About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox's Garrett exaggerated in claiming Obama's statistic on bankruptcies tied to health costs is "[n]ot even close"

March 05, 2009 8:41 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: At a March 5 health-care forum, President Obama said, "The cost of health care now causes a bankruptcy in America every 30 seconds." On Special Report, Major Garrett reported that when asked to support that statistic, the White House cited a 2005 op-ed by Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren in which she referred to a Harvard study that supports the statistic. But Garrett did not note this. Instead, he referred to Treasury Department statistics from 2000 and pronounced Obama's assertion "[n]ot even close."

13 Comments

During the March 5 edition of Fox News' Special Report, White House correspondent Major Garrett left out key data from a report he cited to accuse President Obama of making a claim about health-care costs and bankruptcies that was "[n]ot even close" to accurate.

At a March 5 health-care forum, Obama said, "The cost of health care now causes a bankruptcy in America every 30 seconds." Garrett reported that when asked for support for the statistic, the White House cited a 2005 Washington Post op-ed by Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren, in which Warren wrote:" Every 30 seconds in the United States, someone files for bankruptcy in the aftermath of a serious health problem." Garrett noted that in that op-ed, Warren referred to a 2005 Harvard study, of which she was a co-author. But rather than note that the 2005 study cites statistics from 2001 that support Warren's -- and indirectly Obama's -- assertion, Garrett noted that the study relies on 2001 statistics, but then referred to Treasury Department statistics from 2000 that he said did not support Warren's assertion. Based on the 2000 data, which were not the basis for the Harvard study or Warren's op-ed, Garrett then pronounced Obama's assertion "[n]ot even close."

In fact, according a March 5 post by ABC News director of polling Gary Langer at the ABCNews.com blog The Numbers, Warren's co-author, Harvard professor David Himmelstein, wrote that Obama's error was in not relying on more recent statistics:

Himmelstein tells me that the reason for the difference is a change in federal law that sharply reduced the number of bankruptcies. In 2005, the year he and Warren wrote their op-ed, there were just over 2 million bankruptcies. Data out just today say that in 2008 there were 1.1 million (up sharply, by the way, over 2007). So this error in the White House claim stems simply from the fact that it's using out-of-date information. The next question is whether the estimate of "medical bankruptcies" is reliable in the first place. [italics in original]

In other words, Garrett's characterization of Obama's assertion as "[n]ot even close" is itself an exaggeration.

From the March 5 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier:

GARRETT: And the cost is staggering -- consumers and the government paid $2.4 trillion for health care last year. That's 16 percent of the nation's gross domestic product. In 10 years, the healthcare tab could be $4.4 trillion, and 20 percent of GDP. And the president says there's a more immediate problem, and it sounds alarming.

OBAMA: The cost of health care now causes a bankruptcy in America every 30 seconds.

GARRETT: But the White House could not provide a statistic to back this up. They pointed to a 2005 Washington Post column written by Harvard scholar Elizabeth Warren. In it, she said, quote, "Every 30 seconds in the United States, someone files for bankruptcy in the aftermath of a serious health problem." Serious health problem, not, as the president said, the ordinary cost of healthcare.

But Warren's data comes from a survey of bankruptcies in 2001, and it says 2.2 million Americans are affected by bankruptcy -- not filed for, but are affected by. What's more, a Treasury Department survey in 2000 found medical costs were, quote, "not a major factor," unquote, in bankruptcies filed that year. A senior White House economist could not back up the president's bankruptcy-every-30-seconds assertion.

CHRISTINA ROMER (chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers): I'm going to have to check the numbers for you. I think the important thing is the idea is absolutely true.

GARRETT: High healthcare costs do contribute to bankruptcies, accounting for about a third of those filed in 2006. But one every 30 seconds? Not even close.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 05, 2009 8:50 pm ET)
         

      GARRETT: High healthcare costs do contribute to bankruptcies, accounting for about a third of those filed in 2006.

      Wow...! I didn't know that. Major Garrett should have left that tidbit out if he wanted to discredit President Obama's point.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (March 05, 2009 9:13 pm ET)
           

        And donald trump accounts for another third, if money is the base measurement! ;)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (March 05, 2009 9:19 pm ET)
         

      It's a little disappointing that "it was in the paper" was apparently all Obama needed to include it in a speech.  However, no republican is allowed to comment on it until they beg forgiveness for their thousands of outright lies.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 05, 2009 9:48 pm ET)
           

        No...Republicans are only required to apologize to the leader of the Republican Party, Rush Limbaugh, for their indiscretions.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 06, 2009 7:48 am ET)
           

        Incompetent gop scum has millions of outright lies to atone for. Incompetent gop scum put us in this fix in the first place. Incompetent gop scum have nothing of value to say. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (March 06, 2009 3:13 am ET)
         

      I bet you that it is physically impossible to grab a completely random sample of 10 bankrupt people, and NOT have someone in there that is bankrupted because of health care.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 06, 2009 8:47 am ET)
         

      What's more, 75% of those filing for bankruypcy due to medical expenses HAVE HEALTH INSURNACE!!!

      ANYONE who think our current system WORKS is (1) very healthly and (2) a complete and utter moron.

      It's indefensible.  And Garrett apparently has trouble with not only research, but simple arithmetic.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (March 06, 2009 11:35 am ET)
         
      Someone in the blog world, Huffington, KOS, should ask each and every Republican in the Senate and House if they agree or disagree that DA Limbaugh is the Leader of the Republican Party. How is that for a loaded question? If yes, they become irrelevant, if no, they have to kiss Rushs' butt for forgiveness. I think I'll call the local rep who is Republican but more moderate than most what he thinks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by progressiveright (March 06, 2009 12:03 pm ET)
         
      Health care is the most listed reason on Bankruptcy forms by far and is growing. The main reason for this is the large number of Americains who are either uninsured or under insured.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Liebuster (March 07, 2009 1:27 am ET)
           

        I stick with my Olde English 800 or AKA "eight ball".  That contributes to my freeloading on the current policy holders with my bad health.  I want to drink MORE 40's, get Medicaid WITH my unemployment check as I take my weekly application to NASA.  What can I say, I thought they needed more rocket scientists?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by fantagor (March 07, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
             

          Do I have to point out how racist and uniformed this post is? Apparently so.

          Randy

          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.