About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Following Politico's lead, media fixate on Obama's "awkward laughter" in 60 Minutes interview

March 23, 2009 5:22 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Echoing a March 22 Politico article that was hyped by the Drudge Report, the March 23 editions of Today, Morning Joe, MSNBC Live, and Fox & Friends all featured segments on President Obama's laughter during a 60 Minutes interview. The segments are reminiscent of the media's echoing Drudge by seizing on Hillary Clinton's laugh as a new subject of attention following Clinton's talk show appearances in September 2007.

67 Comments

Echoing a March 22 Politico article that was hyped by the Drudge Report, the March 23 editions of several morning news shows featured segments on President Obama's laughter during a March 22 interview with Steve Kroft on CBS' 60 Minutes. The segments, which aired on NBC's Today, MSNBC's Morning Joe and MSNBC Live, and Fox News' Fox & Friends, are reminiscent of the media's echoing the Drudge Report, among others, by seizing on then-Sen. Hillary Clinton's laugh as a new subject of attention following Clinton's appearance on all five Sunday political talk shows in September 2007. Whereas commentators speculated whether Clinton's laughter -- which some described as a "cackle" -- was evidence of her "calculating" nature, according to the Politico article, Obama's "awkward laughter highlighted an issue Obama has faced dating back to the campaign, a sense that he sometimes is too 'cool' and detached to fully grasp the public anxiety over mounting job losses and economic worries." Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski, however, challenged her co-hosts' fixation on the topic stating: "I don't care who's laughing. ... I want to look at the plan and really assess it fairly. Tone is one thing; we'll see what the action is."

In a March 23 blog post on MSNBC's First Read, NBC chief White House correspondent and political director Chuck Todd, deputy political director Mark Murray, and political researcher Domenico Montanaro credited Matt Drudge with successfully "reduc[ing]" the 60 Minutes interview into a "gaffe[]" about "whether or not President Obama is laughing too much." They wrote:

*** Judge Drudge: If you're asking yourself how some of the lengthy Obama interviews -- like Leno or "60 Minutes" -- get reduced into gaffes about the Special Olympics or whether or not President Obama is laughing too much, look no farther than Drudge. As he did during the general election, he has been working overtime to paint the current president in the most negative light. So far, with Obama's approval rating in high 50s, low 60s, it hasn't worked -- yet.

The Obama-laughter story took the following course:

  • The Politico article, titled, "Kroft to Obama: Are you punch-drunk?" was published on the Politico website on March 22. From the article, by reporters Craig Gordon and Jonathan Martin:

President Barack Obama said he believes the global financial system remains at risk of implosion with the failure of Citigroup or AIG, which could touch off "an even more destructive recession and potentially depression."

His remarks came in a "60 Minutes" interview in which he was pressed by Steve Kroft for laughing and chuckling several times while discussing the perilous state of the world's economy.

"You're sitting here. And you're -- you are laughing. You are laughing about some of these problems. Are people going to look at this and say, 'I mean, he's sitting there just making jokes about money --' How do you deal with -- I mean: explain ..." Kroft asked at one point.

"Are you punch-drunk?" Kroft said.

"No, no. There's gotta be a little gallows humor to get you through the day," Obama said, with a laugh.

[...]

Even his awkward laughter highlighted an issue Obama has faced dating back to the campaign, a sense that he sometimes is too "cool" and detached to fully grasp the public anxiety over mounting job losses and economic worries.

Still, Obama made clear that he's afraid the nation hasn't seen the worst of the economic crisis.

obama-drudge

  • During the first segment of the March 23 edition of Fox & Friends, the show's co-hosts followed Politico's and Drudge's lead. While on-screen text read, "Obama gets grilled; Laughing off the tough economy," co-host Steve Doocy said, "Meanwhile, President Obama yukking it up again, this time not on [The Tonight Show with Jay] Leno but with Steve Kroft -- laughing about the dire straits of our economy. Anyway, we're going to show you what he was laughing about and whether or not you think that's funny as well." Co-host Brian Kilmeade then said, "It was strange." Doocy added, "It was odd."
  • During the March 23 edition of Morning Joe, after airing Kroft's "punch-drunk" question and Obama's response, co-host Joe Scarborough said, "Wow. Willie? What was that? Did that strike you as strange?" Co-host Willie Geist replied, "Before Steve Kroft asked him what he was laughing at, I turned to my wife about 15 minutes earlier in the interview, and I said, 'What is he laughing at?' " Geist also said Obama's laughter during the CBS interview was "odd," and both he and Scarborough agreed it was "strange." Brzezinski, however, said "[y]ou guys are hypocrites" and added: "I think you guys are getting a little picky. I could care less whether or not he laughs." After Geist interjected, "I agree," Brzezinski continued: "I want to know what the plan is. [Treasury Secretary] Tim Geithner has a plan for the banks today. ... The president speaks to the nation tomorrow night in a prime-time news conference, opening himself up for questions. I say we wait and see what happens there." Moments later, Brzezinski added: "I don't care who's laughing or doing what or being on Leno or doing brackets. I want to look at the plan and really assess it fairly. Tone is one thing; we'll see what the action is."
  • During a later segment on Morning Joe, CNBC host Donny Deutsch said of Obama's 60 Minutes interview, in part: "I wasn't quite sure where the meat on the bone was last night, and he had this kind of weird laugh, this nerv -- it was the first time I did not give him an A-plus-plus for his performance." Geist replied: "I want to show the clip that Donnie is talking about right now. ... There was some substance in the interview, obviously, but he had this strange, nervous tic almost -- where he was laughing at strange places." Geist then aired a cropped version of Obama's 60 Minutes interview which included only the responses in which Obama laughed and the portion in which Kroft asked, "Are you punch-drunk?"

Following the clip, Brzezinski asked Deutsch, "All right, Donnie, how is this coming off? Because I guess you could argue that that's -- look, that there's a chorus of criticism for all this stuff ... and [Obama's] laughing it off." Deutsch replied, in part: "We've got to be careful we don't become a nation of spitball throwers. ... You know, obviously, when a guy is out there speaking in the media, every once in a while there is going to be a nervous laugh. There is going to be a misstep. As far as his public persona, there is nobody better. You've got to give it to this guy." Deutsch later added: "He can't win either way. ... When he was out there being dire and saying, hey, look, I've got to get this through, we're in deep doo-doo -- 'Oh my god, he's scaring us.' So, you know, we're in a media world right now where that office it's hard to win either way. I still give him good grades overall, though." Asked to comment moments later, New Republic senior editor Michael Crowley stated: "Well, you know, when I see a politician do a TV interview, and they laugh, they're forcing their laugh; it seems like it's not totally natural. You know, it says to me that they had a conversation with their people, and they said people want you to lighten up a little bit, they think you're grim." Crowley added, "I think part of this is a psychological thing the Obama administration has been trying to do, which is to keep people from freaking out."

  • During the March 23 edition of NBC's Today, while discussing the interview with Todd, co-host Meredith Vieira said, "[Obama] was talking about the economic crisis, and at several points he chuckled, and Kroft actually called him out on that." After Vieira aired Kroft's "punch-drunk" question and Obama's response, Todd said:

TODD: You know, this has been a problem for President Obama when he was candidate Obama, this criticism that sometimes he doesn't seem to show that he feels the pain of what's going on in America, you know, whether it was that criticism of when he described folks in Pennsylvania about clinging to their guns and religion. So sometimes he gets a little sort of Zen-like and above it all, and I think that's where this tone comes from. He also was traveling a lot last week, and as 60 -- Steve Kroft said, he may have been a little punch-drunk and just a little tired.

  • However, during the 9 a.m. ET hour of the March 23 edition of MSNBC Live, Todd said, referring to the interview, "[I]n a moment like that, sometimes I think people can get overly critical at a moment like that." When asked by anchor Contessa Brewer, "Do you get the sense from the White House, Chuck, that the president is having trouble finding the right tone?" Todd responded: "[T]hey believe he has struck the right tone, that this is one of those cases where we inside the Beltway or the folks on the Internet are trying to create a -- create a problem where they believe there isn't one."

From the March 23 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

DOOCY: Meanwhile, President Obama yukking it up again, this time not on Leno but with Steve Kroft -- laughing about the dire straits of our economy. Anyway, we're going to show you what he was laughing about and whether or not you think that's funny as well. Brian.

KILMEADE: It was strange.

DOOCY: It was odd.

From the March 23 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:

[begin video clip]

KROFT: You're sitting here, and you're laughing about some of these problems. Are people going to look at this and say, I mean, he's sitting there and just making jokes about money? How do you deal with it? I mean, explain the -- your mood and your laughter. Are you punch-drunk?

OBAMA: Well, there's got to be -- no, no. There's got to be a little gallows humor to get you through the day.

[end video clip]

BRZEZINSKI: It is Monday morning and 6 o'clock on the East Coast.

SCARBOROUGH: Wow. Willie? What was that? Did that strike you as strange?

GEIST: Before Steve Kroft asked him what he was laughing at, I turned to my wife about 15 minutes earlier in the interview, and I said, "What is he laughing at?"

SCARBOROUGH: My wife turned to me and said, "Why does he keep laughing?" And she's the one that always levels me out.

GEIST: I find it odd.

BRZEZINSKI: Oh my god. You know --

SCARBOROUGH: That was strange.

BRZEZINSKI: You guys are hypocrites.

SCARBOROUGH: You didn't even watch it last night, did you?

BRZEZINSKI: Well, I was flying in, but I've seen clips.

SCARBOROUGH: OK. Well, it's strange.

GEIST: No, it was strange, Mika. It was.

BRZEZINSKI: I'd like to see more.

GEIST: There was a lot of substance in the interview. It was a fine interview. But he has a nervous laughing tic that was -- it was odd.

BRZEZINSKI: OK.

GEIST: Yeah.

BRZEZINSKI: We'll -- we'll talk. I -- I don't know. I think you guys are getting a little picky. I could care less whether or not he laughs.

GEIST: I agree.

BRZEZINSKI: I want to know what the plan is.

GEIST: Yeah, it's just strange.

BRZEZINSKI: Tim Geithner has a plan for the banks today.

SCARBOROUGH: I want to know who is going to win the NCAA and whether his final 64 picks are correct.

BRZEZINSKI: The president speaks to the nation tomorrow night in a primetime news conference, opening himself up for questions. I say we wait and see what happens there.

SCARBOROUGH: I agree.

GEIST: I'm with you.

SCARBOROUGH: I judge a president not by how he does on 60 Minutes, but by how he does on Leno. But do we not have any drums around here? It's -- the optics are really, really strange. And a lot of the op-eds are touching on that, that this is -- from Peggy Noonan to Frank Rich, this weekend, on both sides of the spectrum. A lot of people are saying that he doesn't have the tone right. He's unfocused. Peggy talked about the incredible lightness of being, and Frank talked on the other side of it. This is -- it's getting unsettling.

BRZEZINSKI: Well, we should look at those, but Tim Geithner has a piece in today's Wall Street Journal laying out the bank plan, and, you know, I think that we need to -- we need to actually look at it. I don't care who's laughing or doing what or being on Leno or doing brackets. I want to look at the plan and really assess it fairly. Tone is one thing; we'll see what the action is.

SCARBOROUGH: I agree with you.

BRZEZINSKI: Oh, come on --

SCARBOROUGH: Willie, I wish you and I --

BRZEZINSKI: All right, I'm going to do this --

SCARBOROUGH: -- had the substance of Mika Brzezinski.

BRZEZINSKI: Oh, shut up.

SCARBOROUGH: All right, let's go to Mika with the news.

BRZEZINSKI: You are so bad.

[...]

SCARBOROUGH: Donnie, how did the president do last night on 60 Minutes?

DEUTSCH: Not as great as he has been doing. You know, I'm one of these guys that believes he can chew and walk at the same -- chew gum and walk at the same time. I don't have the issues you have about him picking brackets out there and being on Leno. I think that shows a guy in charge. You're a CEO. You don't want to be sweating. I think he can, once again, talk basketball for five minutes and still, at the same time, solve our toxic assets problem.

SCARBOROUGH: As you know, we both know that it's about image.

DEUTSCH: Yes.

SCARBOROUGH: Does somebody that's laid off in Kansas, who may be predisposed to be angry at the government, want to see their president do that. I agree with you.

DEUTSCH: Once again, a president at any moment can't be doing everything that makes all 300 million people happy. Having said that, the 60 Minutes last night I found a strange choice. I thought he was great on Leno the other night, notwithstanding that misstep in terms of the Special Olympics. He's got a press conference Tuesday. I wasn't quite sure where the meat on the bone was last night, and he had this kind of weird laugh, this nerv -- it was the first time I did not give him an A-plus-plus for his performance.

GEIST: Well, I want to show the clip that Donnie is talking about right now. It's something that struck us earlier in the show. There was some substance in the interview, obviously, but he had this strange, nervous tic almost --

DEUTSCH: Yeah.

GEIST: -- where he was laughing at strange places. Here is the president.

[begin video clip]

OBAMA: You've got a whole host of players, all of whom may have a completely different solution, right?

OBAMA: Folks in Congress, as well as the American people, would like to fix the banks without spending any money.

OBAMA: The only thing less popular than putting money into banks is putting money into the auto industry.

KROFT: You're sitting here, and you're laughing about some of these problems. Are people going to look at this and say, I mean, he's sitting there just making jokes about money? How do you deal with it? I mean, explain the -- your mood and your laughter. Are you punch-drunk?

OBAMA: Well, there's got to be -- no, no. There's got to be a little gallows humor to get you through the day.

[end video clip]

BRZEZINSKI: All right, Donnie, how is this coming off? Because I guess you could argue that that's --

DEUTSCH: Look --

DEUTSCH: Come on. You said --

BRZEZINSKI: -- and he's laughing it off.

DEUTSCH: You said something earlier, Mika, that I agree with, and it was Tom Friedman's column. We've got to be careful we don't become a nation of spitball throwers. This is a president that part of his brand is being out there. He -- you know, he's like Reagan. Reagan was great; Reagan did a lot of missteps. There's a difference between Nixon and Reagan, and Bush and Obama. He is a telegenic, media-centric president. He -- and he's a brave president.

As you said earlier, this guy's going on -- taking questions, primetime. Can you imagine our last president doing that? You know, obviously, when a guy is out there speaking in the media, every once in a while there is going to be a nervous laugh. There is going to be a misstep. As far as his public persona, there is nobody better. You've got to give it to this guy -- even you, Joe. Come on, this guy -- I actually thought on Leno the other day --

SCARBOROUGH: I've always said that.

DEUTSCH: And by the way, him being on Leno shows he's in charge. I was a CEO. I ran a multibillion-dollar company. When we were in trouble, the worst thing I could do was hide in my office versus walking around, cracking jokes, because that let my employees know, you know what? He knows everything is OK. It's going to be OK. And that is his job. He's got to be daddy to everybody. I mean, that is reality.

SCARBOROUGH: Michael Crowley?

CROWLEY: Well, you know, when I see a politician do a TV interview, and they laugh, they're forcing their laugh; it seems like it's not totally natural. You know, it says to me that they had a conversation with their people, and they said people want you to lighten up a little bit, they think you're grim. I think part of this is a psychological thing the Obama administration has been trying to do, which is to keep people from freaking out.

You know, you've seen them recently talk stocks up a little bit. [Obama economic adviser] Larry Summers said that stocks are maybe becoming a good value. They've started to get a little more optimistic about the timeframe for the economy to turn around. And I think what Obama is afraid of is that people are really gonna lose hope, which has its own --

DEUTSCH: He can't win either way.

CROWLEY: -- self-fulfilling philosophy.

DEUTSCH: When he was out there being dire and saying, hey, look, I've got to get this through, we're in deep doo-doo --

CROWLEY: Everyone said --

DEUTSCH: -- "Oh my god, he's scaring us."

CROWLEY: Exactly.

DEUTSCH: So, you know, we're in a media world right now where that office it's hard to win either way.

CROWLEY: Right, right.

DEUTSCH: I still give him good grades overall, though.

From the March 23 edition of NBC's Today:

VIEIRA: All right, Chuck. On another matter, last night on 60 Minutes, the president was interviewed by Steve Kroft. He was talking about the economic crisis, and at several points he chuckled, and Kroft actually called him out on that. Let's take a listen.

[begin video clip]

KROFT: You're sitting here and you're laughing about some of these problems. Are people going to look at this and say, I mean, he's sitting there just making jokes about money? How do you deal with it? I mean, explain the -- your mood and your laughter. Are you punch-drunk?

OBAMA: Well, there's got to be -- no, no. There's got to be a little gallows humor to get you through the day.

[end video clip]

VIEIRA: You know, Chuck, some people criticized the president when he was on Leno last Thursday given the serious nature of the situation we're in right now. Now he does this with 60 Minutes. Does he have to watch his tone?

TODD: You know, this has been a problem for President Obama when he was candidate Obama, this criticism that sometimes he doesn't seem to show that he feels the pain of what's going on in America, you know, whether it was that criticism of what happened when he described folks in Pennsylvania about clinging to their guns and religion. So sometimes he gets a little sort of Zen-like and above it all, and I think that's where this tone comes from. He also was traveling a lot last week, and as 60 -- Steve Kroft said, he may have been a little punch-drunk and just a little tired.

VIEIRA: All right, Chuck Todd, thank you very much.

From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the March 23 edition of MSNBC Live:

MONICA NOVOTNY (anchor): President Obama and his team making the media rounds to talk about their plans to save the economy, and Contessa Brewer is live with the politics desk with one interview that may not have gone off as Obama planned, Contessa?

BREWER: Yeah, Monica, the president had this interview with 60 Minutes. His chuckles over serious economic issues seemed to surprise Steve Kroft.

[begin video clip]

OBAMA: I just want to say that the only thing less popular than putting money into banks is putting money into the auto industry.

KROFT: You're sitting here and you're laughing about some of these problems. [...] How do you deal with it? I mean, explain the -- your mood and your laughter. Are you punch-drunk?

OBAMA: Well, there's got to be -- no, no. There's got to be a little gallows humor to get you through the day.

[end video clip]

BREWER: Chuck Todd is chief White House correspondent and political director for NBC News. Do you get the sense from the White House, Chuck, that the president is having trouble finding the right tone?

TODD: Well, I don't think they would -- I think they would take issue with that. I think they believe he has struck the right tone, that this is one of those cases where we inside the Beltway or the folks on the Internet are trying to create a -- create a problem where they believe there isn't one. That said, you know, the president -- and this was this way during the campaign.

You know, he's got this even keel about him to the point where sometimes he seems like -- he got criticized during the campaign for not being touchy-feely enough or not being able to look as if he was understanding the problems of average Americans, and you know, that happened during that whole clinging to the guns and religion comment that he made and some other things just having to do with the economy. He's trying to get better about that.

You see him embracing people at town halls when they start crying and tearing up and, you know, much more Clintonesque, the way Bill Clinton was. So, I think sometimes, you know, he gets a lot of compliments for keeping his cool, and then, in a moment like that, sometimes I think people can get overly critical at a moment like that.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Caseysprings (March 23, 2009 5:29 pm ET)
         
      I think this was the moment we have been expecting. The media will assault the President just like they did during the Clinton years.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (March 23, 2009 10:35 pm ET)
           

        Yup. They have no shame in waiting awhile, do they?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Floyd (March 24, 2009 9:57 am ET)
           

          Which word did you use instead of "assault" during the Bush years?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 26, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
             

          In referring to the media? We used the words "kissing his ass" during the Bush years.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by jamesB (March 23, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
         

      damage control mmfa.  I prefer not to see my president engaged in "awkward laughter" when discussing bailouts and this awful economy, maybe it's just me. Humor is fine, giggling is inappropriate.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (March 23, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
           

        I prefer my press to be focused on facts and substance, not looks and laughs. If the conservative press had their way we would only be voting for people who looked like caribou barbie and handsome mitt.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jamesB (March 23, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
             

          good point.  But the press isn't in the White House running the country.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (March 23, 2009 5:57 pm ET)
               

            No, but they sure are trying to influence public opinion to drive the direction of the country, thus making them a de-facto policy maker. Not good in my eyes.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jamesB (March 23, 2009 6:02 pm ET)
                 

              funny, but when the media "fixated" on Bush's goofy snickering the left ate that up and never complained, now that its Obama they cry stick to the issues, not the other stuff.  all in the eyes of the beholder.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by worrierking (March 23, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
                   

                A lot of Bush's "goofy snickering" was concerning his war or how his search for WMDs failed to turn up any at the cost of tens of thousands of shattered lives.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by jamesB (March 23, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
                     

                  each could make their case for or against defending the snickering and the giggling, that isn't the point. the complaining is right down party lines, which renders most of it useless.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 23, 2009 7:55 pm ET)
                       

                    Bush's snickering over WMD's was a planned joke at a White House dinner.  He thought it was hilarious that he didn't see WMD's in his office and it didn't get half of the coverage this incident has.

                    Are you really saying the two incidents are similar?

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 26, 2009 12:42 pm ET)
                       

                    each could make their case for or against defending the snickering and the giggling

                    OK, defend the way Bush laughed and giggled at his failure to find WMDs that didn't exist, at the expense of thousands of lies.

                    A real knee-slapper, there.

                    Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (March 23, 2009 6:28 pm ET)
                   

                So what does returning to fixating on a snicker have to do with my last statement?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by jamesB (March 23, 2009 6:34 pm ET)
                     

                  it was merely a comment on how this laugh thing will play in the media, those that defend Obama will defend him and slam the coverage of it.  Those that defended Bush did the same for him.  It's funny, as I said.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by clams casino (March 23, 2009 7:32 pm ET)
                       

                    Bush smirked, giggled and joked his way through nearly every interview he gave, and I don't recall the media fixating on it at all. Not at all.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (March 23, 2009 7:42 pm ET)
                         

                      He called members of the media pet names and snickered every time he called on them.  Then he snickered about the guy in the sunglasses and didn't realize he was BLIND.

                      jamesb is once again (a la Tommy) parsing away today.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Timmee (March 24, 2009 12:23 am ET)
                           

                        OMG...is jamesb actually Tommy?

                        That explains a lot actually. This guy's A#1 goal is to get you to respond. His comments will always be designed to trigger a "WTF?" response from any reasonable person.

                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 23, 2009 8:28 pm ET)
                       

                    No, it's not. We're here because the sclm gave shrub a pass for the better part of eight years and let him fall asleep at the switch before 9/11, lose bin laden at Tora Bora, lie us into Iraq and double the national debt.

                    That's not funny. Cheney pretending to have credibility. Now that's funny.

                    Report Abuse
              • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 23, 2009 8:24 pm ET)
                   

                No, bush incompetently snickered for eight years. That's why we're here. Bush incompetence causing us to be here is the issue.

                Report Abuse
            • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 23, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
                 

              "They're not here. They're not there. Damn. Those WMD have gotta be somewhere."

              Report Abuse
          • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 23, 2009 8:22 pm ET)
               

            Yeah, but bush and cheney were and that's why we're here.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by thejbomb65 (March 24, 2009 10:07 am ET)
             

          speaking of sarah palin and the media......saw the latest issue of people magazine.....there was a family photo of the palins......minus the youngest son trig.....hmmmm.....interesting how she brought him out a few times and was lauded about keeping her son even though he has down syndrome. was she embarassed to have her son there i wonder?

          another point that makes her the ultimate hypocrite is her refusal of stimulus money that would be used for education, especially special education. on the grounds that she would have to expand her state government.

          my questions is this.....whats the problem with having more teachers? first off if you have more teachers there can be smaller classes and more individuallized attention. i speak as someone who went to school as a historian and certified to teach, which i got later on. and if her problem is that once the federal money has dried up after a few years and there wouldn't be anymore money coming from the federal government.....that would turn it into a state issue would it not, basically giving the state controll over education. something republicans are very keen about with states taking care of education. maybe im being overly simplistic, but maybe not.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (March 24, 2009 1:40 pm ET)
             

          If the POTUS wants to be taken seriously then he should skip LENO and ESPN.  I would hardly call 60mins "conservative".  Amateur hour is on full display.  The good news is he will make his mistakes and hopefully learn from them. 

          If he can't handle softballs, no t-ed up balls, from Kroft then we're in for Mr Toad's wild ride.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 26, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
               

            If you want to be taken seriously, you should stop trolling like a wingnut.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (March 24, 2009 1:03 am ET)
           

        "maybe it's just me. Humor is fine, giggling is inappropriate."

        It's you...

        And it is obvious that your intellectual level is something to be desired if you truly feel this way...

        I have been in many difficult moments that were created by others that I had to deal with and found myself smiling or laughing at the predicament. It is a way to relief the stress of the bad situation one finds themself in... something you seem to not be able to grasp.

        I could also remind you of the many jokes that Bush had said that were beyond inappropriate... like that little funny he said to that lady that was working three jobs to make ends meet... or his lack of grasping the English language... is our children learning.

        So you can take your fake outrage and take it up with the other children while the rest of us adults discuss things here!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (March 24, 2009 9:13 am ET)
           

        it was an absurd question

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ugojwt2 (March 23, 2009 5:37 pm ET)
         

      what do you want obama to do,cry

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Spiritgirl (March 23, 2009 6:10 pm ET)
         

      Maybe laughter is just what he needs to keep from getting angry!  The thought that these "best & brightest" would quit because of paycaps - to go to work, where exactly???  I laughed too when I heard him ask the question.  These people failed to do their job - since when should that be rewarded!  And what makes anyone think that they are going to go - where and make what money!?!?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 23, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
         
      What is next / O'Reilly's body l;anguage expert ?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brishon (March 23, 2009 6:25 pm ET)
           

        Oh man....I expect her to be on tonight saying "You know, Hitler and Stalin laughed during interviews too" with O'Reilly stating" "not that we're comparing them!"

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jehovahe8698 (March 23, 2009 6:36 pm ET)
         

      If you really think President Obama is lacking in competency, just imagine if John McCain and the wicked little toothless grin or his over the top temper tantrums was large and in-charge.  We would all be running for cover grimacing every time old Grumpy McCain stepped in front of the camera's.

      Giving the Media the opportunity to critic the actions of someone who is far superior to the vast majority of those interviewing him is absolutely ludicrous.  I mean where the heck does Steve Croft get the audacity to ask the Sitting President if he's Punch Drunk?  This crack pot reporter should try sitting in Mr. Obama's seat for 1 hour and then answer that question.  As the President stated "a little Gallows Humor is required just to get through each day" 

      The funny part is too see the reaction from Stevie Boy, as he tries to figure out what gallows humor is!  More importantly the President must be doing something correct if the only thing you can harangue from a 40 minute interview is wether or not he laughed at a stupid question.

      Way to go Mr. President!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (March 23, 2009 6:42 pm ET)
         

      So, Drudge is where FoxNoise, Joe Scarborough of Morning Joe, Chuck Todd, and others got their "Lead" Story from today.  Thanks MMFA for getting this out there, because I thought maybe these guys came up with this one on their own.  I forgot all about Drudge, who push non-sense that's repeated as "news" for MSM, and would never had given him his props. Good ole' Drudge to the rescue, huh?  Go figure.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 26, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
           

        Drudge, the irrelevant Egg man, attempts to strike again.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (March 23, 2009 6:51 pm ET)
         
      This is such a perfect example of the pitiful state of American journalism... Thanks to Media Matters for highlighting this. The corporate press is absolutely desperate to bring the Obama administration down. Anything they can use, any morsel to distort and smear Obama is fair game.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Reality (March 23, 2009 8:39 pm ET)
           

        Obama is our MVP if that is the case.  This is like a bad wreck.  I'm watching the aftermath.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (March 23, 2009 10:37 pm ET)
           

        Anything they can use, any morsel to distort and smear Obama is fair game.

        They're also making fools of themselves, because Obama's laughter was ironic, revealing a great sense of the absurd. Two things that dumb people can never figure out.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (March 23, 2009 6:53 pm ET)
         
      JamesB's nonsense aside, what I would like to know is what the F are the MSNBC commentators doing judging Obama by what Matt Drudge links to on his site? Good grief, is this 1999 or 2009?? Do they think Drudge is some sort of middle-of-the-road news site? Everything he puts up will be anti-Obama, anti-lib, anti-Dem. Never mind the average Americans that actually really matter. Pay all of your attention to Matt Drudge. This is the problem with the MSM: they are OUT OF TOUCH!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by xititjur3300 (March 23, 2009 7:07 pm ET)
         

      The meatpuppet interviewing Obama is a huge embarrassment to CBS.

       Since when are traditional media stenographers in the business of conducting  psychoanalysis?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 23, 2009 7:17 pm ET)
         

      Where was all this concern when Bush was in office?  I didn't see the Obama interview so I can't comment directly on that but I recall a number of instances of Bush coming off very cavalier when talking about the Iraq war, etc.  Seems like the media only really gets revved up if it's a Dem.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Marker (March 23, 2009 7:21 pm ET)
           

        Thats the repug media which dominates the landscape now.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (March 23, 2009 10:39 pm ET)
           

        Where was all this concern when Bush was in office?

        Bush was constantly guffawing and snickering and making HUGE gaffes, but the press never said anything. One of the revealing things about Farenheit 911 is that Moore got ahold of some of this footage and put it on the big screen. Most people hadn't seen this stuff.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (March 23, 2009 7:25 pm ET)
         

      this is like the "is howard dean crazy" media mania.  that was seriously discussed on the sunday talk shows for the two weeks after the dean scream.  no one pointed out that the whole situation was a creation that started on fox, was furthered by the murdoch owned new york post, and then was picked up by the mainstream media.  they ran a piece of tape that had all the very loud audience sound removed and made it look like some crazy guy yelling in a silent room.  didn't happen that way.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 23, 2009 7:30 pm ET)
           

        Shaggles, Marker, Mefirst, didn't you read Jimmy B's post above?

        funny, but when the media "fixated" on Bush's goofy snickering the left ate that up and never complained

        You all remember that, right? The media reporting endlessly on Bush's snickering? They just wouldn't let up on it.So it's a wash, as long as you were living in the same reality as JamesB was. .

        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (March 23, 2009 8:33 pm ET)
             

          Col.  I didn't hear this kind of commentary when Georgie joked at the Whitehouse correspondents dinner about not finding the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq!?! Remember him looking under his desk and commenting "No weapons under here..." A few mentioned it but nothing like this; "Is he taking the right tone...does he understand the people." GB joked about not finding WMD at a correspondents dinner(read journalist)and they laughed, and marveled at his sense of humor. 

          Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (March 23, 2009 9:33 pm ET)
             

          Ya, just like they fixated on "nucoolar" and various other misrememberings.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (March 23, 2009 8:24 pm ET)
         

      Wow, the President was trippin'. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by kevin hamak (March 23, 2009 9:50 pm ET)
         

      Please read "What Liberal Media?" by Eric Alterman.

      There is no so-called liberal media bias.  But there is a conservative media bias and it pervades the MSM.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by all your eyes (March 24, 2009 11:02 am ET)
           

        The point that MMFA is unwilling to make, and maybe it's outside their mission of simply reporting falsehoods, is that there is a common thread to the misinformation and anti-Obama bias in the mainstream media. The corporate media ownership that controls, to a large extent, the national dialogue, is petrified at the short-term ramifications of Obama's policy proposals, namely cap-and-trade and increased top-tier tax rates. So it has become their mission to drive down his approval ratings, starving him of political capital in his first term, and possibly delivering congress back to the Republicans as early as 2010 to completely hamstring progressive reform.

        Of course, what GE and Wall Street fail to recognize is that Obama's policies can lay the groundwork for future prosperity, but their fear of change results in tunnel vision, and it results in the daily drumbeat of baseless criticism of the President.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Romario (March 23, 2009 11:16 pm ET)
         
      Hmmm...none of these media clowns were this outraged last year when President Bush was tap dancing in front of the White House, which the credit crisis had erupted. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MygbSxnx_bM
      Report Abuse
      • Author by zamfir273114 (March 24, 2009 3:54 am ET)
           

        A lot of "us" (conservatives that is) won't disagree with you about Bush.  Yes, he was a dolt.  Major dolt!  But the media has led us to believe that we can expect more from Obama. That's why he was chosen over Hillary, remember? I personally voted for Hillary so do I expect a lot from Obama? Yes.  I want him to be the best damned President ever.  Going on Jay Leno of all people and acting peculiar on 60 Minutes troubles me a bit.  Maybe this is why President's throughout history steer clear of certain TV shows. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (March 24, 2009 8:48 am ET)
             

          "I want him to be the best damned President ever. "

          OK, now you've put on your Concern Troll uniform again.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 26, 2009 12:51 pm ET)
             

          "I want him to be the best damned President ever. "

          Of course you do. It's evident with every lie you tell about him.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by teo366 (March 24, 2009 3:54 am ET)
         
      An interesting graphic study would be to analyze the identity of the wide range of characters in the media world and try to identify " who rules their world ? " For example, your summary on this matter suggests that Politico through Drudge drove today's anti Obama meme, copying the earlier channel on the Leno appearance of Drudge to others through a host of the vacuous repeaters. Politico announced, shortly after its founding, that this was their business plan to drive traffic to the site. Others have hinted at the same in interviews, e.g. Brian Williams. It would be helpful to compile the geneology of stenographic lunacy and the geneology of the creative lunacy. FSN is overt and shameless. I think with some statistics we might some more and maybe worse among those that do not publish in quite the same volume. If you do such an analysis try not to assume who are the stenoloons a priori. It would ruin the fun.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by moe (March 24, 2009 8:36 am ET)
         

      The phony outrage over this laughing is touching.  No one cares except the media and few wingnuts willing to glom on to anything critical of Obama.

      The counter argument goes, "well, you know what they would say if Bush laughed", is also phony.  Bush had a history, a very long history, a pattern of of gaffes.  Obama has no such history - but hey, the media love this kind of non-story.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (March 24, 2009 9:01 am ET)
           

        "The counter argument goes, "well, you know what they would say if Bush laughed", is also phony.  Bush had a history, a very long history, a pattern of of gaffes."

        There are plenty of examples on YouTube of Bush being of so presidential the eight years he wasted our time being our so called leader.

        "Obama has no such history"

        Yet... as you said... a large chunk of the media is acting as if a president laughing is some kind of a new yet horrible thing.

        - but hey, the media love this kind of non-story."

        Sad... isn't it.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by moe (March 24, 2009 9:38 am ET)
             

          Indeed it is sad.  But when someone like Glenn Beck for example, who is an expert at talking, has a program on a news network, what should we expect?  Unfortunatley there are a lot people like him; a knowledge base a mile wide and an half inch deep.

          News has always been part entertainment, but now it's almost all entertainment.  Cable news has become a joke and that's why I finally turned the cable off.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by daleski22 (March 24, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
         

      Today's Media - Humorless nitpicking morons who have a knack for fabricating news by deciding to focus on Obama's tone rather than what the man says.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by afisher (March 24, 2009 12:51 pm ET)
         
      I just don't remember a "media outrage" when we watched GWB search "his office" looking for WMD's. Are we to presuppose that even stressful times, that everyone loses their sense of humor? I was actually amused as President Obama laughed when he recognized that the approval rating for bailing out the automobile industry was at 18%. What would anyone do when you knew you were on the downside of an argument that needed to be made? YELL or laugh?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by daleski22 (March 24, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
         

      so-called news professionals providing hack psychoanalysis and diagnosis of personality disorders rather than dutifully reporting the substance or lack thereof of certain remarks.

      What's next? "Body language experts?"

      Oh yeah... O'reilly. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by smarshall1432997 (March 24, 2009 5:52 pm ET)
           

        Sure enough, the 'Body Language Expert' was on Bill O'reilly last night.  I just laughed at FoxNoise's and O'reilly's craziness.  Too funny.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by WorldlyMrR (March 26, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
         

      For those that think the media ignored Bush - they could because David Letterman made Bush Gaffes a nightly item.  His piece on "Famous American President Speeches" said it all - we didn't need 100 newspapers writing about it.  I actually would tune in Letterman just to see what clip was coming next.

      I wonder how you all would feel if your President was suddenly the nightly gaffe clip? 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 26, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
           

        Yes, because Letterman is such a well-respected journalist.

        We don't need gaffe clips while you are posting. You are your very own wellspring of ignorance.

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.