Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that Chambliss "predicted" DSCC ads would attack him, ignored NRSC ad slamming Martin
SUMMARY: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has purchased ads in support of Georgia Democratic senatorial candidate Jim Martin and quoted Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss's assertion that Democrats will spend "millions and millions on the airwaves to try to discredit me." But the article did not note that the National Republican Senatorial Committee is reportedly launching a new ad attacking Martin, or that the DSCC and NRSC have reportedly committed similar amounts of money thus far to the Georgia race.
In a November 13 article, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) "has purchased a week's worth of ads on metro Atlanta television stations" in support of Georgia Democratic senatorial candidate Jim Martin, and quoted Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)'s assertion that Democrats will spend "millions and millions on the airwaves to try to discredit me." But the article did not note that the DSCC's counterpart, the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), is launching a new ad accusing Martin of being "Out of Touch with Georgia Values," and both organizations have reportedly committed similar amounts of money to the race. Nor did the article mention that the National Republican Trust Political Action Committee (NRT PAC) is launching a "TV ad campaign and other outreach efforts" focusing on the Georgia Senate race.
In a November 12 post on The New York Times' political blog, The Caucus, Sarah Wheaton reported of the NRSC, "Today... the group began running a new ad attacking Jim Martin, the Democratic challenger, on his tax record in the Georgia assembly." Wheaton further reported that the ad "features a bluesy soundtrack and ends with pictures of Mr. Martin, Senator Charles E. Schumer [D-NY] and Representative Nancy Pelosi [D-CA] as an announcer says, 'With unchecked power hanging in the balance, Georgia can't afford another liberal like Jim Martin in Washington.' " As the announcer makes that comment, the words "Liberal" and "Out of Touch with Georgia Values" appear surrounding Martin's name.
According to a November 11 Roll Call article, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) "has committed $100,000 to the NRSC to help fund Chambliss' race." A November 13 Roll Call article reported that the DSCC "has dropped cable television buys totaling $100,000 in several media markets around Georgia," and that "[d]uring the last week of the general election campaign, the DSCC dropped nearly $1.6 million in independent expenditures in the race while the NRSC shelled out more than $1.3 million in the Peach State." A November 8 Politico article reported that the NRSC "has ramped up its fundraising operation to funnel cash" to Chambliss.
In "A Letter to America" on the NRT PAC website, Executive Director Scott Wheeler wrote: "With Democrats now controlling 57 seats in the Senate, they are perilously close to getting the 60 votes in the Senate they need to end filibuster and pass [President-elect Barack] Obama's radical legislation. This why [sic] the special Georgia Senate run-off election slated for December 2 is now a national contest." Wheeler further wrote that NRT PAC is "launching an emergency appeal to Republicans across the United States to help defeat Jim Martin," including via a "TV ad campaign":
We at the National Republican Trust PAC, also known as GOPtrust.com, are launching an emergency appeal to Republicans across the United States to help defeat Jim Martin and keep Saxby Chambliss in the U.S. Senate.
[...]
Have no doubt the Democrats will throw everything they have to get out core constituencies for Jim Martin: union members, African-Americans and other special interests.
That's why our work at the National Republican Trust PAC is so critically important.
Our TV ad campaign and other outreach efforts will alert Georgia Republicans that this election is like no other. In fact, the future of the United States depends on it.
You can help us in our fight to keep Georgia's seat in Republican hands and out of Obama's control.
Donate today to help this important cause.
During the 2008 presidential election, NRT PAC produced several ads attacking Obama, including one highlighting sermons given by his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. A November 4 Boston Globe article reported of the Wright ad: "The National Republican Trust has made enormous advertising buys to put the ad on several national television networks in the final days of the campaign. The group spent $1.2 million on Thursday and $2.5 million more on Friday." The Globe further reported that the group "expects to raise $8.5 million this year and spend about $7 million on advertisements, including the commercial about Wright."
From The Atlanta Journal-Constitution article:
"John McCain is a great American," Martin said at a news conference at the state Capitol. "And he served his country with distinction. All Georgians know that."
But, Martin said, Georgia voters need a senator who will work with President-elect Barack Obama, not fight him.
"You can bring in all the political leaders of the past, like Saxby Chambliss is to shore up his position, but truthfully, it's the old politics. We're moving forward, and are taking our message to voters," Martin said.
The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, meanwhile, has purchased a week's worth of ads on metro Atlanta television stations for Martin.
Chambliss, standing with Ensign, predicted Democrats will spend "millions and millions on the airwaves to try to discredit me."
"The Democrats are going to try to buy this race," Chambliss said. Neither Chambliss nor Ensign, however, would say how much the GOP plans to spend on the runoff. Democrats have been equally evasive about how much they plan to spend.
Martin said there continues to be no word from Obama about a potential visit to the state before Dec. 2. He said his campaign is moving forward with the same plan as the primary, the primary runoff and the general election: appeal to middle class voters that he will be a voice for them in Washington.
From The Caucus post:
The National Republican Senatorial Committee isn't leaving anything to chance in Georgia, where one of the three outstanding Senate races is heading toward a run-off on Dec. 2. Today, for example, the group began running a new ad attacking Jim Martin, the Democratic challenger, on his tax record in the Georgia assembly.
Senator Saxby Chambliss received a plurality of votes on Nov. 4, but because he did not take a majority, the contest heads to a run-off. The N.R.S.C.'s television ad features a bluesy soundtrack and ends with pictures of Mr. Martin, Senator Charles E. Schumer and Representative Nancy Pelosi as an announcer says, "With unchecked power hanging in the balance, Georgia can't afford another liberal like Jim Martin in Washington."
From the website of NRT PAC:















Saxby Chambliss is a lowlife, he smeared a great American hero in Max Cleland. If there is justice, Chanbliss will lose in this run off.
Chamblis successfully painted Cleland as too liberal for Georgia by using Cleland's vote against the Department of Homeland Security against Cleland. Cleland's loss was part of dissatisfaction towards Democratics statewide. The Democratic Governor was also handily defeated, giving a Republican control over the Georgia Statehouse for the first time since the Reconstruction.
Domocratics? oops.
Awwww.... you shouldn't have admitted your mistake.
In light of all the "democrat party" phraseology being used by the rightys, and the complaints about it from the left, I was prepared to give you credit for being satirical.
But then you went and blew it, Barney.
So the ads that Chambliss ran showing Max Cleland next to Bin Laden had nothing to do with it?? And the fact that hypocritical John McCain, who lashed out against those ads in 2002 now is coming to Georgia to campaign for the 5-time draft deferrer versus the Viet Nam vet Jim Martin??
I see your point. Not being in Georgia, I'd have to defer to those there to see if that one particular TV ad made people think Cleland was a member of Al Qeada.
Bob, I'm just happy that Chambliss' bum knee hasn't stopped him from becoming one of the top golfers in DC or from showing up to repeatedly vote against veterans health programs.
Painted... That's a great euphimism for "lied through his teeth." (link)
hahaha... What do you think of these paintings?
The Obama campaign painted the Post story as evidence that the McCain campaign is trying to disregard the country's serious economic challenges in favor of personal attacks on Obama:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/04/mccain-planning-fiercely_n_131906.html
Where the Dems are trying to paint McCain as more financially out of touch with people, they're strongly suggesting that his Christian conservative running mate is no friend to the Jews.
http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2008/08/obama-camp-conn.html
It's not always a euphimism. But, intentional or not, it was in your first post on this thread.
Hahaha.. Gotta love liberal logic. ;-)
Gotta love conservative black and white thinking, which you've taken to the extreme. Do you really not understand that words can have different functions depending upon the context in which they are used?
"Chamblis successfully painted Cleland as too liberal for Georgia by using Cleland's vote against the Department of Homeland Security against Cleland." - AA
He did this by LYING. See the link. Trying to be clever, I suggested YOU used painting as a euphemism for lying.
"hahaha... What do you think of these paintings?" - AA
Those "paintings" seem pretty accurate to me. Please feel free to point out the lies you think I missed. Otherwise, painting obviously isn't a euphemism for lying in these examples.
"I'd never seen anything like that ad. Putting pictures of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden next to the picture of a man who left three limbs on the battlefield - it's worse than disgraceful. It's reprehensible." - John McCain on the Chambliss ad in 2002.
It did work, though. Maybe this is the year for his comeuppance.
Max Cleland is a political hack and got what he deserved. He is also an idiot.
Uh huh. Because you say so.
Max Cleland is a political hack and got what he deserved. He is also an idiot.
Days before Max Cleland became a triple amputee, he was pulling injured soliders from the battlefield. He's a decorated war hero, who fought for the right for YOU to make the dumb a** statement you just made!
Max Cleland's no idiot, but I'm not sure about you.
Vietnam was a war about my right to make dumb ass statements? Nice
Also John McCain spent 5 1/2 years in a POW camp tourtured so you could make hateful statements about him during the campaign.
Nice
Hateful statements?
Max Cleland is a political hack and got what he deserved. He is also an idiot.
LOL
You call Max Cleland an idiot and then turn around and have the nerve to whine about "hateful statements"?
Caseysprings- you are a lost cause. Max Cleland is someone we all should aspire to be. An "idiot"? Far from it. He is someone who loves his country and has the wounds to show it.
Chambliss is an example of all the worst in the Republican party. I cannot understand why anybody would ever defend him.
Here's an for ads that the Democrats can run in Georgia:
"REMEMBER MAX CLELAND -
VOTE FOR JIM MARTIN"
wz,
That probably would remind the 53% who voted for Chamblis again why they voted for him. I think your ad would work to Chamblis's advantage.
Not when you consider how disgusted most people in this country are that Chamblis had the nerve to question Max Cleland's patriotism.
Samuel Johnson once said "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scpoundrel". And Saxby Chambliss is a Scoundrel of the First Magnitude.
wz,
I do believe the ad qeustioned, not Cleland's patriotism, but his judgement.
Can you provide any proof that Chamblis attacked Cleland's patriotism?
ps. My keyboard seems to be having trouble spelling today. My apologies.
In a press release Chambliss accused Cleland "breaking his oath to protect and defend the Constitution." (link)
Thanks for posting that link, Craig. Perhaps exposure to the facts will help AA get over his selective amnesia......
Take a look at it in context. Strong words, but nothing more than so many claims by the left about Cheney and Bush I've been listening to for eight years.
So now you're admitting that Chambliss attacked Cleland's patriotism.
Good! Baby steps.
Once again, when faced with a fact you attempt to redirect the discussion. The reality is that Chambliss did attack Cleland's patriotism.
AA, I am so tired of hearing about what a hero Max Cleland is, the guy is a poltiical hack and just as former POWs should not be exempt from political opposition, neither should hacks like Cleland.
Then maybe republicans should stop bringing up military service when it suits them. McCain's entire convention was nothing but a walk down POW memory lane. McCain ran as a former vet and got burned because he never discussed the issues. Cleland discussed the issues and got burned by being slimed by lowlife republicans who can't win on issues so resort to character assassinations to win. If the election were only on issues Cleland would have beat that hack Chambliss by a landslide.
Snoopy, The attacks on Cleleand were on issues. Cleland voted against the Department of Homeland Security.
Bull. Chambliss is a liar and you're a sucker.
Cleland co-sponsored a bill to create a Department of Homeland Security. He voted against Bush's bill because of an unfair labor provision.
Until he saw how the political winds were blowing, Bush fought against the creation of the department. Does that make him "too liberal"?
Snoopy, The attacks on Cleleand were on issues. Cleland voted against the Department of Homeland Security
Bulllsh*t! The ad is equating Osama Ben Laden and Saddam Hussein with Max Cleland.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKFYpd0q9nE&eurl=http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2167
And Senator Chickensh*t Chambliss's hasn't been the best friend of vets like Max Cleland either!
Chambliss Voted Against the New GI Bill for Veterans of the Wars in Iraq & Afghanistan.
Chambliss Has Opposed Vets' Program Funding At Least 23 Times in the Senate Alone.
Chambliss Opposed Additional Funding for Traumatic Brain Injury Research-A "Signature Wound" of the War in Iraq.
Chambliss Twice Opposed Guaranteeing Troops Time At Home Between Deployments.
Chambliss Twice Voted Against Funding for Armored Vehicles.
Chambliss Opposed Funding For Equipment And Armor For Troops.
Chambliss Voted Against Health Care Funding for Active Duty Military.
Chambliss Voted Against 3.9 Percent Pay Raise for Military Personnel.
Chambliss Voted Against Increasing Healthcare for Troops.
Chambliss Voted Against Additional $3 Billion to Protect Troops from IEDs.
Chambliss Voted Against Funding for Veterans' Health Care.
Chambliss Chose Tax Cuts for the Wealthy Over Additional Veterans Spending.
You clearly think that facts have a liberal bias, so you don't pay attention to them. Cleland was a sponsor of a bill to create a Dept. of Homeland Security. Wake up. Stop lying.
Dear CaseySprings--
To be honest, I would have liked your post better in the original German, cut I can see why you'd try to avoid that so as not to give yourself away. Sorry, didn't work.
I don't know if Mac Cleland is a political hack and an idiot. I do know what you are, though: you are a lower form of life than the AIDS virus; you are the perfect moral argument for abortion; in fact, the perfect moral argument for infanticide. Whatever you dread most, I wish for you. And soon.
Casey,
This is known by many around here as "honest debate". ;-)
Again with the "many"? That's at least three times this week.