About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Gregory falsely equated Obama remark with McCain's "fundamentals of our economy are strong" comment

March 29, 2009 4:14 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: NBC's David Gregory falsely equated March 13 comments by President Obama with Sen. John McCain's September 2008 comment that the "fundamentals of our economy are strong." In fact, Obama did not comment on the broad "fundamentals" of the economy in his March 13 remarks.

26 Comments

During an interview with Sen. John McCain on the March 29 edition of NBC's Meet the Press, host David Gregory falsely equated March 13 comments by President Obama with McCain's September 2008 comment that the "fundamentals of our economy are strong." Gregory said to McCain: "On the economy -- I don't have to remind you -- during the campaign, you said that, as this financial crisis was really unraveling, as the economy was taking a dive, that the fundamentals of the economy were strong. You were criticized as being out of it, not getting it, not understanding the economy. And yet, just a couple of weeks ago, this was the president in the Oval Office." Gregory then aired a March 13 clip of Obama saying, "If we are keeping focused on all the fundamentally sound aspects of our economy ... then we're going to get through this. And I'm very confident about that." But as Media Matters for America has documented, in his March 13 comments, Obama did not comment on the broad "fundamentals" of the economy; rather, Obama cited specific "fundamentally sound aspects of our economy," including, "all the outstanding companies, workers, all the innovation and dynamism in this economy."

By contrast, Obama criticized McCain in September 2008 for broadly stating that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong." Following Obama's criticism, McCain revised his comments to claim that by "fundamentals," he had been referring to "the American worker, and their innovation, their entrepreneurship, the small business."

From Obama's March 13 speech:

OBAMA: If you've been laid off your job, if you've lost your home, then, you know, right now is very tough. But we're providing help along the way. That's why we put a housing program in place; that's why we're going to be announcing additional steps to help small businesses.

But if we are -- if we are keeping focused on all the fundamentally sound aspects of our economy, all the outstanding companies, workers, all the innovation and dynamism in this economy, then we're going to get through this. And I'm very confident about that.

From McCain's September 15, 2008, speech:

McCAIN: As you know, there's been tremendous turmoil in our financial markets and Wall Street, and it is -- it's -- people are frightened by these events. Our economy, I think, still the fundamentals of our economy are strong. But these are very, very difficult time. And I promise you, we will never put America in this position again. We will clean up Wall Street. We will reform government.

Following McCain's September speech, the Obama campaign immediately criticized McCain's remarks. In a speech in Grand Junction, Colorado, hours after McCain's remarks, Obama said, in part:

OBAMA: It's not that I think John McCain doesn't care what's going on in the lives of most Americans. I just think [he] doesn't know. He doesn't get what's happening between the mountain in Sedona where he lives and the corridors of Washington where he works. Why else would he say that we've made great progress economically under George Bush? Why else would he say that the economy isn't something he understands as well as he should? Why else would he say, today, of all days -- just a few hours ago -- that the fundamentals of the economy are still strong? Senator -- what economy are you talking about?

Numerous media outlets documented that McCain changed his message on the economy after the Obama campaign criticized his comment. Indeed, later that day during a campaign stop in Orlando, Florida, McCain said: "And my opponents may disagree, but those fundamentals -- the American worker, and their innovation, their entrepreneurship, the small business -- those are the fundamentals of America, and I think they're strong." During the same appearance, McCain also said: "The fundamentals of our economy are at risk. ... And those fundamentals are threatened, they are threatened and at risk because some on Wall Street have treated Wall Street like a casino.''

From the March 29 edition of NBC's Meet the Press:

GREGORY: On the economy -- I don't have to remind you -- during the campaign, you said that, as this financial crisis was really unraveling, as the economy was taking a dive, that the fundamentals of the economy were strong. You were criticized as being out of it, not getting it, not understanding the economy. And yet, just a couple of weeks ago, this was the president in the Oval Office -- watch.

OBAMA [video clip]: If we are keeping focused on all the fundamentally sound aspects of our economy ... then we're going to get through this. And I'm very confident about that.

GREGORY: What did you think when you saw that?

McCAIN: I think we're in agreement. I think what the president is saying now -- and it's needed to be said to the American people -- that we have the best workers, we're the most innovative, we're the most productive. We still have the fundamentals of a very strong economy and we need some confidence to get through this. We need -- that's part of the recovery. So, I'm glad we're in agreement.

GREGORY: But in the campaign, do you think that criticism was unfair?

McCAIN: Look, life isn't fair, we all know that.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mrhebert74 (March 29, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
         

      But wait... they both used the word fundamental. So they both meant the exact same thing. So Obama is a hypocrite. Ha! Gotcha, liberals!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (March 29, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
         

      Hey, Repubs, who needs Limbaugh?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (March 29, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
         

      This analysis of the republican budget made me laugh enough to go off-topic.  Spoiler:  the republicans are in favor of good things rather than bad things.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mr. l (March 29, 2009 5:46 pm ET)
           

        The article was funny, but the budget was HI-LAR-IOUS!  

        I like how they used the 'molecule' diagram three times- and all three make no sense.  And how can anyone take these people seriously when they quote some sick dude over in England in America's 'budget' proposal?  

        Besides all the inanity the 'pamphlet' is not written very well from a grammatical sense- there are errors, poor sentence constructions and run-ons. And that's not even mentioning their 'democrat' budget 'misspelling'.  

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Jim Rockford (March 29, 2009 5:17 pm ET)
         
      Gregory's republican leanings have been becoming more and more apparent. This morning all of his questions to Geithner were tough, with repeated followups, including asking the question about "shock" about the bonus payments 3 times. And then his questions to McCain were simple patty-cake questions based on republican talking points and designed to make McCain look as good as possible. If McCain didn't answer in a sufficiently hard core way Gregory would prompt him in that direction. Gregory was more eager than McCain to spin the situation rightward. Should be the guest doing the spinning -- not the host.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (March 29, 2009 6:05 pm ET)
         

      I think Gregory is already being pressured to not be "liberal"...as if he was...read in a Q & A column in Parade today--where he was supposed to respond to the idea that his "liberal" bias was showing, he responded that he tries to be objective.

      This is how the press gets conned into accepting Republican framing.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (March 29, 2009 6:17 pm ET)
         
      There goes that DARN liberal media again! Well, the of course, LOVE McCain. He's on 1 of the Sunday shows EVERY WEEK! Also, let us all point out that when McCain said the fundamentals of the economy are sound was when he refused to say that the country was in a recession. Instead of playing kiss A%% maybe Gregory should have asked McCain if he still thinks the U.S. economy is not in recession and is so, when it did it finally begin in his mind?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 29, 2009 8:40 pm ET)
           

        David Gregory made a new movie, loosely based on " Dances with Wolves ' except it is called " Dances with Rove " .

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 29, 2009 8:38 pm ET)
         
      I am sure the law of the Peter Principle will apply here, except they will promote him to a managerial position somewhere, never to be seen of heard from again.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tapley (March 29, 2009 10:11 pm ET)
         
      he leans so far right, he is almost laying down.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rdirkse (March 30, 2009 12:28 am ET)
         

      I did a lot of double takes when I watched the program.  David Gregory won't last

      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (March 30, 2009 4:01 pm ET)
           

        Don't be too sure, he works for General Electric...excuse me Universal, a division of GE and Vivendi.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 30, 2009 12:56 am ET)
         

      I have to share something I saw last week. Sean Hannity opened his show with a breathless segment about what a disaster Tim Geithner is and that Geithner has to be fired immediately. He brought on Fred Thompson and they both proceeded to trash Geithner for a few minutes. Then, as the segment was drawing to a close Hannity asked Thompson if he therefore agreed that Geithner had to be fired. To hannity's surprise Thompson said absolutely No!! ...that Geithner was the best qualified man for the job and that no other qualified person would take the position. I thought Hannity's jaw was going to hit the floor... :>)

      As for David Gregory's interview with Tim Geithner this morning, I saw it and although Gregory's questioning was pretty tough, Geithner handled himself well. Geithner's primary problem is that the Treasury Department is grossly understaffed at the moment, probably because of Obama's non-lobbyist policy.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 30, 2009 3:37 am ET)
           

        Obama won the election and he gets to put in whomever he wishes to fulfill his governance. I would like to hear the resons these loudmouths at FIOX want geithner to be fired for ? Give me a good debate on this.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dandrea (March 30, 2009 1:21 am ET)
         
      David Gregory is a neocon and I do not use the term lightly. Watch him. He's on a mission.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (March 30, 2009 5:11 am ET)
         

      It's called equivocation. Take a word, ignore the context and attempt to bury someone who dared to choose that specific word. In that spirit, Obama ought to have chosen basic, underlying, formative, elemental, vitals, principal, or essence. I also recommend McCain and Gregory kiss my fundamental. See, context IS everything.

      Randy

      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 30, 2009 11:47 am ET)
         
      "[W]e have the best workers, we're the most innovative, we're the most productive." I don't think any of those things are really true but if they are why does McCain support shipping us jobs overseas?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by right-winger (March 30, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
         

      ANOTHER KISS UP INTERVIEW WITH A REPUBLICAN. FIRST JOHN KING ON CNN AND NOW GREGORY. HEY LOOK ALL LAST WEEK WHEN THE MARKET WAS UP DOWN PLAY ON THE WHITE HOUSE NOW THAT OBAMA PUT OUT THE NEW PLAN FOR THE CAR COMPANYS LOOK AT THE HEADLINES ON ALL THE WEBSITES. HEY WE WILL BE HEARING WALLSTREET DOWN FALL AND OBAMA AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (March 30, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
           

        Hey, I agree with you so why are you screaming at us?

        Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.