About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hour 3: Rush misrepresents Chuck Todd's comments to claim he is "too invested" in Obama

March 24, 2009 3:37 pm ET

46 Comments

This hour of the Limbaugh Wire brought to you by Barack Ogabe
By Simon Maloy

To kick off the final hour, Rush noted a Reuters article headlined, "Resistance grows to Obama's bigger government," and encouraged us all to look at the bigger picture. Rush took us back to January 15, asking us to imagine where the country would be if, between now and then, there had been no resistance to Obama's "assault" on capitalism. Before we could get around to envisioning that nightmare scenario, Rush explained why he took us back to that seemingly random date -- the very next day, Rush first said he wanted Obama to "fail." According to Rush, this was -- he was -- the tipping point, the "first breath" of opposition to Obama, without which there would be no opposition to Obama. But now, because of Rush's desire that Obama fail, people are starting to raise questions.

Finally we were able to move past Rush's ego, and Rush claimed that the Obama administration's goal was power grabs -- in the present and the future. That's why they need "chaos," according to Rush, as demonstrated by the flap over the AIG bonuses. Rush also asked us to remember the Obama administration's desire to regulate executive pay: "Why would a leftist authoritarian want that power? Well, if you control executive compensation, you can then start controlling any other kind of compensation. And if you control that, you have the right to take over the economy's central nervous system, do you not?" The purpose of all this, according to Limbaugh, is... political donations. So says Rush: "[R]ansom, in other words. Obama is basically asking for ransom from financial institutions: Pay me or I'll take you over. Donate to me and my party or I'll take you over -- the old protection racket." That's right, the man who proved himself to be the most effective and prolific fundraiser in campaign history is enacting a vast conspiracy to reshape the American financial system so he can do something he already does better than anyone else.

Just before the break, Rush took a few shots at NBC News' Chuck Todd -- one of those media figures who are "too invested" in Obama -- for saying that Obama was "Zen-like" in his 60 Minutes interview. Of course, Todd used that term in describing a "criticism" of Obama "that sometimes he doesn't seem to show that he feels the pain of what's going on in America."

In a quick segment between breaks, Limbaugh aired audio of today's hearing in the House with Secretary Geithner, during which, according to Limbaugh, Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) "shut down the entire conversation" Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-AL) was having with Geithner, because Bachus "was about to nail Geithner, not on the bonuses, but on the 170 billion in bailout money that 93 to $100 billon of which was sent to other banks, among them Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, and others." It's an interesting theory, but one that doesn't really stand up to scrutiny. According to the New York Times liveblog of the hearing, at 10:58 a.m., there were "questions about A.I.G.'s payments to counterparties, in which some bailout funds were used to pay financial institutions such as Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank in full. Mr. Geithner says his team did explore imposing a loss on the counterparties, but concluded that the Fed had no legal authority to do so." Rep. Frank should really learn to use his conversation-stifling gavel more consistently.

Back from another break, Limbaugh touched on one of the more unfortunate topics from yesterday's adventure with Mark Steyn -- the U.S. government buying condoms from China. Rush linked this to reports that one of the British prime minister's advisers will "warn that Britain must drastically reduce its population if it is to build a sustainable society." Rush went off on this for a while, claiming that you'd have to kill people to reduce Britain's population, and that such thinking represents "leftism" and "Democrat Partyism" and "liberalism." Rush then linked this to yet another unfortunate topic -- his mockery from last week of explorers trapped and imperiled in the Arctic Circle. According to Rush, this "idiot" and "lunatic" adviser to the British PM "should have been on that trek." The explorers were saved, by the way.

Oh, we almost forgot. In the middle of that rant about the British adviser, he "confus[ed]" Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe "with a well-known Kenyan named Barack Ogabe," saying: "Please forgive me. I did not intend that slip-up to be made. Barack Ogabe and Robert Mugabe, at least in human structure, are two different people. I don't know about policy."

Anyway, what remained of the show was spent on the AIG bonuses, with Limbaugh claiming that the government used "fear" (congressional hearings, ACORN, etc.) to compel AIG executives to return the bonus money, in effect levying a 100-percent tax.

That's it for this fine Tuesday's Limbaugh Wire. In our subjective and thoroughly biased opinion, Media Matters' Limbaugh coverage is the best around, so we strongly encourage you to read, listen to, and internalize every last bit of it. See you tomorrow.

Highlights from Hour 3

Outrageous comments

LIMBAUGH: All of this chaos, all of the effort to talk down the U.S. economy to create chaos is necessary for future power grabs. It's been in the works for some time. Treasury and the Congress work together to protect the retention contracts. They sanctioned those contracts.

Yet, now, they're angered and shocked and outraged those contracts were paid as promised. It makes sense if the end game is chaos after chaos after chaos to take over more and more of the private sector. And they are openly admitting this. They told The Washington Post and The New York Times that this is what they want to do -- stories yesterday and Monday, or Sunday.

And let's not forget that Obama wants to control the pay -- the compensation of all bank and non-bank executives too. Why would a leftist authoritarian want that power? Well, if you control executive compensation, you can then start controlling any other kind of compensation. And if you control that, you have the right to take over the economy's central nervous system, do you not?

[...]

LIMBAUGH: Barney Frank and the Obama administration are blackmailing the rest of the financial industry. This could happen to you. You could be next if you don't play ball with us. A polite way to say blackmail is leverage.

Regardless, this is de-facto nationalization of the entire economy. Remember, we have to return the wealth of the nation to its rightful owners, and in Obama's world, that's the poor and the middle class, who are only poor and middle class because all the spoils are being stolen from them by evil, greedy thieves.

So you destroy the private sector. And you do it with a mob demanding that you do so, as in going after AIG executives. That's how it starts: gin up the populist mob to support a takeover of the private sector. What this will then in turn create is political donations from all of the targeted companies -- ransom, in other words. Obama is basically asking for ransom from financial institutions: Pay me or I'll take you over. Donate to me and my party or I'll take you over -- the old protection racket. Now, in most instances, something as dramatic and overwhelming as this would be a tipping point.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: The standard of living around the world has increased in places where there are basic free markets. Where there aren't, of course, the standard of living has declined, such as Zimbabwe, the former Rhodesia, now run by Robert Ogabe -- Mugabe. I was confusing him with a well-known Kenyan named Barack Ogabe. This is Robert Mugabe.

Please forgive me. I did not intend that slip-up to be made. Barack Ogabe and Robert Mugabe, at least in human structure, are two different people. I don't know about policy, but, basically -- regardless, regardless. See, I'm embarrassed I stepped in that -- Barack Ogabe.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: Meanwhile, some jerk, some idiot, this guy should have been along on the trek to the North Pole. They got stranded. They're going up there to check the sea ice. They're up there -- they're skiing. They're skiing to the Arctic Circle, to the North Pole in March, and they got frozen out. The finally were saved. You know what saved them?

An airplane made in Canada: the DeHavilland Twin Otter. The Twin Otter is a very versatile airplane. It has -- if you want to put skis on it, you can do that. If you want to put pontoons on it for water landing, it'll do that. It'll land on a carrier, power on landings. It'll do any number of things.

So it landed and saved them, rescued them, dropped them food and got them out of there. An evil, combustible engine airplane saved these lunatics skiing to the North Pole in March to check sea ice. This lunatic from the UK should have been on that trek.

Enemies list

NBC News' Chuck Todd, for saying that Obama was "Zen-like" during 60 Minutes interview. Rush claimed Todd is "too invested" in Obama.

America's Truth Rejector

Falsely suggested that Barney Frank was stifling inquiry into AIG's payments to counterparties:

LIMBAUGH: What was happening here is Spencer Bachus was about to nail Geithner, not on the bonuses, but on the 170 billion in bailout money that 93 to $100 billon of which was sent to other banks, among them Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, and others, and he had set that all up and that's why the conversation on haircuts and 80-percent ownership and so forth.

He knows where Bachus is going with all this, and so, the -- Barney Frank once again shut down the entire conversation as it was about to nail Geithner on the real, real problem with these bailouts -- and that is the laundering of money to other banks.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by matthrms (March 24, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
         

      part III accuses Rush of "falsely"  claiming that Frank attempted to stifle questions regarding AIG payments to counterparties. 

      Yet no evidence is presented as to why this is false - not even an unsubstantiated explanation.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by citylife9 (March 24, 2009 6:39 pm ET)
         

      LIMBAUGH IS LIKE (BAGEDAD BOB) REMEMBER HIM SADAMS MESSENGER. AS THE  U. S. BOMBS WERE DROPPING AND  U. S. TANKS WERE ROLLING  INTO THE CITY HE IS IN THE FOREGROUND LIVE ON CAMERA TELLING US IRAQ IS WINNING THE WAR AND VICTORY IS ASSURED.  HE WAS A PROGRAMMED ROBOT. ENTER RUSH LIMBAUGH, HE IS A PROGRAMMED ROBOT. PARTY LINE PARTY LINE PARTY LINE. THE TOKIO ROSE OF THE 21ST CENTURY. LIMBAUGH YOUR SIDE HAD THERE TURN THEY FAILED NOW ITS THE OTHER SIDES TURN AND YOU AND HANNITY AND THE FOX NETWORK IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE IT. AMERICA AND THE WORLD IS GOING TO GIVE OUR PRESIDENT TIME TO LET HIS PLAN TAKE HOLD WHICH YOU COULD NEVER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES DO. WE REALIZE THAT ANY OBAMA SUCCESS IS YOUR CROSS. IF HE SUCCEEDS YOU AND YOUR APOSTLES OF DOOM WILL BE DEFEATED WE KNOW YOU, YOUR NOT THE VOICE OF REASON OR BALANCE. THE WEAK ARE EASILY LED      JOE CAPRIO CITYLIFEPRODUCTIONS

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 25, 2009 10:13 am ET)
           

        LIMBAUGH IS LIKE (BAGEDAD BOB) REMEMBER HIM SADAMS MESSENGER.

        Dude, shouting illiteracy just makes you look foolish. Identifying yourself by name as if this would make us want to seek out your company and your other opinions is absurd.

        I don't know what BAGEDAD is, but I just played those notes on the guitar, and it's not a bad riff...

        Report Abuse
      • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 1:19 pm ET)
           

        The conservitives were never in power to fail, The liberal majority were, Take a long look at what they have done to the state.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by my4cents (March 24, 2009 9:30 pm ET)
         

      Limbaugh will always have the ignorant, racist, illiterate, ......(put in your word here) followers. He will continue to rile them and make money off of them (via ratings).

      People like this have existed throughout history. Only disturbing part is that his blind followers are (as a group) capable of influencing public policy. They do not realize they are shooting themselves in the foot.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by BISHAMON (March 25, 2009 2:40 am ET)
           

        I think the MSM is also shooting itself in the foot, if that is possible. I didn't think the press looked too good tonight, especially in comparison with President Obama. Worst question? Jake Tapper's one about the president not calling on Americans to make sacrifices. Just because George W. Bush was faulted after 9/11 for not asking most Americans for sacrifices (and for telling them to go shopping, and for actually cutting taxes during two wars, and for not tapping the spirit of national unity, etc.), Tapper feels he has to ask Obama the same question, after circumstances have changed so drastically? Seemed kind of strange to me.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
           

        my4cents, you are right, there is always a few leaders of the truth. As there is always peaple, like you, who have a knee jerk program to say no to the truth.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by creeksneakers2 (March 24, 2009 10:03 pm ET)
         

      Thank God we have MMFA keeping an eye on Rush because his lunacy is spreading again. Tonight, after Obama's news conference touched on important matters like $trillions in spending, $trillions in deficits, how we'll address health care, etc, David Gregory had one minute to wrap it all up. Gregory said:

      "Obama gave his opening remarkes using a teleprompter." 

      Its alarming how this insanity spreads to the MSM. Please keep up your brave reporting.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by SlickFilly (March 25, 2009 12:41 am ET)
           

        Which only proves that Gregory is an idiot. obama used a giant screen TV.

        >"remarkes" Is this a word?

        HEADLINE:

        Big Screen No More

        Big Screen found duct taped, unplugged, but still smoking after being executed with a deliberate high voltage power surge by enraged Twin Teleprompters. The motive appears to have been insane jealousy.

        Teleprompter #1 blurbed that they simply could not take their master's rejection.

        Teleprompter #2 just flashed repeated visuals of crocodile tears.

        They were taken into custody by Federal Marshalls but immediately pardoned by the president who said he just could not exist without them.

        LOL

        Report Abuse
      • Author by BISHAMON (March 25, 2009 2:13 am ET)
           

        Another non-issue for the MSM to obsess about. First, it was "Is he trying to do too much?" Now it's the teleprompter. Do reporters object to the president addressing the people directly? Or, rather, are reporters suggesting that President Obama relies on the teleprompter because he cannot speak well extemporaneously? If so, that is obviously false, as he speaks off the cuff better than most politicians and is obviously well-informed and thoughtful. 

        The teleprompter is just a tool of the trade, and, I imagine, helps Obama get a lot of things done. I think he is smart to use one. He is able to deliver his message precisely without having to waste time memorizing. George W. Bush relied on notes on cue cards -- I suspect because he had trouble reading a teleprompter. Remember that botched line about GYNs "practicing their love on women across America? That happened when he was using (misreading?) a teleprompter.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 12:52 pm ET)
             

          He speaks better of the telapromter than most politicians,, Are we listing to the same person,, Watch your self, or your nose might enlarge

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (March 25, 2009 1:51 pm ET)
             

          I suspect because he had trouble reading a teleprompter. Remember that botched line about GYNs "practicing their love on women across America? That happened when he was using (misreading?) a teleprompter.

          You mean like when the evil teleprompter tricked Barry O'Gump into thanking HIMSELF on St. Paddy's day?  I'd say that was a botch!  

          Maybe it was all that cheep green beer...yeah!  Blame it on the beer!  

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 25, 2009 10:17 am ET)
           

        "Obama gave his opening remarkes using a teleprompter."

        If the teleprompter stops, George W. Bush and David Gregory are dead in the water. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama can go on without problems because they know their stuff. Clinton actualy did that during a speech for seven minutes when the teleprompter went down. We know what George W. Bush's famous seven minutes of silence was about.

        The teleprompter is there as a reminder and an outline for good speakers. Bush read it verbatim.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
           

        creek, where is the lunact that you are spouting. Since when is the truth lunacy or insanity,  There right when they say libers are mentaly disturbed.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 24, 2009 10:09 pm ET)
         

      Limbaugh likes the party line because it is far superior to the hate america,liberal, fabian crowd that is now in power.The Idea that Obama will sucseed is laughable. He is doing every thing in his power to bring us down, If we survive it will because we made it inspite of him.Sanders a patriot that is very tired of being lied too for 50 years by the fabian media.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 25, 2009 10:20 am ET)
           

        Limbaugh likes the party line because it is far superior to the hate america,liberal, fabian crowd that is now in power.

        Fabian? You mean the 50's beach idol who couldn't sing?

        Sanders a patriot that is very tired of being lied too for 50 years by the fabian media.

        We need someone to translate your garble into coherent, but I'm afraid the translator's brain wouldn't survive the attempt.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 25, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
             

          Nah, he spews delusional dreck in any language.

          Take that blather about dimwitted dittoheads loving their country for example. 

          Report Abuse
        • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 12:55 pm ET)
             

          If you have no idea what the Fabian party is , you are either lying or completly uninformed.. When indout, Liberals resort to attacking the messenger in stead of facing the truth.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (March 25, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
             

          I assume you jest...but just in case...

          Fabian Society is/was a group of British socialists in the late 1800's that advocated social change through small increments as opposed to an all out revolution or change.  

          The argument can be made this is what's happening in the US.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (March 25, 2009 3:13 pm ET)
           

        The Idea that Obama will sucseed is laughable. He is doing every thing in his power to bring us down

        Just in case that rock you're living under, hit you in the head, we are in the worst "recession" since the depression. And that "recession" didn't start in the last 65 days!

        President George W. Bush presided over the creation of fewer jobs in the U.S. economy in the modern era than any president since President Herbert Hoover, according to U.S. Labor Department data.

        More than 2.6 million jobs were lost in 2008 alone, and the unemployment rate, which stood at 4.2% when President Clinton left office in January 2001, has rocketed to 7.2% in January 2009, as President Bush leaves office.

        At the end of President Clinton's presidency, the federal government was running a yearly budget surplus, and the national debt was about $6 trillion. At the end of President Bush's presidency, the federal government will run a record budget deficit of more than $1 trillion this year, fiscal 2009, and the national debt has grown to $10.6 trillion.

        Bush had no energy policy, preferring to 'let the market determine the price for oil'. 

        As a result, when emerging market oil demand and investor speculation pushed oil over $80 per barrel in 2007 and then over $100 in 2008, high energy costs squeezed disposable income further.

        Even after discounting for the overvalued stock market at the end of the Clinton Administration in January 2001, the stock market has still declined, in real terms, as President Bush leaves office in January 2009. That's eight years, no gain in Dow.

        The current recession is already the worst since the 1981-1982 Reagan recession and many economists say the U.S. will be fortunate to enter a recovery by Q4 2009. Very fortunate.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (March 25, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
             

          The current recession is already the worst since the 1981-1982 Reagan recession and many economists say the U.S. will be fortunate to enter a recovery by Q4 2009. Very fortunate.

          Nice try.  That recession is understood to be firmly in J CARTER'S lap.  


          Report Abuse
          • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (March 25, 2009 4:28 pm ET)
               

            Nice try.  That recession is understood to be firmly in J CARTER'S lap.

            Just as the current "recession" belongs firmly in the hands of Bush and the Republican party! The same Republican party that controlled the ENTIRE government for 6 out of 8 years! The same Republican party that controlled Congress from 1994 till 2006!

            It's good to know that you REALIZE and UNDERSTAND that Obama has been president for less than 100 days AND he inherited the current economic disaster we're in from Bush and the Republican party.

            Thanks!

            Report Abuse
    • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 24, 2009 10:17 pm ET)
         

      Limbaugh likes the party line because it is far superior to the hate america,liberal, fabian crowd that is now in power.The Idea that Obama will sucseed is laughable. He is doing every thing in his power to bring us down, If we survive it will because we made it inspite of him.Sanders a patriot that is very tired of being lied too for 50 years by the fabian media.We conservitives are not weak we are right.the liberal sheep are being led to slaughter. And apparently joe you approve.  Why you hate our country is beyond me, Perhaps you could explain what the system Has done to make you hate it so.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 25, 2009 10:20 am ET)
           

        Posting it twice doesn't make it less loony.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 1:01 pm ET)
             

          You never made a mistake, Sure wish I was as smart as you.  Thou this way mybe the message eill sink in a little, You need al l the help that you can get.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 25, 2009 10:21 am ET)
           

        Why you hate our country is beyond me

        Why Wednesday follows Tuesday is beyond you.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 1:05 pm ET)
             

          I understand why one day follows another, Im still dont understand your hatred of the republic.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by louee (March 25, 2009 11:21 am ET)
           

        Has anyone advised you that you are completely insane?  If anyone "hates" our country it is you and your fellow fascists.  You're listening to way too much Rush.  Have you ever asked yourself why Obama would want to "bring us down"?  That is a really dumb, paranoid statement.  Please get a grip on yourself.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
             

          louie, In a few words  new world order. Wake up and smell the roses.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by opopop (March 25, 2009 11:42 am ET)
           

        It look like no matter what happens, if the country goes bad or tremendously well, which is doubtful I think Obama will succeed and fail in different times and activities of his presidency, like every president really, that Obama will always be blamed by some for anything, Rush Limbaugh isn't a credible source for information. From what I've gathered so far, correct me if I'm wrong please, but his views are applauded by the republican party.

        Please tell me who is the Republican party leader aswell?

        I have'nt listened to his radio show so I don't know the way it goes, but if anyone phones in or guests on the show, trying to debate any views of his is obviously pointless.

        He seems very, very bitter, that his idealogies of conservatism isn't shared by the majority, and maybe bitter that his former leader, George W. Bush, is pretty much viewed as a failure.

        If I was any of ye I'd say don't worry about Rush Limbaugh too much, he's like an angry drunk who you can either listen to and keep the peace, or just walk away to his own ramblings, trust me he'll be happy either way

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
             

          You have never listened to him, so that makes him not credible, Pull your head out of the sand and look around. So who do you think is credialble, I realy would like to know, I will go listen and make a decision.. I have yet to see any thing that disputes Limbaugh yet, Not counting peaple who never listen to him.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by opopop (March 25, 2009 2:38 pm ET)
               

            Oh good point Pattydon, my fault also I should have been clearer when making my own view.

            I have'nt listened to him as I said but what I should have explained is his radio show, or appearances on  T.V, except for a few minutes the night he said he wanted Obama to fail, and that was when I turned onto Fox and then switched off. Just letting ya know in case there's any specualtion that I watched another, liberal, T.V channell and I'm told that I was shown only a small part of the interview by far left liberals, I watched a bit and I chose to turn off myself, I could've kept listening.

            Now other reasons for what I've said is from reading transcripts and quotes by him, which on one hand I'd prefer to also have an audio recording so I could listen to his tone while making these speeches but I'm confident in making my decision with just reading.

            Things like the wanting Obama to fail, but even that would'nt sway me to dislike him, but other little things including his attempted comic parody of the song "Puff the magic dragon" with "Barack the magic negro"

            Still, two examples isn't enough for me to condemn a man, but finding some quotes attributed to him which are very narrow minded.

            "I mean lets face it, we didn't have slavery for over a 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite, slavery built the south, I'm not saying we should bring it back, I'm just saying it had its merits. For one thing the streets were safer after dark."

            But again, I would'nt be 100% sure of how accurate that comment is represented, is it out of context or not?

            The reference of Obama as Barack Ogabe, not right but some will say Bush was called much worse, and I won't argue due to reasons I won't go into unless asked.

            Ah!, the AIG thing, the mob with pitchforks I thought was funny, but ridicolous.

            Last one is kinda a full page on media matters, but its the bit regarding a 13 year old Chelsea Clinton, and regarding her as a dog.

            Now I would accept his reason of what happened, it was an accident, but his up front, constant attack on liberals overshadows my thinking that it could've been an accident, as he is fanatically republican.

            So, although I bet, there are republicans, and probably many more that are less well known than Rush, who make sense, and more importantly, communicate their oppostion to a liberal ideal, Rush's past, and probably future, rash and unproffesional style of expressing his views, and trying to promote conservatism, is poor at best.

            Oh and the link for media matters page with the Chelsea Clinton comment and others is

            http://mediamatters.org/items/200903030034

            Also, please by all means show me some negative liberal journalists  and their comments I'm not as invested in this to be a loyal to either side.

            To explain, in Ireland but have been caught interested by the media fighting in America.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 25, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
           

        Limbaugh is the party line.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (March 25, 2009 12:03 pm ET)
           

        The Idea that Obama will sucseed is laughable. He is doing every thing in his power to bring us down,

        Only if you're part of the 43rd reich.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (March 24, 2009 10:58 pm ET)
         

      I have conflicting feelings (irrational) about this whole "Limbaugh Watch".  He IS a dangerous man, but I hate to see him get so much attention.  It is really a problem.  To expose or ignore.  The more coverage he gets, the better he likes it.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by BISHAMON (March 25, 2009 2:23 am ET)
           

        I think the exposure of Limbaugh is a very good thing. Unfortunately, I think Limbaugh's alarmist views are probably shared by some powerful people in and out of government. Is Gen. Hayden still in a position of authority in the U.S. government? He always seemed like a possible Limbaugh fan to me.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 2:30 pm ET)
             

          I sincerly hope your right,, Hopfulyit listened too by a great many patriotic citizens.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by cpinva (March 25, 2009 2:19 am ET)
         

      interestingly, there is a recent poll showing the viewing statistics of limbaugh, hannity, o'reilly, olberman, colbert and stewart. limbaugh & olberman, arguably the most extreme of their genre, also have the lowest #'s, in terms of viewer/listenership and education levels. further, their audience is skewed to an older demographic: 45 to >60. they would both seem to have an affect far out of proportion to the actual size of their respective audiences.

      the two with the highest #'s? stewart and o'reilly, though stewart easily trounces o'reilly in terms of education levels and age demos. o'reilly, like limbaugh, skews towards a much older audience than stewart.

      but, by far the most fascinating statistic of all: nearly 60% of the respondents didn't listen to or watch any of them. what this means is that a very tiny % of the total population is making a lot of noise, especially with regards to limbaugh and olberman.

      this poll was done by (i think) a harvard prof., with two polls done, before and after the election. the data were nearly the same for both periods. odd, when you consider the heightened state of interest in this one.

      what i drew from the poll's results: 1. the less extreme seeming shows had the biggest audiences., and 2. none of these shows has a particularly large audience. certainly, not large enough to justify the attention they get.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by BISHAMON (March 25, 2009 2:26 am ET)
           

        That is interesting. I was just saying to myself today that Olbermann is the liberal equivalent of Limbaugh. KO is just OK with me. Not great. Just OK. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 25, 2009 10:23 am ET)
             

          I was just saying to myself today that Olbermann is the liberal equivalent of Limbaugh.

          Except for that pesky "backing up what you say with facts" thing. Olbermann does it, Limbaugh does not.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
               

            Limbaugh does not have to back up any thing, because is comments are directed to what the main stream news is censoring or distorting. It called listing to both sides and the truth wins. Unless your a liberal sheep that is.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 2:23 pm ET)
           

        40 percent is a small,very tiny,I dont guite understand your math. after 10 percent, It no longer tiny.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pattydon41.sanders3913 (March 25, 2009 12:34 pm ET)
         

      Hey, wing nut if you are ignorant of the fabian party in the us, Praticualy the state department, They have been running it since FDR. Beter look into it before making your self look Ignorant.  I like yhe way you try to shoot the messenger,

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 25, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
           

        Beter look into it before making your self look Ignorant. 

        That is fantastic advice!

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.