Post reports GOP criticism of HHS vacancy, but not GOP's role
SUMMARY: The Washington Post allowed Bush HHS Secretary Michael Leavitt to criticize the Obama administration for not having an HHS secretary in place, but did not note Senate Republicans' role in delaying nominee Kathleen Sebelius' confirmation vote.
An April 28 Washington Post article on "the growing swine flu crisis" reported that President Obama "has yet to fill 15 top positions at the health department or name a full-time director for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and five more nominations -- including that of former [sic] Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius to be HHS Secretary -- are waiting to be confirmed by the Senate." The article, by staff writers Michael D. Shear and Spencer S. Hsu, quoted Bush Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt saying, "Without a Secretary of HHS, this will begin to be managed in ways that will be inconsistent with its nature." However, while allowing Leavitt to criticize the Obama administration for not having an HHS secretary in place, Shear and Hsu did not note that Republican senators have delayed a vote on Sebelius' nomination.
As Media Matters for America has noted, Sebelius is "waiting to be confirmed by the Senate" because Republican senators objected to a unanimous consent request by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) that sought to have a vote on her nomination on April 23. In an article that day noting that Republicans had blocked a vote on Sebelius, the Associated Press reported: "The head of the Republican Party called on President Barack Obama to withdraw Kathleen Sebelius' nomination as health secretary unless she answers more questions on abortion." A Senate vote is currently scheduled for April 28, with 60 votes needed for confirmation.
From the April 28 Washington Post article:
As they confront the growing swine flu crisis, President Obama's administration is attempting to implement a never-before-tested pandemic response plan while dozens of key public health and emergency response jobs in the administration remain vacant.
The president has yet to fill 15 top positions at the health department or name a full-time director for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and five more nominations -- including that of former Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius to be HHS Secretary -- are waiting to be confirmed by the Senate, officials at the department said.
[...]
"Having the top 20 unfilled is a significant problem for the long term," said Michael Leavitt, the HHS Secretary under President Bush. He praised the work of the civil servants, but said the Obama administration "needs to give this priority. Vetted people need to be sent to the Senate. And the Senate needs to respond."
An immediate pandemic outbreak would pose immense challenges to a presidential team operating without much experience and without a long-standing plan. A National Pandemic Strategy and Implementation Plan was developed in 2005 and 2006, but has never been fully tested.
In some ways, such a scenario would combine the test posed by the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, which occurred eight months into the administration of former president George W. Bush at a time when many key Justice Department and intelligence positions were vacant, and Hurricane Katrina in August 2005, which struck just one year after a national response plan was overhauled.
"The fact is it didn't measure up," former Bush homeland security advisor Frances Fragos Townsend said in a Feb. 2006 review of the Katrina response, saying the confusing and overly bureaucratic National Response Plan "came up short."
Leavitt, who led the government's development of the pandemic plan following an avian flu outbreak in 2005, said the crisis needs to be managed at the federal level by health professionals, not homeland security officials.
"Without a Secretary of HHS, this will begin to be managed in ways that will be inconsistent with its nature," he warned in an interview Monday. "If you were managing this out of Commerce, it would all be about trade. If it were Treasury, it would all be about the flow of money."
White House officials dismissed questions Monday about the team confronting the potential pandemic. Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters that he is confident that the administration is ready to handle the crisis.
"Our response is in no way hindered or hampered by not having a permanent secretary at HHS right now," Gibbs said. "Dr. Besser and thousands of people both at CDC and throughout HHS are responding to this ... We feel confident with the team that is there now."















Idiots. Then stop friggin' BLOCKING her appointment and friggin' threatening fillibuster.
Another example of a lack of context or balance because conflict and TMZ-style he said/she said is all the media can handle.
Push Sebelius' confirmation now and let the GOP tie up the Senate with their nonsense.
I just want to see the news. First news' story Swine Flu outbreak -- up next the Secretary of HHS confirmation blocked by the GOP. Now, is the perfect time to ram Sebelius through over the GOP objections.
They have no valid objections anyway.
They need to block her appointment, and fillibuster as long as necesary. With her extreme left views on abortion she is not fit so serve.
I hope you realize that her "extreme" views are held by a majority of Americans. Your views are the minority in this country.
I guess POV doesn't realize that Sibelius will have no input on any policy involving abortion.
What are her "extreme left views" on abortion?
(This ought to be good)
Very simple. Most americans do NOT support partial birth abortion.
That interesting considering that Kansas' abortion rate has gone down during her tenure. If she truly "supported" partial birth abortion, or abortion in general, it stands to reason that she wouldn't have been working to reduce them.
Aw, too bad.
As Nelson Muntz would say, "Ha! Ha!"
Simple ignorance. The bills that Sebelius vetoed were because they included nothing for the health or welfare of the mother or they opened up the medical records of patients. We know, you and O'Reilly are all for protection of privacy unless it is the medical records of someone you disagree with.
Now that y'all have pushed Specter out of the republican party, we are waiting in breathless anticipation for Snowe to follow. 61 is a good number, dontcha think?
It seems that I'm not alone in that line of thinking...
Sometimes I wonder why Mrs. Snowe just doe not switch parties...
Short of being in full lock step with this new breed of GOP...what is the point in wasting ones time with that party!
They have been and will be completely out of touch with reality... I also include FoxNoise and all FoxNoise affiliates, FoxNoise (ongoing) guests and watchers... and certain radio personlities... I think we know which ones I speak of.
-- Now that y'all have pushed Specter out of the republican party -- snoop
The republican party didn't push him anywhere...he's been hiding in plain site for years with beliefs that are more in tune with the democrat party. The American Conservative Union gives him a lifetime rating of only 44.
Snowe? I'll make you a package deal...you can have Snowe and her roommate Susan Collins...and good riddance.
Democrat Party, Oh please. Isn't that a little childish.
Yes, that's the Republican's problem. Too dang moderate.
I'm sure glad laughter doesn't cause my ass to ache.
There is no such thing as a Democrat Party. Brainwashed hiveminders that arent bright enough to know that cant be taken seriously as they have a petulant, petty, childs perspective on pretty much everything
You surprise me Wes. Since when does the Republican Party only contain conservatives?
Since Specter has been a Republican have his views changed that much or is it the Party that's changed? Specter has been a Republican longer than many of todays Republicans have drawn breath.
If either party chooses to exclude centrists then that party deserves to go the way if the Whigs.
Until they start being more inclusive and less willing to be led around by a morally challenged draft dodger, the Republican Party will continue to dwindle.
It shouldn't surprise you, king.
I've expressed dissatisfaction with the republican party for a long time. In fact, snoopy correctly identified me a few weeks back as a RINO...and he was correct.
I'm a conservative...period...and today's republican party offers less and less. I guess I really should change my registration to independent since I would never consider the democrat party and the party that I have been a member of for a long time has lost its way.
The republicans tried to be "inclusive" by nominating numnuts McCain instead of a real conservative...and you know how well that turned out.
Has Specter changed? No. He's always been more liberal than conservative...and you're welcome to him.
Of course you wouldnt you are a cumb petulant petty child who enjoys being a jerk. I say the ReNAMBLAcan pary is for you
He was gone along time ago. The man has always lacked a spine. He should feel right at home now.
"The man has always lacked a spine."
I guess not being in lock-step with the Republican party is "spineless".
What he lacked was the lobotomy that would be necessary for all the far right nonsense to make sense to him. So...Yours went ok then?
Let's not forget that Specter is coming back to the Democratic Party.
Will you please take McCain and Snowe with you as well. Just allows us to put a real conservative in place.
That is YOUR opinion and you are welcome to it. Time again to remind you about the ELECTION RESULTS and that your opinion is pretty minority. So let the GOP take far rightwingnuts advise at their peril
Filibuster away pal.
Our side gained today and yours lost one of the few on your team with a conscience. Rumors abound about more defections. Coleman seems about to go down in flames.
Life looks like it's really starting to suck for you guys.
What does her view on abortion have ANYTHING to do with running HHS? That's utter nonsense, and just plain partisan hackery of the part of the GOP. It's an indefensible position that you and your party are clinging to.
You realize, of course, that your use of the word "extreme" is not even close to being accurate.
I think the time has come for the Democrats and President Obama to rule out the filibuster rule and confirm her without the help of the GOP...
Obama has done a commendable job offering a hand... which led me to write this open letter to him...
Dear President Obama,
I realize that you are not a liberal, you are a centrist in many respects and do lean middle left and middle right on several varying issues, but I am writing this as an open letter on the hopes that maybe, just maybe, someone within your immediate staff might get wind of this letter from me, a humble citizen, to you, the president of these Unites States.
No doubt you have heard this before, how many times, i dare not guess, but I'm presuming that you have heard that perhaps the right-wing conservative corporate owned media is going to lie, distort, and make up everything about you and your policies. Just as they did to varying degrees of effect against President Bill Clinton.
Where Pres. Clinton went wrong and where you can be correct, is that since it is obvious that the right-wing is going to attack you no matter what you do or say, unless it is exactly how George Bush did things, which even then, they (the right-wing attack machine) occasionally found a reason here and there to jump on Bush's butt.
Perhaps you never had any intention of leading as a lefty, progressive, or a liberal (as FDR did for the most part), with that in mind I think you should consider how that 'machine' worked overtime to destroy Bill Clinton, even though he jumped through fire to try and make them happy (NAFTA, WTO), much as your doing today,they still went after him with a venom that was as nasty as it was disgusting.
I would ask you, almost demand that you to start leading like a progressive liberal and give the right-wing something to really hate you for. because no matter what you do, it will make no difference, short of becoming a mirror image of Reagan or Bush overnight, the right-wing is going to charge after you, relentlessly.
So why not give Fox News and Rush Limbaugh types a New Deal full of reasons to hate you, because, sadly, they do. There just is no appeasing the right-wing, so why bother trying anymore? You have done a commendable job in holding your hand out but they keep swinging the knife in your direction. At this point, why not?
Did you vote for Obama believing he would lead like a progressive liberal? All that "most liberal" stuff was right wing attack, not reality.
He's too smart a politician to veer too far either direction. First and foremost he is a smart politician.
I think the time has come for the Democrats and President Obama to rule out the filibuster rule and confirm her without the help of the GOP...
OK... not sure if I'm reading this right, but if you're saying "go with the nuclear option" I say, "NO F-ING WAY." We will NOT alwasy be in power, and if we change the rules, we'll be stuck with them when the Republican's came back to power at some point in the (hopefully distant) future.
Never assume a power you would not give to your opponent. Never place a limit on your opponent that you would not have placed on yourself. That's not liberal or conservtive, it's just principled. And just common sense, assuming you have a long-term outlook.
My apologies if I totally missed the point!
AND YOU SEE HOW THE MEDIA IS DOWN PLAYING THAT STORY LET THAT HAVE BEEN A DEMOCRATE THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ALL OVER.
???
Whoa. Whatever you're drinkin', I want a case! Sounds like it's pretty strong stuff!!! LOL.
?
I think it's wonderful that the Republicans on here want to chase more people out of their party. That's great that you guys have come to accept yourself as only the small religious, regional party that you have become.