About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

The Hill uncritically repeated NRCC's mouse falsehood

February 23, 2009 6:05 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: The Hill uncritically quoted the communications director for the National Republican Congressional Committee, who falsely claimed that in passing the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, "House Democrats have effectively stimulated a mouse in San Francisco Bay." In fact, as The Hill itself has previously reported, the act does not contain any language directing funds to the salt marsh harvest mouse or its San Francisco wetlands habitat.

16 Comments

In a February 23 article posted on the website of The Hill, Reid Wilson uncritically quoted Ken Spain, communications director for the National Republican Congressional Committee, who falsely claimed that in passing the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, "House Democrats have effectively stimulated a mouse in San Francisco Bay." As Media Matters for America has noted -- and indeed, as The Hill itself has previously reported -- the act does not contain any language directing funds to the salt marsh harvest mouse or its San Francisco wetlands habitat, a fact that the House Republican leadership aide who reportedly originated the claim has reportedly acknowledged.

After writing that "there isn't any such money in the bill" for the mouse, The Plum Line blogger Greg Sargent wrote on February 12 that the claim originated in an email from a "House Republican leadership staffer" who, when contacted by Sargent, "conceded that the claim by conservative media that the mouse money is currently in the bill is a misstatement." San Jose Mercury News staff writer Paul Rogers subsequently reported on February 13 that Michael Steel, a spokesman for House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), originated the claim and said that "[t]here is no language in the bill that says this money will go to this project." Indeed, in a February 13 article, The Hill itself reported that the claim was false:

Republicans peppered their speeches with accusations that stimulus money would go to restore the habitat of the salt-marsh harvest mouse. Since that habitat is in the San Francisco Bay Area, they portrayed it as a pet project of Pelosi's.

The bill, however, doesn't say anything about a mouse. Indeed, the word "mouse" isn't in the entire measure of 1,000-plus pages. Republican leadership offices say they were told by a government agency, most likely the Environmental Protection Agency, that it might spend money protecting the suddenly controversial rodent.

As Media Matters has noted, media outlets such as Fox News, Fox Business Network, The Washington Times, and CNN have advanced the falsehood that the recovery act contains language directing funds to the salt marsh harvest mouse or its San Francisco wetlands habitat.

From the February 23 The Hill article:

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) is helping out nearly a dozen Republicans targeted by national Democrats for their votes against the economic stimulus package, inserting himself back into the debate over the nation's economic health.

Romney's Free and Strong America political action committee will donate $1,000 checks to the campaign coffers of 11 Republican members of Congress singled out for attack by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

[...]

"We are committed to helping these courageous Republicans defend their position and fend off political attacks," Romney said in a statement in which he dubbed the group the "Undaunted Dozen."

Ken Spain, communications director for the National Republican Congressional Committee, got in his own shot at Democrats.

"This is their most effective stimulus strategy to date," Spain said. "So far House Democrats have effectively stimulated a mouse in San Francisco Bay and the campaign coffers of 11 Republican members of Congress."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2009 6:17 pm ET)
         

      I'll bet if there was a another tax break for the wealthy involved the Republicans would just love those adorable mice.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (February 23, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
           

        Somewhere out there the marsh mouse, spotted owl, and snail darter are sitting around, smoking a joint, and laughing about all this.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (February 23, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
         

      "House Democrats have effectively stimulated a mouse in San Francisco Bay."

      Did Rick Santorum write that line?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne (February 23, 2009 6:25 pm ET)
         

      Stop me before I write another marsh mouse limerick. ;-)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2009 6:30 pm ET)
           

        Hey, J.  Got anything that rhymes with gerbil...?  ;>)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (February 23, 2009 6:37 pm ET)
             

          Herbal?

          Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne (February 23, 2009 7:12 pm ET)
             

          Hey Irony, I'm still trying to get over the lubicated gerbil thingy of yours. My mind went straight to the gutter as usual. :-0)

          How 'bout verbal?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne (February 23, 2009 8:53 pm ET)
               

            A verbal herbal gerbil. Hmmmn. For some reason Michael Savage and his treadmill of hate comes to mind, ;-0)   

            Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2009 9:56 pm ET)
               

            My mind went straight to the gutter as usual. :-0)

            Sadly, my mind usually starts in the gutter...and then it's downward from there.  ;>)

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 24, 2009 12:19 am ET)
                 

              The wingnuts go on tirades most verbal

              for things sexual, pagan or herbal

              One's prompted to ax

              where do they get their facts?

              From the Urban legendary home of the gerbil

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 24, 2009 12:23 am ET)
                   

                The Hill's BS march mouse funds blurb'll

                trigger wingnuts reactions disturbal

                With fellow GOPpers, they'll debate

                well, verbally fellate,

                Is oral synonymous with verbal ?

                Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (February 24, 2009 12:31 am ET)
                   

                LOL...love the first one. And you used gerbil in the appropriate context... ;>)

                Report Abuse
                • Author by juliajayne (February 24, 2009 8:36 am ET)
                     

                  I give the Colonel two snaps and a swirl for his efforts. Now if only I could get Damon Wayans and David Alan Grier's pictures on here, I'd be all set. ;-)

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (February 24, 2009 7:35 am ET)
         

      People are calling in to Washington Journal to complain about the BILLIONS being spent to protect "Nancy Pelosi's mouse."  So there you go.  It's not a lie anymore.  It's been repeated often enough to qualify as fact in today's media-driven world.

      Knowing the Democrats, I expect to see Pelosi, Reid etc. eventually apologize for the field mouse protection which does not in fact exist, and promise to never again include such pork even though the stimulus bill didn't actually include it this time.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (February 24, 2009 10:08 am ET)
           

        Don't forget about the "Sin Train".  Are there operatives who sit around in a room all day to think up these lies?

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.