Ann Coulter scheduled to have "soapbox" on Larry King Live
SUMMARY: CNN host Larry King announced that Ann Coulter will once again appear on his show. In the past, CNN's Howard Kurtz has questioned why television news networks continue to host Coulter in light of her history of inflammatory commentary.
CNN host Larry King has announced that on May 1, Ann Coulter will once again appear on his show. In the past, CNN host Howard Kurtz has questioned why television news networks continue to host Coulter in light of her lengthy history of inflammatory commentary. Under the headline "Controversy Queen Ann Coulter," King's website currently states: "She's lashed out at the left and even shocked the right so who's the queen of controversy taking on now? Ann Coulter takes your calls and e-mails."
Following Coulter's 2007 comment on CNBC that "we" Christians "just want Jews to be perfected, as they say," Kurtz said on Reliable Sources: "Ann Coulter shoots off her mouth again -- this time about Jews. Is it time for the media to stop giving her a soapbox?"
After playing video of CNBC host Donny Deutsch criticizing Coulter's "just want Jews to be perfected" comments during the segment in which she made them, Kurtz asked, "[G]ood for Donny Deutsch for taking Coulter to task, but why did he put her on in the first place? What did he think he was getting? A polite discussion of the issues?" Later during the segment, Kurtz asked: "Ann Coulter also talked about John Edwards, made a joke about him being gay, using a slang term beginning with 'f,' then she said she was just kidding. Is there a line that you can cross in our society where you don't get invited back on TV or can you insult Jews and gays and widows and still get booked if you deliver ratings?" At the end of the segment, Kurtz noted that Coulter "can say whatever she wants, but there's no constitutional right to appear on a television show."
During the same Reliable Sources segment, CNN special correspondent Frank Sesno stated: "I think we have a responsibility to challenge her when she says these things, to force her into a corner, and at some point to say, 'You know what? This is not credible anymore. You don't deserve this real estate because all you're trying to do is outrage.' "
Some examples of Coulter's inflammatory commentary include:
- In her most recent book, Guilty, Coulter calls children whose parents divorce "future strippers" in a chapter titled "Victim of a Crime? Thank a Single Mother." Promoting the book on the January 5 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, Coulter referred to her statement that children whose parents divorce are "future strippers" as "something that needs to be said," later saying of that contention: "Yes, and they will be, and that is a fact." Also during her Hannity & Colmes interview, immediately after saying, "I don't insult single mothers," Coulter referred to single motherhood as "a recipe to create criminals, strippers, rapists, murderers," echoing her statement in Guilty that "[s]ingle motherhood is like a farm team for future criminals and social outcasts." After co-host Alan Colmes challenged Coulter by saying of single mothers, "So you're insulting them," Coulter replied, "No, I am insulting single motherhood, which is avidly promoted by the left."
- On the April 30, 2008, edition of CNN Headline News' Glenn Beck, Coulter asked of then-Sen. Barack Obama: "Is Obama a Manchurian candidate to normal Americans who love their country? ... Or is he being the Manchurian candidate to the traitor wing of the Democratic Party?"
- In an April 2, 2008, syndicated column titled, "Obama's Dimestore 'Mein Kampf,' " Coulter wrote of Obama's 1995 memoir, Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance: "Has anybody read this book? Inasmuch as the book reveals Obama to be a flabbergasting lunatic, I gather the answer is no. Obama is about to be our next president: You might want to take a peek. If only people had read 'Mein Kampf' ..."
- In a March 2, 2007, speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), Coulter said she "can't really talk about" Edwards because "you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot.' " The CPAC audience applauded her comment. Several newspapers dropped Coulter's column following her remarks at CPAC.
- On the July 26, 2006, edition of CNBC's The Big Idea, Coulter said former President Bill Clinton exhibits "some level of latent homosexuality." When asked by Deutsch if she was indeed calling Clinton a "latent homosexual," Coulter replied, "Yeah," and mentioned, apparently in support of her claim, "passages" she had "memorized" from the so-called Starr Report -- former independent counsel Kenneth Starr's report to the House of Representatives, resulting from his investigation into the Monica Lewinsky controversy.
On MSNBC's Hardball the next day, referencing Coulter's "latent homosexuality" comment, host Chris Matthews asked Coulter, "How do you know that Bill Clinton is gay?" Coulter responded, "I don't know if he's gay. But [former Vice President] Al Gore -- total fag." She went on to defend her theory about Clinton's sexuality by stating that "everyone has always known, widely promiscuous heterosexual men have, as I say, a whiff of the bathhouse about them." Coulter claimed she was "just kidding" about Gore, but said of her theory about Clinton, "It's not only not a joke, it's not even surprising."
- In her book Godless: The Church of Liberalism (Crown Forum), Coulter makes numerous inflammatory statements, including her claim that liberalism is the "opposition party to God" and that "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths" as much as the 9-11 widows. On the June 6, 2006, broadcast of NBC's Today, host Matt Lauer provided a forum for some of the more controversial statements in the book, which was released that day. Lauer read several of the statements aloud and asked her to explain them.
Pressed by Lauer to defend her statement that the widows were "enjoying their husbands' deaths," Coulter responded: "Yes, they're all over the news." She criticized the widows for "speak[ing] out using the fact that they're widows" and "using their grief" and "the fact that you lost a husband" to make "a political point while preventing anyone from responding." She further argued that "the Left" exploits a "doctrine of infallibility," and that "[i]f they have a point to make about the 9-11 Commission, about how to fight the war on terrorism," they "put[] up Cindy Sheehan ... put[] out these widows." As a result, Coulter said, conservatives "always have to respond to someone who just had a family member die" and appear to be "questioning the authenticity of the grief."















Why would ANY network that considered public discourse to be important give this thing that slithers called Ann a podium to spew her foul hatefilled diatribes?
You answered your own rhetorical question. Our media is now nothing but a giant, unfettered propaganda beast. And the FCC is worried that Bono says a bad word, while the networks, et al give us viewers the metaphorical finger.
Metaphorical Finger would be a great band name. The very thing we pointed at the old Soviet Russia (propaganda) has come to pass here. Exhuming McCarthy indeed (Metaphorical Finger would HAVE to cover that song).
Cable crap news networks do not consider public discourse to be important. Only one thing is important to them: the bottom line.
I sure wish Larry had the intestional fortitude to actually confront her. If she really believes what she says, then her whole arguement has to be based on faith, which is the same foundation of all religions. She must have had a vision or experience which revealed the true way of being an American. How else can she speak from such high platitudes to us all? Does she ever compromise? Sounds like Taliban to me.
Ann needs a soapbox, preferably with the soap still in it. She can use it to wash out her mouth.
One thing I give her credit for and that is consistency. Something missing from many of teh reporters and pundits.
But Anne is like the big brother - he'll keep picking on you because he gets a kick out watching your juvenile reactions. The more yu react, the more she talks. I bet if MMFA and teh rest of you treated her as a non-entity she would disappear. A non-controversial guest kills ratings.
Yeah its liberals that keep Ann going. What color is the sky on your planet anyway? No Annie Gangleskank is like the sick twisted uncle that no one likes who craves attention so much he will say ANYTHING. She is pathetic and anyone who thinks she is picking on others rather than being a lying hatefilled harpy without is part of the problem. You mistake what YOU want for what brings ratings. The networks get a whole lot higher ratings than cable and they give INFORMATION. I think the American people want exactly that information not foaming at the mouth soul rotted harpies spewing hatefilled idiocy for the brainwashed zombies who think that is entertainment
Unfortunately, that is nonsense. She has her core group of fans who will buy her books and Fox "News" (and other media) to give her a forum. After an internet search, if the numbers I saw are accurate, it seems as though no book of hers has sold more than 500,000 copies, which would represent one-sixth of one percent of the population, though those numbers, as each book appears, keep going South. Nevertheless that is apparently enough to make her profitable. The "right" keeps her in business, and makes her think she is taken seriously, though clearly by a staggeringly small percentage of Americans.
Actually she wouldnt sell anywhere NEAR that except Richard Mellon Schiafe buys her books in bulk and then conservative groups give them away at con bake sales.
Good point.
Or they give them away free with rightwing website memberships.
Unlike any liberal tome in recent memory right? Face the facts, she is a popular author who sells books. I know how you libs hate the Conservative Movement dominating the book market.
Just because you're "popular" doesn't mean you're telling the truth, or are adding meaningful to the political discussion at hand.
Slavery/segragation was popular at one time. So was smoking cigarettes.
"I know how you libs hate the Conservative Movement dominating the book market."
Actually, it doesn't bother me at all, and I wasn't making a comparison. Just trying to provide a dose of reality.
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public."
- H.L. Mencken
HA you wouldnt know reality if it slept with your wife. She only makes the best seller list because of the bulk buying of her books by Rightwing billionaires that prop UP the rightwing booksale market. Even WITH that she doesnt sell that well. Look at the NYTimes bestesller list and her books ALWAYS have the dagger next to her name.
I KNOW how you hate the way the left has DOMINATED the last two ELECTIONS.
She NEVER sold as well as Al Frankens books. You
That's a great line ;-)
She pretty much IS ignored these days. A few items on MMFA, with a handful of comments, usually.
Since she can barely even muster up much controversy these days, it's even more of a mystery why the mainstream media keeps propping her up. I guess she has a good publicist.
Fawlty,
Appearing on King's show isn't exactly a bee in her bonnet. King has become rather irrelevant. Hell I forget he's still on the air. I'm guessing he would opt for Coulter as a guest believing it might pull in some viewership & ratings for him. Come see the crazy controversial nut job!!!
For me personally Coulter was always just a source of entertainment, in that you never knew what crazy thing she might write or spew. There may have been a time, long ago & far away, that some folks hung on her opinions & took her seriously, but I doubt you'd find many today, even among the hardcore extreme Right.
Ann occasionally made me chuckle in the past when she poked at a Lib, but hey I'm a Con, so that's my excuse ;-)
Not long ago Miz Julia asked if I still checked out her column, & I realized I hadn't read it in months. Hey that shows I'm on the road to redemption, eh? Ha!
You got the "ha!" part right, Reprobate! ;-0)
You moonbat ;-) Ha!
"One thing I give her credit for and that is consistency. Something missing from many of teh reporters and pundits."
CONSISTENCY is what sets her apart from reporters? Whatever. I don't even think you know what point you're trying to make.
"The more yu react, the more she talks."
Bull****. MMFA's critics often get the food chain completely wrong, so you're not alone.
It's the media that gives her a platform from which to speak. If the media pulls its head out of its backside and takes that platform away, her stupidity goes away, the MMFA items about Coulter cease, and you have no commenters to broadbrush with insults.
"A non-controversial guest kills ratings."
I couldn't agree more. News is no longer a public service, it's an entertainment device to lure ad revenue.
Ann is the two-year-old who runs into her parents' dinner party, shouts "POOP!" and runs away giggling at the depth of her wit.
Ann Coulter is 100% right 100% of the time. You loony liberals can't handle it when someone takes you to task. Liberals are nothing but wimps and welfare pimps.
There was a time when Coulter had shock appeal--is she really saying that on TV? And her not a red-faced choleric male gasbag? How weird!
Butthat's been over with for a while. We are clogged up with Coulter-analogues and Coulter wannabes--and the hard-right viciousness is, after eight years of it being official government policy, not startling any more.
My own personal take was that she really lost credibility with Godless. Dif even her fans believe that this woman in the skimpy black dressand the potty mouth was a devout Christian? The book itself was another ple of anti-liberal screed, but but this was just plain ludicrous. It wwas athin posturing that nobody but nobody took seriously.
But she's Madonna: former media darling who has run out of tricks. But Madonna could at least sing.
You know there are certain personality types that are good at self promotion. Actually they make good promoters of any kind. And they don't have to be necessarily good or talented at their craft, ie acting, writing, singing. Just good promoters. Madonna is such a personality and so is Ann. As was Don King. Even though in his case he did have a real talent to promote, unlike Ann and Madonna. Although Madonna does have a modicum of singing talent.
We've always known these types and wondered why they excelled. It certainly isn't because they were better or more talented. They were just born promoters. If anybody studies personality types, they would be the ESTPs.
Okay, that was a bit of OT trivia for anybody interested. Which probably means nobody. Ha!
They were just born promoters.
Miz Julia, good insight about personality types. I'd add Mike Huckabee to your list of born promoters. It may not have won him the nomination or Presidency, but he had mega tv appearances, & now has his own show.
Off to the golf course...wish me luck ...hey wanna caddy for me? :-)
I'd be more inclined to believe that the Huckster is an idealist personality type, but his recent utterings on torture make me second guess that. Although you did nudge me to wonder what Jesus' personality type was ;-0)
Caddy? Now what would be in it for me, I wonder? Hmmmn.
I have no idea why anyone invites this trash talking, brainless neo-Nazi on to talk shows. She's hateful and spews venom at anyone who disagrees with her. Surely the networks can find a conservative that has some brains and civility to express the conservative point of view. What makes Coulter---or "Skeletor" as I like to call her--an expert on anything? I keep hoping she will crawl back under the rock from whence she came. I can understand why right-wing morons like Beck and Hannity drool all over her but I thought Larry King had some brains.
Summary: CNN host Larry King announced that Ann Coulter will once again appear on his show. In the past, CNN's Howard Kurtz has questioned why television news networks continue to host Coulter in light of her history of inflammatory commentary.
It's purely for ratings...period. Why is that such a dufficult concept for Howard Kurtz and others to grasp?
Many of us enjoy Ann Coulter because she drives the "Hate America" crowd crazy. Just look at some of the comments in this discussion. If she doesn't matter, why is she on Larry King for a long intervew? Why have this discussion at all?
Why do we keep feeding the beast? How long would these people keep booking the outrageous if we stopped watching? I think organizations like Media Matters need to show what is being said on the other side, but all of our attention to these fools on TV or radio is just filling their pockets and guaranteeing they will continue to pump out the outrageous comments.
I'm not sure what we could do, but we should always remember that all of these people are doing it for the money...just for the money. When advertising and listenership dries up so do the dollars.
Yawn.
Who odes Rachel Maddow have on?
"Who odes Rachel Maddow have on?"
Translation, please. In English.
ODE TO RACHEL
Bright liberal lass on your cable,
Keeps calling Repugs to the table.
Save P'lenty alone,
They haven't the stones,
To face her they're simply not able.
Let's face it, we seldom have a better occasion to enjoy the slow, painfull, and then pathetic demise of this vial screech, and embarassment of Republican Punditry.
Let her feed upon her own as she affords us her prose during her Orwellian finale.
Happy Thoughts;
Dan Grady
Dan Grady, that was darn purty! As was "Ode to Rachel." The only way to discuss Coulter is with a bit 'o fun.
When Annie goes on Larry King
It's a ratings-slash-"shock value" thing
To the clueless she spews
Her preposterous views
But her tired old schtick has no sting.
When afforded her little soapbox
Her virulent spiel
That once held appeal
Is as stale as her dress and blonde locks
Aimed & threw two Boston Cream Pies
Ann's hair was a mess
And so was her black dress
But Miz Julia was feeling quite high :-)