About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

UPI reported McCain campaign allegations that LA Times is "suppressing a video" of Obama and Khalidi, but not McCain's own reported "connection" to the "Palestinian activist"

October 30, 2008 2:57 pm ET

SUMMARY: UPI reported Sen. John McCain campaign's allegation that the Los Angeles Times is "suppressing a video of a 2003 banquet showing opponent Barack Obama praising a Palestinian activist," and quoted a McCain spokesman saying the video "could provide a clearer link between Barack Obama and Rashid Khalidi" without noting McCain's own reported "connection" to Khalidi.

21 Comments

In an October 29 article, United Press International reported the allegation by Sen. John McCain's campaign that the Los Angeles Times is "suppressing a video of a 2003 banquet showing opponent Barack Obama praising a Palestinian activist," and quoted a McCain campaign spokesman saying the video "could provide a clearer link between Barack Obama and Rashid Khalidi." However, the article did not note what ABC News senior national correspondent Jake Tapper described in an October 29 blog post as McCain's "own connection to Khalidi."

Tapper documented that while McCain served as chairman of the International Republican Institute (a position he still holds), the IRI provided "$448,873 in 1998" to the Center for Palestine Research and Studies, which Khalidi co-founded. Tapper noted in an October 29 update to his post that while the "IRI said a grant made to the CPRS in 1999 was later 'de-obligated,' ... [t]he 1998 payment of $448,873 is NOT in dispute." In a subsequent post published October 29, Tapper reported that the IRI released a statement that day "confirming that it gave money to Khalidi's group ... and also trying to distance the organization from Khalidi himself." The Huffington Post's Seth Colter Walls reported on October 28 on the IRI's funding of Khalidi's organization.

Additionally, in an October 29 post to The New York Times' Caucus blog, reporter Elisabeth Bumiller noted that "the Obama campaign swiftly pointed out that Mr. McCain has his own connection to Mr. Khalidi," and cited the IRI's 1998 grant to the CPRS.

From Tapper's updated October 29 blog post:

But McCain has his own connection to Khalidi.

In 1993, McCain became chairman of the International Republican Institute. He still chairs that respected organization.

That same year, Khalidi helped found the Center for Palestine Research and Studies, self-described as "an independent academic research and policy analysis institution" created to meet "the need for active Palestinian scholarship on issues related to Palestine." (Its archived website is HERE.)

Khalidi was on the board of trustees through 1999.

According to tax returns, the McCain-chaired IRI funded the organization Khalidi founded and served on to the tune of $448,873 in 1998 (click HERE to see the tax return)* as first reported by Seth Couter [sic] Walls at HuffPo.

The IRI continued to give money to the CPRS after Khalidi left the group as well.

[...]

* This post has been updated after the IRI said a grant made to the CPRS in 1999 was later "de-obligated." A spokeswoman for the IRI says the organization is going over its books to get further clarification of the funds it gave the organization. The 1998 payment of $448,873 is NOT in dispute. When IRI gets back to us, we will share the information with you.

From Colter Walls' October 28 Huffington Post report:

In regards to Khalidi, however, the guilt-by-association game burns John McCain as well.

During the 1990s, while he served as chairman of the International Republican Institute (IRI), McCain distributed several grants to the Palestinian research center co-founded by Khalidi, including one worth half a million dollars.

A 1998 tax filing for the McCain-led group shows a $448,873 grant to Khalidi's Center for Palestine Research and Studies for work in the West Bank. (See grant number 5180, "West Bank: CPRS" on page 14 of this PDF.)

The relationship extends back as far as 1993, when John McCain joined IRI as chairman in January. Foreign Affairs noted in September of that year that IRI had helped fund several extensive studies in Palestine run by Khalidi's group, including over 30 public opinion polls and a study of "sociopolitical attitudes."

Of course, there's seemingly nothing objectionable with McCain's organization helping a Palestinian group conduct research in the West Bank or Gaza. But it does suggest that McCain could have some of his own explaining to do as he tries to make hay out of Khalidi's ties to Obama.

From Bumiller's October 29 Caucus post:

But the Obama campaign swiftly pointed out that Mr. McCain has his own connection to Mr. Khalidi. According to tax records cited by Mr. Obama's campaign, a foreign policy organization that Mr. McCain chairs, the International Republican Institute, gave more than $850,000 in 1998 and 1999 to a group in part founded by Mr. Khalidi, the Center for Palestine Research and Studies.

From UPI's October 29 article, "McCain criticizes newspaper on Obama tape":

Aides to John McCain charge that the Los Angeles Times is suppressing a video of a 2003 banquet showing opponent Barack Obama praising a Palestinian activist.

The Times countered that its promise to a source bars the newspaper from posting the video that allegedly shows the Democratic presidential nominee praising Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi at the banquet.

The newspaper reported Wednesday it first wrote about the video in an April article about Obama's ties with Palestinians and Jews while involved in Chicago politics. The report provided a description of the tape.

"A major news organization is intentionally suppressing information that could provide a clearer link between Barack Obama and Rashid Khalidi," said McCain campaign spokesman Michael Goldfarb. "The election is one week away, and it's unfortunate that the press so obviously favors Barack Obama that this campaign must publicly request that the Los Angeles Times do its job -- make information public."

The Times issued a statement Tuesday about its decision not to post the tape online.

"The Los Angeles Times did not publish the videotape because it was provided to us by a confidential source who did so on the condition that we not release it," newspaper Editor Russ Stanton said. "The Times keeps its promises to sources."

The article said Obama's friendships with Palestinian-Americans in Chicago led some to think he was sympathetic to the Palestinian viewpoint. Obama publicly expresses a pro-Israel viewpoint.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (October 30, 2008 3:11 pm ET)
         

      This is so ridiculous.  How desperate is the McCain campaign in these final days?  I hope they suffer such a resounding defeat next Tuesday that rattles this kind of crap campaigning to it's core.  Perhaps during the next go-round this Rove-style slash and burn, divide and conquer, bash the media and instill nothing but fear in voters will all be a thing of the past, up in flames.

      Go Obama.....

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 30, 2008 3:44 pm ET)
           

        Tommy, that's something that has been on my mind for the last few months. Regardless of your basic politics, a victory for McCain will be nothing but reinforcement for this sort of campaign. Of course I have my bias for Obama, but I almost feel like it's just as important that he wins to influence future politics with the mood of his campaign.

        And lighten up with the whining stuff, I was only having a laugh.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (October 30, 2008 3:52 pm ET)
             

          Col, I am not offended easily, not a problem.  I know and appreciate your humor, sometimes we needle each other but it's all cool.

          And I agree with you.  My hope is that when this is all over and done with, the slimy rightwingers who engage in this type of campaigning will be forever tarnished with a huge election defeat as their legacy.  There are some leftwingers who slash and burn too but they are far outnumbered. 

          Those that did it will rethink it all the next time and realize it had little affect in 2008, finally, and try something new.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (October 30, 2008 3:16 pm ET)
         

      The thing that impressed me most about Obama's infomercial was that he didn't mention Grampy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (October 30, 2008 3:24 pm ET)
         

      McCain has turned into the most pathetic presidential candidate in my lifetime. Every day, I think that he's going to try to retrieve some of his lost honor but he does nothing but bring more shame to himself. Today, even Sam (Joe)  the Laborer (Plumber) blew him off at a rally in Ohio. But McCain was able to bus in thousands of school kids for the rally.That says a lot about how important educating our children is to him.

      And I just read a report that his running mate has no intention of going back to Alaska, even if she loses. Isn't she the governor of Alaska? Wouldn't her job require her to be in Alaska as some point?

      Why hasn't some group of concerned scientists taken out an ad about how concerned they are that a fire breathing knuckle dragger who thinks the Fred Flintstone and Dino  had some basis in fact and who ridicules genetic research might be sitting in the oval office someday?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Max Credits (October 30, 2008 4:06 pm ET)
         

      McCain's reckless pursuit of the Presidency is a perfect example of what's wrong with America.  His continued effort to paint Obama as some kind of terrorist sympathizer is bordering on criminal.  He no longer has a chance of restore whatever mavericky reputation he once supposedly had.  Media such as UPI is every but as culpable when it dispenses McCain’s bogus, baseless and bigoted charges against Obama without noting his blatant hypocrisy. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (October 30, 2008 4:14 pm ET)
           

        It's called corporate republican propaganda, and it's probably going to work. It always does, because people are stupid.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Max Credits (October 30, 2008 4:40 pm ET)
             

          <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> I don't agree that the American electorate are stupid and I'm looking forward to a collective rejection of McCain's BS next Tuesday.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Max Credits (October 30, 2008 4:41 pm ET)
               

            Wow... no idea what all that is.  Just meant to post: I don't agree that the American electorate are stupid and I'm looking forward to a collective rejection of McCain's BS next Tuesday.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (October 30, 2008 4:12 pm ET)
         

      I'm amazed that this stuff has had any legs at all- right now one of the networks is seriously asking the qustion, "is Obama a socialist?" I mean, this is insane-- unprecedented, for any candidate to call an opponent a Marxist or a socialist. Really nutcase stuff that's being covered as legitimate news!

      Or this attempt to portray Khalidi as a Palestinian terrorist, when he is in fact a protege of Edward Said, who someone on MSNBC was allowed  to get away with saying "hated Israel."

      The bad news?-- this stuff is working. Combined with the MSM's blatant pimping of select polls to create a bandwagon effect for McCain, there's an excellent chance Obama's gonna lose.

      Here in California, in one of the most heavily Dem districts in the country, there are NO-- I repeat NO, Obama signs, anywhere. That's bad.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by commonsenseliberal (October 30, 2008 4:22 pm ET)
           

        I don't know where in CA you are, but I'm in SF - and there are Obama/Biden signs EVERYWHERE.  I can't walk a block without seeing a sign, or someone wearing an Obama/Biden button (mind you, I'm not complaining).  Also, the No on 8 signs are everywhere, to be expected in SF.

        No on Prop 8!

        Obama/Biden!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (October 30, 2008 6:18 pm ET)
             

          I will also be voting No on Prop 8.  And to see some of the slimy ads that the proponents of this proposition are putting out there is nauseating.  However, I am sickened by Schwarzenegger's lack of involvement in speaking out against this proposition, even his wife has been more vocal about it than he has, he is a joke.

          And I will also say it would have been nice for Obama to voice his opinion more. It's a major issue in a major state to try and deny people their basic rights, he should help it's defeat.  I am disappointed.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by eddy3957 reregistered (October 30, 2008 10:58 pm ET)
               

            And I will also say it would have been nice for Obama to voice his opinion more. It's a major issue in a major state to try and deny people their basic rights, he should help it's defeat.  I am disappointed.--Tommy

            He's off the hook as California is a safe state for him and it's a state referendum.  It would be politically exactly the wrong thing for him to focus on.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by commonsenseliberal (October 31, 2008 10:37 am ET)
                 

              Sadly, you're right.  Obama keeps his mouth shut about this referendum because it could cost him voters in other states (though I would venture to guess that many of those in other states who are against marriage equality likely wouldn't vote for Obama).

              As many of the commercials running here in California say, put aside your personal beliefs about marriage, as this proposition sets an example of how we can go about changing the state constitution to deny others certain rights.  It's not only about marriage equality.  It sets up a slippery slope to voters changing the constitution to deny rights to people with whom they don't agree.  As a gay man, living in the most liberal city on the country, I just cannot fathom that happening here.  But, conservatives in the interior of California, and down in Southern Cali, in the Inland Empire, will have an effect on what rights I have up here in San Francisco.  It's hardly fair.  Denying rights to others because you don't agree with them is most UNAMERICAN.

              What's next in line?  Whose rights are next on the chopping block?

              Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (October 31, 2008 11:22 am ET)
                 

              As much respect I have for Obama, I don't look favorably upon any politician who steers clear of issues because they are politically unpopular, or controversial, especially when they are the right thing to do - as is urging people to vote No on this proposition. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Max Credits (October 31, 2008 11:35 am ET)
                   

                Obama and Biden are against gay marriage.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by commonsenseliberal (October 31, 2008 12:02 pm ET)
                     

                  And they can be against gay marriage all they want.  However, they shouldn't support amendments to state constitutions which ban rights for a certain class of people.  A constitution, whether it be state or federal, should never be used against the citizenry, or be used to deny rights to some, but allow rights for others.

                  Period.

                  If you/they do, you're/they're UNAMERICAN.  See, we on the Left can call Righties unamerican too!  The difference is, Lefties are usually correct.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by commonsenseliberal (October 31, 2008 12:07 pm ET)
                       

                    And let me clarify my comment above, just a bit:

                    I believe that Obama and Biden are anti-gay marriage because it's in the best interest of their political aspirations.  Right now, many in the nation dislike the idea of 'two fags getting married'.  It's popular to hold that belief, especially among those who live in bible-thumping states.  They gotta get the vote.

                    Now, if you were to ask Obama and Biden, both of whom are lawyers, I'm sure they would agree that banning same-sex marriage and legalizing marriage between one man and one woman only, does indeed violate the constitution of the State of California - and I would venture to guess, the Constitution of the United States.

                    When slavery was banned, many still held onto the belief that slaves were equivalent to 3/5 of a white man.  The slaves were freed anyway - and the world didn't come to an end.

                    Gay marriage has been legal in California since June.  California is still alive and well!  I guess that conservative, right-wing G-d the Righties cling to isn't so upset with the notion.

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Max Credits (October 31, 2008 12:26 pm ET)
                       

                    I'm not un-American for pointing out what Obama and Biden have said about gay marriage.  You don't have to be a jerk.

                    Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (October 30, 2008 5:16 pm ET)
           

        Also, if Khalidi was such a "radical", why is he still in the US? Why is he still teaching? I mean, the man must be SOOO dangerous that he could bring down a presidential campaign, but it's OK for him to teach our kids in college?

        Yeah, he must be really super bad.

        Either that, or he dared to speak out about what Israel does to his people. Imagine that. Sticking up for your people.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (October 31, 2008 7:45 am ET)
             

          The funny thing about all of this is that McInsane and Flailin have been vilifying this guy all week but Johnboy has sent more than $400,000 his way.

          Another really strange thing is that Rashid Khalidi was born right here, in NYC, in the good ol' USA, while John Sidney was born in the Panama Canal Zone.

          But then again, the Republicans don't think that New York is part of the American America anymore.

          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.