About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Wallace says mouse falsehood "supposedly ... debunked" -- so where are the Fox News corrections?

February 22, 2009 6:15 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

36 Comments

During the February 22 edition of Fox News' America's News HQ, after former President Bush aide Kevin Sullivan claimed that the economic recovery bill contained a pet project for "the salt marsh harvest mouse," host Chris Wallace replied: "Well, supposedly that's been debunked." Indeed, as Media Matters for America has noted, the bill does not contain any language directing funds to the salt marsh harvest mouse, or its San Francisco wetlands habitat, a fact that the House Republican leadership aide who reportedly originated the claim has reportedly acknowledged. Media Matters has documented that numerous Fox News shows, including Glenn Beck, Hannity, and Special Report have spread the falsehood. Moreover, Fox News Washington deputy managing editor Bill Sammon also advanced the falsehood on Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, which is hosted by Wallace. Despite Fox News' prevalence in spreading the falsehood, and Wallace's recent statement that the story has been "supposedly debunked," a Media Matters for America search* indicates that Fox News has yet to issue a correction on Fox News Sunday, Special Report, Hannity, or Glenn Beck.

After writing that "there isn't any such money in the bill" for the mouse, The Plum Line blogger Greg Sargent wrote on February 12 that the claim originated in an email from a "House Republican leadership staffer" who, when contacted by Sargent, "conceded that the claim by conservative media that the mouse money is currently in the bill is a misstatement." San Jose Mercury News staff writer Paul Rogers subsequently reported on February 13 that Michael Steel, a spokesman for House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), originated the claim and said that "[t]here is no language in the bill that says this money will go to this project."

Fox News programs have repeatedly promoted the false claim without subsequent correction. For instance:

  • During the February 12 edition of his show, Glenn Beck asserted: "Nancy Pelosi put $20 million into the stimulus package to preserve the salt marsh mouse. Now me, as the governor of California, I'd say to hell with the salt marsh mouse. Twenty million dollars. But maybe that's just me."
  • During the February 12 edition of Hannity, while host Sean Hannity spoke with Fox News contributor Karl Rove about the economic recovery plan, Fox News aired text that claimed "$30 mil of stimulus bill [is] allocated for Pelosi backed mouse project." On the February 13 edition (retrieved from Nexis) of his show, Hannity claimed: "Nancy Pelosi gets $30 million for her district, the Wetlands Conservation in San Francisco -- for the salt marsh harvest mouse. What is a salt marsh harvest mouse?" On the February 16 edition (retrieved from Nexis) of his show, Hannity again claimed: "Thirty million dollars for wetlands restoration to help the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse. Help America out there. That salt marsh harvest mouse, does he need $30 million of our tax dollars?"

On the February 17 edition of Hannity, Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich claimed that the recovery bill directs "$30 million to save a mouse in San Francisco."

  • During the February 15 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, Sammon said of the recovery bill: "People look at this thing and see, you know, some mouse is being protected in Pelosi's district."
  • During the February 11 edition of Special Report, host Bret Baier reported:

BAIER: Another item tucked into the rescue plan is drawing howls from Republicans. The Washington Times reports the stimulus contains $30 million for wetlands conservation in Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home district. Some of that money goes for a past Pelosi project, protecting the salt marsh harvest mouse. Pelosi and President Obama have both said the stimulus contains no earmarks. Her office says the speaker had no involvement in the initiative.

In a subsequent report on the February 13 edition of Special Report, correspondent William La Jeunesse presented the Republicans' mouse claim as disputed by Republican and Democratic lawmakers without himself noting that the Republicans' claim is false. From the February 13 report (retrieved from Nexis):

BAIER: Recapping our top story, the House has passed the president's $787- billion stimulus package and the Senate is voting on it tonight. House Democrats hailed the bill as a huge victory. Republicans say it is full of waste that won't create jobs. We told you about some of the grumbling earlier. Now, Correspondent William la Jeunesse looks at other parts of the stimulus plan that critics say aren't very stimulating.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

LA JEUNESSE: Monday, President Obama promised there would be no pork in the stimulus.

PRES. BARACK OBAMA: Not a single earmark.

LA JEUNESSE: But Friday before the House vote, Republican Congressman Jack Kingston claimed to find at least one phantom earmark.

REP. JACK KINGSTON (R-GA): $30 billion for a rat in San Francisco. Mickey Mouse is gonna be envious, he's no longer the mouse with the greatest net worth in California. Now there is a San Francisco rat that has edged him out.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

LA JEUNESSE: He's referring to the salt marsh mouse, an endangered resident of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's Northern California District. While the Bay Area Habitat it calls home is getting millions, Democrat David Obey hotly disputed the mouse is getting anything directly.

REP. DAVID OBEY, (D) WISCONSIN: I wish they would make up their mind whether it is mice or rats, neither of which is in this bill if they will read it.

I got it right here. Find it and show it to me, show it to me!

LA JEUNESSE: Earmark or not, critics say much of the bill is more spending than stimulus. $50 million for shrimp and fish farming and $50 million for high school dropouts, another $50 million to fund art projects for non-profits, $93 million to improve infant and toddler care; $650 million for more digital TV discount coupons, including $90 million in outreach and education.

From the February 22 edition of Fox News' America's News HQ:

SULLIVAN: Then he [Obama] talked about no pet projects, and we end up with the -- what was it, the salt marsh harvest mouse.

WALLACE: Well, supposedly that's been debunked. But yes, there were certainly some pet projects.

SULLIVAN: There were some pet projects.

*SEARCH TERMS: Media Matters searched "publication(Fox News) AND mouse OR mice OR wetland!" since February 11 in the Nexis database. Media Matters also searched transcripts in TVEyes.com using the terms mouse OR mice OR wetland for Fox News and the February 22 edition of Fox News Sunday.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mary59 (February 22, 2009 6:41 pm ET)
         

      Faux News went a courtin' and they did lie, uh-huh
      Sean Hannity went a courtin' and he did lie, uh-huh
      Glen Beck, he went a courtin' and he did ride
      With the GOP and a whopper on his side, uh-huh uh-huh uh-huh

      They rode right up to Marsh Mousie's door, uh-huh
      They fibbed about the dough for the wetland to restore, uh-huh
      They rode right up to Miss Mousie's door
      Gave three loud raps, and a very big roar, uh-huh uh-huh uh-huh

      Uncle Newtie laughed, and he shook his fat sides uh-huh
      Uncle Rat laughed, and he shook his fat sides, uh-huh
      Uncle Rat laughed, and he shook his fat sides
      To think his lies would turn the tide, uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh

      Chris Wallace won't repent, uh-huh
      Without his Uncle Rat's consent, uh-huh
      Without his Uncle Rat's consent,
      he wouldn't favor the President, uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh


      Report Abuse
      • Author by therick (February 22, 2009 7:06 pm ET)
           

        It never ceases to amaze me how Republicans will do or say anything to try to prove that Democrats are bad.  Ratings are all that Hannity, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Beck, etc., give darn about.  Get good ratings--to hell with the country.

        BRING BACK THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE ! ! !

        TheRick

        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (February 22, 2009 7:45 pm ET)
             

          Ratings=Money.......Why can't their sheep see this? I guess that the sheep just feel good about themselves when they think there are people "below" them in life. And that is what the Sideshow Radio Hucksters promote.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (February 23, 2009 2:32 am ET)
               

            I think the sheep feel good about themselves because right-wing professional liars are good at making the sheep feel alone.  They make the sheep feel like everyone who doesn't look like sheep, talk like sheep, think like sheep, and worship the same as sheep are out to get them and take away everthing they hold dear.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by fairliberal (February 23, 2009 9:59 am ET)
             

          It never ceases to amaze me how Democrats will do or say anything to try to prove that Republicans are bad.  Ratings are all that Olbermann, Maddow, and Air America give darn about.  Get good ratings--to hell with the country.

          BRING BACK THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE ! ! !

          Report Abuse
          • Author by edtheengineer (February 23, 2009 3:54 pm ET)
               

            You don't need the Fairness Doctrine to realize Republicans are bad.  All you need are functional eyes and ears (as well as a non-moribund brain).

            Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (February 22, 2009 8:35 pm ET)
           

        Must... rejoin... must... sing! <aargh!>

        I need a liar that knows how to tease me
        I need a liar that wont make me sad
        I need a liar that knows how to tease me
        I need a liar that knows how to tease me
        Someone to thrill me, and say it my way
        I need a liar that knows how t tease me
        Someone that knows the meaning of ah - all Democrats are bad!

        Well Ive been flipping my channels in the evening
        Racing through this media circus at night
        Im so confused, my mindset is ignorant
        Hey - Im so weak, wont someone shut out that light
        Electricity runs thru fox video
        And I watch cause I'm a couch potato
        And all the stonies that are dancin to the radio
        I got fox news pleasing me tonight on the cable

        I need a liar that knows how to tease me
        I need a liar that wont make me sad
        I need a liar that knows how to tease me
        Someone that knows the meaning of ah - all Democrats are bad!

        Well Im not interested in truth with the life Im livin
        But Im a low income slob, with little schooling, and my head in the sand
        Now Im not asking to be loved or be forgiven
        Hey - I just cant face facts thanks to republicans who want me to be left alone

        I need a liar that knows how to tease me
        I need a liar that wont make me sad
        I need a liar that knows how to tease me
        Someone that knows the meaning of ah - all Democrats are bad!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by infinity5551913 (February 22, 2009 6:46 pm ET)
         

      Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada who was instrumental in killing a permanent E-Verify system in the stimulus bill, that was to stop illegal hiring in the workplace, should be thrown out of Democratic office.  Even when unemployment is paramount, he compulsively used his power to remove Americans and legal residents from getting work, so that corrupt big business could use cheap labor.   He is obviously owes favors to , Casino's, the corporate world and special interest lobby, usually for campaign contributions.  Even Nevada n's should recognize his traitorous move, although the national media have said little of nothing?   


      Follow this politicians trail, along with Janet Napolitano of homeland Security, Senator Gutierrez, Senator Edward Kennedy, Rep.Flake and many other Democrats who are pushing hard for immigration reform that will effect all working Americans.   In states like California the ultimate recession has had a seering financial impact, because the overruling Democratic politicians have ignored the voice of the people.  Now crippled by unemployment and an estimated 3.7 illegal aliens squatting the state, they are now forced to cut programs for the disabled, mentally handicapped and education, to name a few.  

       Laws to halt the influx of illegal immigrants have been manipulated, so they never reached the courts.  Pro-illegal alien mayors like Antonio Villaraigosa in Los Angeles, Galvin Newsom of San Francisco have brought upon this state a 47 billion dollar budget crash, which now they expect the taxpayers to bail them out.  Today no state Politician, Governor or elected official has any excuse for the billions of dollars of taxpayers money to support illegal immigrants pouring across our distressed border.


      E-Verify comes up for a vote in March and should be made permanent, to halt illegal hiring. All perpetrators who do not use this cost effective, 99.6 percent success rate of the system, should go to prison.  Immigration reform must start in the workplace, so illegal aliens are pinpointed and deported.


      Deluge the Washington Switchboard at (202) 224-3121  In addition you can call President Obama at 202-456-1111.   Switchboard: 202-456-1414

      Sitting back and doing nothing is what corrupt politicians expect of US?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (February 23, 2009 11:18 am ET)
           

        Infinity, I am responding to your post about immigration because I do not want you to feel left out. But after reading the topic of this thread, I can only conclude that wealthy Americans need a tax cut so they will reinvest in America and people will get jobs.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne (February 23, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
             

          Prince, you still dwelling in Con purgatory? I'd offer you a tax rebate, but all I have is this "real estate". ;-)

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Mrs. Teufelshunde (February 23, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
           

        Why hello Lou Dobbs!  Good to see you on the site.  Perhaps you could stick your anti-immigrant rants into a thread more in line with that topic? 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (February 22, 2009 7:24 pm ET)
         

      If Fox had to always issue corrections, there would be no time left for all their lies.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (February 22, 2009 8:31 pm ET)
         
      Why would a newsman say "supposedly"? Shouldn't he do a little research and have more of a firm answer?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cpinva (February 22, 2009 9:14 pm ET)
           
        Why would a newsman say "supposedly"? Shouldn't he do a little research and have more of a firm answer?
        because this way he has plausible deniability, should anyone call him on it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MissDee (February 22, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
             

          Just like all the liberal pols and talking heads that MMfA loves to defend so much...

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (February 22, 2009 9:46 pm ET)
               

            I thought Charles Schulz died? Who's re-animating that teacher? "wha wha whaaa, wha wha wha wa wa..."

            Report Abuse
            • Author by sportsguydave (February 23, 2009 12:02 am ET)
                 

              I'm sorry, I don't speak Wingnut .. anyone care to translate MissDee's post?

              All I got was MMFA...blahblahblah..Liberals...blahblahblah ...

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 23, 2009 12:54 am ET)
                   

                But, Snoopy and Dave, how can you argue with all of those examples MissDee provided?

                Oh, right, she just spouted off an "I know you are, but what am I?" wingnut BS bomb.

                Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (February 23, 2009 9:33 am ET)
               

            Well, I guess MissDeeMeaner told us!

            What she told us, I haven't a clue, because there was a dearth of "there" there.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (February 22, 2009 10:07 pm ET)
         
      Let's not pick on Fox News here. The rest of the media isn't at their level on this issue. This is typical of the worthlessness of the media as a whole. An extremely simple fact just sort of accidentally leaks in, where it just gets in the way of what the media is really doing. It baffles me that people watch the news to "get informed". It's the least efficient, most error-prone way to get informed that there is. You watch for a month and learn five things, two of which are false and three of which are irrelevant. You can do better looking out your window.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne (February 22, 2009 10:24 pm ET)
           

        Steeve, I love your big picture way of looking at things. I feel more informed not digesting most of the so called mainstream "news" sources. Instead I gather information from macro global sources and aggregated new sources such as truthout.org that concentrate on the stories found on pages 16, 17 and so on, since there are still reporters actually doing their jobs.

        Forget watching almost all network and cable news sources. You just end up having to unlearn misinformation, disinformation and just plain lies and distortions. And as you mentioned irrevelancies. I say bugger the lot of them.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (February 23, 2009 2:10 am ET)
             

          Oh, you and your fancy knowledge and all...;-)

          Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne (February 23, 2009 8:35 am ET)
               

            Ha! 

            Shhhh, don't tell anybody, but I also pal around with terrorists, am a socialist, an elitist and can't bowl worth a damn. And I may have eaten arugula once. But keep it all on the down low, hear?  

            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (February 23, 2009 9:03 am ET)
                 

              Mum's the word, that's just between you and me....& I confess, I am also bad at bowling.  Remember Bush senior bowling?  that video is a hoot.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (February 23, 2009 9:21 am ET)
         

      When listening to the Republicans on FoxNews, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC CBS, or any of the Republican Talk Radio Stations I've noticed these constant three words of  "might, possible, could" as talking point arguments against "ANY" process in fixing issues from President Obama and the Democrats.  I really was having a hard time in understanding how the Republicans could be against "EVERY" issue relating to our government so quickly, until I noticed that these guys are "NOT" against real processes in fixing the problems, but arguing the what-ifs of possibilities that can't fix the problems.  Wink, wink.

      What a great way for the Republicans to explain out the answer of "NO" to every problem while standing strong on the possibilities of non-sense and confusing the hell out of everything as a way of distracting from the Republicans really "NOT" having a solid idea that would fix today's problems of economic chaos in real time solution resolveds.  Not bad, indeed... Wink, wink.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by PurpleState (February 23, 2009 1:04 pm ET)
         
      Perhaps this is how newspapers can make their comeback. Just one big newspaper where Fox, MSNBC, CNN, and the like can print all of their retractions and apologies.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by peace4all (February 23, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
         
      just a couple of quick observations. 1> the right will never stop saying that we are funding mice. they have that in thier brain and it cannot be removed. kind of like the whole Obama birth certificate thing. these morons still think he was born in africa. 2> i think the only reason wallace talked about the story being debunked is because the NYT had a story referring to it as though it were true. and we all know fox will always do oppisite whetever the NYT does :)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by edtheengineer (February 23, 2009 3:50 pm ET)
         

      Expecting a correction from Beck or any other wingnut at Fauxupthenews is analogous to believing in the proverbial pigs that fly.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by FDR_democrat (February 23, 2009 7:08 pm ET)
         

      I agree - Chris Wallace is highly paid, and no doubt has a large staff. "Supposedly?" How hard could it be to actually check?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by coachslife3331 (February 24, 2009 7:33 am ET)
         
      Infinity...do you also believe in Santa Claus....do you believe that ALL Holy Men have a special phone line to God? After reading your wild assertions....WE NEED YOU IN THE WHITE HOUSE! Anyone that can know all of these things must have some special powers..like say, Superman or Batman! Idiot!
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.