About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ignoring Politico's own reporting, Budoff Brown advances misleading CPR ad

May 04, 2009 12:55 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: Discussing the debate over health care reform, the Politico's Carrie Budoff Brown uncritically highlighted a misleading ad by Conservatives for Patients' Rights, providing conservatives with yet another platform to attack progressive health care reform.

6 Comments

In a May 3 Politico article, reporter Carrie Budoff Brown wrote that Conservatives for Patients' Rights (CPR) "releas[ed] a 60-second spot featuring Dr. Brian Day, a past president of the Canadian Medical Association, describing how patients in the country are 'languishing and suffering on waiting lists.' " She added: "Expect to see Day lobbying members of Congress -- and many more stories from both sides in the weeks to come." However, Budoff Brown did not mention that Day has said he favors the health care systems of several Western European countries, not the current U.S. system of health care, as her Politico colleague Ben Smith has previously noted.

In an April 27 Politico blog post, Smith reported that, during an October 9, 2008, interview with the Fraser Institute, Day stated: "I think this is what people tend to forget. They equate alternatives to the Canadian health care system with 'Americanization,' which is not what we're talking about. We're talking about countries like Belgium, and Switzerland, and France, and Austria." In an October 22, 2007, op-ed for Canada's National Post newspaper, Day similarly wrote that "the goal of the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) -- of which I am President -- is to help improve our universal system, not destroy it." Day went on to note in the op-ed that he is not in favor of the U.S. system:

Let me be clear: I am not for an American-style system in Canada.

It is true that I believe in competition. But not the type of unhealthy competition that seems to exist between Canada and the United States in health care. As two of the world's richest countries, we seem to be in a race to the bottom when it comes to health. Canada's health system has been ranked 30th by the World Health Organization, and the U.S. was ranked 37th. Why would anyone copy a system that ranks substantially below ours?

The May 3 article by Budoff Brown is the latest in which she has provided an uncritical platform for CPR and other conservatives to attack progressive health care reform.

From Budoff Brown's May 3 article, "The five faces to watch for in debate over care":

The Storyteller: Jane Doe

Health care is about to enter the heart-tugging phase.

Groups on the right and left have been quietly building arsenals of narrators -- people who can sear the American conscience with personal stories.

The American Cancer Society collects cases through a call center in Texas. The SEIU gathers stories by congressional district. And Conservatives for Patients' Rights, an organization poised to oppose the Obama plan, sent a former CNN reporter to Britain and Canada to produce a documentary on outrages in the European system that critics claim the White House plan will mimic.

The last major health care reform effort in the 1990s was defined by Harry and Louise, the fictional middle-class couple featured in an insurance industry ad. And an extraordinarily complex bill went down amid a flurry of 30-second ads.

Given the fragmented media environment, a singular TV ad may not hold as much sway as it did in the early '90s. But that doesn't mean either side plans to pass up the tool.

Conservatives for Patients' Rights was the first to use it, releasing a 60-second spot featuring Dr. Brian Day, a past president of the Canadian Medical Association, describing how patients in the country are "languishing and suffering on waiting lists."

Expect to see Day lobbying members of Congress -- and many more stories from both sides in the weeks to come.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Brabantio (May 04, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
      3  
      Conservatives for Patients' Rights? What rights? Many people without insurance can't afford to be "patients", and people with insurance now will still have that insurance even if others get put on a public plan.

      No, the goal here has nothing to do with "rights", it has to do with maintaining for-profit health care for everyone and the inherent conflict of interest that comes with it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (May 04, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
        2  
        You nailed it. The Repub/right/neocon dance is always about couching anything regarding public healthcare as a negative that will somehow effect the "rights" of someone privileged enough to have benefits. Follow the money. How much funding does the pro-for-profit healthcare lobby get? Who contributes to them and what are their stakes? Would we ever see such reporting in the debate?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (May 04, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
          2  
          "Follow the money."

          Here's one of my favorite links, I paste it every chance I get. It would be nice to find an updated version, however.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 04, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
               
            I've always held that the cost of health care would be nothing more than the current medicare/medicaid (and otehr gov't plans) budgets along with the revenues of teh health ins industry. IOW: WE'RE ALREADY PAYING FOR IT! THANK YOU SO MUCH for that article proving my position! I love it!
            Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (May 04, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
         
      Nice work, Politico. More ammunition with which the right-wing professional liars can dishonestly debate health care reform.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bilbo_dies (May 04, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
         
      Expect the comments from both sides to become more extreme as the debate carries forward. Just remember that we all pay for health care now and will continue to in the future. All we need to decide is how we want to pay these costs.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.