About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity supports his claim that Obama is "an ideologue" with falsehood

January 26, 2009 9:32 am ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: While interviewing Rudy Giuliani, Sean Hannity repeated the false claim that "[s]ixty-one" Guantánamo detainees who have been released are "back on the battlefield" to support his assertion that President Barack Obama is "an ideologue." Hannity and Giuliani also repeated the claims that fiscal stimulus packages were ineffective during the Great Depression and during Japan's "lost decade," but both those claims have been challenged by economists.

107 Comments

During the January 23 edition of Fox News' Hannity, while interviewing former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, host Sean Hannity repeated the false claim that "[s]ixty-one people we know now were released [from Guantánamo] and now they're back on the battlefield" to support his assertion that President Barack Obama is "an ideologue." Hannity and Giuliani also repeated the claims that fiscal stimulus packages were ineffective during the Great Depression and during Japan's "lost decade," but both those claims have been challenged by economists.

Contrary to Hannity's claim that "[s]ixty-one" detainees who have been released are "back on the battlefield," according to the Pentagon, that figure includes 43 former prisoners who are suspected of, but have not been confirmed as, having "return[ed] to the fight," as Media Matters for America has documented. Indeed, during a January 13 press conference, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell stated: "The new numbers are, we believe, 18 confirmed and 43 suspected of returning to the fight. So 61 in all former Guantanamo detainees are confirmed or suspected of returning to the fight." Moreover, even the Pentagon's claim that it has confirmed that 18 former Guantánamo detainees have returned to the battlefield has been challenged by experts.

In addition, after Giuliani stated, "[I]f you think you're going to get your way out of this recession by all kinds of social programs, welfare programs, you're just going to make it much worse," Hannity claimed: "[T]he Japanese economy was suffering, in the '90s, they had eight separate stimulus packages that created, in their history, massive debt. It was unprecedented. And it didn't work." However, as Media Matters documented, according to prominent economists, economic conditions were improving in Japan before the Japanese government temporarily abandoned stimulus spending in an attempt to reduce the deficit. Nobel laureate and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, for one, points to Japan's fiscal stimulus packages as having "probably prevented a weak economy from plunging into an actual depression."

Moreover, Hannity allowed Giuliani to suggest that stimulus spending during the Great Depression did not work. Giuliani claimed that "the actions of the New Deal, which may have had other reasons for them, did not work from the point of view of solving the Depression. In fact, by 1936, '37, '38, the Depression was arguably just as bad as it was in 1929." But as Media Matters has documented, the suggestion that the New Deal failed has been flatly rejected by some prominent economists, including Krugman, who has said that President Franklin D. Roosevelt did not go far enough to end the crisis and that his attempts to balance the budget hindered recovery.

From the January 23 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: Let's start with, you know, closing down Gitmo. Is this -- I guess the simplest question is: Does this make America safer?

GIULIANI: In my personal opinion, no. I was -- I was -- as a candidate, as you remember, I was against closing Guantánamo -- several times took that position in Republican debates. I think that you shouldn't close it down until you have a real plan of what you're going to do with these people, and until then, you got to keep it there.

What are you going to do? Send them to the United States, or -- nobody wants them. You try to -- you try to send them to other countries; other countries don't want them. People that we have released from Guantánamo have gotten involved in terrorist activities again and killed other people, innocent people, Americans.

HANNITY: Sixty-one.

GIULIANI: Yeah. I mean --

HANNITY: Sixty-one people we know now were released and now they're back on the battlefield.

GIULIANI: And we know some of them have engaged in murdering Americans and other people.

HANNITY: Yeah.

GIULIANI: So you have to have a very concrete plan as to what you're going to do with them before you just announce you're going to close them. Here's my hope. My hope is that President Obama announced that campaign promise, got to get it over with, and now is just going to stay there for a long time --

HANNITY: Well, he --

GIULIANI: -- until they get the practical -- the practical plans over with.

HANNITY: But if he spent the better part of the first two days, I mean --

GIULIANI: Well, maybe they --

HANNITY: -- significantly pushing this -- but it was interesting, as I was watching the press conference with his new press secretary, where are you going to put them?

GIULIANI: Well, they don't seem to know.

HANNITY: No answer.

GIULIANI: Right. So what that might mean is this was a symbolic act rather than a real one. Let's hope that's the case. He satisfies his left-wing supporters by saying I'm closing Guantánamo, and then, you know, two years from now, it's still there.

HANNITY: All right. The big -- the other big issue that is facing this country right now is the economy. He's talking about trillion-dollar deficits as far as we can see. He's saying it's a tax cut, but people who don't pay taxes are going to get a check. Look, you dealt with welfare in New York. Is that welfare?

GIULIANI: Yes. If somebody is not paying taxes, is going to get a check from the government, then that is welfare. You haven't earned it, that's a welfare payment. I think he's going to have to abandon that in light of the economic situation.

HANNITY: Are you thinking that he's really -- he's going to abandon all these things?

GIULIANI: I think so.

HANNITY: You really do?

GIULIANI: I think, as practicality emerges, you're going to see -- I'm hoping you're going to see a very pragmatic approach. I'm not sure if President Obama is an ideologue or a pragmatist. I am hoping and praying he's a pragmatist. We can get through it if he is.

HANNITY: You know, look, I'm going to tell you, my take on it is just the opposite. I think he's an ideologue. And I'll tell you why.

GIULIANI: Right.

HANNITY: Because, look, he's talking about anywhere from 850 billion to over a trillion dollars in a stimulus package -- trillion-dollar deficits as far as we can see. They're going to move on health care, which is --

GIULIANI: Right.

HANNITY: -- will alter this economy dramatically. Gitmo, I think, is we are redefining the war on terrorism. And we can go straight on down the line. Instituting welfare -- the era of big government is beginning again.

GIULIANI: Right. I hope that he and his people have read The Forgotten Man, Amity Shlaes' book, came out last year. It's -- I think it's back on the best-seller list. Basically, it points out why the recession of 1929, which was a bad one, became the Great Depression of 11 or 12 years. And it became the Great Depression because of unwise government actions, first by Hoover, and then by Roosevelt.

HANNITY: Right.

GIULIANI: And if -- if you think you're going to get your way out of this recession by all kinds of social programs, welfare programs, you're just going to make it much worse.

HANNITY: Well, in the 10 years that the Japan -- the Japanese economy was suffering, in the '90s, they had eight separate stimulus packages that created, in their history, massive debt. It was unprecedented.

GIULIANI: Right.

HANNITY: And it didn't work. And you're right, historically --

GIULIANI: And the actions of the New Deal, which may have had other reasons for them, did not work from the point of view of solving the Depression. In fact, by 1936, '37, '38, the Depression was arguably just as bad as it was in 1929.

HANNITY: Yeah, it's true.

GIULIANI: So now you look at that history and you look at the other countries that have tried this, what it says to you is, yes, you have to have a relief program, but it's got to be one that's targeted right to the -- right to the problem.

HANNITY: Yeah.

GIULIANI: The problem is the toxic debt that's sitting on the books of the banks. [former Treasury Secretary Henry] Paulson's first approach, which was then abandoned, probably makes the most sense, which is set up an auction for these toxic assets, the government will come in, make an offer, a low-ball offer, and then private enterprises can come in and try to buy up some of this debt.

So you can take 2 or 300 billion in government funds and you can leverage it with maybe a billion -- a trillion dollars in private funds.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by worrierking (January 26, 2009 9:44 am ET)
         

      "So you have to have a very concrete plan as to what you're going to do with them before you just announce you're going to close them."

      I'd hate to disagree with a living saint like Ghouliani but the time for a concrete plan is BEFORE you start rounding up the usual suspects. Those who planned this fiasco should have had a plan in place on what to do with those we're going to capture, other than torturing them.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (January 26, 2009 11:12 pm ET)
           

        What's funny about G. and the others is that they deny the New Deal being a factor in the 30s, and give credit to WWII instead.

        But they refuse to see that WWII was the biggest public works, prime-the-pump spending program in history! A complete deficit-buster!

        You know why they're this way? Because they are addled.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 26, 2009 9:47 am ET)
         

      I have trouble listening to predictions of doom and gloom from the same people who have been so consistently wrong about practically everything for the past eight years.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by WorldlyMrR (January 26, 2009 6:07 pm ET)
           

        Iam bothered that we are here talking about whether or not the New Deal was successful - when policy approach was changed 4 or 5 years after the start of gov't stimulus - and whether or not Japan did it right (ooh ther was an uptick in the economy in year 7 if only they stayed the course).  I don't know about the rest of you but these stories of whether or not past policies were successful in showing improvement 5 years later scare me to death.  I am suppossed to be retired by then - not working until age 70.

        I think we need to be studying and understanging what needs to be done for quicker signs of positive impacts from a stimulus.  Japan's recovery took a long time even though the world araound them was doing OK.  What chance have we with trying to get back going when the whole world is crumbling? 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (January 26, 2009 9:48 am ET)
         

      Considering that Hannity's talking with presidential nominees who couldn't survive the primary...

      Sorry, just thinking out loud

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (January 26, 2009 10:11 am ET)
           

        I'm just glad we didn't have to witness a Presidential pardon of Bernie Kerek by President Giuliani...and Kerek's appointment to head GITMO. Now I'm sure Bernie would have figured out what to do with those terrorists.  ;>)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (January 26, 2009 10:42 am ET)
             

          Aside from the media continuing to repeat the BS about the people who have "returned to the fight", I'm also noticing that they're discussing this as if closing Gitmo means just letting the prisoners out and dropping them off on my street. Well, not my street, but YOUR street, quivering Fox viewer.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (January 26, 2009 10:46 am ET)
               

            I notice that one of the sad legacies of the Bush years is that it is considered somehow "unpatriotic" to show skepticism toward Pentagon press releases.  How soon we forget...

            Report Abuse
    • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 10:49 am ET)
         
      I think Gitmo was wrong from the start, but are we suppoed to believe the Pentagon? Same Pentagon that has lied for 8 years?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 10:57 am ET)
           

        Yes.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 11:16 am ET)
             

          Why?  Our Government has never exactly told the truth and the same people are running the show at the Pentagon that were running it last week.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 11:51 am ET)
               

            Oh, our government has never told us the truth.  Ok, never mind then.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 11:55 am ET)
                 

              Well I guess they told the truth about WMD. I love how you just want us to belive anything the Pentagon says. Are you telling me that we should not ask questions of our Government? Is this not the mess we got in when we had Bush?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by SaddamHussein (January 26, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
                   

                It sounds sad , but some may now believe they no longer need to question the Government because Bush is gone. That would be a mistake. 

                Report Abuse
              • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
                   

                Indeed. We do need to ask questions of our government, unless of course we're all villified again as being "un-Patriotic" if we should dare question things that are being told to us.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
                     

                  In March of 2003 when I was spit on at an Anti War Protest in Boston, I vowed no one will ever call me anti patriotic again for questioning our Government.

                  Report Abuse
              • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
                   

                I'm not telling you that you should not ask questions of your Government.  But if you really think that it's never told the truth, it seems like a rather insane exercise.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
                     

                  Governor again you are taking what I said out of context . I was refering to context of this post and the War on Terror. Why you said YES do a question on if we are supposed to believe the Pentagon now after 8 years of Gitmo and lies is mindboggling to me.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
                       

                    I did not know that you were only talking about the GWB years.  Considering that your you were hating the Bush Haters last week, I am taken aback that you're now confining government's lies to his leadership.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 12:29 pm ET)
                         

                      There is a difference between being critical and hating people. I don't hate anyone, even you Governor.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 12:32 pm ET)
                           

                        Sueeld hearts Olbermann.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 12:35 pm ET)
                             

                          Sueeld was banned.  I think she was banned because of inflamatory hate speech?

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
                               

                            Holy crap.  Seriously, FYI, people are not as stupid as you are.

                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
                                 

                              Why am I stupid? And I am not sure what a banned poster has to do with the topic at hand? Why are you deflecting from the issue?

                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
                                   

                                You, Sueeld, deflect each time you refer to someone by some other name. 

                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
                                     

                                  You are funny Governor. You appeared after Governor and Former Governor . Also well after Sueeld was gone, yet you know about Sueeld? Amazing.

                                  Anyway I will stick to the topics at hand on the posts while you smear people.

                                  Report Abuse
                    • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
                         

                      I don't think that he IS confining lies to Bush's administration only. As in, the Obama administration has only been in office, not even a week yet. Let's take a breath, take a step back, and let them lie first before we start busting them on it.

                      I'm willing to bet that myself, as well as Casey would call out the lies as we see them. We're not complete partisan hacks such as Bush supporters are/were. Meaning, most hardcore Bush supporters that I know still think he did a GREAT job, and never lied. Nope, not once, about serious issues facing the country.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
                           

                        I'm willing to bet that myself, as well as Casey would call out the lies as we see them

                        Exactly, and my only fear as some of the Bush people are still at the Pentagon to lie and manipuate. Not to the extent of Rummys days but it is a fear. Sad that the mistrust will be here for awhile.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 12:59 pm ET)
                             

                          One should always question their government. It's our patriotic duty.

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 1:04 pm ET)
                               

                            I prefer the Jeopardy format. Government needs answers.

                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
                               

                            Exactly.

                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 1:39 pm ET)
                                 

                              It's our patriotic duty to ask questions of a chronic liar?  Really?

                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 1:42 pm ET)
                                   

                                Who is the chronic liar? 

                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 1:45 pm ET)
                                     

                                  "Our Government has never exactly told the truth."

                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
                                       

                                    Exactly when it came to the war on terror. I made that clarification before . I am not sure what your point is? You obviously did not stand with the majority in 2003 when we knew this war and WMD was BS if that is your attitude about dissent.

                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
                                         

                                      My point is that it is more fruitful to demand action from government, then to ask it questions.

                                      Report Abuse
                                  • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
                                       

                                    "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism"

                                    Thomas Jefferson.

                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 2:03 pm ET)
                                         

                                      We were talking about asking questions.

                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by jamesB (January 26, 2009 2:07 pm ET)
                                           

                                        questioning your government is dissent.  there is no difference.

                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
                                             

                                          Questioning a chronic liar is futile.

                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
                                               

                                            So our dissent toward the Bush administration was useless ? Is that what you are saying?

                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
                                                 

                                              Yes, if your placards and chants contained a questions mark, then it was useless. Please use this script when it comes up again: "No War!"

                                              Report Abuse
                                              • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
                                                   

                                                You are obtuse, magnolia is right.

                                                Report Abuse
                                                • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
                                                     

                                                  You're the bafoon who took to the streets chanting "No War?" in 2003, not me.

                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by jamesB (January 26, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
                                                       

                                                    how dare you call someone a buffoon who took the time to protest peacefully against something they so strongly believe in?  you are contemptible.

                                                    Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 3:40 pm ET)
                                                         

                                                      Thanks James, I never felt like I was a buffon. I guess President Obama is a buffon in the eyes of Victor since he was against the war in 2003.

                                                      Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
                                                           

                                                        You use logic like a penguin uses a pencil sharpener.

                                                        Report Abuse
                                                        • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
                                                             

                                                          And your attacks on people against this war is something I find stunning.

                                                          Report Abuse
                                                          • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
                                                               

                                                            I'm not at all stunned that you're pretending that I'm attacking people for being against war - when in truth I'm just having at you for being a fake and a troll.

                                                            Report Abuse
                                          • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
                                               

                                            But, as mentioned before, Casey was talking about the WOT in specific, and dissent is sometimes defined as:

                                            Disagreement with the ideas, doctrines, decrees, etc. of a political party, government or religion; An act of disagreeing with, or deviating from ...

                                            You first demand action by asking questions of your elected officials, and learn then what they are thinking or proposing, and then offer differing opinions. Questions are required to bring about action.

                                            Victor, are you being obtuse on purpose or because you don't follow this line of reasoning too well?

                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
                                                 

                                              magnolia, I think old Vic is playing games. For some reason he is against anything I post, just his nature.

                                              Report Abuse
                                            • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 2:59 pm ET)
                                                 

                                              I prefer to tell my government what to do, not ask it what it is doing.

                                              Report Abuse
                                              • Author by jamesB (January 26, 2009 3:04 pm ET)
                                                   

                                                give us an example of how you personally told your government what to do, and how this was much more effective than merely questioning and dissent.  can't wait to hear it.

                                                Report Abuse
                                                • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
                                                     

                                                  I told the Mayor of Boston and the Governor of Massachusetts not to give the Red Sox public funding for a new ballpark.

                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by jamesB (January 26, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
                                                       

                                                    i'm not sure demanding is anymore productive than questioning the validity of, or disagreeing with, such public funding.  whatever is your preference.

                                                    Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
                                                       

                                                    You told them and they listened?  Or there was a collective wave of dissent on that issue?

                                                    Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 5:09 pm ET)
                                                       

                                                    Were you not "questioning" what they wanted to do?

                                                    Seems like it to me.

                                                    Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by Victor Colorado (January 26, 2009 5:36 pm ET)
                                                         

                                                      I advocated my view, which I guess could be looked at as "questioning".  I didn't think I could question something without asking a question, but I do get your point.

                                                      Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 8:14 pm ET)
                                                           

                                                        See, by advocating your viewpoint, you were questioning their viewpoint, as in you, you didn't agree with them. You don't have to ask a question, to "question" someone else, or your government.

                                                        Report Abuse
                                              • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 3:04 pm ET)
                                                   

                                                What is the difference?

                                                Report Abuse
                        • Author by my4cents (January 26, 2009 9:49 pm ET)
                             

                          Yeah, where is Rumsfeld these days? Hibernating till the next Republican adminsitration?

                          He claimed (and I heard him too) that he knew that WMD were, to the north, west, south, east of Tikrit. Should he be not held accountable (and jailed if he was lying) for his words?

                          Report Abuse
          • Author by tinka (January 27, 2009 11:20 am ET)
               

            I'm sure the Pentagon was telling lies for the past 8 years is because their Commander-in-Chief told them to lie.

            President Obama will put an end to the lies!

            Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 10:56 am ET)
         

      So, if 61 were released, and are "back on the battlefield" as these clowns like to keep saying; is that Obama's fault? Nope. Because, this would have happened BEFORE he took office, and hence the assertion would be against the Bush Administration.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne (January 26, 2009 11:02 am ET)
           

        Yes, but don't expect people who watch Faux News to notice that little nuance. Because they're talking about it now, it must have some taint on Obama as a result. Timing is everything.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (January 26, 2009 4:59 pm ET)
             
          So you're saying the Bushies released all these 61 people!!! Shocking! and of these, maybe realistically, only 18 may or may not have "returned to the battlefield", battlefield conjuring up images of Gettysburg; whereas it may look more like a vast stretch of sand. Julia, liked your limerick but couldn't get back on the tubes yesterday and was caught up later in a hot game of Scrabble. (Came in 2nd)
          Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (January 26, 2009 11:49 am ET)
           

        Sorry for the correction Mag. I know you meant to say that since it happened before President Obama took office it was all Clinton's fault.

        We all make mistakes, except for GW Bush that is.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by SaddamHussein (January 26, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
             

          You did not hear? This is the Obama Recession, Rush tells us it is so it is true.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
               

            Whatever Rush says is true. I went out for lunch today and was listening to Rush on the radio( I always need a good laugh). Anyway he was announcing his economic recovery package. He thinks he walks on water.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (January 26, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
                 

              I can't wait to hear the Rotund One's prescription for economic recovery.  This is the guy who told 30,000 laid off steelworkers that all they had to do was go out and start their own businesses.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by mescal (January 27, 2009 3:18 am ET)
                   

                Rush's answer is more tax cuts for the wealthy, and more deregulation, Nerzog.

                In other words, more of what got is into this economic cesspool in the first place.

                Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
             

          Oh yeah, forgot about that.

          How do we explain the failures of GHW Bush? Since he came after Reagan? Carter?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
               

            During the 92 campaign Bush Sr. was trying to run against Jimmy Carter.  He kept comparing Clinton to Carter.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (January 26, 2009 11:02 am ET)
         
      HAHAHA! The irony of Hannity calling ANYONE else an idealogue is enough to make me cry with laughter. And why do these tools keep bringing up the supposed 61 former detainees returned to battle? Even if it turned out to be true they were released by the Bush administration. That's not a very good argument for following Bush's policies.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 11:09 am ET)
           

        Exactly. And nobody in the current Obama administration is talking about releasing these people. He's talking about closing the prison at Gitmo. That's it.

        I love it when people talk about if we bring these characters into the US, somehow they're all going to get loose and run amok in the streets committing terrorist acts up and down and through the US. Throw them in a Supermax, isolation for 23.5 hours per day, and constant supervision. Where are they going to go? Nowhere.

        I also believe that they should get a fair trial, per our judicial system. Sure, they're not US citizens (most of them I think), but we have them, let's try them in our system, and show the WORLD that our judicial system is fair, and the best.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 11:24 am ET)
           

        People like Hannity will blame Obama for this, just like they blamed Clinton for 9/11

        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
             

          Don't get the crazies all riled up. They'll be here any moment now with their tirades about Clinton failed to get Bin Laden and all.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (January 26, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
               

            And remember Maglover, you're not really a first string crazy if you don't mention the Silver Platter. You know, the one that Bin Laden was offered on.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
                 

              Yes indeed. Even though, he wasn't offered up on any such silver platter. I suggest this book quite often to folks who might want to read about what was really happening right up until 11-Sep-01 with Bin Laden, and al Qaeda in general. Pick up and read Ghost Wars by Steve Coll. It is insightful, and full of information, and the history of al Qaeda from inception, until right before 9/11.

              There was no silver platter. Pakistan was protecting Bin Laden and the Taliban. A lot.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by worrierking (January 26, 2009 1:42 pm ET)
                 

              I'm almost positive that the platter was only silver plated, not solid silver. 

              After all, Clinton was the president and if he had accepted Bin Laden on shoddy silver plate he'd have created an international etiquette faux pas.

              I can't say that I blame him.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (January 26, 2009 5:00 pm ET)
                   
                I heard that it was a faux platter, and if you call in the next 30 minutes, they'll throw in a faux silver dollar.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (January 26, 2009 11:12 am ET)
         

      Considering that all of the major economic downturns -1929, 1987, and 2008 happened under Republican presidents and their allies in Congress why do they still have credibility on these issues?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Caseysprings (January 26, 2009 11:16 am ET)
           

        You forgot the 82 Recession, worst after the Great Depression until now.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (January 26, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
         
      SHEAR INNSANNITY calling anyone else an ideologue is a joke His FAR RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVESM is his life's calling. We dont expect anything "fair and balanced" from him.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by roundhouse (January 26, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
         

      What a couple of day dream believers. Hannity and Rudy represent a tiny minority of hard right corporatists. Even Frank Luntz can't find a way to spin his numbers.

      "Last month, I conducted a national survey of 800 registered voters on their attitudes toward infrastructure investment...The survey's findings were unlike any other issue I have polled in more than a decade...A near unanimous 94% of Americans are concerned about our nation's infrastructure. And this concern cuts across all regions of the country and across urban, suburban and rural communities. Fully 84% of the public wants more money spent by the federal government -- and 83% wants more spent by state governments -- to improve America's infrastructure. And here's the kicker: 81% of Americans are personally prepared to pay 1% more in taxes for the cause.

      This isn't "soft" support for infrastructure either. It stretches from Maine to Montana, from California to Connecticut. Democrats (87%) and Republicans (74%) are prepared to, in Barack Obama's words, put skin in the game, which tells you just how wide and deep the support is...

      The context of the poll is clear: Americans have a serious case of bailout fatigue. They've seen government pony up to Wall Street and Motor City. Yet the stock market continues to fall, jobs continue to disappear and the spending just plain continues. Top executives received their Christmas bonuses, and the rest of America was left asking, "Where's my bailout check?""

      The conservative worldview is dead, Hannity needs to lead, follow or get out of the way.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (January 26, 2009 12:52 pm ET)
           

        Hannity needs to lead, follow or get out of the way

        Let's see, Roundhouse, I don't believe Hannity has the brains to lead a conga line

        He doesn't seem to be able to follow anything except the most childlike reality-free-market dogma.

        Looks like "get out of the way" is the only reasonable option.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (January 26, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
             

          "I don't believe Hannity has the brains to lead a conga line..."  Col. thanks for the compliment...sort of!? (smiles)

          Report Abuse
    • Author by Shmendrik (January 26, 2009 1:58 pm ET)
         

      Let me sum up today's Sean Hannity's Show so that no one has to listen...

      Let not your heart be troubled.

      Conservative underground.

      Conservatism in exile.

      Newt Gingrich will be on our show.

      Father Flager.

      The unrepentant terrorist William Ayers.

      Michelle Obama said "for the first time in my adult life I am really proud of my country."

      Let not your heart be troubled.

      Obama said Iran and Venezuela are tiny countries.

      Ruth's Chris.

      Lobstergram.

      Freedom Concert tickets.

      Regan conservatism.

      Conservative principles.

      Socialism.

      60% of all taxes are paid by the top 1% of all wage earners.

      Let not your heart be troubled.

      Newsmaker line.

      We'll be right back.  Don't go away.  This is your conservatism in exile.  The conservative underground.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (January 26, 2009 2:42 pm ET)
           

        Speaking of venezuela, anyone catch that issue going on in biscane bay, alaska? They are having an unusually severe winter this year, are almost out of heating oil (it has to be flown in) and Palin is too busy promoting her book to help her state residents. A liberal group that normally helps south american towns is actually flying in oil from venezuela to help alaskan natives. OT, but I thought y'all would find that interesting!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (January 26, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
           

        >>We'll be right back.  Don't go away.  This is your conservatism in exile.  The conservative underground.

        "Hey man, we should, like, totally freak out the liberal establishment, man. That would be, like, far out"

        Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (January 27, 2009 1:29 am ET)
             

          Far in, right off!

          And now open up your heads and wallets for Radio Free NeoCon! For the best in witty bantor and neoarcheological talking point coverage. We'll be right back after we scrape our pronouncers head off the ceiling.

          Keep shopping!

          Report Abuse
      • Author by fantagor (January 26, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
           

        I'd add:

        Reagan ended the Cold War.

        Obama recession.

        Tax and spend Democrats.

        Randy

        Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (January 26, 2009 3:24 pm ET)
         

      Here we go again. These boobs ASSume that if they repeat their lies frequently enough that they'll become accepted facts. Of course they will. In the ranks of the easily convinced knuckleheads that watch bilge water backwash like "Hannity".

      Randy

      Report Abuse
    • Author by goodguy1 (January 26, 2009 9:35 pm ET)
         

      HATE IS NOT A FAMILY VALUE......TRUTH IS THE ENEMY OF A FASCIST STATE. HANNITY IS AN ENEMY OF THE DEMOCRATIC STATE.DEMOCRACY IS HIS DEMOCRATIC RIGHT HANNITY WILL EXPOSE HIMSELF AS AN ENEMY OF THE STATE

      "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, THE TRUTH IS THE GREATEST ENEMY OF THE STATE." -- Joseph Goebbels, German Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (January 26, 2009 9:49 pm ET)
         
      Funny how when talking aobut the mythical "61 terrorists" they never remember to mention they were all released by President Bush.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (January 27, 2009 6:47 am ET)
         

      I notice that to Hannity, guys like Ronald Reagan and Limbaugh and himself are "Dedicated" and "Principled" and "Steadfast" and "Committed."  Liberals, on the other hand, are always "Ideologues."

      It seems to me that an "Ideologue" is a person who refuses to sacrifice his principles and who happens to be a liberal, according to these idiots.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by coachslife3331 (January 27, 2009 10:53 am ET)
         
      They are basing their stance on A LIE!!!! There is no proof that any released people returned to the basttlefield! I get sooo tired of these people lying day in and day out!
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.