About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox, Drudge falsely assert Dodd put "bonus protections" into stimulus bill

March 17, 2009 4:14 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: A FoxBusiness.com article reporting on an amendment that Sen. Chris Dodd added to the recovery bill featured the false headline -- subsequently posted by the Drudge Report -- "Amid AIG Furor, Dodd Tries to Undo Bonus Protections He Put In." Additionally, Fox News' Trace Gallagher falsely claimed that Dodd "created a loophole that allowed AIG to give out these bonuses." Rush Limbaugh also falsely asserted that Dodd's amendment provided an "exemption from any limits on" contractual bonuses agreed to before February 11. In fact, Dodd's amendment actually limited bonuses; it did not add "protection" for bonuses or "create a loophole" without which the bonuses could not be paid.

52 Comments

A March 17 FoxBusiness.com article reporting on an amendment that Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) added to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act featured the false headline -- subsequently posted by the Drudge Report -- "Amid AIG Furor, Dodd Tries to Undo Bonus Protections He Put In." Additionally, Fox News anchor Trace Gallagher falsely claimed that Dodd "created a loophole that allowed AIG to give out these bonuses." And Rush Limbaugh falsely asserted on the March 17 edition of his radio show that Dodd's amendment provided an "exemption from any limits on" contractual bonuses agreed to before February 11. In fact, Dodd's amendment actually limited bonuses; it did not add "protection" for bonuses or "create a loophole" without which the bonuses could not be paid. Nor did it provide an "exemption from any limits" on bonuses agreed to before February 11.

In the article, FoxBusiness.com reported, "Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) on Monday night floated the idea of taxing American International Group ... bonus recipients so the government could recoup some or all of the $450 million the company is paying to employees in its financial products unit." The article later stated: "While the Senate was constructing the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill" [emphasis added]. Indeed, Dodd's amendment as introduced directed the Treasury secretary to require each Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) recipient to "meet appropriate standards for executive compensation and corporate governance": "a prohibition on such TARP recipient paying or accruing any bonus, retention award, or incentive compensation during the period that the obligation is outstanding to at least the 25 most highly-compensated employees, or such higher number as the Secretary may determine is in the public interest with respect to any TARP recipient."

The Senate adopted Dodd's amendment by voice vote. Subsequently, the conference committee assigned to work out the differences between the Senate version of the recovery bill and the House version -- which did not contain such a limitation on executive compensation -- included Dodd's amendment "with several modifications" in its version of the bill. Among those modifications, the bill adopted by the conference committee included the following language:

The prohibition required under clause (i) shall not be construed to prohibit any bonus payment required to be paid pursuant to a written employment contract executed on or before February 11, 2009, as such valid employment contracts are determined by the Secretary [of the Treasury] or the designee of the Secretary.

The amendment as modified by the conference committee was included in the final recovery bill passed by Congress and signed by President Obama.

Neither the amendment as offered by Dodd nor as modified by the conference committee contained an "exemption from any limits" for bonuses agreed to before February 11 as Limbaugh claimed. It only exempts such bonuses from the restrictions outlined in Dodd's amendment.

From the March 17 FoxBusiness.com article:

Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) on Monday night floated the idea of taxing American International Group (AIG: 0.9051, 0.125, 16.02%) bonus recipients so the government could recoup some or all of the $450 million the company is paying to employees in its financial products unit. Within hours, the idea spread to both houses of Congress, with lawmakers proposing an AIG bonus tax.

The move represents somewhat of an about-face for the Senator.

While the Senate was constructing the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill. That amendment provides an "exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009" -- which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are now seeking to tax.

The amendment made it into the final version of the bill, and is law.

From the Drudge Report:

From the March 17 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk with Martha and Trace:

GALLAGHER: Some of the anger is now targeting Capitol Hill, and here's why: Apparently, when senators debated the stimulus package, Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd -- he created a loophole that allowed AIG to give out these bonuses.

It turns out the senator got more campaign donations from AIG last year than any other elected official.

Rich Edson from Fox Business Network is here to sort all this out. I mean, it just doesn't sound good on its face, Rich.

EDSON: No, it certainly doesn't, and when you look at the history of this, last night you had Senator Chris Dodd essentially saying that we should devise a tax to get this bonus money back. But when you look at the Dodd amendment that the administration talks about when it calls for many of the executive pay restrictions to the stimulus bill, there is one provision in that bill that essentially says any contract that was created before this stimulus bill gets into law -- it's still valid. It doesn't apply to any of these executive compensation curbs.

GALLAGHER: And that's the gold question here, is, you know, you're talking about the fact that Chris Dodd -- and the exact number I forget, but you would know it -- and he got more than anybody else in Congress from AIG. AIG, by the way, one of their biggest offices is based in Connecticut.

So, is -- and then he goes out of his way to say, well, let's tax them -- let's get all this money back by taxing them.

From the March 17 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: It's getting so ridiculous -- yesterday on radio station WMT in Cedar Rapids, Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley [R].

GRASSLEY [audio clip]: The first thing that would make me feel a little bit better towards them, if they'd follow the Japanese example and come before the American people and take that deep bow and say, "I'm sorry." And then either do one of two things: resign or go commit suicide.

LIMBAUGH: Did you hear that? He wants the AIG bonus recipients to go commit suicide. Now, I know, he said later we're just talking about honor here. Honor? These bonuses were exempted by Chris Dodd in the "porkulus" bill. Dodd's own amendment, just to remind you, provides an exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before February 11, 2009, and these are -- meaning, exemption from any limits on them.

The "porkulus" bill has an executive compensation pay limit, as you know. We're limiting executive pay. Chris Dodd put in his own bill -- his own amendment -- that exempts bonuses from this limitation. And he's out there now saying tax them at 90 percent. These people are the biggest frauds, artists of deceit -- they all are acting. Every damned one of them knew that this was coming. They are the architects of this. And so now Grassley goes out there, says these guys ought to commit hari-kari.

 

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by LiberalSpinBuster (March 17, 2009 4:21 pm ET)
         
      What is the limit? That seems to be the most pertinent bit of information that would a reporter would need for this argument. If the limit is higher than what has been awarded to these employees, then this post would be a waste of time.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by sloucho84 (March 17, 2009 6:00 pm ET)
           

        The limit is irrelevant.  Even if Chris Dodd put a 20 million caps on bonuses per person, it would still be untrue that he was creating a loophole in the package to allow bonuses before 2/11 to go through in companies being supported by taxpayer money through a stimulus.  Interestingly enough, when it happened, many outlets were pointing out his extra regulation:

        http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0316/028_deserve_fat_bonus.html

        Either way, the limit was 1/3 of the top executives' annual salary.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by LuvLuLu (March 17, 2009 7:59 pm ET)
           

        In fact, Dodd's amendment actually limited bonuses; it did not add "protection" for bonuses or "create a loophole" without which the bonuses could not be paid.

        This post is not a waste of time.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 17, 2009 8:55 pm ET)
           

        If it's faux, it's false.

        Nice try, little fella, but the story is who put them in on behalf of whom and who inherited the mess and gets to clean it up.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Eric Jaffa (March 17, 2009 4:38 pm ET)
         

      Even if those news organizations didn't explain the issue as well as they could have, the fact is that Tim Geithner persuaded the Senate NOT to put a real limit on pay at bailed-out firms into the bill.

      The Senate could have said that existing contracts are null-and-void for compensation over $400,000/year at bailed out firms.  They didn't. 

      The Senate still hasn't done anything of the sort.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (March 17, 2009 4:50 pm ET)
           

        No, they didn't explain the issue all that well...

        Smearing Chris Dodd with outright lies is definitely not doing your job all that well.

        When you have control of the media, and you have a microphone, the wingnuts have a platform to mislead.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 17, 2009 5:46 pm ET)
             

          Smearing Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and the Obama Administration with lies, half truths and pure, unadulterated horsebrit hume is the only avenue open to the gops.

          Lord knows the facts ain't doin' 'em any favors. Then again, they never do.

          These bonus provisions were inserted by the Fed under Bush and Obama inherited them.

          That said, they should just abrogate any existing AIG contracts and let the schmucks sue for their bonuses.

          The gops sure had no compunctions about abrogating any and all existing UAW contracts. Let the gops stick up for the AiG swine.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by peebs755 (March 17, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
               

            I kept hearing that "the bonus's were in the contract", and all I could think of was the Unions that have been forced to "renegotiate" their contracts. I think a little renegotiation would be required in this case.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by historygeek001 (March 18, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
                 

              Shhh!  Don't point that out!  It makes SENSE!

              Report Abuse
            • Author by greatjob (March 18, 2009 2:31 pm ET)
                 

              They knew the amount of these bonuses long ago and did nothing about it. Now they feign outrage to play politics.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by progressiveright (March 17, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
               

            The GOP hates unions and loves management and top executives. Thus they will help top execs keep bonuses that is basiclly stealing and stop contracts to the UAW.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by truthseeker77 (March 17, 2009 9:04 pm ET)
               

            Smearing Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and the Obama Administration with lies

            According to Glen Greenwald, it was an "administration official" who began the smear on Saturday night:

            The attempt to blame Dodd is based on a patently false claim that was first fed to The New York Times on Saturday by an "administration official" granted anonymity by Times reporters Edmund Andrew and Peter Baker (in violation, as usual, of the NYT anonymity policy, since all the official was doing was disseminating pro-administration spin)

            http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/03/17/dodd/index.html

            Report Abuse
        • Author by progressiveright (March 17, 2009 7:16 pm ET)
             

          Drudge does not reporting fact but reports what it thinks will hurt the top Democrats or help the top Republicans even if it is an out right lie.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (March 17, 2009 5:13 pm ET)
           

        "Tim Geithner persuaded the Senate NOT to put a real limit on pay at bailed-out firms into the bill."

        My recollection is different.  I believe Geithner persuaded the Obama Administration, not the Senate.  And there was a limit, but I also don’t think it could be considered “real”:

        The $500,000 pay cap for executives at companies receiving assistance, for instance, applies only to very senior executives. Some officials argued for caps that applied to every employee at institutions that received taxpayer money.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Eric Jaffa (March 17, 2009 6:00 pm ET)
             

          Tim Geithner persuaded both the Obama Administration and the Senate not to put real limits on execuitve compensation at bailed-out corporations.

          Senator Claire McCaskill wanted a limit of $400,000/year.

          Instead, they passed Senator Chris Dodd's proposal to limit bonuses relative to salary, in new contracts only.

          ==============================================

          CHICAGO (AP) ―

          President Barack Obama's economic team tried to keep Democratic allies negotiating the stimulus bill from limiting paychecks for bank executives at banks in need of a bailout. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and economic aide Lawrence Summers failed.

          Sen. Christopher Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, inserted strict rules into the $787 billion economic stimulus package over the White House's objections. Dodd's limits on bankers' bonuses are significantly more aggressive those sought by Obama or Geithner in recent days, with much fanfare.

          Dodd, D-Conn., said the restrictions — an executive making $1 million a year in salary could receive only $500,000 in bonus money, for example — are necessary if Obama plans asks Congress for more money to save the financial sector.

          ===========================================

          Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (March 17, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
         
      They sure know all the tricks don't they? Flat-out lies and smears. Our nation's "media" in action.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (March 17, 2009 5:36 pm ET)
         

      The right-wing is switching gears at blinding speed.  Today, they can’t condemn Obama and the Dems fast enough for not doing more to limit such abuses by bailed out firms.  As this latest item shows, they’ll even lie and mislead in order to do it, as usual.

      But how did some Republicans react back when Obama proposed capping bailed-out executive compensation at $500K?

      Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK): "as I was listening to him make those statements I thought, is this still America? Do we really tell people how to run [a business], and who to pay and how much to pay?"

      Sen. Bob Bennett (R-UT): "It's a leap, because the executive at the bank is a free agent who can leave the bank and go to work someplace else.  You run the risk of having a brain drain at the bank of their top talent. Some of the things some of these bank executives have been doing demonstrates they have a tin ear. At the same time, I'm generally troubled by wage and price control, no matter how logical it may appear."

      Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK): "If we do such a good job of running the federal government, what business do we have telling them how to run the banks?"

      Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC): "If you accept the fact that the government should be setting pay scales in America, then it's hard not to go after these exorbitant salaries. But I think it's a sad day in America when the government starts setting pay, no matter how outlandish they are."


      Sen. Mel Martinez (R-FL):  "What are we going to do next?  Tell a company if they get TARP money where there offices should be? They should be renting maybe from an abandoned federal building?"

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (March 17, 2009 5:43 pm ET)
           

        Missed it by that much!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 17, 2009 5:48 pm ET)
           

        Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK): "as I was listening to him make those statements I thought, is this still America? Do we really tell people how to run [a business], and who to pay and how much to pay?"

        Ya had no problems telling Detroit what to pay autoworkers, schmuck.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (March 17, 2009 6:09 pm ET)
           

        "What are we going to do next?"

        Whoever asks that has ceded the point under discussion.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by mefirst (March 17, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
           

        pete, the thing about all those quotes is they are heavy on the theory of "leave business alone and let them run things".  completely ignored at the same time, is the fact that these same geniuses, the high paid talent these companies simply can't do without, have their hands out for a taxpayer bailout to save their sorry asses.

        as an aside, limbaugh has offered obama a chance to go on his show.  take it, an hour, no commercials, no callers, just rush and barack.  you can be sure fat boy is scared to death obama will accept.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (March 17, 2009 5:36 pm ET)
         

      Last month, republicans led by Rush Limbaugh smeared and rediculed democrats for suggesting salary caps for the top CEO's. It's ironic now watching their indignation against those same CEO's for paying themselves bonus money from the stimulus package. What hipocrites!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by carnaugh690 (March 17, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
         

      American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

      TITLE VII--LIMITS ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        `SEC. 111. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
      •  
          `(b) Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance-
        •  
            `(iii) The prohibition required under clause (i) shall not be construed to prohibit any bonus payment required to be paid pursuant to a written employment contract executed on or before February 11, 2009, as such valid employment contracts are determined by the Secretary or the designee of the Secretary.
        • `(3) SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS- The standards established under paragraph (2) shall include the following:
          `(D)(i) A prohibition on such TARP recipient paying or accruing any bonus, retention award, or incentive compensation during the period in which any obligation arising from financial assistance provided under the TARP remains outstanding, except that any prohibition developed under this paragraph shall not apply to the payment of long-term restricted stock by such TARP recipient, provided that such long-term restricted stock--
      Report Abuse
      • Author by carnaugh690 (March 17, 2009 6:24 pm ET)
           

        That quote didn't come out like I'd hope.

        Google "[H.R.1.ENR]"

        Click the Library of Congress result, should take you to
        American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)
        Final version (Enrolled Bill) as passed by both Houses

        Go to the bottem, click...
        `SEC. 111. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

        Half way down...
        `(iii) The prohibition required under clause (i) shall not be construed to prohibit any bonus payment required to be paid pursuant to a written employment contract executed on or before February 11, 2009, as such valid employment contracts are determined by the Secretary or the designee of the Secretary.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by loonz (March 17, 2009 7:37 pm ET)
             

          Why are posting this?  It's already in the MMFA article.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by loonz (March 17, 2009 7:38 pm ET)
               

            That should be "Why are you...".

            Report Abuse
          • Author by carnaugh690 (March 17, 2009 8:06 pm ET)
               

            Mostly for sourcing - also in case there were anyone who doubted that it existed at all. At first I didn't see the links before the quote. Usually all i see are quotes in articles, rarely any links to sources.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by carnaugh690 (March 17, 2009 6:55 pm ET)
           

        http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_reports&docid=f:hr016.111

        Report Abuse
    • Author by sloucho84 (March 17, 2009 5:56 pm ET)
         

      Likewise, isn't this bonus money NOT included in the 2/17/09 $787 billion stimulus package?  IS AIG set to even get any of that money?

      Regardless, I've seen a lot of pundits only include the sentence that says "Exception is made to contractually obligated bonuses before 2/11" (or whatever).  This is just legalese as it could cause problems if a law was written with the ability to void a year-old contract from a company. This Dodd smear has been bothering me all day.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by sloucho84 (March 17, 2009 6:05 pm ET)
           

        ^ What I meant above by saying AIG isn't getting any of that money was that there were still billions of dollars going to AIG under Bush and Paulson and that also had no provisions about bonuses, and then the Democrats put an insufficient cap on bonuses and their the bad guys?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 17, 2009 9:00 pm ET)
             

          But of course? Ya don't expect the gops to resort to reality and the facts, do ya?

          They're dumb and they're scum, but they're tryin' to win here. Lord knows the facts ain't doin' 'em any favors.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (March 17, 2009 9:23 pm ET)
         

      Drudge & FoxNoise really do get away with spreading mean, nasty, and untrue lies every day, huh?  I sure wish someone would hold them accountable for their lies, but I guess it is hard to do when Drudge & FoxNoise stay so busy with their lies day after day.  Hmmm.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by copiousdissent.blogspot.com (March 17, 2009 11:55 pm ET)
         

      This is something MM always does, you claim something is a lie and then show us exaclty what they said Dodd did.

      When the Bill is written entirely by Democrats, and Dodd places a specific exception for contracts before Feb. 11th, 2009...then HE is responsible for the Bonuses!!!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by loonz (March 18, 2009 6:10 am ET)
           

        You have a reading comprehension problem.  Dodd's amendment placed limits on bonuses with no exceptions.  Someone took a hatchet to Dodd's amendment when the bill went into conference.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (March 18, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
           

        Please re-read the article.  Dodd's amendment put limits on bonuses; it was subsequently changed.  You're flat-out wrong.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by BoboSoetoro (March 18, 2009 12:57 am ET)
         
      Chris Dodd's Porkulus Bill amendment exempted AIG executive bonus payouts.....no amount of spin can change that fact. Dodd was the largest recipient of AIG cash in the 2008 election.....and no amount of spin can change that fact, either.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by politicalgirl (March 18, 2009 7:11 am ET)
         

      Earth to DEMS.  The stimulus package was written by...anyone...anyone...anyone?THE DEMS.  It's all on your watch guys!

      Hey. Are Dodd, Barack et al going to give back their AIG PAC money?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by anyfreedomleft (March 18, 2009 2:20 pm ET)
           

        Hello ... Earth to politicalgirl ...

        The repeal of the law which prohibited actions which ended up causing this mess was written by ... anyone?  anyone?  anyone?  REPUBLICAN PHIL GRAMM!

        But that doesn't stop the ReRushlicans from screaming from the top of their lungs all over the "liberal media" that CLINTON SIGNED IT!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by frankq2722 (March 18, 2009 7:14 am ET)
         
      Just a couple of thoughts on this topic maybe not entirely related. First MMFA loves to link repubs to all their donors and/or bosses or contributors whenever they appear on TV however there is no disclosure that Dodd and Obama were 1 and 2 in campaign contributions from AIG with Dodd getting over 100k. Also MMFA was blasting the repubs for the earmarks arguement stating that it was less than 2% of the total spend. However they don't mention that the 160mil in bonuses is actually less than 1/10 of 1% of the total that AIG is recieving. Now I don't believe that the AIG deadbeats should get a penny of bonuses, I just think it is hypocritical to make these bonuses a publicity event for fiscal responsibility saying they will tax it at 100%, when they have no problems with their own earmarks that total 40 times what the aig bonuses would equal. As for who wrote the bill with respect to the bonuses the amendment was named the Dodd Amendment, now I don't know how the entire process works , but if wording is changed in the Senate isn't Dodd notified of such changes to his amendment prior to a vote. If not then I don't hold him accountable at all, if he accepted or approved those changes then it is still his amendment.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sloucho84 (March 18, 2009 10:13 am ET)
         

      Actually that's not true, he did put a cap with exemptions.  Only because the amendment would not pass if you forced a company to refrain from doing something they had promised their employees under contract. 

      Why do you think the government didn't just make AIG NOT pay the bonuses.  Because that's a whole other can of worms.  They're taxing them by up to 98% because unfortunately, that's the government's only legal recourse.  If they wanted to break contracts because of an extraordinary situation, that would be wrong no matter what.  It's the equivalent of unwarranted wire-tapping and justifying it because of a crisis.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by LiberalSpinBuster (March 18, 2009 11:33 am ET)
         
      The least expensive solution, since all of the concern below is taxpayer money being wasted over this (Well, it should have been), is for the government to get their ignorant noses out of this business. Political gain has no place here!!!! We are in the midst of a financial mess that government is only compounding.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by anyfreedomleft (March 18, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
         

      I remember conservatives pretty much saying that the credibility of a news source is totally blown if they lie ...

      So ... Fox is dead ...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by LiberalSpinBuster (March 18, 2009 3:24 pm ET)
           

        Why just Fox?  Your rationale is severely flawed if you think it is ONLY Fox.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by imsupermom (March 18, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
         
      Dodd did put a bonus protection in the porkulus. He gave AIG the right to pay those bonuses that were under contract before they received their bailout money but not any contracts after receiving the money. Pay attention!! Besides our tax cheating treasury secretary was also well aware of this long ago. This innocent act doesn't cut it to anyone who actually wants to educate themselves.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (March 18, 2009 7:26 pm ET)
         
      Dodd just admitted that he put the loophole in the bill. When will Media Matters issue a retraction? You hacks have absolutely NO credibility. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/03/18/breaking-i-was-responsible-for-bonus-loophole-says-dodd/
      Report Abuse
    • Author by norcal_man051213 (March 18, 2009 8:04 pm ET)
         
      (D) Chriss Dodd just ADMITTED to CNN that he was responsible for the amendment that allowed the AIG bonuses. So, it is "mediamatters" that owes the retraction.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by maxoutman (March 18, 2009 8:11 pm ET)
         

      So much for this argument. According to CNN, Dodd has admitted that he is responsible for the "loophole." Let me be the first to say that you are ALL WRONG? How does it feel to be fooled by Media Matters?

      http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/03/18/breaking-i-was-responsible-for-bonus-loophole-says-dodd/

      http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2009/03/18/tsr.dodd.aig.bonus.intv.cnn

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tdkimbr9392 (March 18, 2009 8:57 pm ET)
         

      Oops! Looks like you might have been a bit TOO anxious to defend your liberal bretheren. Either Dodd or Giethner are in a heap of trouble.

      WASHINGTON (CNN) — Senate Banking committee Chairman Christopher Dodd told CNN’s Dana Bash and Wolf Blitzer Wednesday that he was responsible for adding the bonus loophole into the stimulus package that permitted AIG and other companies that received bailout funds to pay bonuses.

      http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2009/03/18/tsr.dodd.aig.bonus.intv.cnn

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Loghyr (March 18, 2009 9:55 pm ET)
         
      I'd expect a retraction from the spin busting organization that is Media Matters soon. *holds breath*
      Report Abuse
    • Author by slinky5216 (March 19, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
         
      Your all idiots... Did you not see that Mssr Dodd now admits this???? These guys (present administration) are as bad (worse actually) than the last. They forced throught something Obama said he was going to go line by line throught before anyone could reada it. Must be nice to be one of their buddies.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cutthroat (March 19, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
         

      So Dodd actually voted for the AIG bonus cap before he voted against it!  Retraction?  dream on.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.