About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Morris, Hannity, Limbaugh implicate Obama in stock-market decline -- analysts disagree

November 07, 2008 7:09 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Conservative commentators have asserted that President-elect Barack Obama is to blame for the decline of the stock market since the election. But several analysts disagree, citing weak corporate reports and the release of unemployment statistics.

46 Comments

On November 6, Fox News contributor and syndicated columnist Dick Morris, Fox News host Sean Hannity, and nationally syndicated radio host Rush Limbaugh asserted that President-elect Barack Obama is to blame for the decline of the stock market following the November 4 presidential election. Several analysts, however, disagree -- including some who appeared on Fox News or Fox Business Network.

On the November 6 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, Morris said, "Now, the other thing that I predicted in Fleeced is that the stock market would go crazy after he [Obama] was elected. Not just because he's a radical, not just because he's a Democrat, but because he's going to raise the capital gains tax." Hannity replied, "So look what's happening," adding, "If he doesn't come out and say "I'm not going to, you know, raise the capital gains tax, I'm not going to raise taxes," but heading into an economic slowdown, you're predicting the stock market is going to -- it's the Obama tanking?" Morris replied: "It's going to continue to tank. It's lost 12 percent of its value in the last two days."

Similarly, on the November 6 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show, Limbaugh asserted: "OK, so let me start at the top here connecting the dots. On Tuesday we elect a new president. New president promised even before the election, by the way, when we had a 4,000-point drop -- the president promised to increase corporate taxes, capital gains taxes, the top marginal income tax rate, a massive new energy tax that'll bankrupt coal. And his party is talking about a government takeover of 401(k) plans." Limbaugh continued: "So on Wednesday, the Dow drops about 486 points. It's down 346 points today. But of course, according to the drive-bys, these two events have nothing to do with each other. It's just a coincidence. The market's down today because of the jobless numbers. That's how the drive-bys see it. We have the largest market plunge after an election in history. Thank you, man-child Barack Obama."

But even analysts on Fox News and Fox Business Network cited reasons independent of the election to explain the fall of the market in the days following the election.

  • On the November 5 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk, Fox Business Network contributor Eric Bolling stated: "Yesterday we were up 305 points, today we're down 315 -- almost the exact same spot we were prior. Look, you know, a lot of people said, 'Hey, is this in response to Barack Obama becoming president?' " Bolling continued: "When Barack Obama was announced at 11:01 last night, the S&P [Standard & Poor's 500 Index] was down 8 points. It stayed there all night until that ADP [National Employment] Report came out, and that's really when the market fell apart. So you can't really blame it on that. It was the ADP report." Host Martha MacCallum responded: "Plus, it was factored into the market yesterday that Barack Obama was gonna win because it was pointing in that direction. And the market was up considerably yesterday."
  • On the November 7 edition of Fox Business Network's The Opening Bell, Fox Business Network vice president of business news Alexis Glick asserted: "I so did not believe that the market reaction over the past two days was about Obama. Wednesday morning we walked in, we saw the Challenger and Gray [planned layoff] numbers, we saw the ADP numbers, the weekly jobless claim numbers -- yeah, well, they were basically in line, but we knew two days ago that this was going to be a bloody number. Frankly, we probably knew several months ago that it was going to be a bloody number."
  • On the November 6 edition of Fox Business Network's America's Nightly Scorecard, Inc. magazine senior editor Rod Kurtz said to host David Asman: "[Y]ou could say a lot of people are walking around saying they have Obama hangovers because they were out celebrating, but I think what happened in the markets really is more tied to the broader economy and less so with Obama. I think, you know, the fundamentals we've heard so much about the economy during the election. You know, this jobs report could be problematic. I think that unemployment is still an issue. Retail, I've been saying for a while, is a huge issue."

Further, a November 7 Wall Street Journal article pointed to weak corporate reports and analysts' belief that the Bureau of Labor Statistics' October Employment Report -- which was released Friday -- would show job losses as reasons for drops in the stock market. (Indeed, the BLS report showed that nonfarm payrolls fell by 240,000.) From the Journal article (subscription required):

Stocks suffered a second straight round of steep losses amid new signs that bellwether companies and their customers are struggling. Jittery investors also placed early bets that jobs data due out Friday morning will be bleak.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished down 443.48 points on Thursday, off 4.9%, at 8695.79, hurt by declines in all 30 of its components. The Dow has fallen 929.49 points, or 9.66%, over the past two days, the biggest percentage drop since the crash of October 1987.

[...]

The generally downbeat trend in the retail industry was worrisome, as was the possibility that strength at discounters like Wal-Mart may signal that consumers are continuing to tighten their belts, hunting for bargains and spending less at chains with higher prices.

Considering that consumer activity constitutes more than two-thirds of the overall U.S. economy, continued weakness in purchases of everything from televisions to t-shirts could deepen the recession that most economists believe is already underway. Many stock investors have lingered on the sidelines lately, waiting for more clarity about whether things will get much worse.

"There's just not a lot of buying power out there right now, so any bad news we get is going to tend to get the market moving lower," said Daniel Genter, president and chief investment officer of RNC Genter, a Los Angeles money-management firm.

Volume at the New York Stock Exchange was slightly below the year-to-date average. Decliners outnumbered advancers nearly five to one.

Traders said it appeared some participants were placing early bets to brace for a worse-than-expected jobs report when the government issues its monthly assessment prior to Friday's opening bell. According to Dow Jones Newswires, the consensus estimate on Wall Street is that the report will show that nonfarm payrolls shed 200,000 jobs in October, marking the 10th straight month of declines.

"It really looks like people are worried," said Randy Frederick, director of derivatives trading at Charles Scwhab [sic: Schwab]. "I can't see a lot of other reasons for the losses over the last few days to be so deep."

A November 7 New York Times article also reported that analysts attributed the market downturn to the expectation that the BLS report would show a decrease in jobs:

Analysts said that the markets had skidded Wednesday and Thursday as investors hunkered down for the release of the jobs report. They attributed Friday's rebound to unemployment numbers that, while grim, were not cataclysmic, and said buyers were creeping back into the markets.

From the November 5 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk:

MacCALLUM: The Dow is down today about 312 points. And Fox News business expert Eric Bolling is here -- entrée --

BOLLING: Thank you.

MacCALLUM: -- to explain what's going on. What's the reaction?

BOLLING: You know, it's strange. Yesterday we were up 305 points, today we're down 315 -- almost the exact same spot we were prior. Look, you know, a lot of people said, "Hey, is this in response to Barack Obama becoming president?" I'm going to throw this up here -- these guys don't know what I'm doing. I'm sorry, guys. Take a look at this, though: When Barack Obama was announced at 11:01 last night, the S&P was down 8 points. It stayed there all night until that ADP Report came out, and that's really when the market fell apart. So you can't really blame it on that. It was the ADP report.

MacCALLUM: Plus, it was factored into the market yesterday that Barack Obama was gonna win because it was pointing in that direction. And the market was up considerably yesterday.

From the November 7 edition of The Opening Bell on Fox Business:

GLICK (anchor): All right, Jenna, what do you make of the numbers?

JENNA LEE (anchor): Well, I mean, it's interesting to watch the reaction over here, Alexis, because again, when the numbers hit, it wasn't really much of a reaction, and now we're seeing again the kind of selling picking up. The big question is, we talk about auto loans, we talk about mortgage rates, we're talking right now over here about banks actually dropping those rates to the consumers -- it doesn't matter if you don't have a job. I mean, it really all comes back to that. No matter how much you drop those rates, if you don't have employment, you're not going to ask for a mortgage, you're not looking for a new credit card -- or maybe you are. But again, it's those rates. It really all comes back to jobs, so again, you know, not necessarily way bigger than expected, but not good news.

GLICK: Yeah. Connell?

CONNELL McSHANE (FBN correspondent): Jenna's right. This is the story for next year, how high the unemployment rate goes, and how many jobs we shed. I mean, this is a terrible report. I mean, it's getting lost a little bit in the -- we're going to get caught up in the market reaction. The market reacted before the report. We're down 1,000 in two days heading into this because people expect a bad report and we got it this morning, so I don't know what's next.

GLICK: I couldn't agree more -- I couldn't agree more. I so did not believe that the market reaction over the past two days was about Obama. Wednesday morning we walked in, we saw the Challenger and Gray [planned layoff] numbers, we saw the ADP numbers, the weekly jobless claim numbers -- yeah, well, they were basically in line, but we knew two days ago that this was going to be a bloody number. Frankly, we probably knew several months ago that it was going to be a bloody number.

McSHANE: Yeah. It was.

GLICK: All right, guys, we're going to continue talking about it throughout the hour. The opening bell is going to ring in 16 and a half minutes. We're going to go straight to the trading floor, we'll get their reaction to this morning's numbers.

From the November 6 edition of Fox Business Network's America's Nightly Scorecard:

ASMAN: Rod, what do you think the entrepreneurs of this country would like Obama to say, to reassure them they're going to have a business environment they can work in and profit in?

KURTZ: Well, there's no doubt the tax issue remains front and center for a lot of business owners, even if it doesn't necessarily affect their business. That's been the fascinating thing; I think the McCain campaign -- it was brilliant politics -- the "Joe the plumber," the "spread the wealth." There are a lot of businesses out there concerned about Obama's tax plan that aren't gonna be affected by what he's proposing. But, you know, one of the interesting things -- we sort of did a news analysis the day after the election, and a lot of entrepreneurs out there were saying, "Look, we're still sort of mixed on this, but we're glad we finally have a result. We're glad we know it's him." It gets that uncertainty out, because you at least you know where he stands --

ASMAN: Well, there were two bits of uncertainty. First, the uncertainty as to whether he would be president, and the market went down with that uncertainty. Then the markets sort of factored that in and said, "OK, he is going to be president, we can live with him." But now it's the uncertainty of what he's going to do.

KURTZ: Well, I think, you know, you could say a lot of people are walking around saying they have Obama hangovers because they were out celebrating, but I think what happened in the markets really is more tied to the broader economy and less so with Obama. I think, you know, the fundamentals we've heard so much about the economy during the election. You know, this jobs report could be problematic. I think that unemployment is still an issue. Retail, I've been saying for a while, is a huge issue.

ASMAN: All right.

From the November 6 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes:

MORRIS: Now, the other thing that I predicted in Fleeced is that the stock market would go crazy after he was elected. Not just because he's a radical, not just because he's a Democrat, but because he's going to raise the capital gains tax.

HANNITY: So look what's happening.

MORRIS: And every moron knows that if I sell my stock now I pay 15 percent. If I sell my stock later, I pay at least 20, and perhaps 30.

HANNITY: So if he doesn't come out -- let me follow up. If he doesn't come out and say "I'm not going to, you know, raise the capital gains tax, I'm not going to raise taxes," but heading into an economic slowdown, you're predicting the stock market is going to -- it's the Obama tanking?

MORRIS: It's going to continue to tank. It's lost 12 percent of its value in the last two days. When it thought McCain was going to win because he was surging, it rose all the week before. And I think pressure will build on Obama to announce no increase in capital gains tax. We cannot go to the investor and say, "Please put your money in the stock market, please take that risk. And if you gain the money, I'll tax twice as much."

ALAN COLMES (co-host): Hey, Dick, it rose Election Day in the anticipation of an Obama victory. Nobody thought McCain was going to win then. So you're going to come back here, and will you say the next time the market has a great day and goes up a few hundred points, we should thank Obama for that? If you're going to blame him every day -- you know the market doesn't work like that.

MORRIS: I think that there may be some profit-taking and some recuperation, but I think that Obama's tax increases will have the same effect as Herbert Hoover's.

From the November 6 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: OK, so let me start at the top here connecting the dots. On Tuesday we elect a new president. New president promised even before the election, by the way, when we had a 4,000-point drop -- the president promised to increase corporate taxes, capital gains taxes, the top marginal income tax rate, a massive new energy tax that'll bankrupt coal. And his party is talking about a government takeover of 401(k) plans.

So on Wednesday, the Dow drops about 486 points. It's down 346 points today. But of course, according to the drive-bys, these two events have nothing to do with each other. It's just a coincidence. The market's down today because of the jobless numbers. That's how the drive-bys see it. We have the largest market plunge after an election in history. Thank you, man-child Barack Obama.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (November 07, 2008 7:14 pm ET)
         

      it also had some pretty good advances in the last two weeks, when obama was clearly ahead in the polls.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by djasper2761 (November 09, 2008 1:40 pm ET)
           

        I totally agree. The Civil War and ww2 are Obamas fault too. I am pretty sure Obama had something to do with mickeycain getting shot down in Nam. Wasn't Obama one of the guards at the Hanoi Hilton? Obama was also responsible for the Space Shuttle Disater (both of them). Too bad Obama's first bame isn't Albert as in: AlObama

        Report Abuse
    • Author by DFens Foster (November 07, 2008 7:22 pm ET)
         

      They all give Obama too much blame. Bush gets too much blame, too. The President, no matter who it is, does not have nearly as much power over these issues as most people believe.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ultrasanktpauli (November 07, 2008 7:32 pm ET)
         

      ha ha these guys are fools. i'm sure it has nothing to do at all with GM being 'out of money'. that, of course, only happened after the election. they were 'flush' right before. probably has to do with the pesky redistribution of wealth! probably started happening already. ha ha ha

      Report Abuse
    • Author by peebs755 (November 07, 2008 7:33 pm ET)
         
      It's getting harder and harder to think that these people are even funny anymore. I stopped taking ANYTHING they had to say seriously years ago.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (November 07, 2008 7:35 pm ET)
         

      Market went up today, 248 points. Is that also because of Obama?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 10, 2008 10:01 am ET)
           

        Market went up today, 248 points. Is that also because of Obama?

        No, Reagan.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by DFens Foster (November 07, 2008 7:38 pm ET)
         

      Gun sales went way up after Obama won the election. That probably has more to do with Obama than the stock market fluctuations.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (November 07, 2008 7:42 pm ET)
         

      He may have had nothing to do with the stock market, but he has stopped global warming (at least in the upper midwest).

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ultrasanktpauli (November 07, 2008 7:44 pm ET)
           

        i think that global warming can be blamed, in part, on these mouth breathers. too much hot air. not good for the ozone.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (November 07, 2008 8:01 pm ET)
             

          That could be true, global warming did start really taking effect when Congress started meeting year around.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by atheist (November 07, 2008 7:58 pm ET)
         

      I think the election was just an opportunity for the people yanking the chain to give it another yank.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by SFnomad (November 07, 2008 8:09 pm ET)
         
      Kinda funny how this works out, before Tuesday, everything was President Clinton's fault, since Tuesday, everything is President-Elect Obama's fault. The "Party of Personal Responsibility" is always looking for someone else to blame.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mefirst (November 07, 2008 8:27 pm ET)
           

        and everything good under clinton was due to reagan-bush 1, and then on the day bush 2 came in, everything bad was due to something clinton did.   the first world trade center bombing, a month after clinton takes office?  his fault.  9-11, eight months after clinton leaves?  his fault.   even though bush discontinued the weekly meetings that clinton held that were devoted to counterterrorism.   richard clarke all but begged condi for a meeting with bush and was refused.  and clinton had included him in all meetings devoted to counterterrorism.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by gumshoe4096 (November 10, 2008 1:49 pm ET)
           

        Haven't you been paying attention to the news?  It's not Bush's fault.  It's not Clinton's fault.  It's not Obama's fault.  Sarah Palin is allegedly to blame for EVERYTHING.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jello (November 07, 2008 8:22 pm ET)
         
      "Thank you, man-child Barack Obama." Rush, you are such a coward.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (November 07, 2008 8:27 pm ET)
         

      I'll admit, I thought there would be such relief at having an adult in the white house that the stocks would rally.

      Still, let this blame game be a lesson to the country.  The republicans must not be allowed the slightest sniff of power in any branch for any period of time during Obama's presidency.  If they do, they'll claim credit for all the good things the democrats will do, and conservatism will not be sufficiently discredited in the eyes of the stupid.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jim359 (November 07, 2008 9:05 pm ET)
         
      I just knew it wouldn't take the Rethugs long to find something to hit Obama with but this happened even quicker thanI thought. We're going to be hearing a lot of this for the next 4 years (at least).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (November 07, 2008 9:46 pm ET)
         

      These people are beyond dumb.  First of all, most stock trading is computer driven.  Do these idiots honestly think or believe hedge funds making thousands of trades each day have people sitting at a computer terminal placing orders?  Nope.

      Second, how many investors sitting here in November 2008 actually have capital gains that would be taxed?  Seems to me most people have experienced losses, not gains.

      Finally, it is people bailing out of mutual and hedge funds who are driving the liquidation.  This to a large extent is a self-fulfilling prophacy.  People want to cash out of a fund so the fund has to sell stocks in a declining market; the market goes down and more people want to bail so they place sell orders and the downward spiral continues.  Notice how the market often falls at the end of the trading day - those are all those sell orders driving funds to liquidate holdings to raise cash.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by djasper2761 (November 09, 2008 1:54 pm ET)
           

        How dare you interject facts and logic into the conservative's diatribes. faucks news is even funnier now than before the election.They give stupid a bad name.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by gumshoe4096 (November 10, 2008 1:52 pm ET)
           

        Do you hear that sucking sound?  That's the sound of foreign investors pulling money out of the U.S.  Don't be so naive to believe that they would leave their money in the care of a mindless computerized trading program.  Rest assured, there are live human beings telling the trading computers what to do.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mari2jj2970 (November 08, 2008 12:31 am ET)
         

      Only the most stupid person could come to that conclusion.  Well or the most partisan maybe.  The stock market had fallen how much percent starting way before Obamaa's election.  If these guys even had any ability to think through what they say, they would have realized how absolutely stupid that conclusion was.  In fact, Bush is still the President and he alone is responsible for this big market drop.  But you have to admit, although all were silly statements, it was a good try to change the subject from the dismal acheivement of President Bush as far as the economy goes.  Remember those huge numbers of job losses happened before the election numbers were known and while sure enough Bush was still President.  That bunch has little contact with political reality and that no doubt is why Bush has felt free to muck this country because he always had this bunch of benchwarmers to cheer him on no matter how dismal his performance was.  They need to look themselves in the mirror and accept their responsibility in this mess.  So much for a press that holds the government responsible.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by albertsenj (November 08, 2008 1:18 am ET)
         

      WHY in the he!! is anyone listening to to Morris. What possible credibility could this little toad have?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (November 08, 2008 9:13 am ET)
           

        And it's not just credibility, it's expertise.

        Whenever a pundit is talking, all viewers should ask if that pundit has earned a national platform.  If not, turn it off.

        And I don't mean earned as in "climbed the ranks to the top", but earned as in "more skilled/qualified at political/economic/social analysis than most people".

        Report Abuse
        • Author by djasper2761 (November 09, 2008 1:57 pm ET)
             

          morris' theorories are based on phrenology with a twist, there is a lot of tea leaves and hookers involved I am sure.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (November 08, 2008 10:28 am ET)
         

      These guys crack me up. OK, they don't, but I'd like to think that they were funny as opposed to just being, well, incredibly stupid. But it's good to see them getting things started already, not that they waited for the election or anything. Nope. As someone else said in this thread, and I agree, everything bad that happened under Bush II was Clinton's fault. Anything bad that happened under Reagan and Bush I was Carter's fault. And I'm sure that anything that happens bad since this past Tuesday will be Obama's fault. The party of personal responsibility is having a hard time taking, you know, responsibility. Look at the finger pointing and back fighting going on with Palin and McCain's campaign cronies. 

      I LOVE a good implosion in the morning. Social conservatives, say goodbye to the party you once knew, and say hello to the real conservative party, which I hope rises, rather quick, to take its place. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dave (November 08, 2008 12:53 pm ET)
           

        Mags, I love your thinking.

        I'm hoping the Conservative party will refer back to its original ideals, as well. Hopefully, my Conservative party will stand by its core principles of a smaller, less intrusive govt. less spending, less taxation, and put more money back into the pockets of those who've earned it. I want my party back. And after the ass kicking they've just received, they can only go up from here.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wolf kotenberg (November 08, 2008 2:44 pm ET)
             

          it is not going to be easy for the media ( FOX et all ) seem to be hell bent on blaming Obama for the economic crisis instead of debating why they lost. I don't see much new blood in those houses ( Hannity, Morris , Nozell et all still have the microphone )

          Report Abuse
        • Author by mefirst (November 08, 2008 6:21 pm ET)
             

          dave, i am not wedded to the democratic party.   i am registered as one, almost always vote that way, but a lot of times it's because i just can't see the republican candidate as a real choice.  bush over al gore?  please. 

          the problem is that the republicans seem to be a party that's stuck on stupid.   there's a poll out now, believe it or not, on the gop choice in 2012.  even more unbelievable is that 2/3 of republicans favor palin.  i've been pretty critical of her, but in the end i blame mccain for picking her when he had months to make a reasonable choice.   but the thought that the majority of republicans could actually think this woman could lead the party ticket?  it's almost as if reality doesn't enter into the equation here.   joe the plumber is proof of that.  it wasn't who he was, but who he claimed to be, that the republican faithful responded to.   i don't think obama can afford some of the programs he wants, and i will be more than  willing to point that out.   i just don't see the republican party as anything more than a dog and pony show now.   send in the clowns, and here comes sarah.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by djasper2761 (November 09, 2008 2:09 pm ET)
               

            coulter and palin

                    2012

            Chief ecoconomic advisor: joe, Sec. of Defense: inshannity, Text book editor and rewritter:billybob o'really, Sec. of State: limpbahahaha, Treasury Sec: ted stevens, Dept. of sexual reducation: larry craig

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (November 09, 2008 7:31 pm ET)
                 

              Palin/Quayle 2012.  Look at all that executive experience!

              "We're gunna win Indiana this time, you betcha!"

              Report Abuse
            • Author by gumshoe4096 (November 10, 2008 1:56 pm ET)
                 

              Yes, djasper2761.  Your prose is a fine example of the product of the liberal education system in this country, as envisioned by the NEA.

              Report Abuse
        • Author by roundhouse (November 09, 2008 11:00 pm ET)
             

          You don't even know what your party is, Dave. The Republican message has never synched up with Republican deed. The U.S, has never had and never will have, a small government Republican as President. That model is a myth made to entrance all the suckers who have to work for a living. It's a spell woven to feed our aspirations false hope with a story of success that ignores the miracle of small things and the necessity of even smaller endeavors. Republicans ain't about helping the most people. The Republican Party is the Corporate Party, as such they only serve the interests of the wealthy few who were lucky enough to be born talented capitalists. Everyone else, all the small wage earners, the trickled on, are on their own

          When a man has spent his entire life working hard and saving, if that guy was just a janitor, or a short order cook, it doesn't matter to the corporatist if that guy gets sick and loses everything. Shoulda been smart enough or disciplined enough to play the game. Maybe he's a she. Maybe she has cut hair all her life or waited tables or drove a truck and now needs to watch after her own parents whose retirement was blown away in the the wild west stock market by unrestrained free marketers. Maybe their pensions (the only private property a conservative hates) disappeared over night.  None of that concerns the big timer. Folks shoulda just been more like you. You don't share in their burdens, but you'll be the first in line to cut taxes, cut services, cut wages and capitalize on their misery with a for profit proposition.  

          The life of toil and sacrifice in low wage obscurity holds no dignity for the corporatist. The only thing that counts to the Republican is money and shame on the rest if they ain't good at making lot of it, people only deserve as much respect as they have money. They only deserve as much oppurtunity as they can afford.

          Republicans are absurd with their fantasies.

          Wake up, Dave. It ain't you alone, or your cadre of big timers, that make this country great. It's also the janitors and teachers and all the rest who earn respect and dignity by being the most productive workforce on the planet, and yet, get chumped in the you're on your own society. 

          Report Abuse
    • Author by Slobahonnis (November 08, 2008 10:38 am ET)
         

      These are the same guys who also claim that the office of the president "doesn't create jobs" and "doesn't make the economy".  Now they want to say that a president elect can ruin an economy less than week after being elected but not actually being in power yet.  They should all go run for office in Alaska.  That seems to be the only place left that likes this kind of prattle. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (November 08, 2008 2:40 pm ET)
         
      FOX should return to its core competency such as http://www.theboot.com/2008/11/06/faith-hill-deemed-hot-hollywood-mom/?icid=200100397x1213024459x1200776156
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin (November 08, 2008 4:22 pm ET)
         

      Hey Rush, Sean, and The Dick:

      YOU LOST!!!!!!!  Deal with it.  Look in the mirror if you want to talk about the causes.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 08, 2008 5:18 pm ET)
         

      "thank you man child BARAK OBAMA".  Rush, once again you have proven what a pathetic excuse  of a man that you are.All you and your FAR RIGHT WING cohorts do is preach hatred and divisivness  of anyone who disagrees with you. All of you RIGHT WING talk radio people are doing the same job for the REPUBLICAN PARTY that DR JOSEFF GOEBBLES did for the NAZI PARTY.You are a DIVIDER unlike PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA who has been trying to bring both sides together to get this country up and running again. BARAK OBAMA has more kindness,decency and class in his little finger than you have in your entire fat, bloviated body.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (November 08, 2008 7:00 pm ET)
           

        Wow, you unloaded one. yes, the right wing media is going outa their way to smear Obama. and I do not think they are actually doing this for the republican party, but self glorification with the republican party's unspoken blessings.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 08, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
         

      Rush you are also a coward for sitting safely behind your radio mike,not ever having to debate someone of a differing view outside your studio where you cant control  everything.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Proctor (November 08, 2008 10:17 pm ET)
         
      Maybe they're investing in the wrong things. For example: T-shirt manufacturers and screen-printing industries are having a record quarter with the sale of Obama shirts and other related apparel. I know this kind of investment info would'nt appeal to Mr Limbaugh, et al. But as the conservatives have been saying about the Gulf War, "Its not all bad news! Why can't the MSM focus on the good things to report on?"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jmh (November 09, 2008 3:42 pm ET)
         

      So, Hannity cannot even take a week off from his blithering, offensive, lies... or, lets call it "schtick" if you want to give him the benefit of any doubt, to be "fair".

      As far as I am concerned, Hannity's behavior is proof, positive, that he is a

      socio-path.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (November 09, 2008 3:54 pm ET)
         
      LOL...I'm not sure that's who he was referring to, Oscar ... nice try tho .. :)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by npolimeni (November 09, 2008 10:32 pm ET)
         

      I would like to advance the notion for a new label to identify folks like Limbaugh, Hannity, and the like, who Media Matters has labeled "conservatives."

      This label is quite inappropriate, as it lumps these provocateurs with true conservatives. I cringe at the thought of being of the same political ilk as Limbaugh, Hannity et al. To call them "conservatives" is an insult to conservatives.

      Unfortunately, they do not really represent a true political view, as they only deal in personal attacks against people of all views, while pretending to be conservatives. They can discredit a true conservative by labeling him "liberal" or "pinko" or any of the currently popular denigrating labels. They rarely if ever address issues, and rarely if ever, accurately.

      Their recipe is to incite hatred and divisiveness by personal characterizations of the people they want to discredit and zero-out. Their intent is clear, in that, in examining their product, we see what state of mind they produce in their listeners: hate, intense fear of the persons or ideologies attacked, stultification, mental isolation.

      I was watching a news item where a British reported interviewed a CEO of an Ethanol plant, who said he could not vote for Obama because he was the anti-Christ, and quoted the bible to prove it.

      Once a label is created, it can then be applied, and people of such ilk, dismissed off-hand, as their product is not a desirable product in our society, except to show the rest of us, how much better than they we are, and how we can't be fooled by such destructive and instigative discourse.

      Let me start with one, and maybe others can submit ideas to Media Matters, so they can start using a different label for these folks:

      Hate provocateurs through intentional lies and falsehood to destroy, and suborn.

      Haprofoid: (more or less an acronym of the preceding phrase!)

      I want to emphasize that although it may sound humorous here, the idea of a label is very important to start dismissing these folks as off-handedly as they attach and dismiss others by labeling them. I hope Media Matters will take it seriously.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (November 10, 2008 12:16 pm ET)
         

      Do you smell that?  It's the scent of DESPERATION!!!

      When will the market correct itself and people decide that these ignorant no-talent ass-clown aren't worth listening to anymore?!

      The free market has been irrational on this point for far to long.  A market corrcetion is long overdue.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.