About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox News presents deceptively cropped six-month-old Biden clip as new

March 16, 2009 4:56 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Fox News' Martha MacCallum claimed that "after weeks of economic doom and gloom, the Obama administration is now singing a slightly different tune. Take a look at what was said in recent interviews this weekend." Fox News then aired clips of administration officials purportedly giving an optimistic view of the economy, which included video of Joe Biden stating: "The fundamentals of the economy are strong." However, Biden did not make those remarks during an "interview[]" over the past weekend; he made those remarks at a September 2008 campaign event in which he criticized statements by John McCain.

54 Comments

During the March 16 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk, co-host Martha MacCallum claimed that "after weeks of economic doom and gloom, the Obama administration is now singing a slightly different tune. Take a look at what was said in recent interviews this weekend." Fox News then aired clips of administration officials purportedly giving an optimistic view of the economy, which included a clip of Joe Biden stating: "The fundamentals of the economy are strong." After the clips aired, MacCallum contrasted the administration's purported remarks from "this weekend" with what then-Sen. Obama said during the 2008 presidential campaign, when he criticized Sen. John McCain for stating that the "fundamentals of our economy are strong, but these are very, very difficult times." However, Biden did not make his remarks during an "interview[]" over the past weekend; Biden made his remarks at a September 15, 2008, campaign event, and, like Obama, was criticizing McCain for his remarks -- not echoing McCain. Think Progress also noted Fox News' editing of Biden's remarks.

During the September 15, 2008, campaign event in St. Clair Shores, Michigan, Biden said:

BIDEN: John McCain has confessed, and I quote -- I want to make sure I get it right -- he said: "It's easy for me to be in Washington and, frankly, be somewhat divorced from the day-to-day challenges people have." Well, he's right. He's right. If all you do is walk the halls of power, all you'll hear is the wants of the powerful.

Ladies and gentlemen, I believe that's why John McCain could say with a straight face, as recently as this morning -- and this is a quote: "The fundamentals of the economy are strong." That's what John says. He says that "we've made great progress economically" in the Bush years.

Ladies and gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen, I could walk from here to Lansing, and I wouldn't run into a single person who thought our economy was doing well, unless I ran into John McCain.

Folks, John just doesn't get it. He just doesn't understand what average, middle-class people are going through the last 8 years. He doesn't get it. I don't doubt that John cares. He just doesn't think -- he doesn't think that we have any responsibility to help people who are hurting.

During the March 16 edition of The Live Desk, Fox News only aired the bolded portion of Biden's remarks, in which he's quoting McCain.

From the March 16 edition of The Live Desk, which purported to show video of Biden speaking "this weekend":

From the September 15, 2008, edition of Fox News' Happening Now, which aired Biden's remarks in Michigan live:

Fox News also aired video of White House Council of Economic Advisers member Austan Goolsbee stating on the March 15 edition of Fox News Sunday that "the core strength of the economy is middle-class workers." However, Goolsbee said immediately after that, "Over the last eight years, before this president came into office, we saw an unbelievable squeeze on the middle class like nothing we have seen in decades." From the March 15 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday:

CHRIS WALLACE (host): Finally, I want to get into a little bit of the Obama budget with you -- $3.6 trillion, which calls for major tax increases on the wealthy.

And I want to read you something from -- and this is it right here -- the president's budget. "While middle-class families have been playing by the rules, living up to their responsibilities as neighbors and citizens, those at the commanding heights of our economy have not."

Mr. Goolsbee, it's a blanket statement from the administration. People who make money have not played by the rules?

GOOLSBEE: I think you're stretching a little bit the blanket statement. It's not saying that it's been illegal. It's saying the rules of the game that the American economy has followed for decades is that the core strength of the economy is middle-class workers.

Over the last eight years, before this president came into office, we saw an unbelievable squeeze on the middle class like nothing we have seen in decades.

We go through the first boom in recorded economic history of the country, where the median family's income falls by $2,000 while corporate profits and overall GDP rise dramatically.

WALLACE: But --

GOOLSBEE: The president is saying in his budget that he's carrying out in the recovery package and in the budget giving a tax cut to 95 percent of working people and that people who make more than $250,000 a year will go back to the rates as they were at the end of the '90s, that if they pay a bit more, that isn't going to bring the economy down. And that style of thinking, that it's going to trickle down and we should just keep cutting taxes at the top, got us where we are today. It didn't solve the problem.

From the March 16 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk with Martha and Trace:

MacCALLUM: Well, after weeks of economic doom and gloom, the Obama administration is now singing a slightly different tune. Take a look at what was said in recent interviews this weekend.

CHRISTINA ROMER (Council of Economic Advisers chairwoman) [video clip]: The American workers are sound. We have a good capital stock.

LARRY SUMMERS (Obama economic adviser) [video clip]: There does seem to be some sign of stability in January and February -- is better than if that were not the case.

BIDEN [video clip]: The fundamentals of the economy are strong.

GOOLSBEE [video clip]: The core strength of the economy is middle-class workers.

MacCALLUM: All right. Well, the mantra for the weekend is clear, looking at what was said over the course of the shows on Sunday. Let's bring in our panelists. Bill Kristol is the editor of -- the editor of The Weekly Standard, of course, and a Fox News contributor. And Gary Burtless is a senior fellow in economic studies at the Brookings Institution. Welcome to both of you.

Bill, you know, my ears perked up when I heard all that, because I remembered on the campaign trail how, you know, John McCain got lambasted for suggesting that the underlying fundamentals of the economy were still intact. And before you say what you're going to say, let's just play a little bit to remind everybody.

McCAIN [video clip]: The fundamentals of our economy are strong, but these are very, very difficult times.

OBAMA [video clip]: He said, and I quote, "The fundamentals of our economy are strong."

MacCALLUM: So, Bill, a bit of a different tune -- I guess it's OK to say that now.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mk3872 (March 16, 2009 5:06 pm ET)
         
      HOLY CRAP! You can tell it's a good news day for the Dems when FNC has to actually DOCTOR a clip to make it look like bad news for the Dems! MMFA - I really wish you would use stronger language for this. This is really UNACCEPTABLE behavior from a natl news program.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (March 16, 2009 5:13 pm ET)
           

        And the real good news is now any Republican can be quoted as saying "I am a terrorist".  Sure, they may not have said those words in that order, but they've used them all at some point in time.  All you have to do is splice them together.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by historygeek001 (March 16, 2009 5:14 pm ET)
         
      Jeez. Do even the neocons honestly believe Fox anymore?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (March 16, 2009 5:22 pm ET)
           

        I know a few Republicans who question Fox now. I have two friends who have FINALLY begun reading MMFA. They give it a "B" rating but sya that it has enlightened them in certain areas. Which in Repubs speak means--We know Fox lies but never had proof.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 16, 2009 5:37 pm ET)
             

          there are a lot of them who regard FOX as a premier source for the news. Even that Gutfeld guy on Red Eye is considered a journalist, by some.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by historygeek001 (March 18, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
               

            I tend to think of Fox viewers as the choir, except that they don't necessarily believe what they hear, they just like the show.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 16, 2009 5:29 pm ET)
         
      I see how it works. FOXy blonde on tv flapping her lips and noone is listening. Now that Bush is gone, they have no work to do so ..........lets minimise the current administration with half truths.....YEAH lets do it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Rupp (March 16, 2009 5:33 pm ET)
         

      Don't know where you got this video from but it's clearly a fake.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 17, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
           

        That was the whole point of the article.

        Thanks for playing.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jmh (March 17, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
           

        "Don't know where you got this video from but it's clearly a fake."

        So,  you are saying this was not  in the broadcast?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (March 16, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
         

      After many occasions of scolding mmfa about word-smithing and cherry picking data to make a partisan point...this effort by FOX is way beyond the pale in manipulating the news...shameful...disgusting...and outright fraud.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jamesB (March 16, 2009 6:33 pm ET)
           

        it's almost too reckless to be intentional. incredible, even for Fox.  Are their viewers that dismissive of stuff like this, waste of cable landscape.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (March 16, 2009 7:33 pm ET)
             

          I agree...this is really bizarre...can't imagine anyone thinking they could get away with this stunt.

          I haven't seen anything of Biden's response yet...but look out...it won't be pretty.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by armadillo (March 16, 2009 11:29 pm ET)
               

            You misunderestimate the gullibility of the typical Faux viewer. The rest of us have known this for some time.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by thejbomb65 (March 17, 2009 11:20 am ET)
             

          nothing is too reckless for fixed noise. and you give far too much credit to most of their viewers.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (March 16, 2009 10:23 pm ET)
           

        After many occasions of scolding mmfa about word-smithing and cherry picking data to make a partisan point...this effort by FOX is way beyond the pale in manipulating the news.

        Translation: This misnformation is so blatant and indefensible that even I cannot attempt to spin this.  Those other examples had just enough wiggle room for me to cite plausible deniability and othe dubious defenses, but not this one.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jmj (March 16, 2009 5:46 pm ET)
         
      FUX "news" lied again. I'm speachless.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by daniel2 (March 16, 2009 5:57 pm ET)
         

      UNBELIEVABLE.  Media Matters needs to be sending press releases of this to every major media outlet.

      This is not just partisan or selective reporting, this is journalistic fraud.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by harley (March 16, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
         

      Where is fairlibrul to defend her Gawd?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (March 16, 2009 6:58 pm ET)
           

        He's too busy with yesterday to be here today. Check back tomorrow.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (March 16, 2009 6:09 pm ET)
         

      After many occasions of scolding mmfa about word-smithing and cherry picking data to make a partisan point...this effort by FOX is way beyond the pale in manipulating the news...shameful...disgusting...and outright fraud...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (March 17, 2009 11:27 am ET)
           

        It is all those things, and perfectly legal.  Fox went to court to protect their right to lie.

        http://www.relfe.com/media_can_legally_lie.html

        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 17, 2009 11:49 am ET)
             

          The consequences to Fox need not be legal.  The MARKET can punnish a news source that has been shown by OTHER news sources to have no credability or journalistic ethics.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 17, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
               

            Fox's market applauds and rewards lack of credibility, as well as lack of jounalistic ethics.

            It's what Fox counts on.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 17, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
                 

              That's why I'm saying that OTHER news sources need to call them out.  How any company can stand idly by a lose market share to a murdoch subidiary and NOT call them out on the nonsense, I'll never understand. 

              Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (March 16, 2009 6:30 pm ET)
         

      100% wrong about the time, and 100% wrong about the context.

      It's gotta take work to be simultaneously backwards on two orthogonal axes of truth.  It's like traveling due south and due west at the same moment.  This must be evidence of hidden dimensions.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (March 16, 2009 7:12 pm ET)
         
      OT, but how degrading is it for a republican in florida to suggest that newly unemployed pass a drug test - at their expense, to add insult to injury - before they can collect unemployment insurance? Man, that's gotta alienate a few of the ol' rightwing base...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (March 16, 2009 7:26 pm ET)
         
      Fox News practicing dishonest journalism. What a shock.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Victor Colorado (March 16, 2009 7:50 pm ET)
         

      The only thing I'm shocked about here is that some of the above posters are actually shocked by this.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by manndan (March 16, 2009 7:54 pm ET)
         

      Fair and balanced?  Let's hope Olbermann gets on this tonight.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (March 17, 2009 11:21 am ET)
           

        no he is busy skewering Dick. im sure he will take care of it tonight

        Report Abuse
    • Author by sluggo (March 16, 2009 8:42 pm ET)
         

      FOX News

      "If you think Professional Wrestling is a real sport you will love us."

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 16, 2009 8:42 pm ET)
         

      The thing is you can tell all this to average FOX viewers and they would not believe you. You can show them this article and they will believe you even less. FOX operates with impunity...and the outrageous stuff they are saying is actually getting worse.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bwither012965 (March 16, 2009 10:15 pm ET)
         

      Is it time to maybe declare some action?  A petition? some phone calls? 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 17, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
           

        Because Fox has taken serious notice of those things in the past?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by habodabi (March 16, 2009 10:15 pm ET)
         

      This Fox News article is a sad statement about America. It tells the World that America will not question television. America will not demand the truth. America will not demand honesty in journalism. America does not hold Journalists in high esteem or hold journalists accountable when they lie. The simple fact that Fox News is still on the air tells the World that America is stupid.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by compromise (March 16, 2009 11:27 pm ET)
         

      Where is the outrage about Fox News manipulating media clips to misrepresent what a politician said. You found it for which we should all be grateful, but it does not seem to be being picked up by anyone else.

      Your democracy is in trouble if this kind of behavior goes unchallenged by a broad base of citizens.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by armadillo (March 16, 2009 11:35 pm ET)
         

      Good gravy. This us stunning even for Faux. No morals, no character, no patriotism. Since democracy depends on an informed electorate, what kind of government do they want? Obviously not ours.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mikeinmd (March 16, 2009 11:47 pm ET)
         

      This is; of course; just the usual transparent BS from the Foxers, just a little more transparent than usual.  Of course, its clumsiness won't keep it from being cited as PROOF PROOF I TELL YOU (any time in the next 6 months to ten years) that Biden agreed with McCain, or Biden is out of control, or the Democrats are liars, yada yada yada.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 17, 2009 6:22 am ET)
         

      The deplorable aspect of this is that most FOX viewers will never know about this and other episodes of FOX's dishonesty. But, enough is enough... One suggestion is to write letters and e-mails to local newspapers (although newspapers are biting the dust at an alarming rate) and to cable and network news shows complaining about the blatant misinformation that FOX spreads on such a regular basis. The purpose is not any unrealisitic expectation that FOX will change because it will not...FOX will always be FOX. At the very least, it might draw attention to FOX's dishonesty and perhaps it may impact that portion of FOX's viewership whose brains have not yet completely turned to mush. It really is hard to believe that FOX gets away with this kind of stuff. But, for example, my brother, who is an avid FOX viewer, believes in FOX's credibility because he is of the circular mindset that FOX would not be able to get away with lying, as it is accused...you know, I heard it on TV (FOX) so it must be true. It further demonstrates the danger of getting all of your information from only one source.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 17, 2009 7:27 am ET)
           

        Also, at his next briefing I would love to see Robert Gibbs ask the FOX correspondent if his network plans on issuing a retraction (and explanation) regarding the doctored Biden tape.

        And, BTW, so far I have yet to read one post defending FOX... 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (March 17, 2009 9:37 am ET)
             

          I guess even the Troglodytes are embarrassed by this one.  Either that, or they're all sleeping in this morning.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by mfinn7314 (March 17, 2009 8:07 am ET)
         
      Wow, a classic. Look for the correction now that this honest mistake has been brought to their attention. :)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 17, 2009 8:46 am ET)
         

      UN. BE. FREAKIN'. LEAVIBLE!

      Fox should be forced to explain this one ON AIR, and apologize for it.  Blame an intern or qoemthing, at least.  I'm all for both free speech and a free press, but this is more like trying to pass off 'user generated content' (i.e.: YouTube vlogs) as NEWS.  This is insane.  This is how bad it's gotten?  Despicable.

      I'm going to punch the next convervative I hear claiming that THEY were being quoted 'out of context.'

      Disgusting.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (March 17, 2009 9:09 am ET)
           

        I totally agree.  I believe that the First Amendment's protections should be cast very wide, but this amounts to Journalistic malpractice.  If nothing else, what's left of the News industry should police itself and call their colleagues to account for such blatant abuse of their Constitutional mandate.

        This is pathetic and shameful.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 17, 2009 9:31 am ET)
             

          YES! YES!  MARKET FORCES should cause the NEWS INDUSTRY to UTTERLY COMDEMN this sort of NONSENSE!  If the media, and that's ALL media now, is going to remain relavent (and thus be PROFITABLE) then they HAVE to police themselves against some type of QUALITY STANDARD.  BIAS, even a conservative bias, is FINE, but such BLATANT, MANUFACTURED, MANIPULATED DISHONESTY only serves to undermine the value of having the media in the first place!!!

          Anyone NOT owned by Murdoch ought to be all over this!!!  If any media outlet, anywhwre, is losing market share to ANY of Murdoch's subsidiaries, this should be FRONT PAGE NEWS for them.  The rest of the media needs to EXPOSE the lack of CREDABILITY at FOX... and FOx has never made that easier then with there use of THIS CLIP.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (March 17, 2009 1:57 pm ET)
               

            Of course, you have to wonder about those "market forces" when huge corporations are buying expensive commercial time on these News channels. Who, exactly, is the target audience for a Boeing commercial, or CSX commercial?  It's definitely not the consumer... I can't think of any legitimate advertising model that justifies this practice... unless they're buying influence.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 17, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
                 

              Yeah, but if the only people who watched FOX were the kinds of people who were [the target audience for a Boeing commercial] then Fox wouldn't have the POLITICAL clout that it does.  And top-exec's don't need to be lied to to vote Republican - their greed does that for them.  So Fox, as a news source, would be ACTUALLY insignificant, as opposed ot just intellectually insignificant.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (March 17, 2009 10:04 am ET)
         

      If the rest of the media were not so pathetic... it is possible that FoxNoise would be called out on this travesty...

      However... I refer everyone to these tidbits of information as it pertains to FoxNoise ---->

      here

      here

      or

      here

      So the chances are not very likely, with the possible exceptions being Olbermann and Maddow...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (March 17, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
           

        Especially when "reporters" like CNN's John King are willing to sit there drooling and allow Darth Cheney to spout copious lies without even blinking.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (March 17, 2009 11:29 am ET)
         

      O.K. Let's get this straight, everybody.  STOP calling Fox a "news" channel.  They are not about the news and never have been.  They are a propaganda & entertainment channel.  Fox is a parody of journalism.  Only the brilliant Steven Colbert can parody a parody.  His supremely confident idiot is the very essence of Fox.  To see Kristol lurking in the background, waiting to say something really stupid, is the height of creepy.  Fox should re-name itself, parodying "Comedy Central", as "Comedy Right".  

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mr. l (March 17, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
         

      fox *news* and the truth- you never see them in the same room. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sagra (March 17, 2009 6:16 pm ET)
         

      The Goolsbe quote is also out of context:

      From here: http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/node/26691/print

      <blockquote>Wallace: Finally I want to get into a little bit of the Obama budget with you. 3.6 trillion dollars which calls for major tax increases on the wealthy. And I want to read you something from...the President's budget. "While middle-class families have been playing by the rule, living up to their responsibilities as neighbors and citizens, those at the commanding heights of our economy have not."

      Mr. Goolsbee, it's a blanket statement from the Administration. People who make money have not played by the rules?

      Goolsbee: I think you're stretching a little bit the blanket statement. It's not saying that it's been illegal. It's saying the rules of the game that the American economy has followed for decades is that the core strength of the economy is middle class workers. Over the last eight years before this President came into office we saw an unbelievable squeeze on the middle class like nothing we have seen in decades.

      We go through the first boom in recorded economic history of the country where the median family income falls by $2000 while corporate profits and overall GDP rise dramatically.

      Wallace: But, but...</blockquote>

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.