About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Beck echoes tired falsehood that ACORN received stimulus funds

May 06, 2009 6:56 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Glenn Beck echoed a false Republican talking point by stating, "By including ACORN, or groups like them, in the stimulus package, we have guaranteed them billions of dollars to buy more votes for the party that helps them the most." In fact, the stimulus bill does not mention ACORN or otherwise single it out for funding.

40 Comments

During the May 6 broadcast of his Fox News program, Glenn Beck echoed a false Republican talking point by stating, "By including ACORN, or groups like them, in the stimulus package, we have guaranteed them billions of dollars to buy more votes for the party that helps them the most." Beck then likened this to "seed money for the Democratic votes." However, as Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 does not mention ACORN or otherwise single it out for funding; ACORN itself has said that it is ineligible for the funds and has no plans to apply for them.

In falsely claiming that the act steered money to ACORN, Republicans have pointed to a provision in the act that would appropriate $2 billion for "emergency assistance for the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes, as authorized under division B, title III of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 [...] That additional award criteria for such competitions shall include demonstrated grantee capacity to execute projects, leveraging potential, concentration of investment to achieve neighborhood stabilization." The bill does not mention ACORN or otherwise single it out for funding.

Moreover, ACORN has denied that it is eligible for "neighborhood stabilization" funds -- the term used for the redevelopment funds in earlier versions of the act -- and has stated that it does not intend to apply for them. After House Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-OH) office issued press releases claiming that the recovery bill "makes groups like ACORN eligible for a $4.19 billion pot of money for 'neighborhood stabilization activities,' " in a January 28 press release, ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis called the claim an "obfuscation" that "was picked up across the right-wing echo chamber and has been used as a fig leaf by conservatives in their attempts to justify their opposition to progressive economic policies." Lewis further stated: "We have not received neighborhood stabilization funds, have no plans to apply for such funds, and didn't weigh in on the pending rule changes." On January 29, Lewis wrote at the Huffington Post: "[L]et's be clear. ACORN isn't getting any of this money. Since it is set aside for non-profit housing developers to help purchase, rehab, and resell foreclosed properties, we aren't eligible for it in the first place."

From the May 6 broadcast of Fox News' Glenn Beck:

BECK: But here's the one thing nobody else is going to say. If you look at President Obama, you have to realize we didn't elect a president; we elected a former community organizer. So why don't we start looking at him in those -- with those eyes? He's a community organizer. He has helped orchestrate a power grab of industry, energy, health care, and taxes. He wants to control it.

Let me explain through two stories that are in the news right now. If we understand community organizers, we'll understand Barack Obama. First, community organizers. What do they do? They organize communities. What, are they all in disarray?

Take the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, better known as ACORN. ACORN says they are, quote, "committed to social and economic justice," and to help, quote, "those who have historically been locked out become powerful players in our democratic system." Remember, President Obama just said the other day he wants his Supreme Court nominee to have empathy and understand social justice. That sounds like ACORN, not a justice. Hmmm.

They neglect to mention that this is one technique for accomplishing those things. The one technique is fraud. ACORN is facing fraud charges in Nevada, and there's a lot of other states that are getting into that act. Another way is intimidation. How many times have you seen community organizers like Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson threaten to bring their groups to the streets to bring social justice to anyone they perceive as a threat?

Who organized the bus tours of the homes of AIG executives so they could protest and scare the daylights out of their kids? It was ACORN. They're not really helping those who have been locked out. It's about helping those that help them.

This is a power grab. By including ACORN, or groups like them, in the stimulus package, we have guaranteed them billions of dollars to buy more votes for the party that helps them the most. Just as this is seed money for the Democratic votes, the auto bailout will help the party flourish for years to come.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by pete592 (May 06, 2009 8:01 pm ET)
      1  
      Stop wetting your pants, Glenn. The government isn't giving billions to ACORN.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by JamesCraven (May 06, 2009 10:33 pm ET)
        1  
        And once again, the modern day Prof. Harold Hill lies through his teeth, and we'ree seeing he's not wearing any clothes like The Emperor.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by henslecd (May 06, 2009 9:40 pm ET)
        2
      http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/special-editorial-reports/ACORN-got-53-million-in-federal-funds-since-94-now-eligible-for-up-to-8-billion-more-44406217.html

      Read it and weep.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (May 06, 2009 9:58 pm ET)
        2  
        Being eligible for something and actually receiving it are two very different things.

        Until it happens, you, Kevin Mooney and Glenn Beck are simply wetting your pants.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (May 06, 2009 10:09 pm ET)
        1  
        "Read it and weep."

        Followed your little link....

        Kevin Mooney?....... Kevin Mooney?

        Who the heck are you trying to kid... someone in here... or yourself?

        Kevin Mooney is a grunt that works at the illegitimate and very right-wing skewed NewsBusters.com

        So I offer my own link that proves that Mr. Mooney is hardly a voice of any actual reason...
        HERE

        Next time you come here to MMfA... the least you can do is come to the table with an actual story from someone that is not an already proven mouth piece of the right-wing attack machine.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by BillJ-MN (May 06, 2009 10:14 pm ET)
          1  
          I don't think I'd ever heard of this Mooney character before. Looking at your link though, all I can say is WOW. He's quite an extreme propagandist. His work bears no resemblance to any kind of journalism.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by thejbomb65 (May 07, 2009 9:26 am ET)
            1  
            he works for brent "redbeard the pirate" bozell......what do you expect? honesty?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by BillJ-MN (May 06, 2009 10:10 pm ET)
        2  
        Nope, it isn't that easy. We can see the MMFA article. If you want to pretend to refute it you need to cite FACTS that do so. From what I can see, your link doesn't refute MMFA or support Beck.

        Just posting a link means NOTHING. It's intellectually lazy and frequently dishonest.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by thejbomb65 (May 07, 2009 9:33 am ET)
            1
          well wait a minute. you posted a link, that had no basis in facts, given the actual bill does not say acorn, and you have the nerve to say:

          "Just posting a link means NOTHING. It's intellectually lazy and frequently dishonest." BillJ-MN

          you should choose your words more carefully next time.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 07, 2009 10:30 am ET)
               
            you should choose your words more carefully next time.

            You first. Your posts contain far more examples of careless words than Bill's do.

            And, if Bill's link had no basis in fact, perhaps you would like to support that statement with some actual facts rather than just stating your unfounded opinion and expecting us to believe it just because you said so.

            Your posting history suggests that if you say something, it is not to be believed without evidence and facts. And you have presented nothing of the sort.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by thejbomb65 (May 07, 2009 11:22 am ET)
                 
              http://publicservice.evendon.com/RecoveryBill1M.htm.

              this is a full online text of the bill. pdf style. in the search part of it, type ACORN and see what comes up. nothing comes up. cause it isnt in the bill. and i have read the text of the bill and have not seen it mentioned once.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jms (May 07, 2009 3:38 pm ET)
                   
                i just searched the bill for "michigan" or "indiana" or "new jersey". nothing comes up. oh my god, i guess the states aren't getting any stimulus money after all!!!! you are so lame.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by thejbomb65 (May 08, 2009 9:14 am ET)
                     
                  so take the time and try to read the full text. guess what i have. and guess what? no ACORN. nice try thanks for playing you can collect your parting gift of psychotropics on your way out the door
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jms (May 08, 2009 12:52 pm ET)
                       
                    you are too much of a parroting simpleton to understand the point of my post.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by thejbomb65 (May 07, 2009 11:29 am ET)
                 
              i can dig up some more if you like. i have no problem doing so.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by BillJ-MN (May 07, 2009 11:31 am ET)
               
            I don't understand what you're saying about my post. What link did I post? I just stated that henslecd posted a link that failed to refute either MMFA or support Beck. He didn't cite anything from the link or try to present any sort of a case of his own. He pretended that all he had to do was post his link and that doing so made some sort of point.

            I don't see any problem with the words I chose.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by thejbomb65 (May 07, 2009 11:56 am ET)
              2  
              my apologies, i misread the whole thing. im sorry about that
              Report Abuse
              • Author by BillJ-MN (May 08, 2009 9:44 am ET)
                   
                No big deal. I kind of suspected that's what happened. I've done that myself.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by thejbomb65 (May 07, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
              1  
              i think i meant to actually comment on henslecd. im still getting used to this new format and ive on accident posted a couple times where i didnt mean to.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (May 07, 2009 9:58 pm ET)
               
            BIll did NOT post a link at all. He simply stated that you need some actual facts if you want to suggest that MMFA's article, which is supported by facts, is somehow false. If you want to say MMFA is full of it because Newsbusters says so (even though they almost never use facts) then we are saying that will not work. Give us something, and before you tell Bill to choose his words more carefully about the link he uses, be sure he used a link please.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by thejbomb65 (May 08, 2009 9:16 am ET)
                 
              i saw my mistake. i meant it for someone else and misread what bill said.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 07, 2009 7:31 am ET)
           
        Did you see the part of the URL that reads "opinion?"

        The opinion of a wingnut does not equal fact. ACORN is eligible, but that doesn't mean they'll get a penny.

        You're eligible to receive a large sum of money from a Nigerian official who will email you shortly to tell you how you can receive it.

        Let us know when it's deposited in your account.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 07, 2009 8:31 am ET)
        3  
        Try reading the actual BILL, moron. Nothing in there about Acorn at all. Not. One. Word. Amazing what you do with a search feature. This lie has been thoroughly trashed over and over. You people need to broaden your sources of information.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by thejbomb65 (May 07, 2009 9:27 am ET)
          1  
          they can't. cause dick cheney is using contacts within the cia to monitor all communication from neo cons to ensure they are citing only sources approved by him.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (May 07, 2009 9:30 am ET)
        1  
        i read it....and i wept. for you to be precise. the fact that you could be so myopic and so out of touch to actually believe anything that could come from somethign attached to brent bozell, makes me weep for your state of mind and sanity. try reading some real news and getting real facts. not something churned out by a rabid propaganda machine that is slowly choking itself.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (May 07, 2009 9:35 pm ET)
        1  
        LEARN TO READ, they YOU can weep. Pete is of course RIGHT and you are of course WRONG. It is really quite simple
        Report Abuse
      • Author by trbking (May 07, 2009 11:11 pm ET)
        1  
        You're reading and OPINION piece. Not objective journalism. Try to keep in mind there's a difference.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ewl94232 (May 07, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
        2
      The Left-wing media like MMFA do succeed in pointing out more errors than I'd like to see on the part of the Right. This one hinges on whether there's a chance that ACORN might get any of the stimulus funds. If community redevelopment is limited to the demolition of old homes and projects like that, MMFA is right and the Right-wing is wrong because so far as I know ACORN doesn't run any construction/demolition division.

      If the redevelopment funds aren't limited to these construction trades functions, then MMFA is wrong and the Right-wing is probably right. It will shake your sense of reality to the core, if you can even grasp this, but errors aren't exclusive to the Right. They occur at about the same rate on the Left. The same is true for deceptions. Yes, both sides present part-truths and dubious "facts" to create impressions that are not true. And no, the Right isn't any more given to these inconsistencies than the Left.

      These are human failings, universal to all human endeavors. Sports fans are constantly being convinced that the referees or umpires are slanting their calls, enemies in war are always more brutal and ruthless than allies, competitors are always cheating somehow. And the people that disagree with you must be craven, ignorant, delusional, whatever. We are over-eager to see our side as the "good-guys" and our opponents as the "bad-guys."

      Beneath the superficiality of the struggle lie the foundations of these differing beliefs. Reality checking is a useful service, but only when it's done with great scrupulousness. MMFA, unfortunately, often fails to exercise such scruples. The whole concept of an agency that makes it their business to expose the deceptions of those that disagree with them ought to set off alarms in the mind of any serious thinker. It is a condition begging to become a breeding ground for prejudicial judgments. Too often the "deceptions" identified on this site are marginal in their quality, wrong or just trivial.

      Then there is the comment section. Do any of you really believe that you are adding to the understanding of issues with demeaning references to others? With "clever" barbs? With oblique or over-broad condemnations. Do you really believe that you stand with the angels while the opposition is led by minions of Satan? (or any correlation to this differentiation that applies in your particular case.)

      How much more valuable could it be if this section included a critical analysis of the postings based upon their merit. Weak arguments could be honed and refined. The Left could become more able, not just to dispute, doubt and deny, but to educate, to present ideas and persuade others of the superiority of your views. Instead of a rooters section, sites like MMFA need a resource by which their views and arguments can be refined and made more effective.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (May 07, 2009 9:42 pm ET)
        1  
        Do you say the same thing to MRC and AIM which only point out the bias of the LEFT? Is your point that the left should unilaterally disarm? Do you think it is up to YOU what MMFA should do? The politics is NOT what they do. They do conservative media misinformation if that rankles you or if you prefer the larger picture politics there are several million other sites out there. Snivelling that MMFA doesnt do what YOU want them to do is about like being invited to dinner at someones house, eating their dinner all the while complaining that they didnt cook something you would have liked MORE.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (May 07, 2009 10:03 pm ET)
             
          Thank you. I was about to post the same thing. It's not that the posts by ewl are completely without merit, but come on. This site is about right-wing misinformation. For ewl to continuously post here and rant about all there is here is attacks of right-wing misinformation is simply bizarre.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by minmax756 (May 07, 2009 12:58 pm ET)
         
      I have no doubt ACORN will receive millions if not billions of $ over the next 4 years. Obama & crew owe them BIIIG TIME for their work during the election campaign. New lawsuits are popping up everyday. I watched Beck's show last night and I must say the Guy from ACORN was straight from "The Godfather" casting.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by creeksneakers2 (May 07, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
           
        I'm not sure whether it was Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh yesterday who told a lie about a $100 fee tacked onto every real estate transaction in the US for years going to ACORN.

        The host of our local wingnut show on WHP 580 that comes on afterward checked the story and of course found out it was false. Then all the wingnuts called up insisting it was true. Facts meant nothing to them.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (May 07, 2009 9:39 pm ET)
           
        I have no doubt that you dont know what you are talking about and that your Crystal Ball is cracked or your Magica 8 ball is stuck.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (May 07, 2009 10:06 pm ET)
           
        Because?.....

        Check the tinfoil on your hat, my friend. It is coming loose.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by loofabearoreilly19 (May 07, 2009 5:21 pm ET)
        2
      Man, you guys are funny...

      "The economic stimulus bill enacted in February contains $3 billion that the non-profit activist group known more formally as the Association for Community Organizations for Reform Now could receive, and 2010 federal budget contains another $5.5 billion that could also find its way into the group’s coffers."


      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (May 07, 2009 9:44 pm ET)
           
        YOU are a joke. I have water in my glass that COULD turn into ice IF I FROZE IT. Until I do that or at least begin to do that IT ISNT ICE.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (May 07, 2009 10:07 pm ET)
           
        Are you quoting yourself or loofahbear O'Reilly?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (May 07, 2009 11:15 pm ET)
        1  

        "When cows fly, can you imagine the size of your windshiled wipers'
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.