About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Newsweek publishes article on purported debate over whether "Obama [is] the Antichrist"

November 18, 2008 3:24 pm ET

SUMMARY: In a Newsweek article headlined "Is Obama the Antichrist?" senior editor Lisa Miller treated as newsworthy purported debate among some "conservative Christians" over whether President-elect Barack Obama is "the Antichrist." In doing so, she gave credibility to the views of RaptureReady.com editor and founder Todd Strandberg, who has, among other things, smeared gays and lesbians, Islam, progressives, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

98 Comments

In a November 15 Newsweek article headlined "Is Obama the Antichrist?" senior editor Lisa Miller treated as newsworthy purported debate among some "conservative Christians" over whether President-elect Barack Obama is "the Antichrist." In doing so, Miller gave credibility to the views of RaptureReady.com editor and founder Todd Strandberg who has, among other things, smeared gays and lesbians, Islam, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. For example, Strandberg has written that Rev. Jerry Falwell correctly blamed 9-11 on "the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, [and] People for the American Way," and in January of 2006, Strandberg wrote that "Satan is the true god of the Hajj," the pilgrimage to Mecca that is a central part of Islamic faith.

In a November 18 post, Washington Monthly blogger Steve Benen wrote of Miller's piece: "When bizarre, fringe publications speculate openly about who may or may not be the Antichrist, it's easy to dismiss. When Newsweek publishes a 600-word piece on those who wonder about Obama being the Antichrist, one really has to wonder what on earth the editors were thinking." Benen later stated: "I can appreciate the fact that there are a handful of very odd people in the world, some of whom believe the Book of Revelation foretold Obama's election. Strange people can be led to believe strange things. That's not a reason for Newsweek to publish articles about their inanity."

In the Newsweek article, Miller reported:

Strandberg says Obama probably isn't the Antichrist, but he's watching the president-elect carefully. On his Web site, he has something called the Rapture Index, a calculation based on signs and prophecy of the proximity of the end. According to Strandberg, any number over 160 means "fasten your seat belts." Obama's win pushed the index to 161.

In addition to failing to mention Strandberg's smears, Miller did not note that an October 31 Salt Lake Tribune article reported that, "In his 22 years working on Rapture Ready, Strandberg has seen an 'avalanche' of anti-Christ suggestions, including Tony Blair and Bill Clinton. Obama doesn't fit the bill, he says, but he could be a type of 'anti-Christ,' which simply means too many people see him as a replacement for Jesus."

Strandberg has also made repeated anti-GLBT, anti-Muslim, and anti-progressive statements over the years. For example:

  • In a September 24, 2001, commentary, Strandberg agreed with Falwell's statement that "the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way" "helped [9-11] happen":

One of the most asked questions of the past couple weeks has been, "Was this terrorist attack a Judgment from God?" I would put the answer as being most likely - Yes.

Jerry Falwell, once again, brought embarrassment to the cause of Christ when he first correctly laid the blame at the feet of immoral groups in America, but then he cowardly retreated when the press put fire to his feet.

Here is what Falwell said on The 700 Club:

"The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way - all of them have tried to secularize America - I point the finger in their face and say, 'You helped this happen.'"

Here is what Falwell later told ABC News:

"I do not believe they endanger America. I misspoke totally and entirely."

In Jerry Falwell's world it would appear truth depends greatly on how the liberal media views your theology. I've said it in the past, because this man has a gift for repeatedly putting his foot in his own mouth, I think he should decline from making public statements.

  • In a January 16, 2006, commentary discussing reports of mass deaths and injuries during the annual Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca known as the Hajj, Strandberg stated that "Satan is the true god of the Hajj." From Strandberg's piece:

Considering that mass death stampedes are a rarity, their frequency in Mina defies logical explanation. I don't recall hearing of a regular body clean up after partygoers celebrate the New Year in Times Square, New York, or after national sports championships. It could be noted that these events even have an added danger because of widespread alcohol consumption.

I firmly believe the devil is the reason Islamic pilgrims are trampled to death with such strange regularity.

Because Satan is the true god of the Hajj, one would think he would want the pilgrimage to be a smoothly run operation. The ironic twist of having people die during the stoning ritual apparently is just too tempting for Satan and his host of fallen angels to pass up.

In response to the latest loss of life, the Saudis have announced plans for further modifying the site in the coming years to allow some 500,000 pilgrims an hour to carry out the stoning. I think they could expand that number to a million, and people will still be going home in body bags. Nothing will change until Muslims realize something is fundamentally wrong with their whole belief system.

  • In a September 24, 2001, commentary, Strandberg wrote that, "Instead of the Sept 11 terrorist attacks being a huge black eye to Islam, to my amazement, I'm seeing the resulting PR campaign as being used as a net positive. Muslim web sites are seeing heavy traffic, mosques are opening their doors to the public, and Islamic clerics are being invited to interfaith prayer services." He later stated: "Despite the overwhelming contradictions between Islam and Christianity the Antichrist will someday join together all faiths into one super religion that will have him as the supreme leader. The oddity that Islam did not suffer the common backlash of hatred that normally follows any similar type of incident indicates to me the Harlot Church of Revelation must not be too far off."
  • In a November 19, 2001, commentary, Strandberg embraced Rev. Franklin Graham's statement that, "We're not attacking Islam but Islam has attacked us. The God of Islam is not the same God. He's not the God of the Christian or Judeo-Christian faith. It's a different God and I believe it is a very evil and wicked religion." Strandberg wrote, "I was quite surprised to read these comments made by Franklin Graham. I wasn't amazed at all by the remarks themselves. I agree totally with him that Islam is an evil and wicked religion. My astonishment was that he stood by his comments."
  • In a January 21, 2002, commentary titled "Is AIDS A Curse From God?" Strandberg wrote, "I know science doesn't see in terms of the supernatural, but it does seem inescapable to me that AIDS is an unrelenting scourge, and there doesn't appear to be anything man can do about eradicating it through normal medical means." He continued, "Maybe it's time we started looking at it as being a judgment from the All Mighty. It is common knowledge that 95 percent of the time the virus is spread through some type of immoral act. Men simply refuse to hear any talk about sin being the primary root of this plague."
  • In a November 10 commentary discussing Obama's November 4 election victory, Strandberg wrote that "it's unlikely that Obama will be the antichrist" but later said that Americans, in electing Obama, chose to move more rapidly "towards the end." Strandberg added, "[I]t's time for prophecy-minded Christians to fasten their seat belts":

At this point, I think it's unlikely that Obama will be the antichrist. The beast of Revelation will come out Europe, and he will be a man of profound political skills.

What makes Obama potentially important to the end time is not the fact that he will be the most socially liberal president in our nation's history; I think his prophetic significance will center on how he handles our relationship with the state of Israel.

[...]

The global financial crisis is rapidly pushing the world towards the one-world economic system the Bible predicts. Later this month, several key nations are going to come together for another strategy summit.

I don't mean to pick on Obama before he has even taken office. I believe we are so close to the tribulation hour, there is a good reason to be apprehensive about policies he will seek to implement. During the campaign, I thought it was strange that one man could be friends with so many people with radical political views.

Prophetic events have progressed along so far, the only real choice we had between John McCain and Barack Obama in the election was the speed at which we would choose to move towards the end. Now that America has selected the more rapid option, it's time for prophecy-minded Christians to fasten their seat belts.

I don't see anything shocking in last week's election. I do believe strongly that a dark demonic cloud has swept over the land, but this is how we should expect the end times to play out. And, I foresee more negative events to come. The only thing that worries me is the Christians who fail to see the danger that comes from prophecy being fulfilled in our day.

  • In his October 20 commentary warning his readers that Democrats could win a congressional "super-majority" in the November 4 elections, Strandberg wrote that "Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi [D-CA] is the representative of America's Sodom and Gomorrah: San Francisco. I doubt the gay lobby will have any trouble getting her support." He later listed "just five" of the "very long list of liberal proposals that they [Democrats] would love to see become part of the law of the land," including:

- Union supremacy - Unions have been in decline for several decades. One of the key reasons is that they have a negative impact on business productivity. In a highly competitive world, unionized firms tend to fall behind. Democrats love unions because they are a good way to control large blocks of people with promises of government incentives.

- Medicare for all - The U.S. is already facing a calamity from the future entitlements promised to the baby boom generation. That bill will amount to $44 trillion. The idea of expanding the scope of Medicare makes me wonder if the Democrats are part of a secret plan to bankrupt this nation.

- Homosexual rights - Gays already have equal rights. The next step in this moral slide would be to make this sin protected from rebuke. In many European nations, it is a hate crime to quote the Bible's view of homosexuality.

He then wrote: "One of the disadvantages of being close to the time of the rapture is that we may witness some rather shocking changes in our form of government. If liberals are swept into super-majority power, there will be nothing to bar them from enacting these proposals. We can take comfort in knowing we will soon be rescued by a special Someone who will stand solidly for liberty and righteousness."

  • In a November 27, 2006, commentary, Strandberg criticized Pastor Rick Warren for allegedly saying during a trip to Syria that "he could find no persecution there of Christians or Jews. He also said he could find no evidence of extremism or terrorism in Syria." Strandberg wrote that Warren had responded to WorldNetDaily.com founder Joseph Farah's criticism of statements Warren made during his Syria trip by saying, "As a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Oxford Analytica, I might know as much about the Middle East as you." Strandberg wrote, "I found this remark hilarious because in defending himself he admits to being a member of two organizations that are known for being anti-Christ and supportive of a one-world government." Strandberg later stated:

If Warren understood Bible prophecy, he might not be in such hot water. Some day, Syria will be part of a surprise attack against Israel. His trip can only help embolden Israel's enemy into making its move.

Any leader who rejects prophecy runs the risk of becoming an active player in Satan's end-time plan. Warren is currently promoting a global peace plan, which is the same ploy the Antichrist will use to deceive the world.

  • In an undated post on his website titled "Satan's Little Helpers" that has been there since September 26, 2000, Strandberg warns readers that, while Satan can use dictators to control countries that have them, "In the 'free world,' Satan has found the liberal media makes for an effective tool for guiding and controlling society." Strandberg later stated: "When Jesus Christ returns to earth, He'll cast the liberal media into the pit of darkness. In hell, members of the media won't be harassed by us Christians, so they'll have the freedom to follow whatever news stories they choose." From Strandberg's piece:

Although Satan has a host of demonic angels throughout the world, there is one area to which the devil finds himself mostly restricted. Satan and company are spiritual beings, which makes them incapable of acting in this physical realm. Satan's little helpers must be of flesh and bone. so this is where the need for human organizations comes in. In the nations where the devil has dictators in command, he can use them directly to control those countries. In the "free world," Satan has found the liberal media makes for an effective tool for guiding and controlling society.

[...]

The liberal media will be a substantial player in end-time events. When the Antichrist finally does come to power, the liberal media will be tripping over itself to report his every word. The values that the press currently portrays will perfectly match the values of the forthcoming Antichrist. It will be love at first sight.

The liberal media's final act will be to broadcast the hatred of the Jews and nonconforming Christians. Even today, these two groups are constantly reported about a negative bias [sic]. As we draw closer to the tribulation, the negative media coverage will only increase.

When Jesus Christ returns to earth, He'll cast the liberal media into the pit of darkness. In hell, members of the media won't be harassed by us Christians, so they'll have the freedom to follow whatever news stories they choose. They will be able to cover topics like, "Why is hell so hot?" or "Does a snowball really stand a chance down here?" I'm sure the liberal media, at that time, will conclude that hell is a racist and homophobic place, and the burning sulfur will certainly be noted as destructive to hell's environment.

Finally, in the Frequently Asked Questions section of his website, Strandberg has written the following about Jehovah's Witnesses and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints:

  • Question: How can I recognize a cult?
    From the answer: Just for example, let's look briefly at the Jehovah's Witnesses. They believe that Jesus was a good man, but not that He is the Son of God. They also place divine authority on sources other than the Bible. Furthermore, they believe that they acquire salvation through their good works. These beliefs obviously indicate that Jehovah's Witnesses is a cult. But, a religion does not have to meet all of the above criteria to be considered a cult; just one characteristic will do it. Many mainstream denominations are deceiving people by not teaching the truth. But God does not make exceptions to His Word.
  • Question: What is Mormonism?
    From the answer: Mormonism is a cult that, like most cults, is sprinkled with enough truth to just hint at the truth of the Bible while missing it entirely. Again, we have a religion that denies the deity of Jesus Christ. In this faith, He is relegated to being a mere mortal, a true offspring of Elohim and an equal to Lucifer, another of Elohim's offspring. According to the Mormon Doctrine, "Every man who reigns in celestial glory is a god to his dominions;" "There was never a time when there were not Gods and worlds;" and, "Each god, through his wife or wives, raises up a numerous family of sons and daughters." So, every man is equal to Jesus in that he has the opportunity to become a god and have dominion over his people.

From Miller's November 15 Newsweek article headlined "Is Obama the Antichrist?":

On Nov. 5, Todd Strandberg was at his desk, fielding E-mails from around the world. As the editor and founder of RaptureReady.com, his job is to track current events and link them to biblical prophecy in hopes of maintaining his status as "the eBay of prophecy," the best source online for predictions and calculations concerning the end of the world. Already Barack Obama had drawn the attention of apocalypse watchers after an anonymous e-mail circulated among conservative Christians in October implying that he was the Antichrist. Former "Saturday Night Live" ingénue Victoria Jackson fueled the fire when, according to news reports, she wrote on her Web site that Obama "bears traits that resemble the anti-Christ." Now Strandberg was receiving up-to-the-minute news from his constituents in Illinois. One of the winning lottery numbers in the president-elect's home state was 666 -- which, as everyone knows, is the sign of the Beast (also known as the Antichrist). "It is very eerie, and I take it for a sign as to who he really is," wrote one of Strandberg's correspondents.

[...]

Before Christ comes again, those who are saved will ascend to heaven, according to this end-times theology, in a huge, upward whoosh called the Rapture. Strandberg is so certain that the Rapture is coming, he's bought a number of Internet addresses in addition to RaptureReady: AntiAntichrist, Tribulationus and RaptureMe. In the event that RaptureReady crashes during the apocalypse, anyone who needs an update will, with a simple Google search, be able to get one. Strandberg says Obama probably isn't the Antichrist, but he's watching the president-elect carefully. On his Web site, he has something called the Rapture Index, a calculation based on signs and prophecy of the proximity of the end. According to Strandberg, any number over 160 means "fasten your seat belts." Obama's win pushed the index to 161.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by ultrasanktpauli (November 18, 2008 3:32 pm ET)
         

      oje! head hammering stupidity! i need to board a rocketship, "Next stop: Looneyvile!"

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ultrasanktpauli (November 18, 2008 3:34 pm ET)
           

        sorry, actually? i'm the antichrist.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 18, 2008 3:36 pm ET)
           

        Strandberg says Obama probably isn't the Antichrist, but he's watching the president-elect carefully.

        Fair enough, he seems to be applying some restraint, just doing his due diligence.

        I will be watching the Rapture Index carefully, and wondering when all of our fellow Americans can blast ahead into, say, at least the 6th or 7th Century.

        You didn't hear it from me, but there is some debate as to whether Karl Rove is a werewolf. Would an article in Newsweek on that idea be any more ridiculous?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (November 18, 2008 3:48 pm ET)
             

          There's a debate on whether Mark Foley is a child molester and Larry Craig is bi-sexual. It's in their heads...

          Lord, please give us the rapture these idiots desire so I can leave them all behind.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (November 19, 2008 12:06 pm ET)
             

          I believe in the strict seperation of church and state.  Therefore the Anti-Christ, as a religious figure, cannot be the president.  (Says so in the Constuttion.)  Since Obama IS the President, therefore he CANNOT be the Anti-Christ.

          (Tell me that make any less sense than the average conservative argument!)

          Report Abuse
          • Author by djasper2761 (November 19, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
               

            Muslims can be very sneeky. I am waiting for some more imput from shyawn inshannity and Oxyrush  limpbahahaha. Inbred mongoloids are not allowed to be President but, bush got by the screener.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (November 18, 2008 4:34 pm ET)
           

        And where did you end up?  The managing editor's office of Newsweek!  AKA Looneyville...

        Report Abuse
      • Author by BISHAMON (November 19, 2008 1:48 pm ET)
           

        I wonder if Newsweek has ever done a cover story on "The Rapture Hoax" since, if I am not mistaken, the whole idea of the rapture is based on an inaccurate, rogue translation of the New Testament. And, I wonder, why aren't the mainstream Christian denominations more vocal in pointing out this apparently well-known error?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by djasper2761 (November 19, 2008 2:55 pm ET)
             

          When the King bush version of the Bible comes out early next year, we will know for sure. The book of cheaney should be a fun read.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by dazedandconfused26 (November 18, 2008 3:34 pm ET)
         

      Oh no! It's the end of the world! Again.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by BillJ-MN (November 18, 2008 3:38 pm ET)
         

      I read that article hoping the subject would be treated with the ridicule it deserves.  No such luck.  It treated that superstitious nonsense as newsworthy.

      The increase in secularism in the world does give me cause for hope for mankind.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 18, 2008 3:48 pm ET)
           

        Bill, it's hard to believe a mainstream mag put this out, except in an effort to stir up controversy. There's some good stuff there, like this;

        [The AntiChrist] will be a sweet-talking world leader who gathers governments and economies under his command to further his own evil agenda. In this world view, "the spread of secular progressive ideas is a prelude to the enslavement of mankind," explains Richard Landes, former director of the Center for Millennial Studies at Boston University.

        Do even the dimmest not see how self-serving these predictions are for the church and their own little control freak issues?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 18, 2008 3:55 pm ET)
             

          This is good, too--

          " The people who believe Obama is the Antichrist are perhaps jumping to conclusions, but they're not nuts: "They are expressing a concern and a fear that is widely shared," Staver says.

          How many insane people need to agree before they become sane? This is the same mentality used in Fox News viewer polls. "89% of Fox Viewers believe (GOP propaganda item #742)!"

          No kidding, they watch Fox, respond to Fox surveys, they're not very bright, and you've been repeating (GOP propaganda item #742) every day for a month.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (November 18, 2008 4:10 pm ET)
               

            If you keep responding to yourself does that make you insane? ;)

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 18, 2008 4:37 pm ET)
                 

              That depends on how many distinct personalities one is operating with,  how well adjusted each of them are, and how they all get along with each other.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (November 18, 2008 4:50 pm ET)
                   

                Wow!  What an embarrassing moment for Lisa Miller...

                You might expect this sort of trash in the NY Post or Washington Times.  But NEWSWEEK!!!

                She deserves to be fired, or demoted, or at least laughed off the island.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (November 18, 2008 4:51 pm ET)
                     

                  Or get an audition for Faux News...

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by eb (November 18, 2008 7:15 pm ET)
                       

                    Maybe Newsweek is afraid that an Obama administration will lack a lot of the bizaar wierdness we have been experiencing these last 8 years, so their trying to stir things up to keep the news interesting. 

                    I always thought the sign of the Anti-Christ was Bush reading "my  pet  goat" while the towers fell.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by djasper2761 (November 19, 2008 3:05 pm ET)
                         

                      The reason bush just sat there was because that book was erotic to him. He finally got up and went to the library and headed to the refernce section on WOOD!

                      Report Abuse
                • Author by BISHAMON (November 19, 2008 1:52 pm ET)
                     

                  Maybe Newsweek will consider writing an article with this title: "Was George W. Bush the Manchurian Candidate?"

                  Report Abuse
          • Author by BillJ-MN (November 18, 2008 4:18 pm ET)
               

            Any kind of responsible news magazine, even if they ran such an article for its goofiness, should still have quotes from someone who disagrees.  Staver doesn't count.  He's saying it's reasonable to think Obama is the antichrist, but he personally thinks it'll be someone else.

            This story is not only without balance, it's seeking to serve the badly unbalanced.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (November 18, 2008 3:57 pm ET)
             

          Not to mention, none of this stuff is actually in the Bible in one place. They take phrases, and paragraphs, and parables from different places, and then piece them together to give them their stupid rapture fairy tale. It's a fairy tale wrapped up in religion.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (November 19, 2008 8:58 am ET)
               

            Of course it is.  End Times prognosticators will breathlessly point to the "remarkable" connections and cross references allegedly intertwined within the various books of the Bible.  What they fail to mention is that theologians such as themselves have spent centuries pouring over the texts looking for such "connections" and fabricating this perceived thread of continuity.

            All they've proven is that you can indeed pound a square peg into a round hole if you use a big enough hammer... and hit it enough times.  It's an intellectual placebo,  not much different from seeing bunny rabbits in the clouds.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by djasper2761 (November 19, 2008 3:14 pm ET)
                 

              is the last part of your post analagous to the conception of bush? Sure sounds like it to me and I find it abhorent. It is not a good idea to denegrate helzibub in that way.

              Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (November 18, 2008 5:11 pm ET)
             

          This explains why the far right likes GWB so much.  There's no way he is "... a sweet-talking world leader who gathers governments and economies under his command to further his own evil agenda...".

          Bush's unpopularity and clumsy world dealings guarantees that he's not the Antichrist.

          Meanwhile, why should the nutty Cons care?  Shouldn't they welcome the Antichrist as a harbinger of god's plan being fulfilled?  Shouldn't they thank us for electing the "Antichrist" and ushering the second coming?

          Report Abuse
        • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (November 18, 2008 5:23 pm ET)
             

          Do even the dimmest not see how self-serving these predictions are for the church and their own little control freak issues?

          Aw, Colonel, they're just mad that someone's putting up some competition for them...

          Report Abuse
        • Author by BISHAMON (November 19, 2008 2:03 pm ET)
             

          Surely, the most insidious effect of all of this fear-mongering is to sabotage much-needed efforts to achieve international cooperation in addressing global issues and concerns, such as those underaken by that perennial bogeyman, the United Nations. But the fear-mongers are wrong: most major religions, not just secular progressives, advocate a greater role for global governance. Because global problems require global solutions, plain and simple.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by RobertSeattle (November 18, 2008 3:44 pm ET)
         

      Don't these numbnuts realize their batting average for naming 1st century science fiction "AntiChrist" is Zero?  Napolean? Nope. Hitler? Nope. Stalin? Nope.  Etc etc etc.   What bullcrap.  It's a fairy tale!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (November 18, 2008 3:47 pm ET)
           

        On the contrary.  It's like the "Dread Pirate Roberts" from "The Princess Bride".  One person retires as antichrist, and another person takes the title.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (November 18, 2008 4:28 pm ET)
           

        Even a blind squirrel is bound to find a nut in the forest. They'll be wrong a million times but if they're right once they'll feel vindicated.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by neon desert (November 18, 2008 3:45 pm ET)
         

      Editors:

      This is just over the top.  I normally am amused by your news parodies and your societal insights, but when you abandon believability, your humor suffers.  This article is barely worth an audible giggle, but nowhere near your normal laugh-out-loud funniness.  Please, take a good look at what you've done here, and try to recognize the vast separation between the people you depict in this article and real humans - a separation that detracts from the parody.  Don't let TheOnion turn into another one of those parody sites that jump the shark and wind up a wreckage of only warm memories (think SNL).

      I am heading over to MediaMatters.org now to see how the conservatives are spinning and lying.  But I will check back here later to see if this article was merely an anomaly, or a trend.  I HOPE it's not the latter.

      regards,

      Neon Desert

      P.S. - Could we please have some more "Smoov B"?  I love that guy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by YMMOT (November 18, 2008 3:47 pm ET)
         

      What - you mean Sarah Palin isn't the AntiChrist ?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (November 18, 2008 3:56 pm ET)
         

      What if one of the newsweeklies opined on Bush being stupid right after his "election," because so many progressives believe it to be so. Editorially catering to a radical fringe notion is as disengenous as printing baldface lies.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (November 18, 2008 4:33 pm ET)
           

        That's different.

        Bush being stupid is not only based on reality, but is also hardly radical or "fringe".  Whereas the antichrist-Obama is viewed by critics as ridiculous, critics of the stupid-Bush find it threatening.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by eb (November 18, 2008 7:18 pm ET)
             

          Too bad we don't have a parlementary system.  That way we could actually have an Anti-Christ candidate with a party that could win a few seats in Congress.  I think, for everyone's sake, we need more transparency here so as to end all the speculation.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (November 18, 2008 4:02 pm ET)
         

      They just can't get over a black american who goes to a christian church with a beatiful family is a citizen of this country.

      quote-  senior editor Lisa Miller treated as newsworthy purported debate among some "conservative Christians"

      and who are these " conservative christians "  Dobson, Haggart, Huckabee, Palin, Hannity ?????. Last I heard conservative was a moving target having nothing to do with what the bible preaches. Come to think of it, does Hannity go to church and where ?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (November 18, 2008 4:04 pm ET)
         

      Even mmfa has to admit that the alarming circumstances detailed in the article can hardly be considered coincidental.  I mean, the lotto number . . ., the biblical descriptions. .. . This at least raises eyebrows and the issue warrants a deeper investigation than one measly article from a leftwing rag. Let's hope it gets picked by more mainstream orgs. . . .

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (November 18, 2008 4:11 pm ET)
           

        Looks like somebody escaped from the mental ward again...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (November 18, 2008 4:22 pm ET)
             

          Lets see -

          Clinton went to church every Sunday - heathen, murderer, rapist.

          Bush never goes to church - pious, righteous, born-again do-goodie

          Obama goes to church every Sunday - the anti-christ.

          Wingnut logic at its best.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by DAWUSS (November 18, 2008 4:26 pm ET)
               

            Wait... I thought Obama went to a mosque?!

            (I know, I need to work on my sarcasm)

            Report Abuse
          • Author by xxxxx (November 18, 2008 5:37 pm ET)
               

            Keep going:

            Jimmy Carter not only attended church every Sunday, but taught Sunday school while he was president. He, like all Democrats, is a heathen.

            Ronald Reagan, who was divorced and attended church sporadically if at all (and whose wife believed in astrology, which most Evangelicals think is witchcraft), was a saint.

            Not only does W. not attend church, but he doesn't even belong to a church in D.C. Never bothered to join one.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by BISHAMON (November 19, 2008 2:07 pm ET)
                 

              Is that true? I recall seeing pictures over the years of him entering or leaving Sunday services in D.C.

              Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (November 18, 2008 5:56 pm ET)
             

          or out on day pass!?!?!?

          Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (November 18, 2008 4:54 pm ET)
           

        Yeah, alarming... OK, right... Cuckoo is more like it.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (November 18, 2008 4:18 pm ET)
         

      Well, I'm surprised no one attacks Neal Boortz for calling Michael Savage the Anti-Christ...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by DannyHaszard (November 18, 2008 4:42 pm ET)
         
      The big difference between Jehovah's Witnesses and Christians is that the Watchtower Society's central core creed proclaims Jesus second coming in October 1914. They sometimes try to obscure this failed prophecy,and say that he came 'invisibly'.Yes,all other Christains are awaiting Jesus return,the JW say he ALREADY came back in 1914 and is only working through their Watchtower society.    Jehovah's Witnesses have lost membership in all countries with major internet access because their false doctrines and harmful practices are exposed on the modern information superhighway. 
      The Watchtower is a truly Orwellian world.
      --
      Danny Haszard http://www.dannyhaszard.com
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (November 18, 2008 7:01 pm ET)
           

        They had a second coming to my doorstop in 1985, and a 3rd and 4th, until they gave it up.  I saw them coming in a cloud, and in a big honking car full of other "witnesses."

        Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (November 19, 2008 9:28 am ET)
           

        Danny.

        Upon further research the Jehovah's Witnesses have altered their statement of Jesus arriving invisibly back in October 1914..After a two year investigation, in co-operation with Dick Morris and Fox News, they have announced that the invisibilty was actually possible because Jesus used his Klingon Cloaking device. Newsweek will be covering that story next week.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (November 18, 2008 4:42 pm ET)
         

      The "AntiChrist" is relative to the group making the accusation.  To the Jews, Hitler might be the antichrist.  To Christians, Marilyn Manson might be the antichrist.  To muslims, George Bush might be the Antichrist.  To liberals, Rush Limbaugh?

      I can't think of any less blunt way of saying Newsweek sucks. They suck, they suck they suck!  

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (November 18, 2008 4:48 pm ET)
           

        And the payoff?  The very people this article "sucks" up to will still rip Newsweek as part of the evil satanic secular-humanist devil-worshipping mainstream media!  You just can't please some people!...

        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (November 18, 2008 4:56 pm ET)
           

        Rush isn't the AC, he's just an idiot.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (November 18, 2008 6:00 pm ET)
             

          Oh I dunno Magnolialover do you have proof Rush isn't the Antichrist!?????

          Report Abuse
    • Author by jonesjax2374 (November 18, 2008 4:58 pm ET)
         

      Shame on newsweek.  Shame on Vogue for People Magazine quote on cover.  Shame on dying hard print industry!  As for these freaks, they hate everyone, including Jews.  Sooner they're beamed up the better.  Bring it on.  - Satan's Bride

      Report Abuse
    • Author by historygeek001 (November 18, 2008 5:00 pm ET)
         

      Newsweek has reached a new low.  Putting ANY credibility into this article, which they did, was beyond ridiculous.  The fact that they even published the article is indefensible. 

      I truly hope some apologists for Strandberg try to say something here.  I would love to see how they try to defend him.  For that matter, I would love to see anybody who thinks this was a legitimate article explain why they think so.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by DAWUSS (November 18, 2008 5:12 pm ET)
           

        First Amendment?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (November 18, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
             

          Nobody said they didn't have the right to do it, it's just that it's incredibly inappropriate of them.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by BillJ-MN (November 18, 2008 5:25 pm ET)
             

          You realize, don't you, that the First Amendment has nothing to do with anything historygeek001 said?  Anyone is free to publish anything that kind of claptrap, with or without justification.  He's simply asking what the justification for that article might be.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (November 18, 2008 5:30 pm ET)
             

          He didn't say anything about limiting speech.  It would be fun for an apologist to make an appearance so that we can slap them down post haste (with words of course).  Slamming these folks is the one and only time that its OK to harangue someone that is mentally retarded.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (November 19, 2008 7:37 am ET)
             

          No publication with the word "News" in it's title should ever print a story that speculates on nonsense. I've never seen Newsweek, Time or any other legitimate media source have a serious discussion about whether Santa claus is real, or whether unicorns or talking dogs actually exist.

          These are topics some often discuss seriously. Just before the nurse comes with the thorazine.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (November 19, 2008 9:30 am ET)
               

            King, you seem to be forgetting Sam the Talking Dog in the son of Sam stuff.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (November 19, 2008 2:43 pm ET)
             

          I never advocated censorship.  I said that printing the story was reprehensible.  There is a difference.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by DorisRussell (November 18, 2008 5:12 pm ET)
         

      Newsweek should be ashamed

      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (November 18, 2008 5:12 pm ET)
         

      I couldn't care less about Strandberg and his idiotic theories.  The problem is Newsweek giving his crap legitimacy.  As the article reports he's said many people might be the anti-Christ in the past (I wonder if any of them were named Bush? Cheney?) but Newsweek has paid no mind.  Why now?  I hate to "play the racism card" but that seems like the most obvious explanation.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (November 18, 2008 5:28 pm ET)
         

      I knew the Anti christ was posting here.

      Savage is disqualified as he's more of a sour talker, unlikely to be swarmy with most any international leader.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (November 18, 2008 6:36 pm ET)
         

      "The people who believe Obama is the Antichrist are perhaps jumping to conclusions, but they're not nuts"

      No, they're just dumb as a bag of hammers.

      Next issue, Newsweek will examine the little-known laws of physics which allow Santa Clause to deliver 8 billion toys in one night.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (November 18, 2008 7:08 pm ET)
           

        Nerzog, I think that one is best left to NORAD and Clement Clarke Moore.  And to all a good night. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (November 18, 2008 9:56 pm ET)
         

      "Is Obama the Antichrist?"

      Next week I expect to see a Newsweek article headlined "Is Obama Bigfoot?"

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin (November 18, 2008 11:11 pm ET)
         

      Wait a minute.  It's November 18th, not April 1st.


      Somebody actually believes this crap?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by cpinva (November 19, 2008 12:48 am ET)
         

      just because a concern or fear is widely shared, doesn't mean the people that share it aren't nuts.

      what i'd really like to know is, how much money is this guy making off of this nonsense? my guess is that it's a pretty fair amount, given the number of stupid people in this country.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dwilliams6422438 (November 19, 2008 7:51 am ET)
           

        surely the folks at Newsweek are kidding?  Right?  I mean - they can't be serious.......

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jim8601 (November 19, 2008 1:16 am ET)
         

      In the spirit of the fairness doctrine, won't someone write an article about whether Obama might actually be Christ? 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cycat (November 19, 2008 2:12 am ET)
         

      I am a native of a city in Tennessee where a man walked into a Unitarian church recently and opened fire, killing 2 people. He did so out of an admitted hatred of "liberals" whom he feared were ruining the country.  Police found books by Savage (Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder), Hannity (Let Fredom Ring: Winning the War of Liberty Over Liberalism), and O'Reilly (The Good, The Bad, and the Copletely Rediculous In America) during the search of his home after the shooting.  Now, of course, this was a single very disturbed individual.  But to believe that such beliefs are held by only a crazed few is a mistake. By publishing a story seriously questioning whether Obama is the Antichrist, Newsweek legitimizes such irrational debate as a nationwide concern.  I guarantee that this article will be referenced again and again as evidence that Obama is some kind of anti-American threat or embodiment of evil that must be resisted at best, destroyed at worst.  After all, if even a "heathen, commie,  left-wing liberal rag" like Newsweek can see it, soon other media sources will follow and people will realize the truth and....  Overreacting?  I think not.  The fear and superstitions, and self-riteous prejudices aren't that far beneath the surface.  Newsweek is fanning those flames.  Remember that people who commit horrendously evil acts don't necessarily think of their acts as evil--they think of them as justified. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (November 19, 2008 10:10 am ET)
           

        Interesting that the connection between that particular nutcase and his literary collection didn't get much attention in the MSM.  Just imagine the uproar if they had found a footlocker full of Playboys, or a copy of Darwin's "The Origin of Species".

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Cycat (November 19, 2008 2:47 am ET)
         

      Sorry, "Fredom" should of course be "Freedom" and "Copletely", though eerily appropriate, should have been "Completely".

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (November 19, 2008 8:33 am ET)
         

      Can we just move up the Rapture so we can get rid of these clowns? It really would be a much better world without them ...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (November 19, 2008 10:04 am ET)
           

        I can't wait for the Pre-Rapture yard sales.  Should be some really good bargains.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by John151823 (November 19, 2008 11:51 am ET)
         

      I agree with Strandberg one-hundred percent. One blatant irony is that those of you who are obviously on the left portray yourselves as the "good-guys" the "party of tolerance" the "non-judgmental" types. What a lie. The left supports a culture of death and debauchery and is only good-to, tolerant-of, and non-judgmental towards its own ilk. Have a different view, especially one based in spiritual discernment, and they will call you a racist, a nut-job, and an unlimited number of other ad hominem arguments. Just read all of the posts below this one (and likely after). All filled with sarcastic and vicious words, from the tolerant, non-judgemental, good-guys, no doubt. Interesting that not one offers an intellectual argument. Instead, it's a bunch of name calling and full support from you tolerant types to silence anyone who disagrees with you.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by seahawks123 (November 19, 2008 12:39 pm ET)
           

        and they will call you a racist, a nut-job, and an unlimited number of other ad hominem arguments

        Since when is calling someone a racist an ad hominem attack?  If the shoe fits, by all means wear it.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Rodrian Roadeye (November 19, 2008 12:44 pm ET)
           

        <<What a lie. The left supports a culture of death and debauchery and is only good-to, tolerant-of, and non-judgmental towards its own ilk.>> John (Chapter151 verse 823)

        Hmnnn...Have some Sean Hannity Kool-Aid!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (November 19, 2008 1:46 pm ET)
             

          I think he's drinking some other fluid put forth by the mighty Hannity.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by BillJ-MN (November 19, 2008 1:06 pm ET)
           

        Interesting that not one offers an intellectual argument. - John151823

        An intellectual argument against superstitious silliness?  Can we then have an intellectual argument against fairies?  Unicorns?  Dragons?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by cpinva (November 19, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
           

        i beg to differ. i never made any claim to being non-judgmental. if, based on the facts and circumstances, i determine that your beliefs, no matter how deeply felt, are without legitimate foundation, then i'm going to say so. yes, that does make me judgmental.

        and your point would be?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (November 19, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
           

        Interesting--you are intolerant of tolerance.  I suggest taking a course in logic; that might help your thought processes.  And maybe google the psychological concept of "projecting."

        Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (November 20, 2008 4:22 pm ET)
           

        Define "spiritual discernment." 

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Newsweek
    Newsweek
    Newsweek
    251 W. 57th St.
    New York, NY 10019