Boston Globe uncritically reported McCain falsehood on Obama's health care proposal
SUMMARY: The Boston Globe uncritically reported Sen. John McCain's false claim that Sen. Barack Obama proposes to "fine" small businesses that do not provide employee health insurance. While Obama has proposed requiring large businesses that do not provide employer-sponsored health coverage to pay a percentage of their payroll into a National Health Insurance Exchange to help Americans purchase private health insurance, small businesses would be exempt.
In an October 28 article, The Boston Globe uncritically reported that during an October 27 speech in Cleveland, Ohio, Sen. John McCain "articulated in his most dire terms yet what has become the dominant theme of his campaign in the last two weeks: that Obama's plans to raise income taxes and fine companies that do not provide employee health insurance would be obstacles to small-business growth, and kill jobs just when new ones are needed most." But the claim -- which McCain has made repeatedly -- that Obama would "fine" small businesses if they did not provide employee health insurance is false. While Obama has proposed requiring large businesses that do not provide employer-sponsored health coverage to pay a percentage of their payroll into a National Health Insurance Exchange to help Americans purchase private health insurance, small businesses would be exempt.
Additionally, in reporting McCain's claim that Obama's "plans to raise income taxes" would be an "obstacle to small-business growth," the Globe did not note that less than 2 percent of taxpayers declaring small-business income would see a tax increase in 2009 under Obama's plan, according to estimates by the Tax Policy Center (TPC).
Similarly, an October 28 Bloomberg News article uncritically reported McCain's assertion during the speech that Obama's "plan to raise taxes on small businesses, to impose insurance mandates on families and small businesses will cut jobs."
Obama has proposed raising taxes only on individuals earning more than $200,000 per year and families earning more than $250,000 per year. According to estimates by the TPC, 1.9 percent of tax filers declaring small-business income in 2009 will be in the top two income-tax brackets -- which currently includes all individuals earning more than $160,850 and all families earning more than $195,850. Bloomberg and the Globe also did not mention that Obama has proposed tax cuts for small businesses, including the "Obama Small Business Health Tax Credit," a "refundable credit of up to 50 percent on premiums paid by small businesses on behalf of their employees."
Regarding Obama's health care plan, during the October 15 presidential debate, after McCain stated, "Now, Senator Obama, I'd like -- still like to know what that fine is going to be" on small businesses who do not provide health insurance to their employees, Obama responded, "Zero, because as I said in our last debate and I'll repeat, John, I exempt small businesses from the requirement for large businesses that can afford to provide health care to their employees, but are not doing it."
From the Bloomberg News article:
McCain, speaking earlier and just sixty miles away, told supporters in Cleveland that Obama would stifle growth by raising taxes and spending.
"The difference between myself and Senator Obama is our plan will create new jobs; his plan to raise taxes on small businesses, to impose insurance mandates on families and small businesses will cut jobs,'' McCain said.
Obama would "radically increase spending and then raise taxes to pay for it,'' he said.
From the Globe article:
"We both disagree with President Bush on economic policy," McCain said. "The difference is that he thinks taxes have been too low, and I think that spending has been too high."
The remarks inaugurated a final phase in the campaign in which advisers said McCain - implicitly acknowledging that Democrats are likely to strengthen their hold on both chambers of Congress - would offer himself up as a bulwark against the hazards of single-party dominance of the legislative and executive branches.
"We're going to take a beating in the House and Senate. We're big boys and girls and frankly we deserve it," said Michael Steele, the chairman of GOPAC, a conservative group, and one of those who appeared with McCain yesterday.
"The last two or three years, the American people have gotten into a comfort zone of having divided government," he said. "It's part and parcel of this campaign: Tell voters what the consequences are."
Delivered with little advance warning to the media as Obama prepared to present his own "closing argument" at his own event 60 miles away, McCain's address offered no new policy details or prescriptions. Instead, McCain articulated in his most dire terms yet what has become the dominant theme of his campaign in the last two weeks: that Obama's plans to raise income taxes and fine companies that do not provide employee health insurance would be obstacles to small-business growth, and kill jobs just when new ones are needed most. "It's a difference of millions of jobs in America, and Americans are beginning to figure that out," he said. "With one week left in this campaign, the choice facing Americans is stark."















Just like I'm fined for not having kids. It's so unfair!
The fundamental myth perpetuated by the Grampy/Twit campaign is that a business making $250,000 in profit somehow represents the majority of small businesses.
This morning on NPR, they interviewed a business owner who runs some kind of steel business or machine shop. He said that they were nearing the 250,000 mark and they were "struggling". I'm guessing that, like many, he was confusing gross income with net profit.
Any "small business" clearing $250,000 in profit is not struggling. Besides, even if he is clearing that much, if he clears 280,000, his additional tax under Obama's plan would be 900 f***ing dollars. OH THE HUMANITY! These people really need to get a grip.
Nerz, I don't think the Obama campaign is doing a very good job of clearing this up, and the media seems to be buying right into the cons spin. I hope they're not overestimating the average American voter.
If your only source was tv news or am radio, you'd think that a business with sales of $250,000 and expenses/overhead of 240k would be getting a tax increase.
I agree. Maybe Obama will pull out some Perot-style charts tomorrow night on his infomercial, and drive a stake through the heart of this Republican myth.
I really think that a lot of the Republicans flocking around Palintwit don't have a clue about the basics of business taxation. They seem to think that everybody running a business is making lots of money. I don't have the stats, but I've heard that most small businesses fail, and the majority of those that survive are not making anything close to $250,000 net profit.
Most of the small business owners I know might clear 50 or 60 grand, personally, but the "business" makes $250,000. After all the costs of utilities, employees, rent or lease costs, insurance, city, state, and fed taxes, delivery trucks, etc., the poor guy gets to see MAYBE that 50 grand to feed his own family. Since he spends all of his time taking care of his business, he can't even moonlight, like his employee do. Some of these employees can pick up an extra 20-30 grand working other jobs. So, in effect, they can "earn" twice what the boss earns. The boss is driving a rusted out Dart and they drive new Hondas. It's a fack!