About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Dick Morris baselessly suggested Clinton replaced Arkansas U.S. attorney to avoid Whitewater investigation

December 11, 2008 8:12 pm ET

SUMMARY: Dick Morris baselessly suggested that former President Bill Clinton "fire[d] all 93 US Attorneys" upon entering office in 1993 in order to "cover for firing [U.S. Attorney Charles] Banks and replacing him with Paula Casey, a Clinton ally," falsely suggesting that Banks "was hot on [Clinton's] heels as he probed charges that swirled around the [Whitewater] land deal." In fact, Banks had reportedly resisted investigating the Whitewater matter in 1992, just weeks before the presidential election, in defiance of pressure from officials in then-President George H.W. Bush's administration.

21 Comments

In a December 11 column published in the New York Post and on Newsmax.com, syndicated columnist and Fox News contributor Dick Morris and his wife and frequent collaborator Eileen McGann baselessly suggested that former President Bill Clinton "fire[d] all 93 US Attorneys" upon entering office in 1993 in order to "cover for firing [Eastern District of Arkansas U.S. Attorney Charles] Banks and replacing him with Paula Casey, a Clinton ally." Morris and McGann falsely suggested that Banks "was hot on [Clinton's] heels as he probed charges that swirled around the [Whitewater] land deal."

In fact, as Media Matters for America has noted, Banks himself had reportedly resisted investigating the Whitewater matter in 1992, in defiance of pressure from officials in then-President George H.W. Bush's administration, which Banks reportedly said "appears to suggest an intentional or unintentional attempt to intervene into the political process of the upcoming presidential election."

As Mollie Dickenson noted in a February 1998 Salon.com article, Banks refused to pursue the Whitewater matter, citing his belief that "no prosecutable case existed against any of the witnesses," including the Clintons. From the article:

On Oct. 8 [1992], [Attorney General William] Barr convened a joint FBI-Justice Department panel to examine the referral [naming the Clintons as witnesses in the Whitewater case]. But the panel concluded that the referral "failed to cite evidence of any federal criminal offense." The panel's comment about the referral ranged from "junky" and "half-baked" to that its allegations were "reckless, irresponsible" and "odd."

Nevertheless, Barr put a preliminary investigation into motion and ordered Banks to review it again and to report back by Oct. 16, two weeks before the Nov. 3 election.

But, in fact, Banks had already concluded, and the FBI in Little Rock had agreed, that "no action should be taken on the referral at that time." Banks had already prosecuted Jim McDougal in 1990 for alleged bank crimes, and McDougal had been acquitted. Banks said further that he believed "no prosecutable case existed against any of the witnesses," most notably the Clintons.

After Clinton appointed Casey, L. Jean Lewis -- the Resolution Trust Corporation investigator who produced the original criminal referral -- again attempted to persuade the U.S. attorney's office to investigate the Whitewater matter. But as journalist Joe Conason and political columnist Gene Lyons noted in their book, The Hunting of the President (Thomas Dunne Books, 2000), Casey cited Banks' analysis in refusing to pursue the case:

Lewis became particularly exercised after Paula Casey, citing analyses by Justice Department experts and former U.S. attorney Charles Banks, turned down her original 1992 referral for a second time. [Page 95]

Robert Ray, the third and final counsel assigned to investigate the Clintons, announced on September 20, 2000, that he had closed the probe after concluding that "the evidence was insufficient to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that either President or Mrs. Clinton knowingly participated in any criminal conduct."

Further, contrary to Morris' suggestion that Clinton's removing the first President Bush's U.S. attorneys was unusual, as Media Matters has noted, it is common practice; President George W. Bush reportedly replaced 88 of 93 U.S. attorneys in his first two years in office, compared with 89 of 93 by Clinton in his first two years.

From Morris and McGann's December 11 column, as it appeared in the New York Post:

WHEN Bill Clinton took office in January 1993, he was hearing the foot steps of Little Rock US Attorney Charles Banks, who was hot on his heels as he probed charges of corruption that swirled around the Watergate [sic] land deal. President Clinton decided, in one of his first acts, to fire all 93 US Attorneys -- claiming he wanted a clean slate.

Many insiders suspected that the other 92 bodies were a cover for firing Banks and replacing him with Paula Casey, a Clinton ally.

US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald's indictment of Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich raises a similar question as President-elect Barack Obama prepares to take office. Will the new president fire Fitzgerald?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by JLyons (December 11, 2008 8:57 pm ET)
         

      Dick Morris will say anything even the most untrue statements as long as those statements are negative toward President and Sen Clinton. He has no credibility whatsover.  Insignificant a hole.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (December 11, 2008 9:15 pm ET)
           

        He has no credibility whatsover

        Apparently enough for nightly appearances on the Hannity lie-fest.  Olbermann may be partisan, but at least he doesn't discuss the issues of the day with partisan hacks/liars like Morris.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by JLyons (December 11, 2008 9:37 pm ET)
             

          I agree, and not only is Morris a lying hack, I think he has a secret crush on the Clintons.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by SDL (December 11, 2008 10:18 pm ET)
               

            If Morris is out walking and he steps into a pile of dogcrap, he'd somehow find a way to hold the Clintons responsible...  

            Report Abuse
            • Author by princeofwheels (December 11, 2008 10:53 pm ET)
                 

              If Dickie did step in a pile of dogcrap, would the dogcrap wipe the Morris off itself?

              Report Abuse
          • Author by captfoster2 (December 12, 2008 1:28 am ET)
               

            "I think he has a secret crush on the Clintons."

            Well..... their toes anyways.....   :)

            Report Abuse
    • Author by SDL (December 11, 2008 9:16 pm ET)
         

      Didn't know Morris was married. Does she paint her toenails and keep her feet in perfect condition so ol Dick can have a suckfest?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (December 11, 2008 11:30 pm ET)
           

        Dick Morris is as happily married as Michael Jackson, that guy who was with Liza Minelli, and Michael Medved. I'm not sure about Tom Cruise.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pbg (December 11, 2008 9:37 pm ET)
         

      Yeah, sure, right, He fired the Attorney general in 1993 to cover up something that happened in 1978. 

      Clinton sure leapt into action! Just like lightning!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (December 11, 2008 10:05 pm ET)
         

      Another day, another Clinton smear, another paycheck from Dick's enablers.

      Man, I wish my life was that freakin' easy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (December 11, 2008 10:16 pm ET)
         

      Dickie, WRONG again. You have, without a doubt , proven that absolutely NO talent in anything can lead to a profitable bank account. Dick, you are a Dick but we salute your lack of talent and lack of intelligence and lack of scruples and no morals which have made you the half man you are today. I am rooting for you to get a fulltime job at Fox so you can be a role model for the other no talents at Fox.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (December 11, 2008 10:18 pm ET)
         

      Even Dick Morris himself must sometimes wonder how he gets away with it... But as long as there are stupid, gullible, and rabidly partisan Republicans he will always have a job.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (December 11, 2008 11:18 pm ET)
         

      What is behind little dick's obsession with all things Clinton?  It's worse (narrowly) than the Dolt's obsession with all things homosexual.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (December 11, 2008 11:32 pm ET)
           

        Oscar, I think the connection between those two obsessions is pretty clear anytime Dick starts sobbing about the way Bill gained his trust, and then tossed him aside. Like a crushed schoolgirl.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin (December 11, 2008 11:58 pm ET)
         

      What a shock it will be when The Dick says something truthful about the Clintons.  He sounds like a scorned lover.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (December 12, 2008 1:27 am ET)
         

      My guess.....

      Since this cretin has had none to zero credibility at least for the last 15 years.... he will one day very soon wither away, never to be seen or heard again....

      Well.... thats my guess anyways... ;)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (December 12, 2008 1:58 pm ET)
           

        That's my HOPE, but I'm not as optimistic as you are.  I think he'll stay around for a long time, because they thrive on hate.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (December 12, 2008 11:28 am ET)
         

      For some reason, Morris reminds me of Grima Wormtongue, from "The Two Towers."

      Report Abuse
    • Author by cpinva (December 13, 2008 12:16 am ET)
         

      yeah, that worked out so well for the clintons.  it didn't stop them from killing everyone in AR,  or starting the black plague in europe.  those darn clintons, they'll do just anything to advance themselves!

      Report Abuse