About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Wash. Times reported on Obama's "association" with Khalidi, but not McCain's

October 31, 2008 7:49 pm ET

SUMMARY: A Washington Times article stated that Sen. John McCain "drew fresh attention this week to Mr. [Barack] Obama's friendship with Rashid Khalidi" regarding "a 2003 party in Chicago honoring Mr. Khalidi where Mr. Obama gives a speech." But it did not note McCain's own reported "connection to Khalidi": His role as chairman of an organization that awarded a $448,873 grant to an organization Khalidi co-founded.

12 Comments

In an October 31 Washington Times article, in which he asserted that "the politics of association has been the preferred tool of attack" in this campaign, Capitol Hill correspondent S.A. Miller wrote that Sen. John McCain "drew fresh attention this week to Mr. [Barack] Obama's friendship with Rashid Khalidi." Miller added that McCain "called for the Los Angeles Times to release a videotape it has of a 2003 party in Chicago honoring Mr. Khalidi where Mr. Obama gives a speech." However, in the article, which purported to discuss the candidates' "association[s]," The Washington Times did not note what ABC News senior national correspondent Jake Tapper described in an October 29 blog post as McCain's "own connection to Khalidi."

As Media Matters for America has noted, Tapper documented that while McCain served as chairman of the International Republican Institute (a position he still holds), the IRI provided "$448,873 in 1998" to the Center for Palestine Research and Studies, which Khalidi co-founded. Tapper noted in an October 29 update to his post that while the "IRI said a grant made to the CPRS in 1999 was later 'de-obligated,' ... [t]he 1998 payment of $448,873 is NOT in dispute." In a subsequent post published October 29, Tapper reported that the IRI released a statement that day "confirming that it gave money to Khalidi's group ... and also trying to distance the organization from Khalidi himself." Additionally, The Huffington Post's Seth Colter Walls reported on October 28 on McCain's chairmanship of the IRI and its funding of Khalidi's organization, as did The Washington Post in an October 30 article.

From Tapper's updated October 29 blog post:

But McCain has his own connection to Khalidi.

In 1993, McCain became chairman of the International Republican Institute. He still chairs that respected organization.

That same year, Khalidi helped found the Center for Palestine Research and Studies, self-described as "an independent academic research and policy analysis institution" created to meet "the need for active Palestinian scholarship on issues related to Palestine." (Its archived website is HERE.)

Khalidi was on the board of trustees through 1999.

According to tax returns, the McCain-chaired IRI funded the organization Khalidi founded and served on to the tune of $448,873 in 1998 (click HERE to see the tax return)* as first reported by Seth Couter [sic] Walls at HuffPo.

The IRI continued to give money to the CPRS after Khalidi left the group as well.

[...]

This post has been updated after the IRI said a grant made to the CPRS in 1999 was later "de-obligated." A spokeswoman for the IRI says the organization is going over its books to get further clarification of the funds it gave the organization. The 1998 payment of $448,873 is NOT in dispute. When IRI gets back to us, we will share the information with you.

From Colter Walls' October 28 Huffington Post report:

In regards to Khalidi, however, the guilt-by-association game burns John McCain as well.

During the 1990s, while he served as chairman of the International Republican Institute (IRI), McCain distributed several grants to the Palestinian research center co-founded by Khalidi, including one worth half a million dollars.

A 1998 tax filing for the McCain-led group shows a $448,873 grant to Khalidi's Center for Palestine Research and Studies for work in the West Bank. (See grant number 5180, "West Bank: CPRS" on page 14 of this PDF.)

The relationship extends back as far as 1993, when John McCain joined IRI as chairman in January. Foreign Affairs noted in September of that year that IRI had helped fund several extensive studies in Palestine run by Khalidi's group, including over 30 public opinion polls and a study of "sociopolitical attitudes."

Of course, there's seemingly nothing objectionable with McCain's organization helping a Palestinian group conduct research in the West Bank or Gaza. But it does suggest that McCain could have some of his own explaining to do as he tries to make hay out of Khalidi's ties to Obama.

From The Washington Post's October 30 article, "McCain Again Points to Obama's Associates":

Hari Sevugan, a spokesman for Obama, called the issue "just another recycled, manufactured controversy" and rejected the implication that Obama should be tarnished by his association with Khalidi.

"Barack Obama has been clear and consistent on his support for Israel, and has been clear that Rashid Khalidi is not an adviser to him or his campaign and that he does not share Khalidi's views," Sevugan said. He noted that a nonprofit group that McCain chaired once helped fund a polling organization founded by Khalidi.

The International Republican Institute, which McCain has chaired since 1993, awarded a grant of $448,873 in 1998 to the Center for Palestine Research and Studies, which was co-founded by Khalidi, according to IRI documents.

From The Washington Times' October 31 article, "Candidates attack political associations":

Mr. McCain drew fresh attention this week to Mr. Obama's friendship with Rashid Khalidi, a Palestinian university professor who has condemned Israel and has been accused of being a Palestine Liberation Organization spokesman and an apologist for its terrorism. He called for the Los Angeles Times to release a videotape it has of a 2003 party in Chicago honoring Mr. Khalidi where Mr. Obama gives a speech.

The newspaper published an article in April about Mr. Obama attending the party and cited the videotape as corroborating the story. Editors refused to disseminate the videotape, saying it was provided by a confidential source on the condition that it not be released.

"Now why that should not be made public is beyond me," Mr. McCain said in a radio interview in Miami. "I guarantee you if there was a tape with me and [Republican vice-presidential nominee] Sarah Palin and some neo-Nazi ... you think that tape wouldn't be made public? Of course, Americans need to know, particularly about [William] Ayers, also about the PLO. ... It's really unfortunate that we have to go through this."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by ukobserver (October 31, 2008 9:14 pm ET)
         

      To use the conservative logic process:

      Obama has links to Ayers.

      Ayers has links to Khalidi through donations.

       Khalidi has links to McCain through donations.

       MCCAIN PALS AROUND WITH TERRORISTS!!!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (November 01, 2008 1:00 am ET)
         

      McCain cried about those terrible people who would go after him and the Princess if they were on tape with a Neo-Nazi. Sen. McCain, you were on with Seannie the Sissy who loves to have those people on his show and G. Gordon Libby who is one of them.

      The excuses are really starting to fly around for the upcoming demise of the Conservative wing of the Republican party. The blame has been placed on the media, the monies that Obama had, the economy etc. etc. but one little group has been ignored..CONSERVATIVE TALK RADIO and FOX NEWS. This bunch of haters have turned off many of the real Republicans. They have voted against the hate these people put forth. Rush, Seannie the Sissy, O'Reilly, Coulter, my good verminista friend Savage, Cunningham along with the pride of Pittsburgh, Quinny and Radio Rosie have turned the country blue. They should all be rounded up and given thier own radio station and TV station and they can keep spreading the word of hate concerning Obama and those nasty libruls. Anyone who wants to listen can just turn on the WeH8 channel anytime they like. Then, no voices are silenced and they can begin to maul one another because there are only 24 hours of programming a day.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (November 01, 2008 8:07 pm ET)
           

        If Mr McCain had in fact been a senior statesman rather than the chosen path of character assassination he allowed himself and others to embark on, perhaps the opinion of newspaper writers would have been different and even positive in the bigger scheme of serving the nation, militarily and political arena.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (November 01, 2008 1:28 am ET)
         

      Well, I am SHOCKED that Obama would no longer allow the Wash Times on the official campaign plane! I just cannot understand why that would be ...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (November 01, 2008 8:51 pm ET)
         

      mccain is running an ad asking would you get on a plane with a pilot who had never flown, a surgeon who never operated?   conversely, would you vote for someone who had the most important decision a candidate can make, to chose a vice presidential candidate and possible president, and picked someone totally and completely unqualified for the job, based on a three hour conversation?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (November 02, 2008 2:01 am ET)
         

      I certainly would not want to be on a plane he is flying...YIKES. Someone is throwing this election away.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pkbw498 (November 03, 2008 7:05 am ET)
         

      So both Obama and McCain had associations with this Khalidi and his group. So what? How does that affect my life? Is that going to help me pay my mortgage, buy groceries or make that car payment? Please people, let's talk about something important, OK. Enough already!!!!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (November 03, 2008 1:17 pm ET)
           

        That's the point. It doesn't affect us one way or another, or at all. If this Khalidi guy was so dangerous, and so radical, how come he's still in this country teaching as an esteemed professor at a well respected school?

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.