About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

"[E]ducated Joe the Plumber" Santelli spreads conspiracy theories with admitted homicide plotter G. Gordon Liddy

February 23, 2009 8:51 pm ET

SUMMARY: On The G. Gordon Liddy Show, Rick Santelli agreed with Liddy's claim that when Robert Gibbs said during a press briefing, "I'm not entirely sure where Mr. Santelli lives, or in what house he lives," Gibbs was making a "veiled threat." In fact, Gibbs was not threatening Santelli, but rather asserting that Santelli is out of touch with the concerns of "the American people."

58 Comments

As the blog Think Progress noted, on the February 23 broadcast of Radio America's The G. Gordon Liddy Show, CNBC on-air editor Rick Santelli agreed with host G. Gordon Liddy's claim that when White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said during a February 20 press briefing, "I'm not entirely sure where Mr. Santelli lives, or in what house he lives," Gibbs was making a "veiled threat." Liddy later said of Gibbs' comment, "And that's a veiled threat, you know, 'We know where you live,' and so forth." Santelli replied, "It really -- it's quite scary." In fact, Gibbs was not threatening Santelli, but rather asserting that Santelli -- whose CNBC.com profile calls him a "veteran trader and financial executive" -- is out of touch with the concerns of "the American people."

Gibbs' comments came in response to Santelli's February 19 rant over what Santelli said was the government's "promoting bad behavior" and "subsidiz[ing] the losers' mortgages" through President Obama's proposed foreclosure reduction plan. Gibbs said:

Well, let's go through this, because I do think this is very important. And I've watched Mr. Santelli on cable the past 24 hours or so. I'm not entirely sure where Mr. Santelli lives or in what house he lives, but the American people are struggling every day to meet their mortgage, stay in their job, pay their bills, to send their kids to school, and to hope that they don't get sick or that somebody they care for gets sick and sends them into bankruptcy.

I think we left a few months ago the adage that if it was good for a derivatives trader that it was good for Main Street. I think the verdict is in on that.

As Media Matters for America has noted, Liddy served four and a half years in prison in connection with his conviction for his role in the Watergate break-in and the break-in at the office of the psychiatrist of Daniel Ellsberg, the military analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers. Liddy has acknowledged preparing to kill someone during the Ellsberg break-in "if necessary"; plotting to kill journalist Jack Anderson; plotting with a "gangland figure" to kill Howard Hunt to stop him from cooperating with investigators; plotting to firebomb the Brookings Institution; and plotting to kidnap "leftist guerillas" at the 1972 Republican National Convention -- a plan he outlined to the Nixon administration using terminology borrowed from the Nazis. (The murder, firebombing, and kidnapping plots were never carried out; the break-ins were.) During the 1990s, Liddy reportedly instructed his radio audience on multiple occasions on how to shoot Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents and also reportedly said he had named his shooting targets after Bill and Hillary Clinton.

On the February 23 broadcast, Liddy and Santelli had the following exchange:

SANTELLI: [H]e [Gibbs] started that press conference saying, "I don't know where he lives, I don't know where his house is." This is the press secretary of the White House. Is that the kind of thing we want? Is that what it --

LIDDY: It's a veiled threat.

SANTELLI: It really is. You know what? This isn't about left or right. I wasn't for any of the bailouts under the last administration. But I don't realize or recall reading the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution where it says that once you vote for somebody in November, you put duct tape over your mouth and you can't say a word for the next four years. That's just not right.

LIDDY: No, it isn't. And that's a veiled threat, you know, "We know where you live," and so forth.

SANTELLI: It really -- it's quite scary.

In the past year, Liddy has repeatedly used his radio show to dispense conspiracy theories, misinformation, and outrageous commentary.

  • On his November 4, 2008, radio program, Liddy spoke to a caller who stated: "I'm ready to go to the concentration camp, that Obama's police force -- he will round me up. Because I -- I'm a white American." Liddy then said, "Well, listen to this," and aired an edited clip of Obama saying in a July 2, 2008, speech in Colorado Springs: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." Liddy then stated: "Shades of the Gestapo. The Geheime Staatspolizei," to which the caller replied: "How's the cooking going to be? What will -- what will they serve, at the camp?" Liddy responded: "Well, I think, probably, there'll be ham hocks and turnip greens." In fact, Obama's comments about the necessity of a "civilian national security force" referred not to creating a national police force, but to expanding AmeriCorps and other programs.
  • On his November 13, 2008, radio program, Liddy repeatedly advised people not to register their firearms, saying: "The first thing you do is, no matter what law they pass, do not -- repeat, not -- ever register any of your firearms." Liddy added: "Because that's where they get the list of where to go first to confiscate. So, you don't ever register a firearm, anywhere."
  • On October 30, 2008, Liddy said of Obama's electoral prospects in Pennsylvania: "Pennsylvania has been described as Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, with Alabama in the middle. Obama is counting on the urban elites and the welfare class to win the state for him. But he's putting on a show for the rest of Pennsylvania."
  • On his October 7, 2008, radio show, Liddy discussed the detention of anti-Obama author Jerome Corsi in Kenya and aired a sketch in which he played audio of what he called "jungle telegraph drums." During the sketch, Liddy said: "We've used the satellite connection to Kenya, and we are now focusing in on the trial of Dr. Jerome Corsi. ... [H]e's being accused of impersonating a human being. My Zulu's not -- not as good as Obama's, but -- yeah, they're really upset with him. You can probably tell." Liddy then aired a clip apparently from the 1950 movie King Solomon's Mines, which featured characters speaking in Kinyarwanda (not Zulu), one of the official languages of Rwanda, and playing music on drums. Liddy continued: "This is it. This is the -- I think the entire Obama family is getting set to do something terrible to Dr. Corsi. I must say that Dr. Corsi appears to be bearing up with great courage. He's a man. Dr. Corsi will show 'em how to die. Yes, indeed." Liddy went on to say, "That is the -- says it -- the message is going out from Kenya to our brother in America, if I'm understanding the jungle telegraph drums correctly. 'O great brother, born in Kenya, smuggled into Hawaii.' Oh, my. This does not look good for Jerry Corsi. Yes, I think they're going to burn his book now. Matter of fact, they seem to have -- yeah, they've piled up a lot of -- a lot of his books, and there's a big stake in the middle of the pile." Liddy concluded: "All right, I guess it's all over. Jerry Corsi will not be coming back, but he will live on in our memory. Good man, good man. All right, we've lost the satellite feed. ... But remember, you heard it here first: the death of Jerry Corsi, under torture, by Obama's relatives in Kenya."
  • On July 14, 2008, Liddy said of the image of Obama and his wife, Michelle, on the July 21, 2008, cover of The New Yorker: "It's got Obama in his Muslim dress with a turban, and he's there with his wife. His wife has a 'mad at the world' afro, circa 1968, she -- she's got bandoliers and an assault weapon, and there in their fireplace is burning the American flag. The New Yorker finally got it right."
  • On July 9, 2008, while discussing a July 8, 2008, speech in which Obama discussed the importance of learning a second language, Liddy claimed that Obama "wants you to be sure your child can speak fluent illegal alien." He added: "Sadly, with every legal and cultural step we take to make our life more immediately convenient for non-English-speaking illegal aliens, we merely feed the beast." Liddy later stated: "You've just heard Barack Obama insisting that we all teach our children Spanish. Well, not mine, no way. 'Round here, let's see, I speak some French, some German as well as English. Franklin [Liddy's producer] speaks fluent French, fluent Italian, as well as English. But none of us here, so far as I know, speak illegal alien."
  • Throughout the 2008 presidential campaign, Liddy repeatedly claimed that Obama has not produced a valid birth certificate. In fact, in addition to posting a copy of Obama's birth certificate on the campaign website, the Obama campaign reportedly provided the original document to FactCheck.org, whose staff reported in an August 21, 2008, article that they "have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate" and concluded that it "meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship."

From the February 23 broadcast of Radio America's The G. Gordon Liddy Show:

SANTELLI: You know, people went to war to fight over the freedoms we have. You know, when the press secretary said those things about me, Gordon, I can take it. But I'm a family man. I work hard. I have to put three kids through college. Think about this: Not only did he say I didn't know what I was talking about -- and everybody's entitled to their own opinion -- but he started that press conference saying, "I don't know where he lives, I don't know where his house is." This is the press secretary of the White House. Is that the kind of thing we want? Is that what it --

LIDDY: It's a veiled threat.

SANTELLI: It really is. You know what? This isn't about left or right. I wasn't for any of the bailouts under the last administration. But I don't realize or recall reading the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution where it says that once you vote for somebody in November, you put duct tape over your mouth and you can't say a word for the next four years. That's just not right.

LIDDY: No, it isn't. And that's a veiled threat, you know, "We know where you live," and so forth.

SANTELLI: It really -- it's quite scary. And I'll tell you what, Gordon. I consider myself a member in good standing of the press. And last I looked, there's freedom of the press, freedom of speech. Listen, listeners, I'm not asking you to agree with me. And really, this was never about me. This is about you, your money, how you deal with your government, how your kids will be living over the next 20 years, and when they start to go to work. But even more than that, does it matter what -- how many cars you have or how big your house is if you've worked hard and done it right? To think that is now a litmus test for whether you're a good American or not -- I just don't understand it.

LIDDY: Yeah, well. You know, you mentioned the freedom of the press that presumably we still have. But I would suggest to you that they are working on it. That's this talk of Fairness Doctrine and localism and all the rest of it. They're working on that "freedom of the press" thing.

SANTELLI: Right. And you know, Gordon, there's a lot of people hurting out there. And I've never -- of course, these are my opinions -- I've never thought that we should cut down on jobless claims. As a matter of fact, I think this money needs to be spent on jobs, if we're going to spend money we don't have. But it really has to bring jobs. And we should put more money, as we have, in programs that are good programs. If people get laid off, they need jobless insurance. You know, claims insurance. They need some continued health coverage. I understand that they need to be retrained. All of this is good. But when did a house become an entitlement? It's just not the way the country was founded, and I think we just need to go back to our original principles.

And it's not about charity either, Gordon. You know, people want to be charitable in this country, but the legislature shouldn't take that right away.

LIDDY: But Rick, but didn't a house become an entitlement when the government passed a law that said it was? That's the Community Reinvestment Act.

SANTELLI: You're so right. And see, there's another issue here. You know -- first of all, we've never -- there's no society that's been pure anything, whether it's socialist, capitalist. We don't have a pure capitalist society, just for the reasons you've dictated. You know, Congress over the years, Democrat, Republican, independent, have fueled Freddie and Fannie. They always had, supposedly, an intrinsic but not an explicit guarantee by the government.

Who are we kidding? The government made it clear to investors that, you know, we're going to stand behind them. And then they made them lower standards and do things and extend -- listen, we want everybody to have a house. But we want everybody to have a house they can afford and to do all the right things. And to have income verified, not have institutions and unlicensed mortgage brokers. And nothing against that industry -- I'm sure there's good ones. But you can't have this facade, and then when it all falls apart -- you look at the people that are cutting back and doing the right thing, going out less, trying to figure out how to put their kids through school, to retire -- and think we can pick up the tab. We're burdened as well.

LIDDY: Well, you know, Rick, what's happened is -- and I'm sure it was only by accident -- you have become the educated Joe the Plumber of the finance business.

SANTELLI: Well, truly, Gordon, it wasn't my intention. And anybody who's watched me over the years -- I tend to be impassioned. I can be impassioned when I see a movement in a market, when we get a release at 7:30 Central of statistics regarding employment or GDP. That's just the nature of who I am. I don't really want to be a spokesman, but what I really am very proud of is a) the response that I'm getting, which is overwhelmingly positive, and b) discourse, that is debate. That if the pressure and the heat I'm taking from the White House -- or the fact that my kids are nervous to go to school -- I can take that, OK? If people around their dinner tables really have a vested interest in all these zeros, if they're debating, that's good.

LIDDY: You are so right about debate. And, of course, the administration didn't want anybody to read that. 

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DAWUSS (February 23, 2009 8:57 pm ET)
         

      So Joe the Plumber's uneducated???!!!!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (February 23, 2009 9:18 pm ET)
           

        So you're saying he is?

        Oops, I mean, so you're saying he is???!!!!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (February 23, 2009 8:57 pm ET)
         

      Looks like Santelli may have fallen into an open invitation from every right-wing professional liar in America.  All it takes is saying something incredibly stupid on TV and you, too, can become a right-wing hero with 15 minutes to burn.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (February 23, 2009 9:11 pm ET)
         

      Okay. Did anyone catch this?

      "I'm not entirely sure where Mr. Santelli lives, or in what house he lives," Gibbs was making a "veiled threat." Liddy later said of Gibbs' comment, "And that's a veiled threat, you know, 'We know where you live,' and so forth." Santelli replied, "It really -- it's quite scary."

      Okay. Gibbs had just said that they don't know where Santelli lives, and Liddy is saying that they're are threatening him by saying that they know where he lives. Idiots.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by harley (February 23, 2009 11:13 pm ET)
           

        Liddy knows a lot about threats…..

        In 1994, after the disastrous federal raid on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, he gave some advice to his listeners:

        “Now if the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms, resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they’re going to be wearing bulletproof vests. … Kill the sons of b*tches.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (February 23, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
         

      Hey Santelli, you better not say anything about the Clintons'. Just a another warning. Santi, is Fox calling?

      Someone I knew in years gone by actually knew Liddy and said his bravado is just a fraud. He needs attention and his tough guy attitude was his way of getting it. So that puts him in the same category as SeannieBoy the Sissy.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2009 10:09 pm ET)
           

        I don't know how tough Liddy is but to hold one's hand over a flame to impress babes is...well, just plain dumb.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (February 23, 2009 9:58 pm ET)
         

      What a good. Gibbs was clearly talking about what TYPE of house he lives in since Santelli himself was talking about "losers" with an extra bathroom that others have to pay for his mortgage. Big steaming load of crap, that is.

      Funny thing is to all of this, it is conservative outlets Drudge and FNC that pushed this guys rant into the spotlight.

      And so the right wing apparently thinks that stock & deritive traders calling people who can't make their home payments "losers" are being populist and are right that we don't deserve any assistance.

      Real nice.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2009 10:07 pm ET)
         

      Jeez, first it was Bill Clinton killing somebody involved in his cocaine dealings in Arkansas. Then he and Hillary offed Vince Foster. Now Barack Obama has a hit out on Rick Santelli. Man, those damn Democratic Presidents don't fool around.  Who said Democrats weren't tough enough to be President? They're freakin' Sopranos. Hey Barack, Fuggedabowdit...!  ;>)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj2970 (February 24, 2009 4:32 pm ET)
           

        Yep, these delusions of grandeur are put forth in living color.  Amazing that these two nuts have any one who pays ANY attention to their wierd conversations.  The leap from the simple statement about where the guy lives to a threat is something my 9 yr. old grandkid would dream up when playing cops and robbers.  Santelli's silliness on this issue and the hysterical reaction of Liddy makes it certain that they are blowing smoke just to arouse others.  Their hysteria is laughable only if some nut does NOT pay attention to them and they do not incite violence.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (February 23, 2009 10:09 pm ET)
         

      By the way, where does he live?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by truth2tell (February 23, 2009 10:19 pm ET)
         

      Watching Santelli argue with his fellow moneychangers at the financial channel, you can tell he thinks he's the smartest guy there.  Maybe he is.  They are all idiots who believe in Reaganomics.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (February 23, 2009 10:24 pm ET)
         

      Tman

      I caught that too.  Not only does the context make it clear it wasn't a threat, it doesn't even make any sense the way they say it.

      Once you get to this level, why not just say that Gibbs unleashed a string of ethnic slurs against Santelli and insulted his mother?  That's a serious question.  There's literally nothing in what Gibbs said to justify the accusation, so what's the significant difference between pretending that there was and just making up something totally outrageous?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2009 10:31 pm ET)
           

        Put on a tin foil hat. Listen to the tape over and over again and you'll clearly hear the threats implicit in Robert Gibbs attack on Rick Santelli. You will also hear David Berkowitz's dog speaking to you as well.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by truth2tell (February 23, 2009 10:28 pm ET)
         

      Santelli is sure to enhance his credibility by appearing on the Liddy Show.  The last time I heard G.'s show, he was a 70-year-old man who was asking women to send in pictures of themselves in their underwear while holding guns, or he was bragging about his genitals.  When he wasn't doing that, he was calling Bill Clinton a pervert!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Mrs. Teufelshunde (February 23, 2009 11:02 pm ET)
         

      Why are these right-wing guys sure pansies?

      "I know, it's really scary"

      Really?  Robert Gibbs is about the unscariest guy ever.  If he WAS directly threatening me I wouldn't be all that concerned.  But this guy is quaking in his boots because Gibbs said he DIDN'T know where he lived.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Mrs. Teufelshunde (February 23, 2009 11:03 pm ET)
           

        *such* not sure

        I should reread what I write before posting

        Report Abuse
        • Author by truth2tell (February 23, 2009 11:25 pm ET)
             

          This is way off topic, but "Mrs. Teufelshunde" is a really cool name.  Is it real?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Mrs. Teufelshunde (February 24, 2009 12:14 am ET)
               

            Well, it's not my real last name, if that's what you're asking.  It's loosely "devil dog" in German, and my husband's a Marine, so it's real in sentiment.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by thejbomb65 (February 24, 2009 10:06 am ET)
               

            it was given to US Marines after the Battle of Bellau Wood in WWI. the Germans called them the Dogs from Hell because during the battle, Marines had on gas masks, and the Germans said it looked liek they had a snout and because of the gas, the soldiers were foaming at the mouth, eyes were bloodshot from the gas and they were running up a hill on all fours killing everyone in sight.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2009 11:31 pm ET)
           

        Why are these right-wing guys sure pansies?

        Agreed... Maybe his real name is Nancy Santelli. Speaking of which, I'll bet even Nancy Pelosi could kick Santelli's butt.  ;>)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (February 23, 2009 11:03 pm ET)
         

      good grief.  gibbs was clearly making a comment on the housing market in general.  i don't have a problem with the concerns about deficit spending.  it was one of the things i criticized the most about bush.  but where was all this concern when bush doubled the national debt in his two terms and left obama with this mess?  all of a sudden, deficit spending is a problem where it wasn't before.  a trillion flushed away in iraq, the war that was supposed to "pay for itself".  no big deal there.  evermore tax cuts?   bring em on.   deficits are never a problem when it's a republican in office, including saint ronnie.

      and where were all these people screaming about mortgages when paul krugman was predicting this exact outcome 3 and 4 years ago in his column?   he laid this out to the last detail, all the huge mortgages being granted to people that could not begin to afford them and then all the mortgages being bundled and sold from one investment firm to another until finally everyone had to admit the emperor had no clothes.  yes, it's a mess, but it's one that could be clearly seen coming and a lot of these same people shouting now had no objections then.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bluhawk7398 (February 23, 2009 11:04 pm ET)
         

      So by using this thinking pattern(btw I don't believe there WAS a threat, real or implied), the current left snafu trying to say the chimp cartoon was a threat against obama is bogus!! Can't have it both ways children... 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by harley (February 23, 2009 11:11 pm ET)
           

        Another failed analogy from the radical right....big surprise.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 23, 2009 11:42 pm ET)
             

          I just imagine these wingnuts hitting "post", and thinking they've nailed "the left" in some hypocricy.

          Can't really blame the sheep, their shepherds rely on these ridiculous analogies for hundreds of hours a week of tv & radio.

          Bluhawk, you've been suckered.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (February 23, 2009 11:58 pm ET)
           

        Who on the left said that the chimp cartoon was a threat against Obama?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by bluhawk7398 (February 24, 2009 6:42 am ET)
             

          Sorry I don't have exact quotes, but K.O. fro m msnbc had video clips of sharpton calling it a racist threat and had as a guest the head of the naacp who directly called it a threat against obama.....believe me , it pains me to watch countdown,but I do it for the same reason lefties listen to rush(I don't listen to rush by the way!)

          Report Abuse
          • Author by thejbomb65 (February 24, 2009 10:09 am ET)
               

            but  you forgot one important thing. even Keith (which im a fan of his show and watch regularly, if for nothing else cause he is funny and makes a compelling point at times) said that it may not be a threat to Obama, at the very least its a call to violence against SOMEONE. be pelosi, or even obey. that was his take on it.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 24, 2009 12:09 am ET)
           

        Think this through, Bluhawk... The New York Post depicted policemen killing the crazed chimp that created the stimulus bill by shooting him full of large holes. I don't consider the cartoon a threat, per se, but it certainly suggests that it would be okay, even funny, to shoot the creator of the stimulus bill. And, then, when you consider the heated atmosphere of hatred that right wing talkers have created towards Barack Obama among the knuckle-draggers, some of whom love their guns like their children, it makes you wonder if to even jokingly suggest that killing the creator of the stimulus bill is the smartest thing to do.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (February 24, 2009 10:03 am ET)
             

          Remember, all it took was hatred of the left aided by Billo's book and a little insanity that compelled someone to shoot up a church.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (February 24, 2009 10:07 am ET)
           

        well the neo con noise machines needed to counteract the cartoon, so they picked this.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj2970 (February 24, 2009 4:38 pm ET)
           

        Remember the paper owner apologized for the cartoon.  It was disgusting and even someone like him understood that and bless his heart, took responsibility for it.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (February 23, 2009 11:08 pm ET)
         

      Bluhawk

      Who said the chimp cartoon constituted a "threat"?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2009 11:16 pm ET)
         

      My words to Rick Santelli...Gibbs threatens you, and YOU'RE GONNA TAKE THAT? What kinda man are you, you mamaluke?  ;>)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 23, 2009 11:44 pm ET)
           

        Paranoid, frightened candy-asses - the GOP base. It wouldn't be so funny if they didn't spend so much time on their manly tough-talk.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (February 24, 2009 10:13 am ET)
           

        Mamaluke? do you think anyone would get that reference?

        quick history lesson:

        the Mamalukes were Egyptian slaves, who rose up and ruled Egypt from about of 13th century up until the Ottomans took over. the were retained as governors of Egypt until  the fall of the Ottoman Empire.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by cpinva (February 24, 2009 3:18 am ET)
         

      first to clear up another poster's confusion:

      bill and hillary killed everything in arkansas: men, women, children, babes-in-arms, household pets (including those in aquariums), sprayed agent orange over the entire state, then salted it, so nothing would ever grow there again. this was after bill raped every female human in the state.

      this really is pretty damn scary! were i messrs. liddy or santelli, i'd leave the country, now, this very instant! or, failing that, build one of those 1950's era nuclear fallout shelters in my back yard, deep in my backyard. say, 300 feet deep, just to be sure. i'd stock it with enough provisions to last, oh, 8 years or so. then, my family and i would move in, having pre-arranged for a 10 foot thick layer of concrete, w/rebar, to be poured over the entrance, preventing anyone from getting in.

      there we would sit, until at least 2016, riding out the obama nightmare.

      it's the only way to be sure.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (February 24, 2009 7:37 am ET)
         

      Bluhawk

      "Sorry I don't have exact quotes, but K.O. fro m msnbc had video clips of sharpton calling it a racist threat and had as a guest the head of the naacp who directly called it a threat against obama...."

      It would be nice to have exact quotes, since context might make a difference there.  But if what you say is true, then I think most would agree that they're wrong to call it a "threat".  It's miles closer to a threat than "I'm not entirely sure where Mr. Santelli lives", but still over the top.

      The problem for you is that once you take the concept of "threat" away from the Gibbs quote, there's nothing there to criticize.  The cartoon, on the other hand, is still racist.  And that's what most people would seem to be complaining about.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by LittleFuzzy (February 24, 2009 7:49 am ET)
         

      I like this bit:

      But I don't realize or recall reading the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution where it says that once you vote for somebody in November, you put duct tape over your mouth and you can't say a word for the next four years. That's just not right.

      I believe that those words are in the RNC charter regarding Republican Presidents and are to apply to all Americans.  In the case of a Democratic President, Republicans are exempted.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by edtheengineer (February 24, 2009 8:58 am ET)
         

      All Liddy is doing is keeping his republican credentials up to date by alerting us to the evil that lurks in the hearts of all democrats.  To think that I was raised by long-dead republicans who not even bother to spit on this guy.  My dear grandfather is undoubtedly spinning in his grave.  The deterioration of the republican party and its spokespeople like Liddy is awesome to behold.  (He is) a complete jerk and a zero.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by truthseeker77 (February 24, 2009 9:53 am ET)
         
      So according to MMFA Libby considered killing Howard Hunt. Is this the same Hunt who is strongly rumored to have participated in the JFK assassination? Hmmm. The plot thickens. Hunt's son even has audio online allegedly of his father admitting it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (February 24, 2009 10:17 am ET)
           

        you should read a book called "I heard you paint houses" by charles brandt. its about a guy named Frank Sherran, who was a well known union guy, best friend of jimmy hoffa (and admitted in detail that he killed hoffa himself)

        in one section he taks about taking three rifles to a cement plant in baltimore and meeting a guy named David Ferrie. just a few days before JKF was killed.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (February 24, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
           

        Howard Hunt was a criminal accomplice of Liddy's, and he tried to kill him so he wouldn't squawk to investigators.

        Maybe Liddy had a hand in the JFK assassination as well?

        It's too bad Hunt and Liddy didn't murder each other, then we'd be rid of two treasonous scumbag criminals!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by congero6189599 (February 24, 2009 11:24 am ET)
         

      Gary Kamiya wrote an article @salon.com entitled,"Who is the right calling a'loser'?" I think he hit the nail on the head,here is the link for those interested :http://www.salon.com/opinion/kamiya/2009/02/24/rick_santelli/index.html?source=newsletter

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Zoltan600 (February 24, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
         

      It's funny how popular people get in the mainstream media when they are quoted disagreeing with Beloved Leader. Santelli is 100% correct.  I do not choose to spend my money helping people stay in houses they should never have been allowed a loan for.  Give me another option.

      Z

      Report Abuse
      • Author by MoonbatYouBet (February 24, 2009 4:31 pm ET)
           

        It's always hilarious how some people feel this need to always refer to Obama using special pet names that they think someone other than themselves and those who agree with them use.

        Do you want to bail out the banks who voluntarily made mortgages they knew had a very high chance of defaulting?  Do you want to bail out the investment firms who multiplied the effect of those mortgage defaults by bundling them into risky investment schemes and camoflaged the risk with fraudulent bond ratings?  Do you want to bail out the neighborhoods which have their property values destroyed by abandoned properties?

        I don't like the idea of bailouts myself, but I don't see a different way other than letting the collapse happen and to deal with the aftermath.  That doesn't sound cheap or easy either.  In fact it reminds me a bit of something that paradoxically includes the adjective "Great" in it's name.  What was that historical event I wonder?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by edtheengineer (February 24, 2009 1:43 pm ET)
         

      Whenever the republiCANTS get caught with their pants down and their arguements discredited, they roll out the "I'm an victum" arguement.  Their shallowness and their cowardness are both disgusting.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by edtheengineer (February 24, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
         

      When my TV died, people like Mr. Santelli, as well as Liddy, Beck, O'Reilly and others were major reasons for not purchasing another.  It made no sense to shell out good money to enable listening to such unmitigated hoo haa.  Unfortunately, the hoo haa factor on TV is increasing at a rate that drawfs the rate of growth of such deleterious things as dandruff, climate change, and rheumatism.  TV is now worse than all of the foregoing and Mr. Santelli is a prime example.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by truth2tell (February 24, 2009 10:41 pm ET)
           

        It's too bad we can't have a la carte cable.  As it is, our cable bill payments are going to support these guys.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mari2jj2970 (February 24, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
         

      So tell, me will you?  Why should anyone even give a second thought to what this convicted felon says or does.  That Santelli sucked it up to Liddy shows how bankrupt his thought process is.  I think that Liddy has in mind to incite a riot or a killing spree just to prove how influencial he is.  The guy is truly psychotic.  After all my years of working in mental health, it is so easy to understand just how criminally inclined Liddy is.  The great thing about the situation now is that he is so outlandish that every one knows his rhetoric is just all talk and that he hides behind his desk so he is perfectly safe.  But for him to assume he has any credibility after his long line of criminal activity shows how lacking in insight the poor thing is.  Santelli and Liddy make a wonderful pair.  I suggest the get married and form a happy, crazy couple.  They suit each other perfectly.    My word, my first big giggle when thinking about Liddy and I cannot stop laughing at the thought of this cooky couple.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by truth2tell (February 24, 2009 10:48 pm ET)
           

        Maybe there's some light at the end of the Liddy tunnel.  He's now about 80 years old and sounded kind of weak on a recent TV appearance.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by sjkt2278 (February 24, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
         

      Is this really a comedy show ? G. Gordon Liddy must be parading a radio talk show . It could be a skit on Jon Stewart . Otherwise he is just plain crazy . 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (February 25, 2009 12:35 am ET)
         

      "I'm not entirely sure where Mr. Santelli lives, or in what house he lives,"

      Good grief, they are so desperate for something to be concerned over - how about the economy that Bush ruined - how about being concerned then?

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.