CNN failed to note Dole "Godless" ad's voiceover controversy
SUMMARY: CNN anchor Kyra Phillips presented a report by correspondent Joe Johns on an ad in which Sen. Elizabeth Dole accused Democratic opponent Kay Hagan of taking money from "a leader of the Godless America PAC" at "a secret fundraiser" and that included a woman's voice saying, "There is no God," while a picture of Hagan appeared onscreen. But while Johns and Phillips noted that Hagan has indicated an intention to file a defamation lawsuit, they did not note that in accusing Dole of defamation, Hagan cites the ad's false suggestion that the voice is Hagan's.
A November 3 CNN Newsroom report on Sen. Elizabeth Dole's (R-NC) "Godless" ad, in which Dole accused Democratic opponent Kay Hagan of taking money from "a leader of the Godless America PAC" at "a secret fundraiser," failed to present the part of the ad that included a woman's voice saying, "There is no God" while a picture of Hagan appeared onscreen. A Raleigh, North Carolina, News & Observer fact check stated that the ad may lead viewers to believe "that the unidentified female voice at the end of the ad is Hagan's."
While anchor Kyra Phillips and CNN correspondent Joe Johns noted that Hagan was filing a defamation lawsuit over the ad, neither reported that in her notice of intent to sue, Hagan asserted: "The voiceover, clearly presented to appear to be Plaintiff's [Hagan's], was an intentional attempt by Defendants [Dole and her election committee] to deceive the citizens of North Carolina and malign the Plaintiff and subject her to contempt. Plaintiff has never made such a statement. Despite knowing this, Defendants purposely made it appear that she did."
By contrast, several media outlets reporting on Dole's ad and Hagen's suit mentioned that the ad included an unidentified woman saying, "There is no God," while Hagan's picture is onscreen.
From the 1 p.m. ET hour of the November 3 edition of CNN Newsroom:
[begin video clip]
JOHNS: It's been called despicable, a sign of desperation.
ANNOUNCER [video clip]: A leader of the Godless Americans PAC recently held a secret fundraiser in Kay Hagan's honor.
JOHNS: With time running out in her tough re-election bid, Republican Senator Elizabeth Dole went up with a sledgehammer of a television ad against her Democratic opponent, Kay Hagan, an ad tailor-made to put religious conservatives, always a force in North Carolina, on red alert.
ANNOUNCER [video clip]: Godless Americans and Kay Hagan. She hid from cameras, took godless money. What did Hagan promise in return?
JOHNS: Hagan is screaming foul and says she is filing a lawsuit, claiming damage to her reputation.
HAGAN: I don't have a relationship with this group. I've never even heard of it until Elizabeth Dole put a press release out about it. Never heard of it.
JOHNS: So what's the truth of it? Keeping them honest, let's start with the facts. It's true that Hagan attended a fundraiser on her behalf, at the Boston home of a guy named Woody Kaplan, who is a member of the board of advisers of a group called the Godless Americans Political Action Committee. But the fundraiser was not sponsored by the Godless Americans PAC. Rather, it was sponsored by Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, and something called the Secure our Senate Majority Host Committee. According to Hagan's disclosure forms, Kaplan, in his own name, has donated a total of $2,300. Hagan says she has received no money from the Godless Americans PAC itself. Her campaign says the fundraiser was not secret, and she wasn't hiding from the camera. OK, so the ad stretches the facts a little, but is it despicable?
STUART ROTHENBERG [Rothenberg Political Report]: I think this is actually standard political theatre.
JOHNS: And there's a money trail.
ROTHENBERG: You go to a fundraiser, take a check, you're going to have to answer for that. Doesn't mean she can't answer, but it's not such a crazy issue to bring up for the Republicans.
JOHNS: Hagan has come out strong. She and others see a larger problem with the ad. It implies she's anti-Christian, even though she says she's a Sunday school teacher and an elder in the Presbyterian Church.
HAGAN: I want people to know who I am. I am a strong Christian and I believe in my faith. And I am appalled that Elizabeth Dole would stoop this low.
JOHNS: Democrats have a lot riding on this race. Getting to a filibuster-proof majority could depend on it.
ROTHENBERG: Senator Dole's state is crucial because she's one of the nine seats that the Democrats need to get 60. If they can take her out, they still have a chance to get to 60. If she wins, it's an awful hard fight for them.
[end video clip]
PHILLIPS: Well, Hagan is now suing Dole for defamation and libel. Joining me from Chicago with his insight on this nasty Senate battle, CNN political contributor David Brody. It always gets nasty in politics. He's also the Christian Broadcasting Network senior national correspondent. So I'm curious, what do you think of the ad - Dole's ad?
BRODY: Well, I mean, I think by all accounts, most people would say it's pretty over the top. I mean, look, anytime you start to, you know, in essence condemn someone else's, you know, faith walk, if you will, I mean, then you're going into real dangerous and uncharted territory. You know, I have to say, Kyra, it reminds me a little bit, though, of the broader issue going on in this country between Democrats and Republicans and the faith issue. Because Democrats have been trying for a long time to kind of break down that wall that separated them a little bit on the faith issue between them and voters, their party and voters. But now, all of a sudden, Republicans are a little bit on the defensive when it comes to faith, because the Democrats have obviously made inroads in this area, especially in the South, running a lot of pro-life Democrats and a lot of pro-faith Democrats, if you will. And that has put the Republicans back on their heels quite a bit, Kyra.
PHILLIPS: All right. So at the end of the day, how important is religion to a person's vote?
BRODY: Well, I think it's very important. I mean, if you look at surveys across this country, you can look at 75, 80 percent of folks talk about their belief in God, but I think it goes beyond that, Kyra. I think what we're talking about here is this emotional connection, you know, if you will, between a candidate and voters. What do I mean by that? What I'm saying here is that, you know, when you talk about faith, when you talk about God and values, you really are able to connect with voters at that emotional level. Because, let's face it, most folks, though policy is important, they do have to have this emotional connection with the candidate. Look at what's happening with Barack Obama and what he's been able to do with his faith outreach team. That has really helped him a lot in the last year or so.















Polls show Dole's phony voiceover is backlashing. But Let's talk about something more important. 1st, why are you reichpublikkkans into putting mutilated animals on the doorsteps of Democrats?
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Severed_goat_head_left_outside_Dem_1103.html
And 2nd, why are you sick f&cks actually trying to file complaints about Obama visiting his dying grandma - who died today, BTW? You are some really sick f&cks, you know that, don't you?
As a relatively Godless person myself, I will take additional schadenfreude in the resounding defeat of a person who operates on the premise that lack of religiosity is some kind of character flaw.
I hope Dole gets embarrassed tonight.
I think this goes back to a fundamental difference between Liberals and Conservatives, and it also helps explain the Troglodyte hysteria over Bill Ayers. It seems that Liberals are willing to work with and be around people with whom they disagree, and Conservatives are less inclined to tolerate those with opposing views. Maybe it's a by-product of their tendency toward black and white thinking.
Apparently, Dole's opponent is also very religious, but was willing to meet with atheists who supported her politics. This is no big deal to a Liberal, but Conservatives, I guess, are afraid that atheist cooties will rub off on them. Likewise, they don't understand how Obama could have been in the same room with Ayers and not be overcome with Sixties Radical Terrorist Cooties.
"It seems that Liberals are willing to work with and be around people with whom they disagree, and Conservatives are less inclined to tolerate those with opposing views. Maybe it's a by-product of their tendency toward black and white thinking." - Nerzog
It's interesting to note that it's usually the Republicans who are screaming that the Left is intolerant to other points of view. Project much, Righties?
Conservatives like to play word games. If we object to their plastering the Ten Commandments on Government buildings, they call us "intolerant". If we defend the gay community against their attempts to codify anti-gay bigotry, they call us "intolerant".
I guess it goes back to the Civil War, when the South accused the North of being "intolerant" toward their peculiar institution.
God, speaking of ads, can you reichpublikkkans actually hire a spell checker?
Now don't be trying to make a virtue out of proper spelling.
It takes a Virtuous Vulture to pull that off.
80P
What a horrible monster! Obama doesn't think selfishness is a virtue?
Just kidding. I don't think most Republicans are as selfish as they are stupid. They just think they're going to get trickled down on. It's like they take pride in being ignorant. Who said that?
Molly Ivins came close in a description of shrub, which I'm probably mangling. "Not stupid, but willfully ignorant." Is he setting the standard...again?
I'm volunteering some time for the campaign tomorrow, wonder if I'll meet a few of the willfully ignorant?
"They just think they're going to get trickled down on." - The Col.
Repubs don't like gay folks, but they sure are into watersports!
Is this ad targeted at old Ayn Rand fans?
That lady is rolling in her grave everytime one of these corrupt Republican jerks talks about her ideals as if they followed them.
I've had CSPAN on tonight, and caught most of the speeches by all 4 candidates, and I am seriously having trouble understanding those voting for McCain/Palin, regardless of their core political principles.In past elections, as much as I disagreed with people voting differently, I at least understood their positions. Grampy & Palin both seem straight-out insane.
Here are some things you must believe if you're voting GOP tomorrow;
Wealth will be created and enjoyed by the average American by following the same failed supply-side plan that's resulted in greater concentration of wealth towards a tiny minority.
Barack Obama has, as a key part of his platform, bankrupting the coal industry.
Joe the "Plumber" was just standing in his driveway, minding his own business (his imaginary business) when a presidential candidate wandered by.
An elderly senator who has been in D.C. for three decades and almost invariably voted with the current administration , along with his dim-witted show poodle sidekick, who doesn't understand the job she's applying for, nor the Constitution, are going to change/ shake up Washington.
Please feel free to add to my list. And if you know any young people who might decide to slack off & forget to vote tomorrow, give 'em a bang on the ear.
A bimbo who socialized the oil industry in her state has issues with socializing health care, and a worn out geezer who gave away military secrets to the viet cong because they twisted his little pinky and then got a medal for saying "owie" thinks he's more american than other soldiers who went through far worse torture and never said anything to their captors, but got no medal because their daddy wasn't a high ranking officer in the navy.
Wooo Hooo!!!
The Steelers (owned by the Obama supporting Rooney's) defeat The Redskins at FedEx Field. Twice the fun for me since 1) I'm a Steeler fan and 2) the whole Redskins losing at home means the incumbent loses thingy.....(except in 2004 when the Packers beat the Skins and Kerry still lost...or did he?)
Any hoo, apologies for dragging this waaaaay OT. I've had a wee-bit too much Guinness.....
Wooo Hooo!!!
The Steelers (owned by the Obama supporting Rooney's) defeat The Redskins at FedEx Field. Twice the fun for me since 1) I'm a Steeler fan and 2) the whole Redskins losing at home means the incumbent loses thingy.....(except in 2004 when the Packers beat the Skins and Kerry still lost...or did he?)
Any hoo, apologies for dragging this waaaaay OT. I've had a wee-bit too much Guinness.....
I heard part of Jeff Christie's radio pukefest yesterday, and he said that when the Redskins win their last game before a presidential election, the incumbent party stays in power. And since they lost last night, that almost guarantees an Obama win today!!!!!
WOO-HOO!!!!
"I've had a wee-bit too much Guinness....." - Knowlies
At least you've got good taste... :)
They had to pull big Ben out of the lineup, didn't they? They had to ignore H. Ward all night long, didn't they? I just needed 5 points to beat my opponent, 5 simple little ol' measly points, and the steelers couldn't come through for me in fantasy football. Dang them...
Hehe- Snoop, I have Hines Ward as well. That near-TD would have won me the matchup, instead I lost by 2.
I forgot this, from the list of Things We Must Believe--
Our military is operating on a shoestring budget
Another from the list of Things We Must Believe--
Sean Hannity is a Great American.
Democrats created the current economic mess by forcing banks to give mortgages to poor people.
When the president does it, it's not illegal.
Ted Stevens was acquitted.
Larry Craig can achieve a "wide stance" with his pants down around his ankles.
Barack Obama - who attended an anti-American Christian Church for 20 years as a Muslim mole, thinks that announcing he wants to bankrupt the coal industry is a good campaign tactic, has a wife who proudly advertises that she hates America, and overtly pals around with former domestic terrorists in charitable organizations - got to be a U.S. Senator by hiding something from us.
Alzo the best medical system in the world!
Trade with Cuba is wrong because the country is communist, but trade with China and Vietnam is vital to a spirit of international harmony.
The United States should get out of the United Nations, and our highest national priority is enforcing UN resolutions against Iraq.
A woman can't be trusted with decisions about her own body, but multinational corporations can make decisions affecting all mankind without regulation.
The best way to improve military morale is to praise the troops in speeches while slashing veterans' benefits and combat pay.
If you don't teach them about contraception, teenagers won't have sex.
A good way to fight terrorism is to belittle our longtime allies, then demand their cooperation and money.
Providing health care to all Iraqis is sound policy. Providing health care to all Americans is socialism.
HMOs and insurance companies have the best interests of the public at heart.
Global warming and tobacco's link to cancer are junk science, but creationism should be taught in schools.
A president lying to enlist support for a war in which thousands die is solid defense policy.
Government should limit itself to the powers named in the Constitution, which include banning gay marriages and censoring the Internet.
Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a conservative radio host. Then it's an illness, and you need our prayers for your recovery.
You support states' rights, which means Attorney General John Ashcroft can tell states what local voter initiatives they have the right to adopt.
Hey, I said "add to" my list, not "totally blow the doors off of it"! Well played, Sir!
Well... I did mean to delete the last one! :)
That list may be familiar to some of you, who probably got a longer version of it in your in-boxes back in 2004. I deleted a few that clearly only applied to the Bush/Kerry race, but somehow I missed the one on Ashcroft.
It's sad though, to see how many still apply, and how many people still believe them.
Corporations giving millions of dollars to bribe members of Congress is "Free Speech", but a fleeting glimpse of Janet Jackson's boob on the TeeVee threatens the fabric of society.
Two gays marrying to solidify their ongling relationship destroys the "sanctity of marriage", where Brittney Spears' 23-minute marriage, Pamela Anderson's and J. Lo's multiple marriages, and wedding ceremonies for dogs and cats do not.
Or...notable legislators divorcing their sick wives to marry younger women promotes "family values".
As far as I know, every single ad in the media is created using software. I can't think of any program that doesn't include spell checking.
So why do so many typos get aired and printed? Maybe to show the Joe the Dumber crowd that fancy book learning isn't something to be proud of, but something for the "normal" conservative types to ridicule.
Maybe Obama actually said "virture"?
No, it's meant to convince the morans that the mavrick ticket isn't elitist.
Hate to nitpick, Neon, but it's "elitest".
Sure it's eliteist if you approve of the status quo.
Neon's just gone mavrick with his speliin'.
You mean "Mavrik". I wish I could work in "hipocracy" somehow.
HA! A liberal wishing he could work? That's funnier then there mispelling errors. Face it, us libs are a bunch of loosers and hipocrits.
your right.
Gillty as charged.
Shouldn't that be "most elitest"?
It's the onliest way i've ever saw it.
You may have a point, but I think of it in a more Darwinian way. Our literary environment has changed, and we have devolved along with it. Those spell checkers have made us not only lazy, but also largley unbale to sepll. We rely two mush no computers too witch four are errs.
Sorry Colonel but I have been hypnotized by Seanniethe siisy and Rush...I will do thier bidding today when I go to the polls to vote. I promise to NOT vote for:
The above post was spell checked by one of Palins' kids..the seven year old.
The above post was spell checked by one of Palins' kids..the seven year old.
Who knows more about what the vice-president does than her mother.....
Elizabeth Dole should be ashamed of herself and she should join her husband in retirement after tonight.
She will be retiring on January 3, 2009 - after her replacement is sworn in.....
I thought it was proven that MMFA was created by Hillary Clinton and funded by George Soros for the sole purpose of electing her as President. If she doesn't win today, will MMFA disappear?
I thought it was proven that MMFA was created by Hillary Clinton and funded by George Soros for the sole purpose of electing her as President. If she doesn't win today, will MMFA disappear?
I though it was created for the sole purpose of raising M. Rotten Levin's blood pressure. I heard part of his screamfest last night, and I though he was getting close to having a stroke on the air....
The entire Screechmonkey tribe is nearing a mass apoplectic conniption. If the polls are correct, they are about to find themselves on the porch again.
The real tragedy is that they've convinced their gullible sycophants that Obama will raise ALL taxes, take away their guns and outlaw the Bible. I actually heard one of their callers this morning say that she couldn't vote for Obama because she believed in freedom. WTF? How do people that stupid survive to adulthood?
Nerzog, I've been listening to a lot of the call-in segments on CSPAN lately, usually early morning or late night, and they're pretty entertaining. There seems to be less screening than talk radio, the hosts remain neutral, occasionally asking follow-up questions. They alternate between the phone line for supporters of different candidates, so you get a good mix. I'll admit, I've heard some pretty dopey sounding Obama supporters, but the Mccain call put them to shame.
Last night, I heard one caller say he was voting for Gramps FOR ONE REASON;Michelle Obama said she didn't feel like a part of this country. The caller advised her to move to another country.
So remember, when you vote today, your vote may be cancelled out by somebody who is voting against Obama because of something his wife never said.
Hopefully, he'll get lost on the way to the polls.
I've heard several Talk Radio Troglodytes express the opinion that God would determine today's winner. Does that mean that they won't kvetch if Obama wins? OF COURSE NOT! They will subsequently receive a revelation that, at the last minute, SATAN tricked God (he does that a lot, apparently) and flipped the vote.
Satan was stumping in Nevada this weekend, but never made it out of Vegas. Not sure exactly what delayed his departure, but there may be a clue in the fact that Sarah Palin, among others, can get her soul back by presenting a picture ID and an undisclosed amount of cash at the Bellagio cashier window.

BLACK MAN ELECTED TO LEAD US OUT OF THE DARK AGESMaybe Stuart Rothenberg should get the crib notes to Article 6 Section III of the US Constitution:
"no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."
But for good ol' Stu and the beltway idiots, unconstitutional attacks are just part of the game.
Christian-fascists.
It doesn't have anything to do with the Constitution, really. The religious test refers to something established by the government. Obviously it would be impossible for anyone to enforce a law based on the motivation of the individual voters. It's basically impossible for an atheist to run for President, but that concept doesn't violate anything legally, there's no court-based cure for that.
Of course, religion has nothing to do with governance, so voting on it is ridiculous. And the attacks on Hagan were ludicrous and shameful, and I was thrilled to see Dole go down in flames. She richly deserved it.