Fox News reportedly "now expresses regret for booking" Andy Martin -- but what about Hannity?
SUMMARY: The Washington Post's Howard Kurtz reported that Fox News Channel "now expresses regret for booking [Andy] Martin," who has a history of making anti-Semitic and racially charged comments, on Hannity's America. Kurtz wrote: "[Fox News Senior Vice President Bill] Shine says Hannity disagrees with some of Martin's past comments. 'Having that guy on was a mistake,' Shine says. " But Hannity himself defended Martin's appearance on his show and has not expressed regret on either Hannity's America or Hannity & Colmes for having hosted Martin.
In an October 27 article, Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz reported that Fox News Channel "now expresses regret for booking [Andy] Martin" -- who, as Media Matters for America has noted, has, among other things, referred to a judge as a "crooked, slimy Jew" and accused African-Americans of being "willing to corrupt and abuse their public offices" -- on the October 5 edition of Fox News' Hannity's America. As Media Matters documented, Sean Hannity hosted Martin -- identified by Hannity as an "Internet journalist" -- to make what Hannity called "the explosive claim that [Sen. Barack] Obama's role as a community organizer was a political staging ground perpetuated by the unrepentant terrorist William Ayers." Kurtz wrote: "[Fox News Senior Vice President Bill] Shine says Hannity disagrees with some of Martin's past comments. 'Having that guy on was a mistake,' Shine says. 'We obviously didn't do enough research on who the guest was.' " But according to searches of the Nexis and Factiva databases, Hannity himself has not expressed regret or acknowledged having made a mistake regarding Martin on either Hannity's America or Hannity & Colmes, both Fox News shows.
Indeed, when confronted by Robert Gibbs, an adviser to Obama's campaign, on October 7, Hannity defended Martin's appearance on Hannity's America, even though he acknowledged to Gibbs that Martin's comments about Jews are "despicable."
Moreover, as Media Matters noted, at no point during the report featuring Martin did Hannity question any of Martin's assertions or note Martin's history of smears against Obama and his anti-Semitic and racially charged comments.
On the October 7 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, Gibbs said to Hannity: "On your show on Sunday ... the show that's named after you ... [t]he centerpiece of that show was a guy named Andy Martin." Gibbs added that "Andy Martin called a judge a 'crooked, slimy Jew' " and that "Martin went on to write that he understood better why the Holocaust took place." During the exchange, Hannity said: "When I interviewed Malik Shabazz, when I interviewed Al Sharpton, when I interviewed all these controversial figures -- you see, on Fox, we actually interview people of all points of view, whether we agree or disagree." Gibbs later asked, "Why am I not to believe that you're anti-Semitic? Why am I not to believe that everybody who works for the network is anti-Semitic because Sean Hannity gives a platform to somebody who thinks Jews are 'slimy'?" Hannity, who told Gibbs that Martin's anti-Semitic comments are "despicable," further asserted: "Mr. Gibbs, I'm a journalist who interviews people who I disagree with all the time, that give their opinion. Fox has all points of view. We're allowing you on the program, and I don't agree with hardly anything Obama says." (As Media Matters noted, Hannity has previously said he is not a journalist.)
From Kurtz's October 27 article:
An early October edition of his weekend show, "Hannity's America," was built around Andy Martin, a conservative writer who maintains an anti-Obama Web site. Martin said on the show that Obama's community-organizing work in Chicago was "training for a radical overthrow of the government." The onetime political candidate has a history of making controversial statements. In a 1983 personal bankruptcy case, according to the Chicago Tribune, he referred to a judge as a "crooked, slimy Jew" and described Holocaust survivors in a filing as "operating as a wolf pack." Martin has denied holding anti-Semitic views.
The program drew a blast from [MSNBC's Countdown host, Keith] Olbermann, who called it "Stalinist," "desperate," "panicky" and based on "a transparent nut job."
Fox, which initially defended the show, now expresses regret for booking Martin, who was interviewed by a producer. Shine says Hannity disagrees with some of Martin's past comments. "Having that guy on was a mistake," Shine says. "We obviously didn't do enough research on who the guest was."















Who cares what Hannity thinks? A senior Fox VP says it was a mistake and regrets it. Hannity's personal remorse, or lack therof, is immaterial to me.
Personal remorse....Hannity....hmmm. Wonder if he argues with his priest during Confession?
That's good to know, Tommy. Personally, I find it interesting to know that, unlike the FOX News Senior VP, Hannity does not regret giving Martin's views an airing on his show. Of course, up until now, Hannity has not considered himself a journalist. Personally, I see him more as a hardhat sitting on a bar stool giving me his strong opinions on things, whether or not he is particularly well-informed.
I don't really care what Hannity thinks, but I think his silence on this subject is a tacit endorsement of Martin's views, and I think that Hannity likes it that way.
ah tommy, always looking at the big picture. "me me me me me..."
Something we agree on Tommy.... Hannity's personal feelings about having Andy Martin on are basically immaterial... and not exactly what I would define as misinformation
For this one instance... I think MMfA may have let their feelings get the better of them? I think we can all agree that most of us are not fans of FoxNoise or InSanity.
But in no way am I defending Hannity, to me, he is still and will always be, the single most stupid moron ever to have a TV show!
But I don't see any misinformation here... I see a moron defending a racist...
This is not by definition... misinformation... all this thread does is puts a little light on one dummies stupidity!
Fox will never apologize for having Shamity on the air. Oops, I read the headline incorrectly.
The Foxites are sooooo sensitive. They are like quacking ducks with their "fair and balanced" meme when anyone calls them on their bull hockey. Check out blondie on the defensive on C&L..
[url]http://crooksandliars.com/silentpatriot/obama-spokesman-1-fox-news-0[/url]
I saw that dustup. I hope the Obama spokespeople continue to hit back at Fox. Too many people have been intimidated by the Murdoch/Ailes would-be Ministry of Truth for too long.
Geez, can you imagine her attitude if the sales clerk at Nordstrom mistakingly took another customer instead of her. But her attitude was unprofesional. She acted like she was personally responsible for the network = just another bubble headed bleach bond reading the news.
Don't confuse arrogance and dishonesty with stupidity.
I tink that speaks volumes to Haniity's charachter. We all know he's a real drama queen when he shill's for the Fox army, but unrepentent is a sign of a weak soul
Hannity sees the act of repenting as a sign of weakness. If he admits to being wrong about one thing, he fears, then the sheep might just wonder what else he could be wrong about. It is ony through a habitual show of absolute certainty that he can appear strong to his slack-jawed followers.
"Foolish consistancy is the hobgoblin of little minds" - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Am I reading this correctly...? FOX VP, Bill Shine, says to The Washington Post that it was a mistake to have Andy Martin on. But did he or anyone else from FOX make that same statement on the air on FOX? How many FOX viewers read The Washington Post? How many FOX viewers know of Bill Shine's statement? It would appear to me that any sincere statement of regret would have to be made directly to FOX viewers to have any meaningful effect. Otherwise FOX viewers who don't read The Washington Post are still left with the impression that Andy Martin is credible.
Good questions Irony. I went to the to the ADL site and the only mention of it I could find was the following short letter with no demands which they sent to Hannity. I would think they could use their influence to get at least what you allude to as far as on-air apology from Hannity or Fox management.
http://www.adl.org/media_watch/tv/Hannity_Anthony_Martin.htm
---------------------------------------------------
Sean Hannity
October 10, 2008Fox News Channel
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Dear Mr. Hannity:
We were astonished to see that during the October 5, 2008 edition of Hannity's America, you interviewed Anthony Martin, a man with an extensive track record of making anti-Semitic and anti-Israel remarks.
A person who espouses such odious views ought not to be given the opportunity to enhance his credentials or his standing by appearing on Hannity's America.
Sincerely,
The Anti-Defamation League
The only reason that Shine made this statement to the Washington Post was the the Penny Saver had already gone to press.
Fox News reportedly "now expresses regret for booking" Andy Martin -- but what about Hannity?
I'm sure Faux News regrets hiring Sean Insanity... :-)
Sean Hannity is CRAZY, he don't know his head from his foot. At least someone at FOX has a little dignity
This latest outrageous "mistake" by Hannity and FOX news should not be forgiven until an apology and an admission of wrongdoing is issued on FOX news by Hannity himself. His sheeple need to hear it from him personally. Believe me, the majority of the American people already know the truth.
I am disgusted by the lack of fairness displayed by Hannity and most of the FOX media. First, Sarah Palin wasn't vetted and now FOX is interviewing unvetted people who incite hatred and predudice. In both cases, Sean Hannity swallows everything they say and asks for more. When America is ripped apart by civil unrest, I hope you people are the first to be caught in the fray.
Joe the Plumber should have been vetted too, by the way, but I guess that goes against having to do actual research. Psst. John McCain donated quite a bit of money to Khalidi. Pass it on.
Yeah, right.
You often wonder why we even give credence to weak men like sean hannity and andy martin. They are abusers of the air waves who spread their vile sentiments to those who are already vile.
It may be a foreign concept, but journalists interview people with whom they do not agree with all the time. That is what Hannity said, but it was funny that his defense was not posed on here.