Nicolle Wallace misrepresented Obama's remarks about U.S., European attitudes
SUMMARY: On Morning Joe, Nicolle Wallace falsely suggested that President Obama did not praise the U.S. and did not criticize Europe during a speech in France. In fact, during his speech, Obama criticized "anti-Americanism" in Europe and referred to "the good that America so often does in the world."
During the April 6 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, Daily Beast contributor Nicolle Wallace falsely suggested that President Obama did not praise the United States and did not criticize Europe during remarks he made on April 3 in France. Wallace stated, "[W]hy not go to Europe and brag on your country instead of standing there in his professorial way and saying sometimes we suck, sometimes we're OK. You rock, Europe. Please. ... He called us arrogant, dismissive, and derisive on French soil." In fact, in his April 3 remarks, Obama criticized both American and European attitudes toward each other, while also referring to "the good that America so often does in the world."
As Media Matters for America has noted, immediately after stating that "there have been times where America's shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive," Obama criticized "an anti-Americanism [in Europe] that is at once casual but can also be insidious." Obama continued: "Instead of recognizing the good that America so often does in the world, there have been times where Europeans choose to blame America for much of what's bad. On both sides of the Atlantic, these attitudes have become all too common. They are not wise. They do not represent the truth."
From Obama's April 3 speech, none of which was aired by Morning Joe during the segment:
OBAMA: In recent years we've allowed our Alliance to drift. I know that there have been honest disagreements over policy, but we also know that there's something more that has crept into our relationship. In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.
But in Europe, there is an anti-Americanism that is at once casual but can also be insidious. Instead of recognizing the good that America so often does in the world, there have been times where Europeans choose to blame America for much of what's bad.
On both sides of the Atlantic, these attitudes have become all too common. They are not wise. They do not represent the truth. They threaten to widen the divide across the Atlantic and leave us both more isolated. They fail to acknowledge the fundamental truth that America cannot confront the challenges of this century alone, but that Europe cannot confront them without America.
From the April 6 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:
MIKA BRZEZINSKI (co-host): You know, looking at this Pew poll that we showed at the top of the show in terms of support for the president's job approval rating in his first year -- not surprising. Republicans and Democrats, there's a big split, and it usually is with -- along party lines, except for Reagan. But this is an historic split, and perhaps one that is a little unexpected given what he promised as president.
WALLACE: Yeah.
BRZEZINSKI: Fair enough?
WALLACE: Yeah, but, look, he's very popular. He's over 60 percent. I think that's true, and I think that what's happening is, I think, some of the Republicans are kind of coming home. I think they're uncomfortable with the spending. I think they're uncomfortable with the domestic policy. I think they're just -- they're uncomfortable. Look, I think he had a chance, and I don't think he's made any giant blunders, but I think there have been missed opportunities.
And I watched his entire town hall in France -- because I was watching this program and it came on -- and, you know, to stand there and say America's been arrogant, we've been dismissive, we've been derisive, instead of standing there and saying, you know, we're not perfect but we're the greatest country in the world -- I think that's where you start to lose the Republicans. I think they truly believe in an American exceptionalism that is different from what Obama on this trip defined his as. He understands and can relate to nationalism, but I think at his core he does not seem to believe in American exceptionalism the way most Republicans define it.
BRZEZINSKI: I think that's possibly true that there's a big division there in terms of how we see ourselves. Although, I could see it as incredibly, I guess, constructive to be -- well, to admit where we need to improve.
WALLACE: Yeah, and look -- and I think -- you know, I believe that standing on foreign soil and saying anything other than, you know, we're not perfect, but we're the best darn example of a country that gives all it can give, that works as hard as it can work, and can be a great partner if you do your part -- I mean, put some skin in the game, Europe. You know, send some troops to Afghanistan. Instead, it's --
BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, I know -- 5,000 NATO troops --
WALLACE: -- you know, oh, we were bad, we were arrogant. But --
CARLOS WATSON (MSNBC political analyst): But -- but hold on.
WALLACE: But listen -- but he said --
WATSON: But he clearly --
WALLACE: -- but he said we should celebrate your unity. Well, look, like have a stamp? I mean, celebrate Europe day?
WATSON: All right --
WALLACE: It's stupid and ridiculous, and that's why he's losing Republicans.
WATSON: Well, first of all, I think that poll leaves something out, which is he's got 57 percent of independents, and a lot of the people who, 25 years ago, would have called themselves Republicans no longer call themselves Republicans -- call themselves independents. And so, it's a little bit misleading in terms of the gap --
WALLACE: You know, he's very popular.
WATSON: But -- and I think you're right, in terms of fundamental popularity. But I also think that we miss it if we say that he hasn't made any progress over the last week through that G-20 summit -- that you clearly saw France make movement and talk about being cooperative in that process. I think you clearly saw -- you say no?
WALLACE: Red-state America cares so much about France? I mean, I just, you know -- he's very popular --
WATSON: Of course you care --
WALLACE: -- and I think that goes ahead of it.
WATSON: -- more about France and about French troops --
WALLACE: Look, we --
WATSON: -- and about French cooperation on economics and trade. You say -- you say no?
WALLACE: We want to be liked, but we want be liked for --
WATSON: Forget being liked. You want more troops in Afghanistan, and you don't want --
WALLACE: And they're sending like thir --
WATSON: -- you don't want them overly subsidizing some of their industries --
WALLACE: -- they're sending like 20 to help with training. I mean, you know.
BRZEZINSKI: France -- NATO itself, I think, giving 5,000 -- a piddly 5,000 over the weekend --
WALLACE: For security, not for fighting.
BRZEZINSKI: -- for -- not even -- not even the support forces.
WALLACE: We're at war. You know, they can call it whatever they want. Mike Gerson had a great line on Meet the Press. He says "overseas contingency" sounds like a lost luggage retrieval operation. It's a war. We're at war against terrorism.
WATSON: That's so -- that's so --
WALLACE: We didn't start it, but we're at war.
WATSON: That's so easy to say that when all we've seen in the last several years is the reverse happen. We've seen that our supposed coalition of the willing pull troops out.
BRZEZINSKI: Should he use "war on terror?"
WATSON: At least we start seeing progress going the other way.
WALLACE: He should use whatever he wants, but he should keep this country on a war footing.
MARK HALPERIN (Time senior political analyst): Is he making mistakes on foreign policy that are giving your party a chance to have an edge on national security, like you've had for your whole career?
WALLACE: I don't know. I don't know. I don't think so.
BRZEZINSKI: I love your honesty.
WALLACE: I mean, you know, I don't know. But I -- and I don't think he's -- again, look, he's at 60 percent. He's very popular --
BRZEZINSKI: Yeah.
WALLACE: -- and he's very good, and Michelle is a national asset. But why not go to Europe and brag on your country, instead of standing there in his professorial way and saying sometimes we suck, sometimes we're OK. You rock, Europe. Please.
WATSON: Because I think we tried that and it didn't work.
HALPERIN: That's a paraphrase, right?
WALLACE: He called us arrogant, dismissive, and derisive on French soil. Oh, I almost died.
BRZEZINSKI: Oh my lord. I see it completely differently. And that's what I love about this show and you, Nicolle Wallace. Thank you very much for coming on.















Isn't that tradition? Didn't Bush ever bow to the Saudi King? Or did he stop at kissing and hand-holding?
ummm i thought that is protocol when greeting the Saudi king and that every head of state does that.
nope, he is the first head of the u.s. to bow to a foreign head of state, royal or not. he is witless and clueless, i am afraid.
Ring, hand or tuchas?
http://heliconia.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/bush-abdulah1.jpg
did she misrepresent his bow to the Saudi king.
No, but you just did.
I've seen the video. In my opinion, calling it a "bow" is inherently misleading, giving the impression that it was some gradiose gesture of sublimation. What I saw was barely more than a nod of acknowledgement.
And, as others have pointed out, Obama's gesture was FAR less than the Saudis have received from other Presidents in recent memory.
Hey, Deeznuts. I haven't even seen "the bow", but I've been on the road a lot the past few days, and getting the spin from the wingnuts. I've heard the words "prostrate", "submission", "surrender" and "worship" used to describe what I'm guessing was a polite diplomatic gesture. It's really getting sad, the lack of anything of substance the media has to contribute. And it seems to be effective, as demonstrated by at least one poster above.
Mike Gallagher had the funniest bedwetter panic attack, paraphrasing as closely as I can remember from this morning;
"I don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill, but American president's do not bow to Muslim leaders. And the fact that this president did should shake you to your foundations!"
Seriously, that's pretty close to what the douchebag said.
"I don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill, but American president's do not bow to Muslim leaders. And the fact that this president did should shake you to your foundations!"
Sounds like a whole lot of shakin goin' on with the righty talkers these days. Doin' Jerry Lee proud dadgumit. I wonder if dude knows how to play the piano with his rump.
He could probably kick up a racket with some Dick Van Dyke style knee cymbals, what with all that quivering.What an embarrassing bunch of pansies the far right have become.
and what about bowing to the Japanese emperor? is that unacceptable?
for a head of state, yep it is. macarthur was not a head of state, he was a governor or whatever title they gave him. also, he wore khakis, no tie, and the emperor came to mac's headquarters.
Troll.
Wow. Talk about a total and complete distortion of Obama's speech.
Please report the actual news and try to get it right..........if in fact that's what you claim is the business you're in.
Cherry picking lines from a speech isn't news
WHY didn't they call her on it. Why did they let her repeat it over and over again. The three of them sat there and let her present only one side of the argument. And her arguement sounded just like the GOP talking points. Just like Hannity truncating the speech to make it seem like he isn't proud of America. These people are either deeply partisan and obfuscating or they are idiots.
"[W]hy not go to Europe and brag on your country..."
Because that's not good diplomacy?
Because they've heard that for the last 8 years?
Lewis Black does an excellent routine along these lines. He says (paraphrasing), If you went to work every day, saying "I'm the best motherf*&^er here!", your co-workers wouldn't like you very much.
Same thing here...if the President were to go to Europe and say, "We're the best motherf*&^ers here!", it wouldn't be very well received. The Europeans have heard that the last eight years - and it's not good diplomacy.
Exactly sikvodoo, deeznuts and commonsenseliberal . . .
Wallace stated, "[W]hy not go to Europe and brag on your country instead of standing there in his professorial way and saying sometimes we suck, sometimes we're OK. You rock, Europe. Please.
Maybe Ms Wallace has been asleep for the past eight years . . .
"A good many of you are probably acquainted with the old proverb, “Speak softly and carry a big stick — you will go far.” If a man continually blusters, if he lacks civility, a big stick will not save him from trouble, and neither will speaking softly avail, if back of the softness there does not lie strength, power. In private life there are few beings more obnoxious than the man who is always loudly boasting, and if the boaster is not prepared to back up his words, his position becomes absolutely contemptible. So it is with the nation." Theodore Roosevelt - R
If only conservatives ever listened to the better Republicans that history had to offer.
ooops, my thinking got disconnected. Morning joe comedy hour. I did see her on FOX.
isn't this the same one who tried to get sarah palin to backstab McCain?
Makes sense, for Palin didn't need help doing that. Makes for interesting conspiracy theater for Nicolle wallace was a Bushie and Bush did not like Mccain.
Sith Lords always turn on themselves in the end
I just read elsewhere the Palin family turned on the kid that fathered a child with her daughter. Sounds like Mt Redoubt is not the only thing that erupted up north.
treachery is the Way of the Sith
Yeah, wolf; Sarah Palin claimed she was disappointed that Levi Johnston would make an appearance on the Tyra Banks Show "in a bid for [get this] fame, fortune, and attention."
Wow, Sarah . . . I have yet to hear of Johnston running for national office or getting a $150K wardrobe at taxpayer expense . . .
and continue to do so in 2012
In case you were wondering, POW--
"THE DANGEROUS AGE OF OBAMA IS UPON US!!!!"*
OK, I'll turn off Hannity now. But it's so much fun to watch the idiot screech.
*actual Hannity quote leading into the commercial, minutes ago.
"THE DANGEROUS AGE OF OBAMA"..Hannity forgot the Dawning..isn't that one of the songs from that new Broadway hit..."SMEAR". The story of long haired people, hippies/liberals and nudity on stage. The title song has words like:
'Smears, long , beautiful smears'...Do I have the right show?
Sounds like the play Hair, and the song The Age of Aquarius, were they together?
I say you're right.
"why not go to Europe and brag on your country"
Brag about what exactly? Historically, the US has done a lot of good for the world and Europe. Recently, what would there be to brag about? Serious question. Because if he had gone over amd just repeated again that the US was a great ally during WW2 and during the Cold War... well, that would have been true, but what would the point have been?
If a real relationship with the governments and people of other countries is expected, we have to look at the US from a realistic and foreign viewpoint. And that viewpoint right now doesn't really care so much about the Marshall Plan.
Mika's Dad is the only one who comes on with common sense mostly...
"why not go to Europe and brag on your country"
The Republican'ts spout off how patriotic they are and how much the love their country, etc. Isn't respecting the President of the United States, the very country they claim the "love" so much, count? How about showing respect to the very person that made a pledge to be not just those who elected him, but everybody's president and that he would fight for you too? How about showing true patriotism that way? Or is that reserved for Republicans? How about telling the truth instead of distorting the facts? Nicole Wallace, like so many others that has adopted her way of thinking (or lack thereof) still don't get it. The Republican party or Conservatives or whatever they wish to call themselves these days, not only continue to bash the President and his policies every chance they get, because either they won't take the time to understand them or they believe in blind ignorance -- Their Own! Blind ignorance gets these people exactly what Bush/Cheney left them --- BROKE, BUSTED and downright DISGUSTED!
Now, what exactly, should America being bragging about, Ms. Wallace, besides the election of Barack Obama? Hell, they all watched that so they knew he was elected and were very much excited about it. And guess what? They still are.
It's okay to agree to disagree. However, to disagree rather than admit you simply don't want or can't understand, is not advantageous. Surely, you Republican'ts learned this from the last election. Right?
Vey Good Point!!!! A critique of the Presient is always appropriate but that means a balanced assessment based on facts not just opinion based attacks.What we get on our current President more so than any others is a smear campaign with distortion of facts,maybe some out of context half-truths and many outrageous insights/opinions.Sometimes the attacks are beyond disrespectful.How can so many people that have been wrong so much on foreign policy(Cheney,Gingrich,Rove,Bolton,Rice ,Ms Wallace here ,etc) keep getting a platform to espouse more of the same and not even be seriously challenged!??
They should bring Mr. Bryzenski on this show more often!!!! Better yet let him co-host with Joe to show some balance for a change!!!