About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

The Hill repeated false GOP claim that ACORN is a "beneficiar[y] of the stimulus package"

January 28, 2009 2:16 pm ET

SUMMARY: The Hill's Jared Allen repeated the false claim that ACORN is, in Allen's words, a "beneficiar[y] of the stimulus package," and uncritically reported NRCC communications director Ken Spain's false suggestion that the stimulus bill includes "a $4.2 billion bailout" for ACORN. In fact, the bill does not mention ACORN or otherwise single it out for funding. Additionally, the bill requires that the $4.19 billion it allocates for "neighborhood stabilization activities" be distributed through competitive processes.

8 Comments

In a January 27 Hill article, staff writer Jared Allen repeated the false Republican claim that the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) is, in Allen's words, a "beneficiar[y] of the stimulus package" currently under consideration in Congress. Allen also uncritically reported National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) communications director Ken Spain's false suggestion that the stimulus bill includes "a $4.2 billion bailout" for ACORN. As Media Matters for America has documented, the bill does not mention ACORN or otherwise single it out for funding and requires that the $4.19 billion it allocates for "neighborhood stabilization activities" be distributed through competitive processes. Additionally, the Drudge Report linked to a January 27 FoxNews.com article that had the misleading headline: "Republicans Object to Stimulus Dollars for ACORN."

In the Hill article, Allen reported:

The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) suggested Democrats are using the troubled economy as a way to advance their own social agenda, citing the liberal grassroots group ACORN and others as beneficiaries of the stimulus package.

"Spare us the phony press releases," said NRCC communications director Ken Spain. "So far the Democrats' idea of 'protecting the middle class' has consisted of taxpayer-funded contraceptives and billions of dollars in ACORN-stuffed pork.

"It's hard to decipher which is the most fraudulent notion -- the fact that ACORN is a law-abiding entity worthy of a $4.2 billion bailout or that $1.1 trillion in out-of-control government spending is going to defy the experts and have some sort of immediate effect on the economy," Spain said.

The false claim that the stimulus bill provides ACORN with "a $4.2 billion bailout," which Allen allowed Spain to make unchallenged, is based on a misrepresentation of a provision in the bill that would appropriate $4,190,000,000 "for neighborhood stabilization activities related to emergency assistance for the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes as authorized under division B, title III of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008." The provision states that "not less than $3,440,000,000 shall be allocated by a competition" to "States, units of general local government, and nonprofit entities or consortia of nonprofit entities," and provides that "up to $750,000,000 shall be awarded by competition to nonprofit entities or consortia of nonprofit entities to provide community stabilization assistance." The $4.19 billion would be distributed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Neighborhood Stabilization Program.

As Media Matters noted, on January 26, House Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-OH) office released a memo that claimed "[t]he legislation could open billions of taxpayer dollars to left-wing groups like the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), which has been accused of voter fraud, is reportedly under federal investigation; and played a key role in the housing meltdown." A January 23 release to which the January 26 document links stated that "the Democrats' bill makes groups like ACORN eligible for a $4.19 billion pot of money for 'neighborhood stabilization activities.' "

These attacks related to the stimulus bill recall the false smear propagated by several media figures in 2008 that Democrats tried to create a "slush fund" for ACORN in the 2008 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (January 28, 2009 2:49 pm ET)
         

      So, what's ACORN's annual budget.... anybody know?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by philib (January 29, 2009 9:22 am ET)
           

           Who knows? Criminal activities seldom keep accurate books. We do know that they get 40% of their funds from government programs (just like the ones from the stimulus package). But, I guess, as long as there are liberals who support illegal voter registration there will be supporters of acorn. We also know they have at least $800,000. Which the Obama campaign gave them during last year's primaries. That was certainly helpful...Obama gives acorn nearly a million bucks and in return acorn gets as many illegal voters out there as they can. Didn't people have a problem with Bush giving his cronies money? I don't see why Obama giving his cronies money gets a 'pass' from liberals. No...wait...I do understand: the "H"-word*.

        *-hypocrite

        Report Abuse
        • Author by eecee (January 29, 2009 12:51 pm ET)
             

          Well, let's get a few things straight.

          The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now does not apply for nor does it receive any federal grants.

          http://www.acorn.org/index.php?id=17857&tx_irfaq_pi1[showUid]=161&tx_irfaq_pi1[back]=P2lkPTE3ODU3&cHash=3b5f677fec

          ----------------------------------

          Has the Obama campaign or the Democratic Party paid ACORN to register voters during this campaign?

          No.

          Obama For America did contract with a political consulting group called Citizens' Services, Inc. for Get Out The Vote work in early 2008 for over $800,000. A small amount of this money was subcontracted to ACORN for recruitment and training of canvassers.

          http://www.acorn.org/index.php?id=17856&tx_irfaq_pi1[showUid]=166&tx_irfaq_pi1[back]=P2lkPTE3ODU2&cHash=d3bd22c3b8

          ----------------------------------------

          • Most states require every card collected to be turned in whether it is a valid application or not.
          • ACORN calls each card collected up to three times to ascertain the information on it is legitimate and complete.
          • All suspicious cards are flagged, set aside, and delivered to the board of elections under a cover sheet that describes the problems.
          • Almost all the cards submitted to the boards of elections that have been noted as “possibly fraudulent” were caught by ACORN’s quality control procedures first.
              http://www.acorn.org/index.php?id=17860&tx_irfaq_pi1[showUid]=152&tx_irfaq_pi1[back]=P2lkPTE3ODYw&cHash=2fef4890d6
          Report Abuse
          • Author by philib (January 30, 2009 9:04 am ET)
               

            "The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now does not apply for nor does it receive any federal grants." ....  "None of ACORN's contracts to perform work on projects receiving federal grant money has provided funding for voter registration."

                  The last sentence of the link you provide directly opposes the first sentence. Which sentence do we believe? Or, is this more liberal double-talk? Obviously, acorn is receiving federal money for "contracts to perform work". They simply claim none of it goes to "voter registration". How are you able to maintain your position that acorn receives NO federal funding?? Then acorn dissagrees with your stance they do not use federal money for voter registration. When the very statement you used to contradict acorns use of federal funds for voter registration is self contradicted: "A small amount of this money was subcontracted to ACORN for recruitment and training of canvassers."  Can you or acorn be any more miss-leading, dishonest or unfactual?

               Are you claiming there is no connection between acorn and citizen services inc? These articles tend to disagree with you:  http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/15/obama-acorn-citizens-services-inc-false-fec-filings/  +  http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/blairsvilledispatch/s_584284.html

            Report Abuse
    • Author by ultrasanktpauli (January 28, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
         

      ACORN! OOGABOOGA!!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by BillJ-MN (January 28, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
         

      Here's a statement I've tossed out several times in several places and it's never been factually challenged:

      Over the course of decades, across the country, not one fraudulent vote has ever been linked to any ACORN activities.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eecee (January 29, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
         

      Well, ACORN itself has responded to Boehner's lies.  Of particular note:

      We have not received neighborhood stabilization funds, have no plans to apply for such funds, and didn't weigh in on the pending rule changes.

      http://www.acorn.org/index.php?id=12439&L=1%2Findex.php%3Fid%3Dhttp%253&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=22503&tx_ttnews[backPid]=12346&cHash=9b523c1a5a

      Looking forward to the MSM trumpeting this fact as loudly as they trumpet the lie.


      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.