About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity faults Obama during stock market downturn but gives no credit when it's up

May 04, 2009 4:00 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: After repeatedly using the stock market's poor performance to criticize President Obama, Sean Hannity, when confronted with the fact that the Dow has surpassed its level on Inauguration Day, stated that "[t]he market doesn't mean anything to me."

30 Comments

After repeatedly suggesting that President Obama was responsible for the stock market's poor performance, Fox News host Sean Hannity, when confronted with the fact that the Dow Jones industrial average has surpassed its level on Inauguration Day, denied that the market is a proper "indicator" of Obama's performance handling the economy and stated: "The market doesn't mean anything to me."

Discussing Obama's performance on the economy during the May 1 edition of Fox News' Hannity, Fox Business Network anchor Alexis Glick said, "[L]ook at the market in the 100 days. Yes, we went to 12-year lows in early March, but we have re-climbed back to where we were before he was inaugurated." Hannity responded, "The market doesn't mean anything to me. ... Alexis, you're the first person to tell people don't look at the market unless you're in it for five or 10 years, right? All right, so we're not looking at the market." Hannity then added: "But this is the indicator that I'm looking at. The Congressional Budget Office says we're going to have $10 trillion in debt."

However, Hannity has previously referred to "Obama's bear market" and used declines in the stock market to criticize Obama administration policies.

For example, on the March 10 edition of his show, Hannity said to former Democratic National Committee financial committee chair Michael Brown, "Obama, since he's elected, has tanked the markets." Brown asked, "Oh, that's Obama's fault?" and Hannity responded, "That's right." Similarly, on the March 6 edition of his show, Hannity stated: "And our headline this Friday night: Welcome to Day Number 46 of 'Obama's Bear Market.' Now, that's what some news organizations are calling it tonight as the Dow Jones industrial average actually finished up about 30 points today at the end of a disastrous week." Furthermore, on the March 5 edition of Hannity, Republican strategist Kate Obenshain said of Obama's policies, "Of course, the markets are in a free-fall, because they recognize what's happening here." Hannity agreed, saying, "[I]t is a reaction. If they had so much faith and confidence in [Obama's] plan -- because, remember, markets don't react emotionally. Markets react to numbers." Hannity continued, "If they had faith and hope in [Obama's] plan, why wouldn't they react more confidently?"

Media Matters for America has documented a pattern of Fox News hosts and other media figures blaming Obama for the stock market when it is performing poorly, despite the fact that the Dow Jones average was on a downward trajectory months before his inauguration, and failing to credit Obama for stock market bounces.

From the March 5 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: The Dow is literally tanking. It's going down here. The president said he's not watching the gyrations of the stock market --

OBENSHAIN: Oh, my gosh.

HANNITY: I'm thinking, this is like, well, it's just like a political poll. And I'm thinking, well, a political poll? When people lose now --

OBENSHAIN: Unbelievable.

HANNITY: -- we're heading to 5,000? And people lost, you know, 60 percent of their money?

OBENSHAIN: In two and a half months, Barack Obama has added more to the deficit than George Bush did in eight years fighting two wars and dealing with Katrina. Of course, the markets are in a free-fall, because they recognize what's happening here.

NICK DiPAOLO (comedian): Exactly.

STEVE MURPHY (Democratic strategist): That's not what it is, but go ahead, Nick.

OBENSHAIN: That's part of what it is.

MURPHY: That's not what it is.

DiPAOLO: The free market is allergic to socialism. This is the reaction you should -- the Wall Street -- it should be.

HANNITY: Well, wait a minute.

DiPAOLO: Wouldn't you get scared if it went up?

MURPHY: Nick, they're all socialists on Wall Street themselves.

HANNITY: Well, but I mean, that's the point. It is a reaction. Wait, it is a reaction.

DiPAOLO: It's an allergic reaction to his baloney.

HANNITY: If they had so much faith and confidence in his plan -- because, remember, markets don't react emotionally. Markets react to numbers.

OBENSHAIN: Right.

HANNITY: If they had faith and hope in his plan, why wouldn't they react more confidently?

From the March 6 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: And our headline this Friday night: Welcome to Day Number 46 of "Obama's Bear Market." Now, that's what some news organizations are calling it tonight as the Dow Jones industrial average actually finished up about 30 points today at the end of a disastrous week.

According to Bloomberg News, the Dow has now dropped faster during the first six weeks of the Obama administration than any other administration in at least 90 years. But is that a surprise after weeks of talking down the economy?

From the March 10 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: Michael, at any point do you think that he, for political reasons, to scare everybody, that he's overdone it with the fear-mongering, and maybe it's time that he pay attention to the gyrations of the market?

BROWN: You don't think he's doing that, Sean?

HANNITY: No, he said he's not. He said, "I don't pay attention to the day-to-day gyrations."

BROWN: First of all, thank goodness President Obama is now president because of the mess you guys have put us in. It's about time that we have --

HANNITY: All right. Forget about blaming Bush. Why --

BROWN: -- some sanity. Is --

HANNITY: Obama, since he's elected, has tanked the markets.

BROWN: Oh, that's Obama's fault?

HANNITY: That's right.

BROWN: That's not anything he inherited?

HANNITY: No.

From the May 1 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

GLICK: At the time, we also thought we were going to see a lot more of Paul Volcker -- and that's probably my biggest disappointment. We're not seeing a lot of Paul Volcker and he's one of the best Fed chairmen. So that's a disappointment.

But on the Lawrence Summers and the Geithner front, yes, the jury is still out. But look at the market in the 100 days. Yes, we went to 12-year lows in early March, but we have re-climbed back --

HANNITY: The market doesn't mean anything to me. The market means --

GLICK: -- to where we were before he was inaugurated.

HANNITY: But Alexis, you're the first person to tell people don't look at the market --

GLICK: OK --

HANNITY: -- unless you're in it for five or 10 years, right?

GLICK: OK. Yes.

HANNITY: All right, so we're not looking at the market. But this is the indicator that I'm looking at. The Congressional Budget Office says we're going to have $10 trillion in debt; we're stealing from our kids and our grandkids; he's putting down a huge down payment on nationalized health care; and we're going to be paying, 10 years from now -- my last point, I promise -- $806 billion a year on interest alone if interest rates stay low.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Leftym0m79 (May 04, 2009 4:07 pm ET)
         
      So, if the market means nothing to him(Hannity) then why is he even...oh never mind, that would be applying logic to an obviously illogical person. Although, the jury is still out on whether or not Hannity is actual human-type person.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 04, 2009 4:08 pm ET)
      3  
      And how many times did we hear Douche Windbag talk about the "Obama Recession"? Funny that the fat, drug-addicted hypocrite's not talking about the "Obama Recovery," no?

      I guess Oabama's merely RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT must have been enough to kick off the recession and keep it going, but the prospect of nearly $1T in recovery efforts couldn't POSSIBLY have helped.

      Morons.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Victor Colorado (May 04, 2009 4:21 pm ET)
        4  
        "Obama has tanked the markets" serves as the perfect soundbite to Hannity's stupidity. This fake patriot keeps shooting blanks.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by neon desert (May 04, 2009 4:21 pm ET)
      2  
      Wha-wha-WHAT?!?
      I'm shocked- Shocked!!! - to find out there seems to be the appearance of a convenient re-prioritization of factors by Mr. Hannity.

      Why, 3 months ago when thousands of us were predicting this very scenario, how could we have possibly been expecting it to come true?

      If one didn't respect the bona fides requisite to merit a prime-time political analysis television program, one might suspect he abandons intellectual integrity and merely says things in order to villify his political opponents.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (May 05, 2009 9:03 am ET)
           
        where you being rhetorical? cause thats what the mannity does.....

        as for bona fides.....apparently all you need is a high school diploma and be a college drop out. like the mannity.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by union (May 04, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
      2  
      So I'm not the only person who has noticed this. There is almost *nothing* anywhere in the press about the modest signs of recovery that are starting to emerge. You're lucky if you hear about this once a week. As soon as good market news comes up, they smother it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (May 05, 2009 1:28 am ET)
           
        To be fair, good news are never reported very prominently.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bilbo_dies (May 04, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
         
      Gee, I thought we all knew, Liberal policies cause the market to go down. If they happen to go up that is just capitalizm at work in spite of the Liberal policies.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (May 04, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
      1  
      All right, so we're not looking at the market. But this is the indicator that I'm looking at. The Congressional Budget Office says we're going to have $10 trillion in debt; we're stealing from our kids and our grandkids; he's putting down a huge down payment on nationalized health care; and we're going to be paying, 10 years from now -- my last point, I promise -- $806 billion a year on interest alone if interest rates stay low.

      All it takes to get a Republican to tap his inner fiscal conservative is a Democratic president. What a tool.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (May 04, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
        2  
        This sudden attack of fiscal consciousness is most peculiar isn't it? They never uttered a word about stealing from our kids and grandkids when billions were disappearing into Bush's Middle East Bloodbath.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (May 04, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
      1  
      That's pretty blatant. I'm not sure Obama deserves any credit yet but he sure as hell doesn't deserve the blame they've been flinging at him since Jan 21. That was your guy Hannity. And to be fair Bush deserves credit for any good the stimulus package has done so far. When the banks started showing improved earnings and the market stopped sliding that was mostly due to the Stimulus bill that was signed before Obama took office.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (May 04, 2009 6:40 pm ET)
        2  
        There was no stimulus bill signed by Bush. There was a bank bailout in October and a stimulus early last year. However the previous stimulus was widely considered a failure because it was mostly tax cuts instead of stimulative spending. Bush deserves credit for nothing positive, except maybe the destruction of the Republican party.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (May 04, 2009 6:45 pm ET)
             
          Sorry. You're right. I didn't mean stimulus. I meant bailout. I could be wrong but I think the initial bank bailout was the reason some of the banks started posting profits in the first quarter which helped the market start to turn around.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by SteveRiverson162410 (May 04, 2009 8:49 pm ET)
      1  
      What do you expect from Hannity? Fairness?

      I'm sure if McCain had won the election and the market was the way it is now, Hannity would have blamed Bill Clinton.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (May 04, 2009 9:09 pm ET)
      1  
      WOW! A whole new format! Maybe I'll have to think about this for a while. "Improvements" are not necessarily that.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (May 04, 2009 9:28 pm ET)
           
        This whole theme, looking at day to day market fluctuations as indicators of the economy as a whole, is bottom-of-the=barrel stuff even for Fox. They seem to be bitter and clinging to their audience base, the stupidest couple million Americans.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne (May 05, 2009 12:21 am ET)
        1  
        Donald, I agree. Not necessarily good "Improvements". Not loving that we can't post pictures. And I can't see people's name without my reading glasses on. And I'm vain and don't like to wear them ;-)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fawltylogic (May 05, 2009 1:27 am ET)
            1
          I like the new format. Images would be nice though.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MickD (May 05, 2009 3:33 am ET)
            1  
            Is there any place on MMFA that explains the changes or are we forced to figure them out for ourselves (help the comprehension-impaired :o)?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (May 05, 2009 8:05 am ET)
             
          You shouldn't worry about wearing your reading glasses while you're online JJ.

          Other than myself, and a handful of the others, most can't see you through the internet tubes.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 05, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
             
          There's a button on the text entry box labeled "Picture." Isn't that how you post images?

          Let me see:
          [http://cdn-www.dailypuppy.com/media/dogs/1739_misha_and_clemmie.jpg_thumb.jpg]

          It works!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by thejbomb65 (May 05, 2009 9:01 am ET)
         
      times are bad=blame the democrats no matter what (even if we were the ones who caused it all)

      times are good=its the free market doing its job (we have no explanation and are just making noise)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Thorgrim (May 05, 2009 11:32 am ET)
        1
      Obonga deserves no credit for the rise. If you watch the ticker by the minute, you'd see that it rose before he opened his mouth.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 05, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
           
        It rose before you opened yours, too.

        Pleas look up "post hoc ergo propter hoc" and learn why it's a logical fallacy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (May 05, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
           
        thank you for your non contribution. pleas exit to your right and return to your neo con fantasy world
        Report Abuse
    • Author by SMTDL (May 05, 2009 11:34 am ET)
      2  
      How hypocritical and immature!!!I bet if there is any market drop this week ,he'll be back to blaming Obama.How can someone this shallow develop such a following and get paid such big bucks?I guess it is clear what Fox values and it's certainly not professionalism or jounalistic integrity!!!!
      How hard is it to say ' maybe my judgement was off' or better yet..'I'm no economist and no expert on the stock market'!!!
      How can anyone with half a brain listen to this Hannity drivel?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (May 05, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
           
        "How can anyone with half a brain listen to this Hannity drivel?"

        Thorgrim, we'll let you field this one.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by thejbomb65 (May 05, 2009 1:37 pm ET)
             
          i doubt you will hear anything from him. i think he used all the brain power that was permitted to him in just coming up with what he said before
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Romario (May 05, 2009 11:30 pm ET)
         
      LOL...Hannity just got pwned by MediaMatters....too funny.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.