About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Outbreak: Limbaugh spreads Obama Derangement Syndrome

April 07, 2009 10:59 am ET

SUMMARY: Since President Obama's inauguration, Rush Limbaugh has made numerous baseless and ominous claims warning of what will happen if the United States adopts either Obama's policies or those pushed by other progressives, often while invoking fears of rising socialism, communism, and tyranny.

57 Comments

In an April 5 article headlined "Anti-Obama talk worries some on right," Politico reported that some conservatives are concerned that -- in the words of conservative author David Horowitz -- some conservative commentators have "Obama Derangement Syndrome." Politico noted that in a piece for Frontpagemag.com, Horowitz "warns that the criticism of Obama among some conservatives has approached 'over-the-top hysteria.' " The fears are well-founded. As Media Matters for America President Eric Burns pointed out in the Politico article, "[I]n recent weeks, [Rush] Limbaugh made a number of ominous claims about the country's fate, including saying that the White House is '[p]erfectly timed, perfectly programmed, perfectly educated to destroy capitalism ... and they're in the process of doing it.' "

Media Matters has compiled a list of statements Limbaugh has made since President Obama's inauguration, including baseless and ominous claims warning of what will happen if the United States adopts either Obama's policies or those pushed by other progressives, often while invoking fears of rising socialism, communism, and tyranny.

Attacks on Obama's policies

  • On January 22, Limbaugh told Fox News host Sean Hannity that with the election of Obama, "I'm very much concerned that our greatness is going to be redefined in such a way that it won't be great, that we're just going to become average. We cannot have this large a government role in the private sector, with so many people thinking that just because they're Americans they're entitled to things -- that this guy is gonna be passing them out, and keep this country great and innovative, full of entrepreneurs. This -- these things concern me."
  • On February 12, Limbaugh "thank[ed]" Obama for "doing the job that everybody expects of you, taking every tradition and institution that defined this country's greatness and trying to rip it to shreds."
  • On February 13, Limbaugh stated: "I want the stimulus package to fail, 'cause if this thing for the first time ever does what it never has done before, we're even worse trouble. If it becomes established that the federal government and the federal government alone can manage the economy and take over the private sector, then forget it, folks -- I'm looking for property in New Zealand, and I'm gonna put my money in Singapore."
  • On February 27, Limbaugh said, "The dirty little secret ... is that every Republican in this country wants Obama to fail, but none of them have the guts to say so; I am willing to say it." He added, "We want him to fail because we want to preserve our country as we found it. We do not want to see a successful attack on capitalism."
  • On March 10, Limbaugh, noting others' view that the current economic crisis is "a war," declared: "[I]f Obama is our general, this war is lost."
  • As Burns noted, on March 18, Limbaugh claimed that "everyone in the White House" is "[p]erfectly timed, perfectly programmed, perfectly educated to destroy capitalism ... and they're in the process of doing it."
  • Limbaugh also stated on March 18 that "the big point about this AIG business" is to "poison as many minds in this country as possible to capitalism and to corporate America. This is exactly the kind of thing Barack Obama and his team love: everybody hating corporate America, hating Wall Street, hating CEOs, hating executives."
  • On March 20, Limbaugh claimed that "this administration [is] targeting individualism. This administration in the Democrat [sic] Party have an all-out assault on capitalism, individualism, and freedom." He later said that Obama "wants everyone in finance ... to be hated. He wants people in that business to be hated. He wants people in that business to be suspects," and asked, "You don't think this guy has a bug up his dress ... chip on his shoulder about wealthy people?"
  • On March 24, Limbaugh declared of the Obama administration: "They are focused on the destruction of the private sector. They -- this is an all-out assault on capitalism."
  • On March 25, while referring to the "tyrannical mob" that purportedly fomented the AIG bonus outrage, Limbaugh stated to a caller whose husband works for AIG: "You've got the president of the United States lined up against your family. That's what you have to realize. The president of the United States has seen to it that busloads of protestors -- if they find out where your husband and you live -- will show up on a bus tour to protest you."
  • Similarly on March 25, Limbaugh told a caller who said her husband works for either a company that received bailout money or a subsidiary of such a company: "People want families like yours to suffer. They want you to understand how hard life is for them, and that's why they support Obama. Because they think Obama's gonna get your mind right." He added, "Obama is gonna take away from you all these things, and you're gonna have to find out what it's like to send your kid to a rotten school. And you're gonna have to find out what it's like to have your husband never be home. And you're gonna have to find out what it's like for the rest of them. That's what Obama's gonna do. He's gonna equalize things. He's gonna level the playing field."
  • On March 26, while criticizing Obama's response to a question about "when can we expect the jobs that have been outsourced to other countries come back," Limbaugh stated that Obama "is a gutless wonder; he is seeking as much chaos and depression among average Americans as he can get."
  • Also on March 26, Limbaugh claimed, "On Capitol Hill, the treasury secretary [Timothy Geithner] testifies before [Rep.] Barney Frank's [D-MA] committee on how he intends to destroy our capitalist system with Barney Frank banging the gavel in support."
  • On March 27, Limbaugh stated of Obama's economic policies: "I have warned you and warned you again: If President Obama succeeds with this, our nation fails. Our nation is unalterably changed for generations."
  • On March 30, Limbaugh said of the "Obama takeover of the GM plant": "[U]nderstand it has nothing to do with a personal animus about Obama. It's about the fact that we fear -- 62 million Americans fear by virtue of those who voted against Obama -- we love and we fear the loss of our liberty, the loss of our freedom. We fear a government tyranny. We fear any form of a dictatorship. We fear the notion that government has all the answers and will do everything necessary to solve every problem for individuals. It scares us."
  • Later on March 30, Limbaugh stated that "[b]ased on what we've seen with General Motors and the banks, if [Obama] fails, America is saved," adding, "Barack Obama's policies and their failure is the only hope we've got to maintain the America of our founding."
  • On March 31, Limbaugh quoted novelist Ayn Rand saying, "The man who speaks to you of sacrifice is speaking of slaves and masters and intends to be the master" and said, "That is President Obama." He later added, "President Obama says we all need to sacrifice for whatever reason -- this reason or that reason. What it means is we need to pay more. We need to have less affluent lives. We need to dial down our prosperity. And we need to give the money to him, not a charity."
  • On April 1, Limbaugh claimed that if Obama "causes chaos and unemployment in a Republican state, that helps him. President Obama is about chaos. He's about misery. He is about people being unsatisfied and frightened of the future so that they will turn to him for the solution, not Governor [Rick] Perry [R-TX] or [Gov. Sarah] Palin [R-AK] or [Gov. Mark] Sanford [R-SC]."
  • On April 3, Limbaugh claimed, quoting Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer, that Obama "wants to warranty your life." Limbaugh continued: "Anything that goes wrong, he will deal with, the government will fix. Anything, any injustice, any economic injustice, any kind on inequality, anything that's not fair that happens to you, the government will make it right. That's what he seeks." Limbaugh later added that "Krauthammer calls him the great leveler. This is -- basically, you have to destroy capitalism. You have to wipe it out and then you have to take everything from everybody you deem has too much, and then you have to redistribute. That's what he wants to do."

Attacks on Democrats, Democratic proposals

  • Also during his January 22 interview with Hannity, Limbaugh said, "What made this country great is the recognition by our founders that individuals are all created equal endowed with certain inalienable rights -- life, liberty, pursuit of happiness. If you look at the Democrat Party, are they for life?" Limbaugh then claimed that Democrats are "the party of abortion." He continued, "Liberty? These are the people that are trying to pass any law they can to restrict where you can go, what you can do when you get there, where you can eat, what you can eat, what you can smoke, when you can't smoke, what kind of baby you can have, all these things. Pursuit of happiness? I have yet to see a happy liberal. I have yet to see a happy Democrat. They're always angry about things."
  • On February 17, Limbaugh stated that "the very people trying to undermine the Constitution because it's an obstacle to them are the very people that we put in power lately, over the years, both at the state level -- some places, the city level -- and in some instances, at the United States government level, the federal level. The Constitution is under assault by people who just -- who find it restrictive and unpalatable." Limbaugh later asked, "How do you come to a compromise with people like that?" He continued: "Everybody said, 'We ought to compromise, Rush, bipartisanship, we got to all get along.' How do you do that? How do you compromise good versus evil? How do you compromise victory with defeat? As I said last week, should Jesus have made a deal with Lucifer? Should Jesus have made a deal with Satan?"
  • On February 19, Limbaugh likened Democrats to murderers, rapists, and "this Muslim guy" who "offed his wife's head." He told a caller that "liberal Democrats" "are gonna establish separate rules for themselves by which they live, such as there'll be a w-- able to not pay their taxes and work in government at high levels. They're not gonna be subject to whatever greenhouse gas laws there are." Seconds after, he said, "Forget Democrat. These people are liberal socialists now. They bear no resemblance to the Democrat Party of John Kennedy, for example. ... It's about power; it's about control. These people genuinely look out over this country from their lofty perch and they don't like what they see. ... At this point, I don't care about the why. They're not going to leave, they're trying to control it. At this point, the only thing is they must be stopped -- within, within the confines of our Constitution and the political arena of ideas. They must be stopped. I don't care why they see this country the way they see it. I don't care why a murderer does it. I don't care why a rapist does it. I don't care why this Muslim guy offed his wife's head."
  • On March 10, Limbaugh "expla[ined]" the Employee Free Choice Act by stating, "You are a small business employee. Your boss has a shop that is not union. After this legislation passes, one day Tony Soprano will walk in, with a lead pipe, and he will start beating people upside the head to vote to unionize, because you cannot vote in private." He went on: "Card check is a public vote on whether to unionize. So they send in a Soprano guy with a lead pipe aimed at your kneecaps, or your head, and they tell you it'd be a good idea if you participated in unionizing the shop. And then after they unionize the shop, they really couldn't care much less about your shop. All they want is your dues -- to be able to send it to the Democrat Party."
  • On March 18, Limbaugh stated of the threats AIG CEO Edward Liddy had been receiving over bonuses: "I'm sure these are deranged leftists from the Democrat blogs and so forth. Well, they're the ones that hate capitalists."
  • On March 19, Limbaugh compared Barney Frank to Joseph McCarthy by claiming that "McCarthy sat there on a committee, and was basically using the power of government to impugn -- legally or not, falsely or not -- private citizens. Barney Frank's doing the same thing, demanding their names be made public, that their bonuses be turned back."
  • Also on March 19, Limbaugh stated of the Obama administration, "I think as much of the capitalist system as they can destroy, they will. They will at least send it on a downward cycle, which creates the need for government." He added, "That's what this AIG business is about. This AIG business is about, 'Look it, these people are thieves.' "
  • Discussing the Employee Free Choice Act on March 19, Limbaugh returned to his earlier comparison and said, "Imagine this: You're working at your small business, and Tony Soprano walks in and -- got a lead pipe with him. And we're gonna unionize this place -- well, at least we're gonna vote on unionizing this place, and we're gonna -- we're gonna vote in public." He added, "Nobody wants their kneecaps busted. I'm speaking figuratively, of course. But this is the intimidation factor of publicly voting, not the secret ballot, which exists today."
  • On March 27, while referring to "predatory politicians," Limbaugh stated, "We keep hearing about toxic assets on Wall Street. ... The real toxicity is in the U.S. Congress. Barney Frank and [Sen.] Chris Dodd [D-CT] for example, just to name two, are toxic congressmen. They are toxic. They are poison members of our government."
  • On March 30, Limbaugh said: "Liberals, whether it's [Michigan Gov. Jennifer] Granholm or Obama, they want every one of us to make sacrifices. We have to suffer, and that's their version of life: suffering. We must all suffer. We must pay for the consequences of our prosperity, and the only way to fix things is with mass sacrifice, mass suffering." He continued: "Well, let me translate and define that for you. Mass sacrifice is tax increase upon tax increase upon tax increase upon loss of freedom upon loss of freedom. That's what they mean by sacrifice. You give up a little bit of you for the sake of the government growing large over you."
  • On March 31, Limbaugh claimed that a new piece of climate change legislation being drafted by Reps. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Ed Markey (D-MA) will "finish this country off."
  • On April 2, while discussing the proposed Pay for Performance Act of 2009, Limbaugh referred to "leftists ... talking about fairness" as "slave masters," stating that "[t]hey are going to decide what's fair. And their definition of fairness is everybody being the same -- equalization of outcomes, which means, as I love to constantly say, spreading misery equally."
  • After a caller asked about "card check" on April 3, Limbaugh again used mafia imagery: "Tony Soprano standing in your business with a baseball bat or a lead pipe, you as the business owner are not going to try to convince your workers to a) throw him out and decertify, because even if you throw him out, Tony Soprano's waiting outside the door when the employees leave."

Invoking scenarios of socialism, communism, and tyranny

  • A March 12 entry (subscription required) on Limbaugh's website stated that Obama's policies are "about 'social justice.' " It continued: "His education plan is Maoist (no surprise given the Ayers/Klonsky influence), and he is otherwise a Bolshevik. I'm also quite sure, given his character traits, that he would be a Stalinist if he thought he could get away with it ... and he's working on that, too. I wonder what the country will look like in his 10th or 15th year as president?"
  • On March 16, while discussing New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's letter asking for names of AIG bonus recipients and negotiators, Limbaugh asked, "Is [Cuomo] working out of the Reichstag or what? Does Albany have a Reichstag building in it? Or maybe there's a Kremlin in it. "
  • On March 20, pointing to reports of AIG executives seeking private security to protect them at their homes, Limbaugh claimed that we "now have mob rule the way it started in Nazi Germany." Minutes later, Limbaugh stated of the AIG clawback vote in the House: "We are not Soviet Russia and they are not the Politburo, but you can't tell the difference some days in the way they act, in the way they speak."
  • On March 24, Limbaugh stated of wanting Obama to fail: "Our opposition to Obama is indeed based on N-O. We say no to socialism. We say no to government berating the private sector for the purpose of taking it over. What's negative about that?"
  • Also on March 24, Limbaugh claimed that Obama is "taking away freedom incrementally, each and every day, making another big grab at it," adding, "That's not hypocrisy, that's tyranny."
  • On March 26, while discussing the upcoming Earth Hour, a climate change awareness initiative asking people to turn their lights off for an hour, Limbaugh called Obama an "extremist, tyrannical president," stating that "this level of emotional derangement, it's been present in this country for a long time, but, look with the election of extremist, tyrannical president, look at all of it that he's brought to the surface."
  • On March 31, while noting support for Obama in a poll, Limbaugh said: "Maybe we have descended into a nation that sort of loves the concept of soft tyranny. Maybe we have a majority of Americans that actually like it or are willing to support it."
  • Also on March 31, Limbaugh compared the United States to Venezuela, stating, "Look where we are today -- the government has taken over two automobile companies, have expressed purpose in getting rid of SUVs and trucks. They have." He added, "Same thing's gonna happen with health care, 'cause you can't have a change without a crisis, without a villain. Obama has to always be portrayed as the hero. Phony outrage fueled by all the president's men, the drive-by media, will turn the country upside down. We are Venezuela in the early years."
  • Later in his March 31 show, while claiming that the Obama administration wants Americans to "sacrifice" on their car choices, Limbaugh compared the administration to the Nazi Gestapo. After stating his theory that Obama wants to jack up gas prices and force hybrids on everyone, Limbaugh said: "Politics is why you can't get a car you really, really like or why they don't make as many as you really, really like because they're being forced to keep the Gestapo off their back. They're forced to manufacture cars that people aren't buying to keep the Gestapo off their back."
  • On April 2, Limbaugh claimed that "Obama is engaged in a slow surrender of United States' best interests, our national interests" at the G-20 summit. He later added that "this is being reported as a slam dunk, grand slam. [Obama's] the star of the show. ... But the truth of the matter is the socialists at the G-20 have prevailed, and Obama is, for all intents and purposes, one of them. It's not just the $1 trillion they have pledged, the G-20 nations to the IMF and the World Bank to ostensibly wipe out third-world poverty -- worldwide poverty and stabilize the world economy. These clowns wouldn't have the first idea about stabilizing anything. They're about destabilization."
  • Later in the April 2 show, Limbaugh aired a clip of Obama discussing the results of the G-20 meeting: "We made enormous strides in committing ourselves to comprehensive reform of a failed regulatory system. We agreed to increase transparency and capital protections for financial institutions. We're extending supervision to all systemically important institutions, markets, and products, including hedge funds. We'll identify jurisdictions that failed to cooperate, including tax havens, and take action to defend our financial institutions." Limbaugh claimed that "[t]his is what [French President Nicolas] Sarkozy wanted. This is what Sarkozy threatened to walk out over. This is -- this was already -- tax havens, hedge funds." He continued: "They're going to raise taxes. They're going to go out and create new tax cheats in order to get money from them. They're going to spend and spend and spend and spend. This is a global socialist big-time maneuver."
  • Limbaugh described Obama saying at the G-20, "As president of the United States, president of the American people, I have to convince the American people that their self-interest is tied to yours" as "socialist gobbledygook." He stated, "This is all just getting so -- it's frustrating and it's so dead wrong. Our self-interest is tied to who? Who? I get up every day, and I've got to wait to figure out what somebody else in the world is doing before I decide whether or not what I'm doing is going to work? Whether it's good for me or my country, our self -- what? Our self-interest? That must -- alternative fuels -- so we've got to get rid of oil so somebody else can come up with a new green technology. What is -- all this is socialist gobbledygook. It sounds just brilliant. It sounds just unified and compassionate."
  • On April 3, after stating that liberals are never satisfied, Limbaugh compared advocates of gay marriage and opponents of SUVs to "the Soviets" and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez: "They don't stop. It's like the Soviets. They didn't have four-year plans based on the service of term of their leader. They had forever plans, and if you had to, you know, take a year off, maybe a step back before you took two steps forward, then fine. But they had the objective, it was there, and whenever it got done was fine as long as you're always working for it." He continued, "Same thing with Hugo Chavez. Hugo Chavez taking over the banks now. Hugo Chavez nationalizing the oil industry. Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. We're getting an early sign of what Chavez did by watching things happen here. But they just -- they don't stop. They advance these ideas, and this is why an electoral majority needs to happen in order to defeat these people."
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (April 07, 2009 11:08 am ET)
         

      remember what limbaugh did after clinton's election in 1992?  he was running a "count" every day, "day 87 of america held hostage".  [he dropped that after the oklahoma city bombing by timothy mcveigh.]   the problem is that on the one hand people say "he's just an entertainer".  but he doesn't claim to be just an entertainer.  he says i'm your newspaper, you don't need to listen to anyone but me.  he says i will never lie to you [except about being a drug addict of course].

      Report Abuse
      • Author by shoes89 (April 07, 2009 2:03 pm ET)
           

        It must be a really s ... l ... o ... w day for "conservative misinformation" when MM is agreeing with David Horowitz and posting just another anti-Rush article.

        ^

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jwcoop715110 (April 07, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
             

          Nah, it's never a slow day for conservative misinformation.

          Clearly, ignorant trash by ignorant trash for ignorant trash is a growth industry.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by atcross (April 07, 2009 11:35 am ET)
         

      What these demagogues either don't get or don't care about is that there's just enough unbalanced malcontents like McVeigh out there feeding on this crap to fuel something violent like the kid in Pittsburgh who killed three last week. There's nothing you can do about it but expose them to the general public, make this observation, and put peer pressure on people who listen to stop listening and take away his pay check. Keep up the good work.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (April 07, 2009 11:38 am ET)
         

      If socialism, communism and/or tyranny would mean taking away all of Rush Limbaugh's money, toys and health care benefits, and making him work for a living, then I'm all in favor of communism, socialism and/or tyranny.  ;>) 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by CdaLuni861563 (April 07, 2009 11:58 am ET)
         

      Maybe I'm just waking up, but I just do not get hate for the sake of hate.  You can disguise it anyway you want, but it's still there.  I used to wish that people like him were off the air.  I talked with my 93 year old grandfather and he told me these people were great to listen to.  He said the loudmouths weren't the ones to worry about.  It's the quiet ones who sit in positions to enact what these hatemongers think are the ones to worry about.

      He may boast big numbers, but I believe that there are more listeners than he'll admit to that listen/watch with kind of a cartoonish interest.  Just for the shock value of ignorant speech.  Maybe it's just the idealistic liberal inside of me.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by thejbomb65 (April 07, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
         

      this coming from a guy calling feminists "femanazis"

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 07, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
         

      Every time LIMBAUGH opens his mouth he continues to prove what a worthless piece of garbage he really is.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (April 07, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
         

      Here's the thing. With folks like Horowitz who break down their commentary, and actually do substantial work in criticizing President Obama, and back up their claims with facts, and actual numbers, I've got no problem with that. I may disagree, or agree with them.

      People like Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, Savage, and others are not coming at Obama from a critical perspective at all. They are just throwing out red meat to their minions and followers, and have nothing to substantiate their outrageous claims and opinions. If you're going to criticize, break it down for us, tell us why you think what he's doing is bad, and back it up with facts and numbers and figures. But what they're doing is just throwing out words that sound bad, and shouldn't even be in the same sentence together. Marxism, socialism, communism, fascists, and so on. 

      I had been accused in the past of having Bush Derangement Syndrome when he was in office, but alas, I look back now, and see that the criticizing that I did was based on facts, and I wasn't just throwing out some "ism" words because I didn't like Bush. Indeed, no, I did not like him, or where he took our country (seems as though I was in the majority of this one at the end of his 2nd term by the way), and I had substantive criticisms about his policies. All these folks have is red meat, and that's it. They apparently have no critical thinking skills.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Timmee (April 07, 2009 8:15 pm ET)
           

        Yeah but have you been to FrontPage Magazine lately. Horowitz wrote an article telling everyone to chill out...that Obama was our President...etc

        The responses he got back were the most telling. Sometimes you can't turn these people off. If you tell them that Obama is a Marxist, Communist, Nazi who is invading and polluting your bodily fluids, you can't just tell them to be civil about it. Be civil about a baby murdering, non-American born Muslim who is destroying America? I think not.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by kazport (April 07, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
         

      Liberals still have Bush derangement syndrome just tune in to MSNBC. They still have Bush in their lead-in commerical. It just amazes me how Rush Limbaugh bothers the left. You are giving him the best ratings he has ever had. The DNC spending money on the Rush billboard truck was the lowest. If thats what they can spend their money on then I feel really sorry for them. I would donate the money to some worthy cause. Rush has raised 1.7 million dollars for Leukemia and has himself donated 1/4 of a million for this one cause alone. he also has had numerous fund raisers for our troops and continues to be one of the most generous donators to many causes.  We that listen to Rush or support what his ideology is are not stupid. We are the 50% that did not vote for Obama and still beleive he is taking this country down the wrong path. We will continue to voice our objections and will not be silent. The left has MSNBC, ABC< NBC< CBS<CNN and yet want more. Because we are the oppostion we don't deserve to have a voice?

      IT IS STILL A DEMOCRACY,. AT LEAST THE LAST TIME I CHECKED.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (April 07, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
           

        Liberals still have Bush derangement syndrome

        That's because his mis-deeds are having long lasting effects. 

        The left has MSNBC, ABC< NBC< CBS<CNN

        Now that's funny!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (April 07, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
             

          "The left has MSNBC, ABC< NBC< CBS<CNN

          Now that's funny!"

          Yeah, it sure is considering that those outlets show up here all the time being called out for parroting rightwing garbage.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (April 07, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
           

        With both the legislative and executive branches belonging to Democrats, Limbaugh is going to have higher ratings anyway.

        Limbaugh donating to charity doesn't mean he can make inflamatory comments.  Limbaugh listeners are not 50% of voters either.  He is not popular among the general public.

        All the networks you list are mentioned here as guilty of conservative misinformation quite often, and all are owned by corporations which benefit from conservative policies.  Bob Schieffer was a friend of the Bush family, and Brian Williams is a Limbaugh fan.  The left "has" nothing of the sort.

        Nobody's said that the opposition doesn't deserve to have a voice.  People are allowed to criticize you for the nature of your rhetoric, though.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 07, 2009 4:49 pm ET)
             

          Let's be very clear though: during the Bush Misadminstration, the Republicans who held both the House and the Senate basically told Democrats to sit down and STFU.

          And now Republicans are crying for their voices to be heard?  Sorry righties...your worthless candidate lost the election (thank GOD for that).  Get over it.  So, either get busy and actually work with the party in power to get us back on track, who is actually willing to let your voices be heard (unlike when hypocritical Republicans were in control) or sit down and STFU.

          At least lefties allow rightie voices to be heard - even when they don't deserve it.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (April 07, 2009 5:10 pm ET)
               

            Republicans did dismiss Democrats, I agree.  I think Democrats should make efforts to compromise with Republicans (which means Republicans actually have to vote for the resulting bills), but it's very hard to sympathize with complaints that they aren't doing so.  "You reap what you sow" and all that jazz.

            I was speaking more to commentary.  We always get this, no matter how ridiculous and reprehensible the quotes, someone comes along and says we're just trying to silence the opposition.  The problem is this idiot telling people that Obama wants to destroy capitalism, not simply that he disagrees with our philosophy.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by creeksneakers2 (April 07, 2009 1:07 pm ET)
           

        Limbaugh doesn't believe in Democracy.

        He tried to sabotage the Democratic Presidential Primaries this year.  He pushes lies about ACORN which are designed to cover up GOP voter intimidation. Where was Rush on counting all the votes in Florida?  The Florida GOP legislature said they were going to give the election to Bush no matter who had the most votes. Rush didn't complain about that.

        In fact, Rush advocates a one party state with unlimited power, as long as its his side that is runnning it. He's often talked about destroying the Democratic Party. He's poisoned our national discourse by fooling his listeners into thinking he tells the truth and that everybody else is lying. 30% of the public is sold on whacked out lies that come from Rush.

        He destroys people who disagree with him.   He may not call for government censorship, but is totally fine with ending debate.  Rush monopolizes his air time and allows no fair hearing for other points of view.

        By the way,  less than 50% of the public voted against Obama.  And those news outlets you think are so liberal? Come around Media Matters more and follow the coverage.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 07, 2009 9:10 pm ET)
             

          CREEKSNEAKER, I  agree with everything in your last post.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (April 07, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
           

        kazport, I think you fail to realize that some people want Limbaugh on primetime so his voice can be heard throughout the land. Since he has been knighted as the Leader/Mouthpiece of the Republican Party, his words are getting out to people who only hear clippings of his nonsense. And people are learning that this guy is Barnum on steroids(there, I was nice and didn't mention that he is a drug-addict). His lies and misinformation are cruel and hate filled. The curtain has been removed and the true Rush Limbaugh is being revealed to all Americans, not just those who follow him blindly.

        Ratings, pshaw...who cares except the advertisers. High ratings mean more dollars to advertise. The company spends more on advertising which in turn forces them to raise their prices on their goods..just like Sports advertising. It is capitalism at its finest. And this means more money for Rush, God Bless him for that. But remember where his money comes from...the public and those who lost their jobs so he could be paid.

        I like the Bush Derangement Syndrome ever since the Republican leaders have been suffering because of it..and many have caught this happy disease.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jamesB (April 07, 2009 1:31 pm ET)
           

        you hit it kaz, and it drives liberals nuts.  they have never been able to compete with Rush or talk radio and it grates so under their skin only to their detriment.  They whine and complain and moan and monitor his every word and it only emboldens him more to keep at it.  If they weren't so collectively clueless they would see that.  But their intolerance and hatred for him blind them to any rational thought, so they go on and on, and then complain about corporations owning radio stations and they don't like liberals either, and all this conservative information running around, it's just not fair to liberals.  Yet they control every branch of government and they still whine and can't figure out how that is far more important to their cause than some loudmouth on talk radio.  liberal crybaby syndrome, when is someone going to write a column about that?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (April 07, 2009 1:37 pm ET)
             

          Who was complaining about "conservative information"?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jwcoop715110 (April 07, 2009 2:46 pm ET)
               

            That would make it an oxymoron by an oxy-moron for morons.

            There's a certain symmetry to that. Just play it as it lies with the dimwitted ditto heads. They always leave it sittin' up nice, clean, high and fluffy for ya.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (April 07, 2009 1:39 pm ET)
             

          And the point of bringing up corporations is simply to point out that the left doesn't control the MSM.  Not sure how you missed that.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by jamesB (April 07, 2009 1:41 pm ET)
             

          conservative misinformation

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (April 07, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
               

            Oh, so you think it's all fine and dandy that people are spreading conservative misinformation around because Democrats control government?  Otherwise, what's your point?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (April 07, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
                 

              jimmy likes liars.  Makes him feel better about himself.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by westla (April 07, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
               

            Brab makes a good point, what is your point?  Correcting conservative misinformation is an important function, regardless of who controls government.  I don't understand why you won't answer him, or clarify why you think it's "whining"?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jamesB (April 07, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
                 

              correcting conservative misinformation, or liberal misinformation are fine and dandy, and important.  crying about what Limbaugh's opinions or rants of the day are is nothing but whiny, crybaby nonsense.  As for Brab, he knows why I don't respond to him anymore.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (April 07, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
                   

                "But their intolerance and hatred for him blind them to any rational thought, so they go on and on, and then complain about corporations owning radio stations and they don't like liberals either, and all this conservative information running around, it's just not fair to liberals.  Yet they control every branch of government and they still whine and can't figure out how that is far more important to their cause than some loudmouth on talk radio."

                "correcting conservative misinformation, or liberal misinformation are fine and dandy, and important."

                Unless it comes from some loudmouth on talk radio, in which case liberals shouldn't care.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by westla (April 07, 2009 2:33 pm ET)
                   

                Well, I suppose it comes down to how negligible or not the difference is between information and opinion.  Limbaugh speaks his opinions, but often times they come out of misinformed "facts" so in that vein it is appropriate to correct him in this forum. I don't see that as whining, but setting the record straight.  If his opinions take a hit in that correction, that is his problem for poorly sourcing his opinion.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 07, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
                     

                  Don't expect Republicans to care about setting the record straight - as long as they win, they don't care.

                  Now that they are the loser party, they seem to whine more and more.

                  Freakin' crybabies, the lot of them.

                  Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (April 07, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
                   

                We all know why you don't respond to him. I think it's because he exposes your foolishness.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 07, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
                     

                  I think it's because he exposes your foolishness. - congero

                  That, in itself, shows that jamesB knows that what he is saying is down right stupid - but he does it anyway.

                  Maybe he's a masochist?

                  Report Abuse
              • Author by mefirst (April 07, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
                   

                more whining by jamesb?  a guy who doesn't agree with anything this site does, or the way they do it, and he just hangs around everyday to complain. 

                Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (April 07, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
             

          jimmyb, "write a column about that?"  You just did. Hopefully someone esles' will make more sense.

          jimmyb, you've been around here long enough to know that Limbaugh is considered a clown and a liar. Just because posters continuously point that out doesn't me he is driving ANYONE NUTS. I think it is the opposite. Rush is reaching further and further down his barrel of lunacy to find something that sticks. His rhetoric is getting meaner and meaner as he finds that only his dimwit heads believe him. And I know a few who have sworn off the Great American Hater. Really, he hates 72% of the country, what else ahould he be called?

          You and kaz have your opinions but based on what?? What Rush says?? I think not but you do support his hatred.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jamesB (April 07, 2009 1:52 pm ET)
               

            you and others just made my point. He is a clown, and a liar, and not very popular with the American people except his loyal dittoheads - so all the fretting about him around here just illustrates my point, he drives liberals nuts because they can't shut him up.  They would never admit that, but that is what they really want.  anyway, I was just responding to kaz's email because he made some very good points that obvious sting a few around here, and they don't like that.  oh well.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (April 07, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
                 

              James:"He is a clown, and a liar, and not very popular with the American people except his loyal dittoheads"

              Kaz:"We are the 50% that did not vote for Obama and still beleive he is taking this country down the wrong path"

              James:"I was just responding to kaz's email because he made some very good points that obvious sting a few around here, and they don't like that."

              Apparently Kaz is one of the loyal dittoheads you don't care for very much, but yet his points are "very good".

              Report Abuse
            • Author by princeofwheels (April 07, 2009 2:06 pm ET)
                 

              jamesb...Who is fretting about Rush Limbaugh? It is his vile, hateful rhetoric that people don't like. There is a difference between the two. I personally want Rush exposed to all Americans so they can see the nonsense he puts out.

              On another thread today I mentioned that Rush and Fox news will destroy themselves through the FOXLESS DOCTRINE, their form of Suicide on the installment plan. They are destroying themselves but a little push won't hurt.

              At least we agree..he is a liar but not a very funny clown.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne (April 07, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
               

            POW, that's the meme of Jimmy B and my boy, J2 (God bless his handsomeness), that Rush and Coulter drives us Liberal types plum INSANE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

            Report Abuse
            • Author by princeofwheels (April 07, 2009 2:08 pm ET)
                 

              I just order a cuckoo clock. Instead of a cuckoo bird, a little fat Rush comes out and gives the wrong time. But he is right twice a day.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by juliajayne (April 07, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
                   

                I'd rather have a pole cat come out and spray me twice a day..............;-) Less stanky.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by princeofwheels (April 07, 2009 2:26 pm ET)
                     

                  I want to see someone reply to that post. My keyboard has become letterless. They all disappeared.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by juliajayne (April 07, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
                       

                    C'mon, blondie blue. Surely you're not without speech. :-)

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by juliajayne (April 07, 2009 7:10 pm ET)
                       

                    Okay, what do ya say about that cat Limbaugh on a stripper pole? Any better? No?

                    Report Abuse
                • Author by eweston8542983 (April 07, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
                     

                  I'm stunned that JJ would consider taking a pole cat out of its natural envirenment. But mostly I'm wonderring how you would get the animal to cooperate twice daily....probably dangerous information that would do me no good. ;o) 

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by juliajayne (April 07, 2009 8:35 pm ET)
                       

                     But mostly I'm wonderring how you would get the animal to cooperate twice daily...

                    Dear sir, you have asked Chicago's question 67 and 68. :-0)

                    Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne (April 07, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
             

          liberal crybaby syndrome, when is someone going to write a column about that?

          Dude, make a broken record. Or write that column, boy. :-0)

          Report Abuse
        • Author by jwcoop715110 (April 07, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
             

          "you hit it kaz, and it drives liberals nuts.  they have never been able to compete with Rush or talk radio and it grates so under their skin only to their detriment."

          Well, if you don't count facts, reality or elections, I suppose you might have a point, james. 

          Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 07, 2009 4:51 pm ET)
             

          Project much?

          Report Abuse
        • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 07, 2009 9:13 pm ET)
             

          JAQMES, You must still be living in RUSHWORLD. Your lst post was complete bunk.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (April 08, 2009 2:56 am ET)
             

          "some loudmouth on talk radio."

          A "loudmouth" that the entire Republican party is beholden to.  A "loudmouth" that is to be bowed before and begged for forgiveness should you be a Republican that is brave enough to criticize him in the media.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (April 07, 2009 2:41 pm ET)
           

        50% that did not vote for Obama!?!?!?  You mean the election was a draw? And you say your not stupid?!?!?  I must beg to disagree!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (April 07, 2009 3:30 pm ET)
           

        You mean, you were one of the 46% that voted for McCain. Big difference there between 46 and 50 percent, but hey, whatever.

        And because Rush raises money for tax write off purposes no doubt, this somehow makes him a good person? Why doesn't he donate MORE of his money. He makes close to 40 million per year, 1.7 million is but a mere pittance of his salary for talking on the radio. Surely, he could spare some more, I mean, if he was SOOO benevolent. 

        MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, and CNN are liberal? HA! Man, that was the best one that I've heard all day long. You claim you deserve to have a voice, sure, why not? But, you guys are the ones that are always telling us how high Rush's ratings are. How high FoxNews' ratings are (and they are allegedly). When you have the market cornered on talk radio shows, and cable news, how much more "voice" do you want?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (April 08, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
             

          "You mean, you were one of the 46% that voted for McCain. Big difference there between 46 and 50 percent, but hey, whatever."

          You gotta remember, mag:  when it comes to wingnuts, basic math is not their strong suit [see 2000 US presidential election.]

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (April 07, 2009 7:31 pm ET)
           

        We that listen to Rush or support what his ideology is are not stupid. (Kazport)

        Classic.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (April 08, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
           

        "The left has MSNBC, ABC< NBC< CBS<CNN and yet want more."

        UH-OH . . . somebody better tell

        Chris Matthews

        Jake Tapper

        Campbell Brown

        Lou Dobbs

        that they're all LEFTIES . . .

        Report Abuse
    • Author by yankeefan19252745 (April 08, 2009 6:56 pm ET)
         

      Dear Sirs,

        Since when have corporations been for free enterprise?

        Didn't Teddy Roosevelt speak out against the power of trusts?

        What capitalist wants to see a competitor use capitalism against him?

        Clifford Spencer

      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.