About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

MSNBC's Brewer, Watson aired Gingrich's gratuitous Twitter attack on Pelosi

February 25, 2009 6:20 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: MSNBC uncritically repeated a Twitter post by Newt Gingrich in which he attacked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for "standing up to applaud the private jet line" in President Obama's address to Congress "while she flies around in a government jet at taxpayer expense." Gingrich has repeatedly attacked Pelosi over her use of the plane while also falsely claiming that her predecessor, Dennis Hastert, did not use one.

35 Comments

On February 25, MSNBC aired a segment on Republicans' use of Twitter during President Obama's February 24 address to Congress. The segment, which included tweets -- Twitter posts -- from Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) and Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), also included a tweet from Fox News contributor and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich (R-GA) in which he attacked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). Gingrich's tweet, which anchor Contessa Brewer read and MSNBC aired a graphic of, read: "Speaker Pelosi standing up to applaud the private jet line while she flies around in a government jet at taxpayer expense verges on bizarre." Media Matters for America has previously documented Gingrich's repeated attacks on Pelosi regarding her use of a private jet.

Introducing the segment, Brewer stated that the "Republicans Twittered their way through President Obama's address to Congress last night." She added: "GOP lawmakers reacted in real time to practically everything the president was talking about." Brewer and co-anchor Carlos Watson then read tweets from Culberson, Barton, and Gingrich while the texts of their tweets appeared on-screen. However, Brewer and Watson did not air any Twitter posts from any of the Democratic lawmakers or pundits who also Twittered during the speech.

According to Watson, Culberson tweeted: "We are at war -- seems to me honoring our troops should come on page one rather than at the end of the speech." Watson also reported that Barton tweeted: "Aggie basketball game is about to start on ESPN2 for those of you that aren't going to bother watching Pelosi smirk for the next hour." Watson then said, "But Contessa, just a few minutes after this, someone else posted on his same page, 'Disregard that last tweet, [it was] from a staffer.' " Brewer replied: "Yeah, blame it on the staffer." (Those tweets have since been deleted from Barton's account.)

Brewer also stated: "Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich wasn't in the room, but he posted this about the speech." Brewer then read a combination of two tweets Gingrich had posted during the speech: "A Democratic pep rally not a State of the Union -- sophomoric and silly. Speaker Pelosi standing up to applaud the private jet line while she flies around in a government jet at taxpayer expense verges on bizarre."

As Media Matters documented, during the December 19, 2008, edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, Gingrich falsely asserted that Pelosi's predecessor as speaker, Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-IL), "did not get a private plane" following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Gingrich added: "There's no reason for anyone but the president and vice president of the United States to have that level of security." Gingrich made his comments during a segment in which co-host Sean Hannity criticized Pelosi's use of a private jet. In fact, following 9-11, the House sergeant-at-arms, the Defense Department, and the White House agreed that military planes should be made available to the speaker of the House for national security reasons, and Hastert was the first speaker to use one.

Some Democratic lawmakers tweeted during the speech, as several media outlets have noted. For example, a February 25 CNN.com article reported:

Rep. Earl Blumenauer, a Democrat from Oregon, sent out a flurry of tweets during the evening. "One doesn't want to sound snarky, but it is nice not to see Cheney up there," he remarked just before the speech.

"Obama enters," Blumenauer wrote after the House Sergeant-at-Arms announced the President's entrance. "Crowd goes wild. Members taking pictures. McCain and Lindsey Graham. What a picture."

Democrat Claire McCaskill, perhaps the most avid Twitter user in the Senate, was excited to see Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg appear following her pancreatic cancer operation.

"I did big wooohoo for Justice Ginsberg [sic]," McCaskill wrote. "She looks good."

From the 2 p.m. ET hour of the February 25 edition of MSNBC Live:

BREWER: The Republicans Twittered their way through President Obama's address to Congress last night. GOP lawmakers reacted in real time to practically everything the president was talking about, and they gave some behind-the-scenes details. Here's a post from Texas Republican John Culberson. "All our seats are first come first serve. We sit wherever we want. The congressmen on the aisle got here real early."

WATSON: And later Culberson tweeted this way: "We are at war -- seems to be -- seems that honoring our troops should come on page one rather than at the end of the speech." Also, from another Texas Republican, this time Joe Barton, posted this, kind of interesting: "Aggie basketball game is about to start on ESPN2 for those of you that aren't going to bother watching Pelosi smirk for the next hour."

BREWER: Wow.

WATSON: But Contessa, just a few minutes after posting this, someone else posted on his same page, "Disregard that last tweet, [it was] from a staffer."

BREWER: Yeah, blame it on the staffer, right. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich wasn't in the room, but he posted this about the speech: "A Democratic pep rally not a State of the Union -- sophomoric and silly. Speaker Pelosi standing up to applaud the private jet line while she flies around in a government jet at taxpayer expense verges on bizarre."

OK, if you're into Twitter, you can follow me by going to twitter.com/contessabrewer.

WATSON: Or you could also go to twitter.com/carloswatson. You can also get your daily tweets from all of our MSNBC anchors by going to twitter.MSNBC.com.

BREWER: I don't know about all this -- Twitter.

WATSON: [unintelligible]

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shaggles (February 25, 2009 7:07 pm ET)
         
      Nearly as bizarre as Gingrich impeaching President Clinton for lying about an affair when he was having one (and lying about it) himself.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (February 25, 2009 7:15 pm ET)
           

        ...While his wife was in the hospital.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Cheney2012 (February 25, 2009 10:11 pm ET)
           

        You left out that part about Gingrich lying under oath and obstructing justice.  Oh wait, that didn't happen.  Only Clinton, your hero did that.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (February 25, 2009 11:12 pm ET)
             

          That's just because Newtie had so many charges against him they just didn't get around to that yet. You know, the ol' going after the low hanging fruit routine...

          http://www.experiencefestival.com/newt_gingrich_-_ethics_charges

          Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (February 26, 2009 1:02 am ET)
             

          Actually, that's where you're wrong.

          Clinton did, as we all know, lie about his affair with one Monica Lewinsky. I did not condone him for that action, it was stupid, and silly.

          The part that you get wrong, is that his lie about his affair had nothing to do with the case that he was being deposed in, and therefore, did not obstruct justice from happening, which is why he was never criminally charged for that perjure of himself, because it had nothing to do with the case. It was brought up to make Clinton look bad, and had nothing to do at all with the independent investigator Ken Starr's case against Clinton.

          That's the part that you yay hoos seem to forget.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by historygeek001 (February 26, 2009 1:13 pm ET)
               

            And, judging from their reaction to Scooter Libby, obstruction of justice is only a "techicality" anyway.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by Mrs. Teufelshunde (February 25, 2009 7:35 pm ET)
         
      I for one cannot understand why in the world politicians would want to "twitter". Speaking of sophomoric...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (February 25, 2009 7:42 pm ET)
           

        Because it's the only way they can play with their handhelds and not be condemned to a lake of fire by the Tennessee Taliban.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (February 25, 2009 7:46 pm ET)
           

        It took me about five and a half seconds to get sick of the word "Twitter."  Christ, as if blathering away on a cell phone or texting away on a blackberry wasn't juvenile enough.

        I'm also sick to death of hearing about how Nancy Pelosi "acted like a cheerleader" and "was practically waving pompoms" simply because she repeatedly rose to applaud her President, who also happened to be the leader of her party.  The sexism continues to rule in the media- most VPs rise to applaud; Nancy Pelosi "waves pompoms."

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jjamele2880 (February 25, 2009 7:47 pm ET)
             

          Excuse me, most Speakers rise to applaud; Nancy Pelosi "waves pompoms."

          Report Abuse
          • Author by oscar the grouch (February 25, 2009 8:16 pm ET)
               

            I wonder how much hand lotion she had to use last night after the speech, considering the abuse she subjected them to by clapping every fifth word (it seemed).

            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (February 25, 2009 8:30 pm ET)
                 

              Oscar, that wasn't hand lotion, us liberals roll up our sleeves and use spit! ;)

              Report Abuse
              • Author by oscar the grouch (February 25, 2009 11:16 pm ET)
                   

                Just don't clap after applying that "lotion".

                Report Abuse
                • Author by snoopy (February 25, 2009 11:41 pm ET)
                     

                  Republicans: the Detroit Lions without a gameplan...

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by snoopy (February 25, 2009 11:47 pm ET)
                       

                    I have to apologize, that was just wrong. It was more like the Detroit Lions with an armchair quarterback...

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jwcoop715110 (February 26, 2009 12:03 am ET)
                         

                      And a game plan. Think Nixon sending in plays to George Allen. How'd that work out?

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by oscar the grouch (February 26, 2009 12:17 am ET)
                           

                        Probably about as good as you giving the Rs advice on how to win/lose an upcoming election.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by magnolialover (February 26, 2009 1:03 am ET)
                             

                          Seems as though lately, we do know how to WIN them. Look at the scoreboard. Results do count for something don't they?

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by oscar the grouch (February 26, 2009 9:24 am ET)
                               

                            I will concede that point.  Govern well or the pendulum will swing back sooner than later.

                            Report Abuse
                    • Author by oscar the grouch (February 26, 2009 12:15 am ET)
                         

                      Armchair quarterbacks have a pretty good record (but primarily because they look at everything in hindsight).

                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by oscar the grouch (February 26, 2009 12:14 am ET)
                       

                    Didn't the Detroit Lions set some kind of record this past year without a gameplan?  But now, don't they have a new President that has promised "change"?

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by snoopy (February 26, 2009 10:42 am ET)
                         

                      Not a president, oscar. He's the new head of the RNC - oops, I meant DLC. But the armchair quarterback still calls all the shots.

                      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (February 25, 2009 7:47 pm ET)
         

      So, if the GOP can't stand waste, how come they won't cut the size of their congressional staff even though they have less senators and congressmen than they did last year? Talk about waste...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (February 25, 2009 7:53 pm ET)
           

        Ya mean, besides the fact that their hypocrites and frauds and their scum-vote constituents let 'em get away with it for Jesus?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Shmendrik (February 25, 2009 8:44 pm ET)
         

      Pelosi is a typical limousine liberal.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (February 25, 2009 9:59 pm ET)
           

        How so, shmendrik?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (February 26, 2009 1:05 am ET)
           

        Yeah, how is that exactly? How is that different from republicans who are rich? Let me help you. It's not. Except, the republicans act like "salt of the Earth" people, when they know, darn well know, that they're not. Prime example. George W. Bush. He was a prep school kid raised with a silver spoon firmly lodged in his mouth, but he wanted to be an everyman, he wasn't. Pelosi, at least, made her own money.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by hd742159 (February 26, 2009 1:03 am ET)
         

      I'm a big liberal believer, but NANCY PELOSI has some financial issues that have been bugging me.  If anyone can clarify any of the murk surrounding the investments her and her husband have please help me out. Again, I'm not attacking her, but there are some funny things happening with her investments.

      And about the smirk - I mean, George Bush didn't stop smirking for 8 years. Aren't we owed some smirk time? I'm smirking right now!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tinka (February 26, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
         
      The "Twitter" will be the final downfall of the Republican party. Do they not realize that anyone and everyone can read their snarky "Twitts" about President Obama and other non-Republicans. The believe that "Twittering" will save the Republican party! What a hoot!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by imsupermom (February 26, 2009 3:25 pm ET)
         
      Pelosi is a joke. She is an embarrasement to our way of government and an embarrasement to women.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (February 26, 2009 5:17 pm ET)
           

        Pelosi is a joke. She is an embarrasement to our way of government and an embarrasement to women.

        And you're an embarrassment to mothers.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by markbfoot199 (February 26, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
         

      When do we get to see what the Dems were typing?  Or do we not get to see?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Shmendrik (February 26, 2009 9:28 pm ET)
         

      Forget renewable energy!  We can use Nancy Pelosi's eyelids for perpetual energy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (February 27, 2009 11:47 am ET)
         

      Cheap shot time, eh?  Don't want to deal with all the stoopid lies about Pelosi, eh?

      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.