About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Time uncritically repeated Coleman camp's "accus[ation]" that MN sec. of state has "breach[ed] neutrality"

November 17, 2008 9:06 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: Time repeated an "accus[ation]" by Sen. Norm Coleman's campaign that Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie has " 'breach[ed] neutrality' by saying that the State Canvassing Board will probably consider taking up ... tossed absentee ballots" in advance of a recount in the Senate race between Coleman and Al Franken. But Time did not note that Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty approved of the composition of the board Ritchie named to certify the vote and oversee the recount or that a lawyer for Coleman's campaign reportedly said that the "state should feel good about who's on the panel."

12 Comments

In a November 17 article, Time's Justin Horwath uncritically repeated an "accus[ation]" by Sen. Norm Coleman's (R) campaign that Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie has " 'breach[ed] neutrality' by saying that the State Canvassing Board will probably consider taking up ... tossed absentee ballots" in advance of a forthcoming recount in the Minnesota Senate race between Coleman and Democratic challenger Al Franken. Franken, who, Horwath noted, like Ritchie, "belongs to the Democratic-Farmer-Labor coalition," filed a lawsuit in Ramsey County District Court "seeking to obtain the names of voters' whose absentee ballots were rejected" and "hopes to submit the ballots to the State Canvassing Board for consideration." But in reporting the Coleman campaign's accusation of partisanship by Ritchie, Horwath did not note that Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty approved of the composition of the board Ritchie named to certify the vote and oversee the recount or that a lawyer for Coleman's campaign reportedly said that the "state should feel good about who's on the panel," as Media Matters for America has documented.

Additionally, while Horwath noted that the board "includes two Minnesota Supreme Court Justices and two Ramsey County District Court judges," he did not point out that two of the board's five members -- Eric J. Magnuson and G. Barry Anderson -- were appointed to the Minnesota Supreme Court by Pawlenty.

From Horwath's November 17 Time article, "Coleman and Franken: Fighting Over the Minnesota Recount":

The recount, which will cost taxpayers roughly $87,000, promises to be arduous. The State Canvassing Board will certify elections results Tuesday and the recount begins Wednesday, when election officials in 110 locations across the state will analyze by hand each of the nearly 3 million ballots to determine voter's intent. (Minnesota uses optical scanners, and many voters haphazardly filled in the intended ovals, didn't do so at all or otherwise improperly marked their ballots.) Thousands of party representatives will literally be peering over their shoulders to challenge any apparent discrepancy. By law, election officials must place any challenged ballots in a separate pile for consideration by the State Canvassing Board. Secretary of State Mark Ritchie chairs the five-member board, which also includes two Minnesota Supreme Court Justices and two Ramsey County District Court judges.

On Saturday, the Coleman campaign accused Ritchie, who, like Franken, belongs to the Democratic-Farmer-Labor coalition, of "breaching neutrality" by saying that the State Canvassing Board will probably consider taking up the tossed absentee ballots. Ritchie has vowed to hold regular press conferences during the recount. "The whole world is watching to see if we're living up to our reputation as Minnesota -- our brand," Ritchie says. "Accuracy is the only measurement by which we can determine who won this election." Ritchie does not expect the recount to be completed until at least December 19. If the results are a tie, the contest could be decided by a coin toss.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by snoopy (November 17, 2008 9:28 pm ET)
         

      Republicans, suing for a lower voter turnout. Priceless.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (November 17, 2008 10:02 pm ET)
         

      in other words, they don't agree with us.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (November 18, 2008 12:39 am ET)
         

      Funny how it's always the same same old story. Democrats trying to get as many people as possible to vote and Republicans trying to prevent as many as possible from voting. Why is that? Why are Republicans always so afraid of democracy and free elections?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by TelltaleHeart (November 18, 2008 5:13 am ET)
         

      So, just so we are clear: Democrats want every real vote counted, and Republicans want to disenfranchise as many Americans as possible?

      Well, okee-doke.

      .

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Eric Jaffa (November 18, 2008 6:07 am ET)
         

      Mark Ritchie said the opposite:

      ===================================

      http://www.startribune.com/politics/state/34409514.html?page=2&c=y

      Secretary of State Mark Ritchie said Thursday that the state would not consider rejected absentee ballots as it begins the recount of the 2.9 million votes cast in last week's election. "Recount law is very specific about what is included," Ritchie said. "Under current law, those rejected ballots would be handled by a court."

      ===================================

      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (November 18, 2008 11:27 am ET)
         

      Republicans are a bunch of big, whiney cry babies.  Coleman has tarnished his reputation with these spurious accusations.  Even if he wins he's going to come off looking bad.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (November 18, 2008 12:43 pm ET)
         

      I suppose any minute now Hannity/Limbaugh are going off on an endless discussion about the word " neutrality " and definition thereoff ? until it suits their rampage ?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (November 18, 2008 9:58 pm ET)
         

      'breach[ed] neutrality'

      Translation: They will follow the MN Constitution.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (November 20, 2008 3:16 pm ET)
         

      "Minnesota law triggers automatic recounts when the vote margin between the top two candidates in federal, state, or judicial races is less than one-half of one percent in a general election."

      Why does the media hate the MN Constitution?

      Report Abuse