About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hour 1: Limbaugh on Obama: "He's a bad guy. He's one angry guy"

March 24, 2009 1:30 pm ET

3 Comments

This hour of the Limbaugh Wire brought to you by investor prenups
By Simon Maloy

Sometimes, when we feel sorry for ourselves for having to listen to the likes of Mark Steyn prattle on about cat AIDS and Birther gibberish, we take a step back, survey the broader talk radio landscape, and remind ourselves that it could be worse. Anyway, welcome back for another day of the Limbaugh Wire -- this time it's the real McCoy, as El Rushbo is back from charity golfing.

Rush kicked off the show by once again explaining Obama's grand plan to drive down the economy so he can take over the private sector and destroy capitalism. The impetus behind Obama's grand conspiracy is, apparently, his overarching anger: "I tell you, this is one angry guy. He's a bad guy. He's one angry guy. His wife is angry as well. Everybody around him is in full rage, although they're probably happy now to see him sit around what is -- what's happening."

From there, Rush touched off on the semi-interesting factoid that the Sunday New York Times opinion page contained several pieces critical of Obama. Rush was upset, however, because the New York Times "leftists" were attacking Obama's style, not the substance of his ideas, because "leftists" will never "admit that their ideas are bad." Except for Paul Krugman, who, according to Rush, may be "more right than wrong" regarding Treasury Secretary Geithner's toxic asset plan. At this point, we dove under our desk because we were sure reality had just torn itself asunder. After a minute or so, we convinced ourselves that the end times were not upon us, so we resumed listening.

Talking about the toxic asset plan, Rush encouraged private investors participating in the plan to get a "prenup" before entering into this "marriage" with the government, because they'll end up being taxed at 90 percent if they make too much money. Moving on to Geithner, Rush noted that The Washington Post reported that the "Obama administration is considering asking Congress to give the Treasury secretary unprecedented powers to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies, such as large insurers, investment firms and hedge funds, whose collapse would damage the broader economy, according to an administration document." According to Rush, "Geithner is going to get total control over determining whether something needs to be seized or not, whether it's working or not -- and it's just keeps on coming, folks." This isn't quite accurate -- the Post article he read from noted that the "Treasury secretary could act only after consulting with the president and getting a recommendation from two-thirds of the Federal Reserve Board."

Rush came back from the break with an explanation of what "toxic assets" are and once again cautioned investors to get a "prenup" so that they don't face "retroactive taxation" or hearings with Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA). Rush expressed his extreme disapproval with the toxic asset plan because it is "just another bailout," saying that investors are going to be buying toxic assets with government "loans" and that they don't have to repay that money, regardless of whether the investments make or lose money. According to Rush, it's a "show" intended to make it look as thought the private sector is saving the economy. The key thing to remember, according to Rush, is that the private investors participating in the plan are the same people Obama has been "vilifying" for the past six months (and they're all Democrats).

Rounding out the hour, Rush returned to his teleprompter fixation, claiming that CNN's Jeannie Moos and the rest of the "drive-bys" are covering for Obama regarding the teleprompter mishap involving the Irish prime minister. Rush was incredulous that Obama, according to Moos, jokingly read the wrong speech to cover for the Irish PM: "Obama is not a person with a sense of humor. No serious, angry, leftist ever has a sense of humor." Rush then demanded that Moos show the video of the incident if that really was the case. Of course, in the very same segment, Moos said quite clearly of the incident: "Too bad it wasn't on camera."

Highlights from Hour 1

Outrageous comments

LIMBAUGH: The poor and the middle class, this is a bunch of people that believe a bunch of things. One of the things they believe is that the nation's achievers and so-called wealthy have acquired their wealth by stealing it or not allowing others to have it, and this has created the middle class and the poor. And so we've got to go get that money back, and that's what we're in the process of doing.

Remember Obama told some people in a California town meeting not to be investment bankers -- the same thing his wife did during the campaign in Zanesville, Ohio. I tell you, this is one angry guy. He's a bad guy. He's one angry guy. His wife is angry as well. Everybody around him is in full rage, although they're probably happy now to see him sit around what is -- what's happening.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: After they have made it doubly tough for anybody to run a profitable business, then they can go in and seize it, when you can't make a profit, when your business isn't doing -- this is all part of a plan. This is not a rescue. This is a plan. They are focused on the destruction of the private sector. They -- this is an all-out assault on capitalism.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: See, Obama had the presence of mind to run to the teleprompter and thank himself, knowing full well he's just trying to bail the Irish prime minister out of an embarrassing moment by thanking himself. Well, if that's the case, show us the tape. If it's just a joke, if it was -- I mean, this could really help Obama to show that he can ad lib off the prompter. Isn't that one of the big complaints that people have about him?

So, Jeannie, go get the tape and show it to us if this is such a brilliant effort by Obama to tell a joke, which he can't do by the way. Obama is not a person with a sense of humor. No serious, angry, leftist ever has a sense of humor. Obama does not have one. He's got an engaging smile, but when he tries to crack jokes, we know what happens. He is not funny. He is not a funny guy.

What? What? Well, we've got yucks at the handicapped. That's what I mean. He's not a funny guy. He does not know how to tell a joke. This whole notion this was a joke, Obama going up there to bailout -- show us the tape, Jeannie. Or get this pool reporter. Show us the tape if it's just a joke, if it's just a joke. So they will continue to cover for him.

America's Truth Rejector

Misleadingly claimed new plan would give Geithner "total control" over decision to seize financial institutions:

LIMBAUGH: The Obama administration is going to ask Congress to give the Treasury secretary unprecedented powers to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies like large insurers, investment firms, hedge funds, whose collapse would damage the broader economy -- this from White House spokesman Robert Gibbs. They're going to use it until they get control of as much of the private sector as they want.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: So they're going to get rid of the independent agencies that examine the health of various aspects of the economy. They're going to turn that over to Geithner. Geithner is going to get total control over determining whether something needs to be seized or not, whether it's working or not -- and it's just keeps on coming, folks.

There's nothing in the road to stop these people -- nothing on the road to stop them. No boulders in the way -- and even if there were boulders, these people are in a jet. They're flying over the land. They're not driving over it. And they're proceeding full speed ahead.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by cshoem81386 (March 24, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
         

      This irresponsible and unwell person who could talk about Michael J. Fox and Michael's real disabilities merits no comment really....but I've determined that Limbaugh really has a disability himself.  His own words display that.  Check that video.....

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Spiritgirl (March 24, 2009 2:57 pm ET)
         

      This loud-mouthed, pill addicted, let's do away with the facts - let alone truth, "leading" representative of Republicans and is an extremely angry/sorry excuse for a human being.  The fact is this guy is an ignoramus with a following, which proves my other point about the dumbing down of Americans!  

      Americans cannot expect that the plutocracy that owns much of the media will actually tell them what they don't really want the public to know.  Whether that media is print, radio, or internet - the medium matters much less than the message that is being dissemanated to the public.  As the plutocracy is looking at diminishing returns and "feels" that they are being unfairly persecuted (awww) - this is where Rush and his ilk come in - they are a loud distraction feeding on and into the anger that many Americans are feeling.  Of course, many of the angry don't really have an understanding of the "why, how, and what" of this fiasco - they just know that their jobs are being lost, healthcare is unaffordable, and they may be losing or have lost their homes.

      First off he should be fired - I know first amendment rights, but that Rush still has the ability to scream fire in a crowded theater - was already ruled upon by the Supreme Court - you can't - and he does not have that right!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dickday (March 24, 2009 5:49 pm ET)
         

      Craig Crawford at Trail Mix drafted a set of rules for proper commenting on his blog. Not to dissuade people from attacking him, but to bring some peace to a site where commenters were attacking each other.

      I did an entire series on this at TPMCafe, in the readers section. Suffice it to say that rush breaks every single rule in his discussions on the web. Every single one. His arguments are always ad hominem in nature. He does not properly cite authorities. His entire purpose is to raise people's ire.

      rush baits people. He not only misrepresents what others say, he will not provide the context in which the statement was made in the first place and he misquotes the statement to begin with as you have demonstrated time and time again.

      He is teaching people, along with sean and savage and bill orally and the other rugrats how not to communicate.

      And I feel that this is where the problem arises in comments sections all over the web.

      rush is simply a bad example. Forget politics for a minute. rush is a bad example to all of us as to how to approach argument and rhetoric.

      Your series is of the utmost importance because you calmly approach his statements and demonstrate how he is wrong.  Very good material here for all of us when we are confronted with demoagogues.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.