Morning Joe debunks claim that union autoworkers are "paid 70 bucks an hour"
SUMMARY: Debunking the false claim, advanced by many in the media, that autoworkers employed by U.S. auto manufacturers receive $70 or more per hour in wages and benefits, Bob Shrum said on Morning Joe that "there's this one crazy statistic" that autoworkers are "paid 70 bucks an hour." Mike Barnicle added: "The $77 an hour thing is not true. It's the compilation of all the benefits." Joe Scarborough later stated, "[J]ust so everybody knows, when we talk about $77 or $45, we're not only talking about the money, the benefits, everything else, retirement, we're also talking about the money to -- the legacy costs of the existing retirees."
On the December 4 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, co-hosts Joe Scarborough, Mike Barnicle, and Mika Brzezinski debunked the false claim, advanced by many in the media, that autoworkers employed by U.S. auto manufacturers receive $70 or more per hour in wages and benefits.
After Democratic strategist Bob Shrum noted that "there's this one crazy statistic" that autoworkers are "paid 70 bucks an hour," Barnicle said: "The $77 an hour thing is not true. It's the compilation of all the benefits." Scarborough later added, "[J]ust so everybody knows, when we talk about $77 or $45, we're not only talking about the money, the benefits, everything else, retirement, we're also talking about the money to -- the legacy costs of the existing retirees." Shrum replied, "It's health care for ... people retired 25 years ago. I mean, that money's not going to anyone who's working there now." Brzezinski replied, "And they have a lot to carry with that." Scarborough concluded: "It's very misleading when you're talking about $77 an hour in labor costs. "
As Media Matters for America has noted, according to General Motors, the figure representing the hourly cost of labor to U.S. automakers -- a cost that GM puts at $69 -- includes not only current workers' hourly wages and benefits, such as health care and retirement, but also retirement and health-care benefits that U.S. automakers are providing for current retirees. Notwithstanding this fact, numerous media figures and outlets have advanced the falsehood that autoworkers receive $70 or more per hour in wages and benefits, some using it to blame autoworkers for the domestic auto industry's financial straits.
From the December 4 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:
SHRUM: There may be a better way, and I think the far better way is for Congress to come up with a serious plan, have a serious oversight board. Remember here that we're not just beating up the unions. After all, these are the people who represent those folks in Detroit. Well, there's this one crazy statistic, have you seen it? That they're paid 70 bucks an hour for auto workers?
BRZEZINSKI: Well, yes. This is debatable.
SHRUM: It's not true. It's --
BARNICLE: The $77 an hour thing is not true. It's the compilation of all the benefits.
SHRUM: Right. And the benefits of the retirees and the pensions of the retirees. It's actually about $28 an hour.
BRZEZINSKI: Really. OK, now we --
SCARBOROUGH: The thing is, even on that point, if you're comparing the $77 to the $45 that foreign automakers do, even that is only a two-year deal because they've already made corrective measures.
BRZEZINSKI: Renegotiated.
SCARBOROUGH: So, that $77 figure goes down to $45, $46 in 2010.
BARNICLE: And new hirees, I believe -- don't hold me to this -- but under the new contract that starts January 1, new hirees are receiving like $18 or $19 an hour, so it goes down even further.
SCARBOROUGH: And again, just so everybody knows, when we talk about $77 or $45, we're not only talking about the money, the benefits, everything else, retirement, we're also talking about the money to -- the legacy costs of the existing retirees.
BRZEZINSKI: Well, yes.
SHRUM: It's health care for -- health care for people retired 25 years ago.
BRZEZINSKI: Exactly.
SHRUM: I mean, that money's not going to anyone who's working there now.
BRZEZINSKI: And they have a lot to carry with that.
SCARBOROUGH: It's very misleading when you're talking about $77 an hour in labor costs.
BRZEZINSKI: That's true.















Well, Morning Joe is not the place you'd usually expect to debunk corporate conservative misinformation...
But, we'll take it.
Way to go guys!!
Only because Barnacle the phony was on.
Examples of his phoniness would be? Dose his phoniness vary, or is it consistent and to what metric?
An opinion is all well and good but throw some meat out there will ya!
Don't be so impatient, EW. I think the comment's being posted in installments.
I think the comment's being posted in installments
And posted by just one of the various nom de plumes.....who all just happen to hate anything MSNBC.
Julia, there's just too much hatiness going on in the world. And too many contractions ;-)
Too much hatiness?
I guess this new hat craze hasn't reached NJ yet.
Oh now get off my gal Mary's back. Hattiness would apply to hats...:-0)
But I think her new spelling is better ,non the less..... Mary always endeavors to please. And to bring peaciness and tidings of great joy to all. :-0)
mary59, you have just coined and contributed a great new word, "hatiness". Stepen Colbert must be jealous! I love it!
I could get it trademarked but I offer it to all the world in the spirit of world peace.
Mary59: Shouldn't that be world "peaciness"?
Excellent! I shall proceed with world peaciness from this day forth...
Worrier, I take you point about hats. Perhaps we should spell the great new word "hateyness."
Arrr, I forgot me "r" as in "your hats."
Arrr
No need to go "pirate" on us, Mar....:-)
Pirateyness is not my specialty, but if they'd pay me $70 an hour I'd do it. (see now this thread is back on track and totally relevant.)
"too much hatiness going on....."
Is that like "too much truthiness" (Colbert).... ;)
"Nom de plumes"?
Are you saying that petty soon someone will be calling someone a "sockpuppet"?
Hey JJ,where's your New England beau ?
Are you saying that petty soon someone will be calling someone a "sockpuppet"?
Hell knows which set of sockpuppet nom de plumes who do not use contractions it might be. Not that I'm a nom de plume hater...:-)
Hey JJ,where's your New England beau ?
Oh believe me, he's alive, well and kickin' up a storm. I got me a live one....wink, wink. I'll tell 'im you inquired...:-0)
Hey King, Miz Julia let me know you were asking for me. I am in fact alive & well...& kickin up a storm up here in New England
I'll be back one of these days. My sweet Texas gal hasn't exactly turned me into a full fledged Dem/Lib....but she's helping me see the light :-)
He came back with another opinion below.
Ugh! Maybe I'm just a hateful impationist?
His continued friendship and going on the Don Imus show. That to me is an example of phonyness. If he were sincere with alot of his "causes" he would not longer appear on the Don Imis show.
I just hate Barnacle because he is a Red Sox fan.
Another opinion...ok.
Here's mine. I've been fortunate never to have heard his show. The number of people who have appeared on his show is probably well over 1000. Somehow I can't paint them all the same. Tragic failure on my part, no doubt. That some of those I might totally disagree with might say something good on the occasion, a further fall.
There must be more to phoniness that appearing with Imus.
I like Barnacle but I remember last spring this bothered me, MMFA brought it to our attention.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200804170008?f=s_search
http://sidesalad.net/archives/DebbieDownerRachaelDratch.jpg
do you hear this?
One small victory for truth against an onslaught of lies and misinformation.
Is there hope for journalism, after all?
Pat Buchanan wants us to bail out the Auto Industry is that conservative misinformation?
To coin a hoary old phrase, Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Buchanan's average isn't that good, but occasionally he nails one.
I agree but he is right, we do need to bail them out. I loved Michael Moore last night on Olbermann he made some good points about what the Auto industry
Stay tuned...
If I put a quarter into my disc drive, will I get the conclusion?
You will not get any thing, you hater. ;-) ;-) ;-)
will I get the conclusion?
You may get the conclusion with contradictions but no contractions.
Mary & JuliaJayne, I find it laughable that you do not realize that you are guilty of the same hate of which you accuse me. Do you not see that you prove my point? You are hateyfull scum and human trash.
I think I have made my point?????
Do you have a link to support your claims?
Thanks for the discussion. Have a nice day.
That is hateyness to you, Mr. Colonel.
You have made a pointandsoIhavetooIthink.
Here is my link:
Have your day be merry and nice.
Just in case you're visiting MMFA again for the first time...
They like to give props to media heads who finally get something right after MMFA has been hammering it home day after day.
Shaggles, it is "a CORRECTIVE to conservative misinformation". MMFA does it often.
how is this conservative misinformation?
You may be interpreting the mission statement too literally. The $73 dollar story IS the mis-information. The news that this misinformation has been recognized by the media is NEWS to the readers of this site. And welcome it is.
Yeah. I probably am taking it too literally. I don't see this here too often though. I usually have to go to Crooks & Liars to read about the MSM actually getting something right.
What do you know, for once Scarborough gets something right.
After them all getting it wrong the last few weeks. Conspicuously missing was any reference to their own misquotes of this same figure.
Dispite The lack of a union anchor on some companies, the industry average is -36.7%. Worst is Chrysler at -47%, Nissan-42.2%, GM -41.3%, Toyota-33.9%,Honda-31.6%,Ford-30.5%.
GM does have some interesting things in their well documented (clogged) pipeline. One being the "Autonomy" 'flat-pack' chassis. Could be a very good product, at the mercy of the braintrust that has put them where they are today.
I have a j.d. and I make $16/hr in NYC. Even $18/hr base before benefits is entirely too much.
Maybe if you cut back on the Jack Daniels you'd get paid better.
Heh.
Randy
Scar is one of the least offensive conservative commentators out there. If you eliminate everyone WORSE than him, MMFA wouldn't be nearly as interesting.
(And by "eliminate" I mean from consideration, not from the earth!)
Bye bye American auto makers. And bye bye union works and your pathetic UAW!
Incite revolutions much?