate machine will not work anymore. Americans are tired of hearing about anti American, blah blah blah.
I hope you're right, but I'm a bit more cynical than you. I don't think it will end and there are people for whom it will always play.
I think it will be at least different, as I'm sure an Obama administration would have the proper rebuttal machine in place. But I agree, history, with their abject loss of power (the Repubs crack cocaine) they will be on overdrive.
The Troglodytes have figured out how to dodge the fact that Obama has proposed no such tax increase; they don't believe him. I've heard several commentators, like DoucheBag Glenn Beck, say that we just can't trust a Democrat not to raise everybody's taxes.
That becomes an all-purpose talking point... accuse your opponent of what you think he might do... not what he says he'll do. The idiot GOP base won't know the difference anyway. I wonder... can we get away with saying that Grampy will go nuts and nuke Spain, or that Palintwit will require universal Church attendance? I mean, if it's valid to criticize a politician for what he or she MIGHT do...
Right, Nerzog, I've seen that from posters at this site as well. It goes a little like this--
Wingnut: GO AHEAD! VOTE FOR OBAMMA IF YOU WANT A COMMUNEST ANTI-AMERICAN TAX INCREASE LIKE HE'S PROMMISED!!!
Human:Obama's plan reduces taxes for the vast majority of Americans.
Wingnut: LOL!!! IF YOU BELEIVE THAT YOUR REALY DRINKING THE COOLADE !!!! HIPOCRITS !!!
lol@Colonel's spot-on characterization.
Thank you Mr. H. I thought the all-purpose accusation of hypocrisy* was my finest touch.
* or "hypocracy", "hipocrasy" "hypockressy", or many other variations, even if there's nothing remotely hypocritical in the comment.
I thought it was pretty good, but don't you think it may have been a little better if you had placed the words "Anti-American" before HIPOCRITS?
Adjectives are all the rage this year in wingnut circles. Do you ever see Gramps's prom date say "this country", or "these people"? It's always this "GREAT country", or these "PATRIOTIC people" or those "anit-American people".
Although in the singular "that one" will do.
And a chant of USA, USA USA would have ben nice but usually when reading wingnutese, it's always implied, so I'll drop the last complaint.
Thanks for the suggestions, WK. I was going for "nuanced", and that may have been a mistake.
.
What cracks me up about our loose cannon right wing friends who come on here, are the random, and often used LOLs, which tells me that they might be about, oh, 19 years old, or maybe less, and also, what you wrote about hypocricy being used A LOT by these folks, even when it doesn't mean what they think that it means.
Har! Check it out, Mag. The always loony MissDee busts out a hypocrisy charge on the ABC The Note thread.
It's fascinating to see the limits of right wing nutball thinking, The wingnuts like to shout "moral relativism ! " when non-wingnuts use their brains to make distinctions, just as they call us hypocrites when we can see clear differences that they can't.
To her credit, she did spell "hypocrite" correctly.That's a dittohead gold star!
Once again I find myself apologizing for Sacramento. Sorry, rest of the country.
I think taxes on Americans like "Joe the Plumber," i.e. lying GOP plants, should be raised.
Sarah Palin's praising of a fictional character called "joe the Plumber" reminds me of Dan Quayle's attacks on another fictional character, Murphy Brown.
Neither could come up with a real-life example to support their plans, such as they are/were.
Why does Media Matters not have the e-mail link to Steven Thomma?