About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ignoring Toussie case, USA Today claimed Bush "eschewed controversial pardons"

January 21, 2009 3:33 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: A USA Today editorial discussing former President Bush's departure from office claimed that Bush "eschewed controversial pardons," which it called "a refreshing contrast" to former President Clinton's departure. In fact, Bush's pardon for New York developer Isaac Toussie, announced December 23, was withdrawn after it was revealed that Toussie's family contributed more than $37,000 to Republicans.

34 Comments

In a January 21 editorial discussing former President Bush's departure from office, USA Today claimed that Bush "eschewed controversial pardons." The editorial stated: "Aside from some questionable last-minute regulations, Bush's departure was a refreshing contrast [to former President Clinton's]. He eschewed controversial pardons." In fact, on December 23 the White House announced that Bush was issuing a pardon to New York developer Isaac Toussie, who was convicted of mail fraud and false statements to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development -- an act that the White House announced that Bush would not carry out after it was revealed that Toussie's family contributed more than $37,000 to Republicans.

On the day the pardon was announced, a Politico blog post noted that Toussie's father "did give $28,500 to the RNC [Republican National Committee] this year."

The next day, December 24, White House press secretary Dana Perino stated that "[w]ith respect to the case of Mr. Isaac R. Toussie, the Counsel to the President reviewed the application and believed, based on the information known to him at the time, that it was a meritorious application. He so advised the President, who accepted the recommendation." Perino added: "Based on information that has subsequently come to light, the President has directed the Pardon Attorney not to execute and deliver a Grant of Clemency to Mr. Toussie." Perino also reportedly said that the contributions "raise[] the appearance of impropriety."

A December 25 Washington Post article reported that Toussie "is represented by Washington defense attorney Bradford A. Berenson, who served as an associate White House counsel under Bush from 2001 to 2003" and that Toussie's family donated to several Republican candidates. From the article:

White House press secretary Dana Perino said neither Bush nor counsel Fred Fielding was aware of the GOP contributions from the father of Isaac Robert Toussie, who had been convicted of mail fraud and of making false statements to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Perino said Bush had also been unaware of other aspects of the Toussie case that were revealed in news reports yesterday.

"Looking at the totality of the case, more could have been described to the president," Perino said. "The political contributions certainly were not known. It raises the appearance of impropriety, so the president prudently decided not to go through with the pardon."

[...]

Toussie pleaded guilty to mail fraud and lying to HUD, admitting that he falsified finances of prospective home buyers seeking HUD mortgages, and was sentenced to five months in prison and five months' house arrest in July 2003. The New York Daily News also noted that hundreds of former customers filed a federal lawsuit against Toussie, accusing him of luring poor, minority home buyers into agreeing to overpriced mortgages with hidden costs.

Federal election records show $37,700 in donations to Republicans this year by Toussie's father, developer Robert Toussie, including a $28,500 donation in April to the presidential campaign of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). The elder Toussie's wife, Laura, also gave $2,300 each to GOP Sens. Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Gordon Smith of Oregon, records show.

A December 25 CNN.com article reported that "[q]uestions continued to swirl Thursday over the president's decision to withdraw a pardon for a New York developer involved in a Long Island mortgage fraud scheme." From the article:

The White House initially announced the pardon Tuesday afternoon, immediately setting off a firestorm of criticism from angry homeowners and investors, as well as government watchdog organizations quick to note Toussie's ties to prominent Republican officeholders.

Among the questions now being asked are:

  • Why didn't the White House conduct a more thorough investigation of Toussie's background?
  • Why did White House Counsel Fred Fielding circumvent the typical pardon application process by directly considering Toussie's clemency request instead of leaving it to the Justice Department?
  • Did Toussie get special treatment because of his political connections?

Toussie and his father, also a developer, are defendants in a lawsuit filed in New York federal court on behalf of more than 400 minority home purchasers who allege a conspiracy involving racial steering, racketeering and fraud related to homes the Toussies built on Staten Island, attorney Peter Seidman told CNN.

Additionally, USA Today stated: "Presidents have not always departed with such poise. In 2001, the last transition before this one, Clinton's final days in office were like his presidency" and cited as evidence that "Clinton gave a radio address and not just one but two farewell speeches, all on a day that was supposed to belong to the freshly minted President Bush." It later stated that Bush "left Washington on Tuesday with a wave and a quick exit into his waiting plane a classy way to slip into the exclusive club of former presidents." However, USA Today did not note that Bush gave a public, post-departure speech in Midland, Texas. Additionally, according to a Defense Department article, Bush also attended a "private departure ceremony" at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland. Further, Clinton's final weekly radio address -- reportedly taped on January 19, 2001 -- was released on Saturday, January 20, 2001, the day Clinton left office. It is customary for the weekly address to be released each Saturday. Bush also released his final radio address on the final Saturday during his tenure as president -- January 17.

From the January 21 USA Today editorial:

The best way to leave the presidency is graciously and quietly. In that, George W. Bush did himself and the nation proud.

[...]

The Bush-to-Obama transition was a "model in both directions," says John P. Burke, a political science professor at the University of Vermont.

Presidents have not always departed with such poise. In 2001, the last transition before this one, Clinton's final days in office were like his presidency: controversial and cacophonous. He issued questionable pardons. He made a plea deal to avoid future prosecution. Staffers pulled childish pranks such as popping the "W" off a number of computer keyboards. Clinton gave a radio address and not just one but two farewell speeches, all on a day that was supposed to belong to the freshly minted President Bush.

Aside from some questionable last-minute regulations, Bush's departure was a refreshing contrast. He eschewed controversial pardons. He left Washington on Tuesday with a wave and a quick exit into his waiting plane a classy way to slip into the exclusive club of former presidents.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Caseysprings (January 21, 2009 3:38 pm ET)
         

      Sorry , but I disagree with MMFA. Bush canceled the pardon and did not abuse the pardons like Former Presidents Clinton and Bush Sr.  I know MMFA does not like it when the media highlights some of Bushs decent things, now I am waiting for a story on how Obama really did not say "I want to Thank President Bush".  Or that Obama really did not engage in a final hug with the former President.

      This is another example of silly behavior.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (January 21, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
           

        OK, he eschewed controversial pardons when busted on them. Better?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Caseysprings (January 21, 2009 3:45 pm ET)
             

          There was a problem and they withdrew it, unlike Previous administrations. I know MSNBC was very upset that there was only the pardons of the border agents. That idiot Chris Matthews would have spent another 2 hours on the I hate Bush blah blah blah discussion. Move on MMFA, the President wants us to stop the partisan hate.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Blue Fielder (January 21, 2009 4:28 pm ET)
               

            Here's a hint: "partisan" does not mean "disagrees with me". I'm absolutely sick of you using the word "partisan" without regard to its meaning in EVERY SINGLE POST you make.  You're an obnoxious, whining, ignorant troll.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Caseysprings (January 21, 2009 4:38 pm ET)
                 

              I know exactly what "partisan", and I pasted it below. Obviously you calling me names means you do not want to have a civil discussion, instead you want to polarize the board.  Not what my President wants us to do.

              an adherent or supporter of a person, group, party, or cause, esp. a person who shows a biased, emotional allegiance.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (January 21, 2009 3:43 pm ET)
           

        Duh?  It is rather obvious to those who don't drink the MMFA kool aid  that Bush eschewed controversial pardons when he withdrew the Toussie pardon as it became controversial.

        Next we'll see a defense of the pardons of Marc Rich and the unrepentant FALN murderers by good ol what's his name.

        MMFA is laughable.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (January 21, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
             

          It's been 8 years and you STILL KEEP BRINGING UP BILL CLINTON! But why am I not surprised? Y'all are still bringing up FDR...

          Report Abuse
      • Author by jamesB (January 21, 2009 3:43 pm ET)
           

        yep.  and considerng Clinton pardoned crook Mark Rich, mmfa has no room to compare Bush with Clinton on this. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by SFnomad (January 21, 2009 4:08 pm ET)
             

          Anyone that got a pardon was a "crook" by definition, even the ones that Dumbya did.  I would say Failure in Chief Bush's commutation of the criminal "Scooter" Libby was contraversial as well and far worse than the Mark Rich pardon.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by anotheramerican (January 21, 2009 5:48 pm ET)
               

            You conveniently do not mention that Clinton profited by his pardon of Rich. Nor do you talk about how the FALN pardon of unrepentant murderers was an overt political favor to curry the Puerto Rican vote for Hillary's Senate run.  You have to ignore those inconvenient "truths" in order to come to your conclusion.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by friedbergboy1422 (January 21, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
                 

              AA,

              Please report to the Gingrich/union thread, your questions about the white Republicans who voted for Obama have been answered with specific examples.  Thank you.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (January 21, 2009 7:45 pm ET)
                   

                To Barney's credit, I noticed he's put "truths" in quotation marks when describing his information. He should do that whenever he mentions his "facts".

                Report Abuse
        • Author by Blue Fielder (January 21, 2009 4:28 pm ET)
             

          Sorry, clinton had nothing to do with this, troll.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Caseysprings (January 21, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
               

            Hey Damian, the troll is you. Anyone with a different view than you is a Troll?

            Get real.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by SDL (January 21, 2009 4:50 pm ET)
             

          Let's see...

          Ford pardoning Nixon...

          Bush 41 pardoning Weinberger....

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Caseysprings (January 21, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
               

            President Gerald Ford was honored for his courage in making a controversial decision of conscience to pardon former President Richard M. Nixon. On September 8, 1974, President Ford granted a “full, free and absolute pardon” to former President Nixon “for all offenses against the United States which he...has committed or may have committed or taken part in” while he was president. Nixon accepted the pardon. The response from the press, Congress and the general public was overwhelmingly negative. Appearing before the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary, President Ford explained under oath, in the first sworn congressional testimony ever given by a sitting president, that there were no deals connected with the pardon. Ford wrote in his autobiography that Nixon's pardon “wasn't motivated primarily by sympathy for his plight or by concern over the state of his health. It was the state of the country’s health at home and around the world that worried me.” In 1976, President Ford lost the White House to Jimmy Carter in one of the closest elections in American history. Many historians believe Ford’s pardon of Nixon contributed to his defeat.

            http://www.jfklibrary.org/Education+and+Public+Programs/Profile+in+Courage+Award/Award+Recipients/Gerald+Ford/

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Old_Benjamin (January 21, 2009 5:21 pm ET)
                 

              What's your point?  Oh, you don't have one cause you're a troll.  Nevermind.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 21, 2009 3:43 pm ET)
         

      He eschewed controversial pardons.

      Aren't all pardons, by their very nature, controversial...to someone?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (January 21, 2009 4:03 pm ET)
           

        The only other ones I know about were for the Border Security killers. Nah no possible controversy there.

        Who else got one? Scooter didn't, but as hands that touch bar cells will never touch his. His pain is debatable for the nonce. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (January 21, 2009 4:36 pm ET)
             

          EW, did you hear Bush's speecxh in Tx last night, whitewashing his 8 years of incompetence and buffoonery? The part where he babbled on about leaving office with a sense of accomplishment and his head held high? That sounded like a pretty controversial pardon to me.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (January 21, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
               

            Missed it, too busy openning champaign bottles. His egocentric world view continues unabated. Or perhaps he can't find anyone to stand with him. That bubble arround him may have unexpected exterior support.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by truthseeker77 (January 21, 2009 6:53 pm ET)
         

      "with George W. Bush’s head of state immunity now terminated, the new government of Barack Obama was obligated by international law to commence a criminal investigation into Bush’s torture practices.

      http://harpers.org/archive/2009/01/hbc-90004250

      Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (January 21, 2009 7:15 pm ET)
         
      • Who are the "Border Security killers?"
      • Commuting the sentences of the two Boarder Patrol officers was highly controversial because those gun crime sentences were mandated by Congress - an unConstitutional law, in my opinion.  Those two gentleman shot a suspect and then took several steps to cover up the crime and lie about it - including not reporting the shooting.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by newzhound (January 21, 2009 7:16 pm ET)
           

        Sorry - should be "Border" not "Boarder" - the Boarder Patrol would be B&B inspectors...

        Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (January 21, 2009 9:24 pm ET)
         

      And how much did the new Secretary of State's brother profit from his pardoning enterprise?

      C'mon Media Matters (for very little), do you really believe this one is a winner?  This is a fresh departure from the previous presidency where it was clearly understood that the dispensation of pardons came with a price, whether money for the double-wide trailer in Arkansas, trying to gain political favor for a spouse, a fee for service stipend for the first's ladies bro or some other nefarious reason.  Nice thing is our soon to be Attorney General signed off on all the graft before anyone could stop it! 

      As far as Bush's pardons, too bad he didn't fully clean the records of Libby, Campean and Ramos just commuted their sentences.  At least Marc Reich will be allowed to vote, if he ever returns to this country and faces the mountains of other charges placed against him.

      Keep up the good work MM(fvl)!  Your complaints are generally laughable, but this one rises to a whole new level of smell!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (January 21, 2009 9:59 pm ET)
           

        But if he pardoned Libby then he'd no longer be able to hide out behind the fith amendment. He might be enticed to talk,..and that would be bad.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (January 22, 2009 1:40 am ET)
             

          Why is "laughable" such a popular word with the most ridiculous clowns that post at this site? Do their instructors use this word (along with their fake laughter) enough that it's taken the place of having a point?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by proudconservative (January 22, 2009 11:19 am ET)
               

            to kernal and westeaston,

            Maybe when I think of and post on Media Matters (for very little), laughable probably is overused, even if accurate.  Point taken.  I'll try to use the word pathetic more often when referring to MM(fvl) and other words of that tenor to properly flavor future comments.

            Thanks for your assistance in this matter!

            Report Abuse
            • Author by proudconservative (January 22, 2009 11:28 am ET)
                 

              Oh westeaston, sorry to forget about you.

              I'd love to hear Libby 'sing' if people like Sandy Burgler could explain how all those documents from the national archives got stuffed down his pants and socks as an 'accident due to poor oversight'.  You know, in the same fashion as Treasury Secretary Geithner approaches his tax returns!

              Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (January 22, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
                   

                Not to mention the democratic head of tax regs in congress. How do you guys keep missing that obvious hit. Sandy's talked, the case thoughly worked over and the result was? You really see comparisons in the two? Course you do

                Report Abuse
                • Author by proudconservative (January 22, 2009 6:29 pm ET)
                     

                  I did mention it!  And of course the comparisons fit, they all just made snafues!

                  Now back to this losing proposition by Media Matters (for very little), let's compare the pardon records of Bush vs. the purity of Bill Clinton's pardons in the dead of night and the new attorney general's willing approval of them.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by eweston8542983 (January 22, 2009 9:06 pm ET)
                       

                    It would be pleasant to take you posts at face value. Pity thats not a real option.

                    Anyhoo, You have a purity metric in your back pocket. Along with a deffinition of the dead of night that has breathless relevence. Add a person's willingness index. And Bob's your uncle.

                    Decode your answer...now.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by proudconservative (January 22, 2009 9:55 pm ET)
                         

                      westeaston and others seeking insight and truth,

                      Eric Holder, Obama's wish for leading the Department of Justice.  It's from Wikip but it gives a good overview of his involvement in the Clinton pardons.

                      "In a 2003 report covering 177 Clinton pardons, that Holder had played a significant role in facilitating the Rich pardon, first by recommending the well-connected Jack Quinn to legal representatives of Marc Rich, by failing to fully inform prosecutors of the pending pardon, and by eventually delivering a "neutral leaning favorable" opinion of the twilight pardon to the President from a position of authority. Holder has expressed some regret over his handling of the Rich pardon, stating "I wish I had done some things differently with regard to the Marc Rich matter. Specifically, I wish that I had ensured that the Department of Justice was more fully informed and involved in this pardon process".

                      Holder was also involved in Clinton's decision to reduce the sentences of 16 members of the Boricua Popular Army, an organization that has been categorized by the FBI as a terrorist organization. The clemency request was initially opposed in 1996 by U.S. Pardons Attorney Margaret Love. When Holder was elevated to Deputy Attorney General in 1997, he was asked to reexamine the issue by 3 members of Congress. In July 1999, Holder recommended clemency to President Clinton with a report from then U.S. Pardons Attorney Roger Adams that neither supported nor opposed clemency. A month later, the clemency was granted by Clinton. According to The Hartford Courant, the clemency was unusual because it was opposed by the FBI, the federal prosecutor and the victims. According to the newspaper, it was also unusual because, before the commutations, the Boricua Popular Army members were not required to repudiate their actions, and they were not asked to provide any information concerning the whereabouts of Victor Manuel Gerena, a co-conspirator and one of the FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives, or the millions of dollars stolen by the group in a 1983 robbery of Wells Fargo in West Hartford, Connecticut." And for the ill-informed or those trying to remain in denial, a brief look of how Clinton left his final (skid) mark on his presidency.... http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/010305/archive_004851.htm Holder will approach justice the way Geithner will deal with taxes.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by eweston8542983 (January 23, 2009 10:38 am ET)
                           

                        Another hyperbolic load of hypersensitive froth. Like your concern of worker abuse, extremly discrete though longwinded in coverage. Who'd a thought you had it in you.

                        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.