NBC's Yang baselessly suggested Pelosi is rushing recovery package so she can go on trip
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
SUMMARY: NBC News' John Yang baselessly suggested that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is rushing an agreement on the economic recovery bill because she "has a congressional delegation trip to Italy scheduled to leave on Friday, and of course, the speaker's maiden name is D'Alesandro, and she would dearly love not to miss that trip." In fact, Pelosi has said, "If we don't have [a bill] by the time of the Presidents recess, there will be no recess."
On the February 11 edition of MSNBC Live, NBC News White House correspondent John Yang reported that the House and the Senate are "trying to get an agreement" on the economic recovery bill, "perhaps as soon as this afternoon, so they could vote on the compromised conference report by tomorrow. That would be incredibly quick action." Addressing anchor David Shuster, Yang added: "But, David, all politics is local, as you know. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi [D-CA] has a congressional delegation trip to Italy scheduled to leave on Friday, and of course, the speaker's maiden name is D'Alesandro, and she would dearly love not to miss that trip." However, Yang gave no indication that he contacted Pelosi for a response, nor did he note that Pelosi has repeatedly said that Congress will stay in session through the recess if necessary.
In recent interviews, Pelosi stated that there will be no Presidents Day recess unless a bill is agreed upon:
- On the January 21 edition of CNN's Larry King Live, Pelosi stated: "We will have a bill before the Presidents Day recess or else there will be no Presidents Day recess." After host Larry King asked, "Or there'll be no recess?" Pelosi replied, "Or there'll be no recess."
- During a January 14 interview on NPR's Morning Edition, host Renée Montagne said to Pelosi: "Back for one last moment on the stimulus package: You've said that this package would be passed before the Presidents Day recess, which is next month." Pelosi replied, "That's right. If we don't have it by the time of the Presidents recess, there will be no recess."
Additionally, in a January 23 article, Reuters quoted Pelosi saying, "We're on schedule for our timetable to have a bill on the president's desk to be signed before the Presidents Day recess. Again, if not, there will be no recess." Similarly, in a January 9 article, the Associated Press reported that Pelosi "promised lawmakers that she would cancel next month's planned Presidents' Day vacation if necessary." And on January 8, The Hill and United Press International quoted Pelosi saying, "If we don't have a bill before the Presidents [Day] recess, there will be no Presidents [Day] recess. ... We are not going home without an economic recovery package."
From the 11 a.m. ET hour of the February 11 edition of MSNBC Live:
SHUSTER: John, in looking at what both the Senate and the House did in their effort to try to make sure there are only shovel-ready jobs, it's about $90 billion. So, most of it will be other stuff, like aid to the states, or education, or Medicaid and whatnot. Where -- has the White House sort of signaled, given that there is this severe battle right now between the House and the Senate -- members of the House want, for example, $70 billion in money reinstated that would go to the states. The Senate -- Senator Specter, for example, said that no, if the Senate version is altered in any fashion, he will bail on it.
Where does the White House come down on these sort of arguments? Or is the White House simply trying to stay out of it and let members of Congress figure this out themselves?
YANG: Well, they're taking a direct role in this. Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, Peter Orszag, the CBO director, were on the Hill last night within hours of the Senate passage. You know, the -- even though they're -- the conferees don't meet officially until this afternoon, aides and the staff have been meeting actually even before the Senate bill passed, going through the weeds, getting through a lot of the minor details, but a lot of the big questions still remain.
The White House is pushing to get the $16 billion in school construction funds back in, which the House really would like to see back in the Senate; Republicans, the moderate Republicans, who gave them the margin, not so much. The other big issue of contention, as you said, is that money going directly to the states -- the House bill had 79 billion; the Senate compromised to get the three Republican moderates on board so they could get over the filibuster hurdle, took out $40 billion. They cut that in half. That's going to be a big issue because if that money is not there, a lot of states are going to have to lay off a lot of workers, cut a lot of services, and that's the one thing that the president and the administration would like to avoid.
They are talking about trying to get an agreement, perhaps as soon as this afternoon, so they could vote on the compromised conference report by tomorrow. That would be incredibly quick action. But, David, all politics is local, as you know. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has a congressional delegation trip to Italy scheduled to leave on Friday, and of course, the speaker's maiden name is D'Alesandro, and she would dearly love not to miss that trip.
SHUSTER: NBC's John Yang at the White House.
















So where is the misinformation?
Hi AA, the misinformation is that it is not true, where does Yang base the suggestion that she is rushing an agreement?
Yes.
AA, have you been listening to Rush lately? He and his clones have been spouting the ' Obama wants this thing done NOW' meme much lately. What Yang said sorta fits right in with that meme, doncha think? One prob though - as Neon succintly addressed - the assertion Yang made is false. Bzzz.
rabbit,
I have not been listening to Rush. Thanks for the update. I have heard Obama himself say the bill needs to be passed right away... He said something about 'a window of opportunity' in reference to the bill but correct me if I am wrong.
What I think is missing, is why is Pelosi going to Italy? It is another waste of taxpayer's money... but then something like this is non-news as she casually tosses around billions of our dollars for pork barrel spending in the House Stimulus Bill.
Too bad Yang didn't present that angle.
There's no pork in the bill. Everything in it is needed.
You're beating a dead horse. Unfortunately, 42% of the bill was purposely created out of tax cuts which republicans wanted. Rather than engaging in quid pro quo, the ungracious losers of the last election would rather be a bunch of selfish limbaughs and call the rest "pork". Never mind that we already had this debate over the stimulus in the last election and they were overwhelmingly turned down. They no longer deserve bipartisanship from Obama. As long as they are gonna obstruct 100% of anything that is a democratic idea, I say let the selfish losers rot.
Why are you intentionally this dense?
The reporter suggested, without any proof, that Pelosi wants the bill passed quickly so she can go to Italy. And that was the point of the MMFA article.
First you ask where is the misinformation and then when someone rubs your head in it, you nitpick something about Rush and then come back an irrelevant why is Pelosi going to Italy question.
And so you will go on.
come back an irrelevant = come back with an irrelevant
The timing of this new found concern over the taxpayers' money on the part of conservatives isn't the least bit surprising. I wish there would have been more of you back when we were tossing hundreds of billions into the Iraq debacle. Now someone wants to invest in America and suddenly the Republicans discover that the purse has strings.
Well, I think we all know the true reason why the Right subscribes to that double standard but I'll let a Righty come on here and tell us instead. Not that it will happen in my lifetime. :)
I think it is reasonable to have some open hearings on the porkulus bill. But that's the point, rush so few have a chance to see this bill for what it is.
This has got to be the biggest spending bill ever rushed through congress in secret, without opportunity for public debate or hearings. Whether or not Pelosi is rushing this in order to get her Italian economic bailout started, we won't find out about the damage done through this bill until it is too late.
proudconservative,
I am of the opinion, and I know lots of people disagree, that in the long run, (backed by CBO estimates,) the country will be better off by doing nothing and letting the recession run its course than spending a trillion dollars rewarding the bad management and penalizing the rest. I read that if you divide up all the money being spent, it comes out to about $10,000 per taxpayer.
I think Newsweek's headline says it best. "We are all Socialists Now".
"We are all Socialists Now"
Ironic isn't it? The end result of decades of Commie-fearing free-market mania is we need to be rescued by Socialism.
kernal,
Rescue? A rescue like drilling a hole in the bottom of a boat to let the water out!
Not quite, but seeing that you and AA have settled on the bold plan of "doing nothing", I won't bother trying to persuade you of anything else.
Isn't doing nothing what got us here?
AA asks stupid questions in a nice way. You seem to get your kick by demeaning others (kernal?). In the process, you are doing an injustice to your 'proud conservative' posting handle.
It ticks off real (fiscal) conservatives like me.
Go on and continue to make a fool of yourself.
ur2centsworth,
Get over yourself and lighten up. The dear kernal is able to speak for himself. Others, who have a sense of humor, do so as well and give it back.
I'm guessing that a fiscally conservative person like yourself, will understand why your cents had to be cut in half. Then again, a bailout could await someone such as yourself and you could be on your way to making more cents!
Whatever.
"...the country will be better off by doing nothing and letting the recession run its course than spending a trillion dollars rewarding the bad management and penalizing the rest..." I believe this crisis is the deepest and largest since the Great Depression of the last century which resulted in a World War with all of it's destruction and consequent realignment,what you advocate is lunancy!
congero,
If you believe the depression started WWII you will have to blame FDR for prolonging the depression with his 'spending' plans that did not work.
It did not work then, and I believe it will not work now.
How did his spending program prolong the Great Depression? Why didn't his spending during WW2 prolong the depression?
They did work, they cut unemployment almost 50%! The only time there was an uptick was when conservative dem's forced a reduction in stimulus spending.
And you may want to check your history. the depression in Germany was a significant reason behind the start of WW2. High unemployment coupled with a massive debt drove the german populace to embrace anyone who could promise real change. Adolf Hitler made those promises and delivered, unfortanately for the rest of the world.
Now would be a good time for you to make some vague comparison between Obama and Hitler. It would be wholly expected having read your posts on this subject to date.
wow, that's twice now you used the word porkulus bill. A direct copy/paste of rush limbaugh! And you wonder why liberals claim you folks won't think for yourselves!
Maybe, upon her return from her Italian stimulis trip, she have a congressional hearing on the events of last September. Maybe we could call it the '9/18' commission. I, for one would like to know, who was pulling out $550 billion dollars from the banks in just a few hours on September 18, 2008. What country or individual has this kind of money? Wouldn't the accounts have some means to be tracked? This event seems to be a key precipitor into the economic fallout that the county has experienced but yet no one is looking into who moved that kind of money so quickly and why.
This is something that even the left wants to have the media look into....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=114x56391
Check out the video and try to figure who put 'us in the middle of the Atlantic, without a lifeboat'..
http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/02/how-world-almost-came-to-end-at-2pm-on.html
I just sent Yang an e-mail,
What a tird. He wants to show he can deliver the corporate snark too. Probably the only way he thinks he can impress his masters.
I've said this before, and I'll say it again. Brock was right. He said in his book "The Republican Noise Machine" that MSNBC gets a list of talking points that they are supposed to work into their broadcasts. They are often from Drudge and are essentially Republican talking points. I remember Lester Holt one day on MSNBC in 2004 saying something about John Kerry's tan. It was sad, really.
THANK YOU.
njguy93@yahoo.com
The Republican Noise Machine
--A Classic
Do you believe the Dems do not send out a daily talking points?
Idaho Democratic Party spokesman Chuck Oxley told me he gets daily talking points from the DNC and occasionally he tries to localize them for Idaho.
http://www.politicswest.com/local_western_politics/22869/mad_voter_spin_doctors_firing_blanks_idaho
Great catch, AA! That is, if you can't make the distinction between a PARTY SPOKESMAN and a TV NETWORK.
Fortunately for you, somebody misunderstood Neon's jab at Yang as racist, and appears to have flagged it, so you're back at strike two.
I was wondering what happened. My reply to that comment also disappeared.
Apparently, someone believes that doing laundry is woman's work, and accusing a man of doing it is offensive.
Go figure...
And you didn't even mention his maiden name.
Wow, imagine that. A PARTY spokesman getting marching orders from THE PARTY.
What a brilliant observation.