About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Full plate-itude: Media repeat charge that Obama has taken on too much

March 12, 2009 4:47 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Recently, the media have highlighted claims that President Obama's "plate" is too "full," suggested he has "bit off more than he can chew," or otherwise given credence to the accusation that the president has loaded his agenda with unrelated items when he should be focusing on the economy. In many instances, the media have simply run teasers to this effect, reinforcing the idea without challenge; in other cases, they have highlighted the accusation, while also providing responses by the Obama administration.

29 Comments

Recently, the media have highlighted claims that President Obama's "plate" is too "full," suggested he has "bit off more than he can chew," or otherwise given credence to the accusation that the president has loaded his agenda with unrelated items when he should be focusing on the economy. In many instances, the media have simply run teasers to this effect, reinforcing the idea without challenge; in other cases, they have highlighted the accusation, while also providing responses by the Obama administration.

Indeed, Obama and his aides have asserted that Obama's initiatives on health care, energy, and education reform are inextricably linked to the economy. During his March 10 speech about education before the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Obama spoke to those "who believe we can only handle one challenge at a time" and made the case that reforming health care, education, and energy will have economic benefits.

From Obama's speech:

OBAMA: They forget that Lincoln helped lay down the transcontinental railroad, passed the Homestead Act, and created the National Academy of Sciences in the midst of civil war. Likewise, President Roosevelt didn't have the luxury of choosing between ending a depression and fighting a war. President Kennedy didn't have the luxury of choosing between civil rights and sending us to the moon. And we don't have the luxury of choosing between getting our economy moving now and rebuilding it over the long term.

America will not remain true to its highest ideals -- and America's place as a global economic leader will be put at risk -- unless we not only bring down the crushing cost of health care and transform the way we use energy, but also do a far better job than we have been doing of educating our sons and daughters; unless we give them the knowledge and skills they need in this new and changing world.

For we know that economic progress and educational achievement have always gone hand in hand in America. Land-grant colleges and public high schools transformed the economy of an industrializing nation. The GI Bill generated a middle class that made America's economy unrivaled in the 20th century. And investments in math and science under President Eisenhower made it possible for Sergei Brin to attend graduate school and found an upstart company called Google that would forever change our world.

During a March 9 press briefing, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs emphasized Obama's point after a reporter noted Obama's speech on education and asked, "Why should the president be talking something -- about something that admittedly would be, you know, important for future generations to improve education in America, when there's a house on fire right now?" Gibbs replied that "I think part of the house that's on fire is dealing with the education problem. ... [W]e're not facing these economic challenges because of one thing; we're not going to get out of these by solving one thing."

Yet, the media have repeatedly echoed the charge that Obama may be taking on too much. For example:

  • On the March 6 edition of CNN's American Morning, anchor John Roberts asked whether "some people are beginning to think, is this administration biting off more than it can chew?" CNN White House correspondent Suzanne Malveaux responded, "You know, a lot of people are asking that question. Aides inside the White House, they have an expression. They say, well, we're putting a lot on the grill, and they believe that they can handle this. But there's some supporters of the Obama administration who are scratching their heads and thinking this is way too much to put on their plate."
  • On the March 7 edition of CNN Newsroom, anchor Fredricka Whitfield said, "[A] full plate for the president of the United States: filling up his Cabinet, trying to get the economy back on track, and tackling health care reform." Later, after playing a clip in which Obama stated, "Because we cannot bring our deficit down or grow our economy without tackling the skyrocketing cost of health care, I held a health-care summit on Thursday to begin the long overdue process of reform," Whitfield stated: "All right, the president has a lot of irons in the fire. Some people are wondering if the president is actually stretching himself a bit too thin." Subsequently, Whitfield asked CNN deputy political director Paul Steinhauser, "[D]oes he have too much on his plate?"
  • On the March 9 edition of ABC's Nightline, anchor Martin Bashir teased a segment by saying, "[W]hen we come back, President Barack Obama's full plate. Impressive multitasking or biting off more than he can chew?" During the report, senior White House correspondent Jake Tapper asserted that "[i]t was September 2008 when then Senator Barack Obama, making light of Senator John McCain's suspension of his campaign to deal with the economic crisis, said that, as his campaign put it, a president should be able to walk and chew gum at the same time." Later, Tapper said, "But with the president taking on issue after issue after issue after issue ... some critics are wondering if this president thinks he can walk and chew gum and ride a bike and juggle and read a magazine and play with his daughters and take a nap all at the same time." During Bashir's tease, on-screen text read: "President's Full Plate."

Nightline-full plate

  • On the March 9 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, Dobbs stated: "The White House today declared the president remains focused each and every day on our economic crisis, but critics say the president has been overwhelmed by the severity of this recession and his policies of bigger government could actually worsen the crisis." He then asked senior White House correspondent Ed Henry: "[S]o where is the president's focus?" Henry replied: "Well, Lou, as you noted, senior aides here insist that he is focused on the economy, but the president is facing tough questions tonight about whether he's filling his plate with so many side issues that it's preventing him from really focusing full time on this financial crisis."
  • On the March 9 edition of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360, Cooper introduced a segment by saying, "President Obama has got a lot on his plate, both by circumstance and choice. Stem cells, health care, stimulus, two budgets -- this year and next -- and banks and more, smaller issues, of course, the kind that can damage a presidency little by little."
  • On the March 10 edition of MSNBC Live, anchor Norah O'Donnell teased a segment by saying, "Fifty days after taking the oath of office, President Obama is staring at a full plate, from saving the economy to health care and now education." Later, introducing a segment with former Mitt Romney press secretary Kevin Madden and Democratic strategist Penny Lee, O'Donnell asked, "What about these Republicans and other critics of the president who say, 'He's doing way too much. He should not be doing stem cells. He should not be doing education. He should not be doing health care. He just needs to be focused on the economy'? The president says, look, presidents can walk and chew gum at the same time."
  • In a March 10 ABCNews.com article, Tapper asserted that "the administration says the issues Obama faces, particularly the economy, need swift action, his critics warn he may be doing too much too soon." Later, in a section of the article titled "Too Much on His Plate?" Tapper noted Obama's speech on education and quoted Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) saying, "I think we have to be careful, not overload the economy. ... Our thrust should be turning the economy around, and we do that through banks, getting people back to work."
  • On the March 10 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews asserted that "[a] lot of people believe that this president has bit off more than he can chew" and asked Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), "[D]o you think he's made a big mistake in trying to do his agenda at the same time he's trying to deal with the economic problem?" Pence began his reply by stating: "I really believe he has." Pence later stated: "You know, the president here, rather than focusing on those kinds of policies that would really jump start this economy, the kind of things John F. Kennedy did, Ronald Reagan did, and that our nation and George W. Bush did after 9-11, instead the president's come out with an aggressive agenda to transform health care, transform energy in America."
  • On the March 10 edition of CNN's No Bias, No Bull, anchor Campbell Brown teased a segment about Obama's plans for education reform by saying, "President Obama is facing huge challenges on everything from the economy to health care these days. But he is still adding more to his plate, today proposing an overhaul of the public school system."
  • On the March 11 edition of American Morning, anchor Kiran Chetry said of Obama's agenda, "Depending on how you look at it, he accomplished a lot so far. Others say he may have bitten off a bit more than he can chew. So joining us now to chew that over, from New Orleans is Democratic strategist James Carville, and here in New York, Republican strategist Ed Rollins." During the subsequent segment with Rollins and Carville, Rollins picked up on the "full plate" theme, saying: "He's had a very aggressive attempt to live up to all of his campaign promises. You know, the concerns I have is that there is an awful lot on his plate, an awful lot that Congress has to do, and an awful lot of money that's been thrown out there. And I say this as an American, not as a Republican: I hope it works, because there's no second chance to spend this kind of money again."
  • As noted by blogger Matt Cooper on TalkingPointsMemo.com, on the March 11 edition of NBC's Today, host Matt Lauer asked Council of Economic Advisers Chair Christina Romer whether the president had "bitten off more than he could chew."

From the March 6 edition of CNN's American Morning:

ROBERTS: The administration is being very aggressive in tackling those three pillars -- the housing, the economy, and health care. But some people are beginning to think: Is this administration biting off more than it can chew? You know, we're trying to get the economy back on track. Why are we going to health care right now?

MALVEAUX: You know, a lot of people are asking that question. Aides inside the White House, they have an expression. They say, well, we're putting a lot on the grill, and they believe that they can handle this. But there's some supporters of the Obama administration who are scratching their heads and thinking this is way too much to put on their plate.

From the noon ET hour of the March 7 edition of CNN Newsroom:

WHITFIELD: All right, so, a full plate for the president of the United States: filling up his Cabinet, trying to get the economy back on track, and tackling health care reform. So, he talks about that challenge actually today in his weekly address.

OBAMA [video clip]: Because we cannot bring our deficit down or grow our economy without tackling the skyrocketing cost of health care, I held a health-care summit on Thursday to begin the long overdue process of reform.

Our ideas and opinions about how to achieve this reform will vary, but our goal must be the same: quality, affordable health care for every American that no longer overwhelms the budgets of families, businesses, and our government.

WHITFIELD: All right, the president has a lot of irons in the fire. Some people are wondering if the president is actually stretching himself a bit too thin.

Our deputy political director Paul Steinhauser is with us today in person. Always good to see you --

STEINHAUSER: Pleasure to be here.

WHITFIELD: -- in person as opposed to in Washington. All right, does he have too much on his plate? I guess he would probably say no, right?

From the March 9 edition of ABC's Nightline:

BASHIR: And when we come back, President Barack Obama's full plate: Impressive multitasking or biting off more than he can chew?

[...]

BASHIR: President Barack Obama's workweek began with another significant announcement, an end to his predecessor's ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. From the economic crisis to his strategy for Iraq, it seems each day has marked by a major action. Our senior White House correspondent Jake Tapper now on the delicate balance of quantity versus quality.

TAPPER: It was September 2008 when then-Senator Barack Obama, making light of Senator John McCain's suspension of his campaign to deal with the economic crisis, said that, as his campaign put it, a president should be able to walk and chew gum at the same time.

OBAMA: It is going to be part of the president's job to deal with more than one thing at once.

TAPPER: But with the president taking on issue after issue after issue after issue...

OBAMA [montage]: Health care -- stem cell -- trillion dollar deficit -- our economic problems -- the way we use energy -- Afghanistan -- Iraq -- Pakistan -- torture -- Guantanamo.

TAPPER: Some critics are wondering if this president thinks he can walk and chew gum and ride a bike and juggle and read a magazine and play with his daughters and take a nap all at the same time.

SEN. LAMAR ALEXANDER (R-TN): Presidents have many problems to solve, but no one ever suggested that the wisest course is try to solve them all at once.

From the March 9 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight:

DOBBS: The White House today declared the president remains focused each and every day on our economic crisis, but critics say the president has been overwhelmed by the severity of this recession, and his policies of bigger government could actually worsen the crisis. Ed Henry has our report from the White House. Ed, so where is the president's focus?

HENRY: Well, Lou, as you noted, senior aides here insist that he is focused on the economy, but the president is facing tough questions tonight about whether he's filling his plate with so many side issues that it's preventing him from really focusing full time on this financial crisis.

From the March 9 edition of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360:

COOPER: President Obama has got a lot on his plate, both by circumstance and choice. Stem cells, health care, stimulus, two budgets -- this year and next -- and banks and more, smaller issues, of course, the kind that can damage a presidency little by little.

From the 1 p.m. ET of the March 10 edition of MSNBC Live:

O'DONNELL: President Obama calls for a sweeping overhaul of the nation's public school system, saying it's time to start rewarding good teachers and stop making excuses for the bad. But is the president making the grade himself? Fifty days after taking the oath of office, President Obama is staring at a full plate, from saving the economy to health care and now education. Is he taking on too much?

[...]

O'DONNELL: And is President Obama taking on too much, or is he doing too little? Critics say he needs to trim back his agenda and do more to fix the economy. But today, the president is actually pushing back.

OBAMA [video clip] I know there are some who believe we can only handle one challenge at a time. They forget that Lincoln helped lay down the transcontinental railroad and passed the Homestead Act and created the National Academy of Sciences in the midst of civil war. President Kennedy didn't have the luxury of choosing between civil rights and sending us to the moon. And we don't have the luxury of choosing between getting our economy now moving now and rebuilding it over the long term.

O'DONNELL: Let's bring in Democratic strategist Penny Lee; she is a former senior adviser to Senator Harry Reid, and now works for the lobbying group Venn Strategies. We also have Kevin Madden, a former communications manager for Republican Mitt Romney. Great to see both of you.

MADDEN: Glad to be with you.

O'DONNELL: All right. Kevin, let me ask you that. What about these Republicans and other critics of the president who say, "He's doing way too much. He should not be doing stem cells. He should not be doing education. He should not be doing health care. He just needs to be focused on the economy"? The president says, look, presidents can walk and chew gum at the same time.

From the March 10 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:

MATTHEWS: Well, let me cut this question in half here. A lot of people believe that this president has bit off more than he can chew. Not only is he pushing for more stimulus in the economy with the big stimulus bill, but he's also going for changing the tax structure, making it much tougher on people at the top, to pay for health care, to pay for energy development -- for alternative energy development, to pay for higher education.

Congressman Pence, do you think he's made a big mistake in trying to do his agenda at the same time he's trying to deal with the economic problem?

PENCE: I really believe he has. I believe the stimulus bill was less about stimulating the economy and more about reorganizing the priorities of the federal government. Even The Washington Post criticized the stimulus bill on that basis.

But I think you put your finger on it. You know, the president here, rather than focusing on those kinds of policies that would really jump start this economy, the kind of things John F. Kennedy did, Ronald Reagan did, and that our nation and George W. Bush did after 9-11, instead the president's come out with an aggressive agenda to transform health care, transform energy in America, which -- you know, [Rep.] Barbara [Lee (D-CA)] might be enthusiastic about it, and I don't begrudge her her opinion, but the president's tax increase, the marginal tax increase, more than half of the people that would pay that are the very small business owners that are most struggling in this economy.

From the March 10 edition of CNN's Campbell Brown: No Bias, No Bull:

BROWN: President Obama is facing huge challenges on everything from the economy to health care these days. But he is still adding more to his plate, today proposing an overhaul of the public school system.

From the March 11 edition of CNN's American Morning:

CHETRY: Well, President Obama's first 50 days are now history. It's been a busy 50 days -- passing the economic stimulus, ordering Guantánamo Bay Closed, announcing an Iraq pullout, and pitching health care and education reform. Depending on how you look at it, he accomplished a lot so far. Others say he may have bitten off a bit more than he can chew. So joining us now to chew that over, from New Orleans is Democratic strategist James Carville, and here in New York, Republican strategist Ed Rollins. Both CNN contributors. Great to see you both this morning.

ROLLINS: Good morning.

CHETRY: Thanks for being with us. So, Ed, let me start with you. His approval rating right now, President Obama, is at 61 percent, slightly higher than some of his predecessors. At this point in the game, how do you think President Obama is doing?

ROLLINS: Well, he sprinted out of the blocks. He's had a very aggressive attempt to live up to all of his campaign promises. You know, the concerns I have is that there is an awful lot on his plate, an awful lot that Congress has to do, and an awful lot of money that's been thrown out there. And I say this as an American, not as a Republican: I hope it works, because there's no second chance to spend this kind of money again.

CHETRY: What's your assessment, Jim -- James -- Jim?

CARVILLE: I'm in New Orleans; we do a lot of chewing down here. And I -- yeah, I mean -- I think -- I think Ed is a kind of anti-Limbaugh kind of guy, and he -- everybody -- most people want this thing to succeed. But there -- there's a lot on the plate. He's done a lot in 50 days. And I think now they're probably going to have to catch up with getting some of this stuff done. And I think it will work, and I sure do hope it works. It's a lot of stuff.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by terrapin53 (March 12, 2009 4:57 pm ET)
         

      the critics are all right wing idiots and then the MSM just jumps on the bandwagon to create talk for the day and for ratings. Go Obama and kick some butt!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by right-winger (March 12, 2009 5:09 pm ET)
         

      MAYBE IF THERE BOY BUSH HAD TAKEN ON A FULL PLATE WE WOULD NOT BE IN THIS MESS NOW. I LOVE HOW TODAY WHY OBAMA WAS TALKING TO THE BUSINESS PEOPLE  FAIR AND BLANCE FOX NEWS WOULD NOT SHOW IT. BUT I BET IF THE MARKET WAS STILL DOWN OR A REPUBLICAN WAS IN OFFICE THEY WOULD HAVE SHOWED IT. HEY MSNBC, CNN, CBS,ABC,NBC AND FOX NEWS NOW THAT THE MARKET HAS BEEN UP FOR 3 DAYS WILL SAY IT WAS BECASUE OF OBAMA NOW?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 13, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
           

         But Bush didn't have the luxury of choosing between preventing the 9/11 terrorist attacks a clearing brush on the ranch!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 12, 2009 5:11 pm ET)
         
      It is an honor to have a president who has the courage to take on the rubble left behind by the previous administration and their misdeeds. The obstructionists, whose finantial leaders have bought the airwaves in preparation for a one party system, should be ashamed of themselves for not supporting the presidency, the elected by the majority presidency, and not offering an alternative. It is very easy to complain but when complaining offer at least a glimmer of the solution instead of bumper sticker cuteness.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (March 12, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
         

      This is funny...

      If Obama were to be like Bush and basically do nothing... would that make the corporate owned media happy?

      It is obvious that much needs to be done in this country... and President Obama is at least trying to do something... lots of somethings... it is painfully appearant that Republicans have no idea what hard work and trying are all about...

      If they did... they would be supporting President Obama and not beating up on him.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 12, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
           

        2010 is midterm elections agai. we need to increase the democratic majority

        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (March 12, 2009 5:25 pm ET)
             

          Of course, I heard Limbaugh the other day talking about how this administration is SUCH a disaster that he can't possibly see how the republicans won't take back the House and Senate in 2010. You know, this failing to mention the facts about how the public, or majority of folks in the US see the President as doing a good job, and that the democrats in Congress are more highly rated than their republican brothers and sisters (not that overall public opinion of Congress matters much, because what really matters is how those Congresspeople are rated in their home districts or States). 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 13, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
               

            2010 will be another bloodbath for the Right.  Especially if the Democratic challengers remind thie voters that thier Republican elected officals were against the stimulus, against jobs, against help in a disaster (economic or meteorological apparently), against regulation of thefat-cats and billionaires, against fair lending practices, and against the eventual recovery that will come with Obama leasing the way.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (March 12, 2009 5:19 pm ET)
         

      Bush took enough vacation for the next 4 terms to be fully rested. Now lay off the man, he's got a job to do!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 12, 2009 5:44 pm ET)
           

        Keith Olbermann,recently, added up the days Mr bush was on vacation and it was over 440 days. Of course the quacks over at FOX all chimed in unison chanting " working vacation '.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (March 12, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
             

          Let's see, the last company I worked for, you get 10 days of vacation per year for the first 2 years you work there, so that's 10 days over 2 years of 20 days.

          For years 3-10, you get 15 days of vacation. If you take 6 out of those 8 years, multiply by 15 days, you get 90 days for.

          Add together, you get 110 days for 8 years of work.

          Bush had 4 times as many vacation days as what I would have had.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 12, 2009 5:34 pm ET)
         
      I don't get the "he's trying to do to much" meme. Don't you want a President that can walk and chew bubble gum at the same time? What I hear more though is the accusation that he's trying to cram healthcare, etc. down our throats while everyone is realing from the economic crisis. That's not the way I see it but it's not a completely unreasonable criticism. What is unreasonable is that criticism being levelled against Obama by those who were silent about Bush's over reaching while the country was still in shock after 9/11. But that's pretty typical of MSM.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 12, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
           

        Nice to have a young president with a family that adores him, not to mention the 360 (?) electoral votes that got him in. Very much in contrast with a drunk son future president at the republican Convention.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (March 12, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
           

        I have noticed the recent meme coming from the media about trying to cram other reforms into this time of crisis and all. It's not as if Bush ever did anything like that did he? Oops, yeah, he did that, and a whole lot more. I mean, the republicans would never use the threat of terrorism to retain office and win elections would they?

        These folks are such incredible hypocrites.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (March 13, 2009 12:29 pm ET)
           

        Good article about this very subject in the daily Progress Report:

        http://pr.thinkprogress.org/

        Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 13, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
           

        Don't you want a President that can walk and chew bubble gum at the same time?

        Well...  Geogre W. Bush got elected twice, so I'd guess that's not so imporatnt for a lot of people.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (March 12, 2009 7:15 pm ET)
         
      President Obama must do "too much at once". Otherwise he won't have earned the "exotic, tax-payer funded vacation" the right wing cabal will scream about the first time he stops in HI for a few days to see family.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (March 12, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
           
        It's funny you mention vacations. I was just wondering this morning if Bush had taken a vacation yet by this point in his first term? Didn't he spend like 100 days on vacation his first year in office?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (March 12, 2009 8:09 pm ET)
         
      Either he's not doing enough(Stock market), or he's doing to much(health care reform). So klick your ruby high heels three times and repeat after me: The Goldielocks Direction, the goldielocks direction, the goldielocks direction. Repeat as necessary, Char singe , serves a whole nucular fambly.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (March 12, 2009 10:55 pm ET)
         

      President Obama may appear to some to have taken on so much because he has a strong work ethic, and wants to accomplish a great deal.  His predecessor, on the other hand, was a slacker.  No wonder someone who works hard stands out so much.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by progressiveright (March 12, 2009 10:55 pm ET)
         
      If Obama's plate is to full that is because it is every mess that Bush left him with. Obama has not added anything yet and will wait to i bet.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bopaan680 (March 13, 2009 9:00 am ET)
         
      Obama is following in Bushes Footsteps. He has added new subsidy programs, expanded existing ones and added new mandates on states. But spending under Obama thus far is tripled. Maybe people don't understand these spending and mandates are shifting productive private activities to lesss productive Government activities. Productivity is the source of higher standards of living. So shifting it to Government over time creates a reduction in incomes and less productivity. Bottom line is Obama's budget creates more Government bloat, more economic distirtions and lower standards of living for anyone who is not living of federal hand-outs. That is what top economist say and it makes alot of sense. People this isn't about left or right this is about America What do Americans want Big Government slow growth and less freedom. Or small Government with more Growth and more freedom. The Government waste billions of tax dollars on poorly run and mismanaged programs. I fail to understand why people want to give more of their tax dollars to be wasted by Big Governemnt.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jcalton (March 13, 2009 11:42 am ET)
         

      President Roosevelt didn't have the luxury of choosing between ending a depression and fighting a war.

      He didn't have to choose because they didn't happen at the same time.

      Note: Gerald Ford could not walk and chew gum at the same time. Franklin Roosevelt could not walk.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by xititjur3300 (March 13, 2009 12:56 pm ET)
         

      Don't you know?  According to the traditional media, Democratic presidents always "try to do too much."  For example,  with Bill Clinton, he even had a wife that "tried to do too much" (and she still is).

      All this because Democratic presidents, as a rule of thumb, actually possess a work ethic.

      Republican presidents, meanwhile, see the presidency as more of a ceremonial job (re: "Being president is a government job, therefore it's not a real job").  And our media agrees with this.

      That's why nobody in the corporate media had a beef with Bush being the foremost slacker president in American history:  Because, true to Republican ethos,  "Bush understood you can't take being president too seriously." 

       The American media thinks it's a sign of greatness when a [Republican] president starts two wars then runs off to rural Texas to chop wood for 3 weeks.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MB141 (March 13, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
         
      The news media is truly out of ideas when they all start parroting some right-wing talking point that was probably created by an RNC intern or blogger. I think all of these anchors got used to being lazy during the Bush administration with all the time they spent NOT investigating and NOT reporting. Now that Obama is in office and actually getting things done, the media is having trouble keeping up with him!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by doraosh9303 (March 13, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
         

      What yout headlins should have said is "Media repeats charge that Obama has taken on too much. Then proceeds to criticize him for not taking on the issue of earmarks."

      Pundits want it both ways. Even though the earmarks constitute a piddling amount of the omnibus bill (less than 2%), many of the projects to be funded are worthwhile, and we desperately need government spending at this time they excoriate Obama for not focusing on this. To take this issue on will not be easy - after all earmarks come under the power of the legislative, not executive branch and are a very minor problem compared to the economic crisis we now face. This carping is as ludicrous as a parent whose child has a life-threatening bacteria complaining that the doctor is doing nothing to cure the kid's acne at the same time he is trying to save his life.

      Maybe Jon Stewart will take the media on for this idiocy now that he has cleaned CNBC's clock.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.