Beck echoes tired falsehood that ACORN received stimulus funds
SUMMARY: Glenn Beck echoed a false Republican talking point by stating, "By including ACORN, or groups like them, in the stimulus package, we have guaranteed them billions of dollars to buy more votes for the party that helps them the most." In fact, the stimulus bill does not mention ACORN or otherwise single it out for funding.
During the May 6 broadcast of his Fox News program, Glenn Beck echoed a false Republican talking point by stating, "By including ACORN, or groups like them, in the stimulus package, we have guaranteed them billions of dollars to buy more votes for the party that helps them the most." Beck then likened this to "seed money for the Democratic votes." However, as Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 does not mention ACORN or otherwise single it out for funding; ACORN itself has said that it is ineligible for the funds and has no plans to apply for them.
In falsely claiming that the act steered money to ACORN, Republicans have pointed to a provision in the act that would appropriate $2 billion for "emergency assistance for the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes, as authorized under division B, title III of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 [...] That additional award criteria for such competitions shall include demonstrated grantee capacity to execute projects, leveraging potential, concentration of investment to achieve neighborhood stabilization." The bill does not mention ACORN or otherwise single it out for funding.
Moreover, ACORN has denied that it is eligible for "neighborhood stabilization" funds -- the term used for the redevelopment funds in earlier versions of the act -- and has stated that it does not intend to apply for them. After House Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-OH) office issued press releases claiming that the recovery bill "makes groups like ACORN eligible for a $4.19 billion pot of money for 'neighborhood stabilization activities,' " in a January 28 press release, ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis called the claim an "obfuscation" that "was picked up across the right-wing echo chamber and has been used as a fig leaf by conservatives in their attempts to justify their opposition to progressive economic policies." Lewis further stated: "We have not received neighborhood stabilization funds, have no plans to apply for such funds, and didn't weigh in on the pending rule changes." On January 29, Lewis wrote at the Huffington Post: "[L]et's be clear. ACORN isn't getting any of this money. Since it is set aside for non-profit housing developers to help purchase, rehab, and resell foreclosed properties, we aren't eligible for it in the first place."
From the May 6 broadcast of Fox News' Glenn Beck:
BECK: But here's the one thing nobody else is going to say. If you look at President Obama, you have to realize we didn't elect a president; we elected a former community organizer. So why don't we start looking at him in those -- with those eyes? He's a community organizer. He has helped orchestrate a power grab of industry, energy, health care, and taxes. He wants to control it.
Let me explain through two stories that are in the news right now. If we understand community organizers, we'll understand Barack Obama. First, community organizers. What do they do? They organize communities. What, are they all in disarray?
Take the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, better known as ACORN. ACORN says they are, quote, "committed to social and economic justice," and to help, quote, "those who have historically been locked out become powerful players in our democratic system." Remember, President Obama just said the other day he wants his Supreme Court nominee to have empathy and understand social justice. That sounds like ACORN, not a justice. Hmmm.
They neglect to mention that this is one technique for accomplishing those things. The one technique is fraud. ACORN is facing fraud charges in Nevada, and there's a lot of other states that are getting into that act. Another way is intimidation. How many times have you seen community organizers like Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson threaten to bring their groups to the streets to bring social justice to anyone they perceive as a threat?
Who organized the bus tours of the homes of AIG executives so they could protest and scare the daylights out of their kids? It was ACORN. They're not really helping those who have been locked out. It's about helping those that help them.
This is a power grab. By including ACORN, or groups like them, in the stimulus package, we have guaranteed them billions of dollars to buy more votes for the party that helps them the most. Just as this is seed money for the Democratic votes, the auto bailout will help the party flourish for years to come.















Read it and weep.
Until it happens, you, Kevin Mooney and Glenn Beck are simply wetting your pants.
Followed your little link....
Kevin Mooney?....... Kevin Mooney?
Who the heck are you trying to kid... someone in here... or yourself?
Kevin Mooney is a grunt that works at the illegitimate and very right-wing skewed NewsBusters.com
So I offer my own link that proves that Mr. Mooney is hardly a voice of any actual reason...
HERE
Next time you come here to MMfA... the least you can do is come to the table with an actual story from someone that is not an already proven mouth piece of the right-wing attack machine.
Just posting a link means NOTHING. It's intellectually lazy and frequently dishonest.
"Just posting a link means NOTHING. It's intellectually lazy and frequently dishonest." BillJ-MN
you should choose your words more carefully next time.
You first. Your posts contain far more examples of careless words than Bill's do.
And, if Bill's link had no basis in fact, perhaps you would like to support that statement with some actual facts rather than just stating your unfounded opinion and expecting us to believe it just because you said so.
Your posting history suggests that if you say something, it is not to be believed without evidence and facts. And you have presented nothing of the sort.
this is a full online text of the bill. pdf style. in the search part of it, type ACORN and see what comes up. nothing comes up. cause it isnt in the bill. and i have read the text of the bill and have not seen it mentioned once.
I don't see any problem with the words I chose.
The opinion of a wingnut does not equal fact. ACORN is eligible, but that doesn't mean they'll get a penny.
You're eligible to receive a large sum of money from a Nigerian official who will email you shortly to tell you how you can receive it.
Let us know when it's deposited in your account.
If the redevelopment funds aren't limited to these construction trades functions, then MMFA is wrong and the Right-wing is probably right. It will shake your sense of reality to the core, if you can even grasp this, but errors aren't exclusive to the Right. They occur at about the same rate on the Left. The same is true for deceptions. Yes, both sides present part-truths and dubious "facts" to create impressions that are not true. And no, the Right isn't any more given to these inconsistencies than the Left.
These are human failings, universal to all human endeavors. Sports fans are constantly being convinced that the referees or umpires are slanting their calls, enemies in war are always more brutal and ruthless than allies, competitors are always cheating somehow. And the people that disagree with you must be craven, ignorant, delusional, whatever. We are over-eager to see our side as the "good-guys" and our opponents as the "bad-guys."
Beneath the superficiality of the struggle lie the foundations of these differing beliefs. Reality checking is a useful service, but only when it's done with great scrupulousness. MMFA, unfortunately, often fails to exercise such scruples. The whole concept of an agency that makes it their business to expose the deceptions of those that disagree with them ought to set off alarms in the mind of any serious thinker. It is a condition begging to become a breeding ground for prejudicial judgments. Too often the "deceptions" identified on this site are marginal in their quality, wrong or just trivial.
Then there is the comment section. Do any of you really believe that you are adding to the understanding of issues with demeaning references to others? With "clever" barbs? With oblique or over-broad condemnations. Do you really believe that you stand with the angels while the opposition is led by minions of Satan? (or any correlation to this differentiation that applies in your particular case.)
How much more valuable could it be if this section included a critical analysis of the postings based upon their merit. Weak arguments could be honed and refined. The Left could become more able, not just to dispute, doubt and deny, but to educate, to present ideas and persuade others of the superiority of your views. Instead of a rooters section, sites like MMFA need a resource by which their views and arguments can be refined and made more effective.
The host of our local wingnut show on WHP 580 that comes on afterward checked the story and of course found out it was false. Then all the wingnuts called up insisting it was true. Facts meant nothing to them.
Check the tinfoil on your hat, my friend. It is coming loose.
"The economic stimulus bill enacted in February contains $3 billion that the non-profit activist group known more formally as the Association for Community Organizations for Reform Now could receive, and 2010 federal budget contains another $5.5 billion that could also find its way into the group’s coffers."
"When cows fly, can you imagine the size of your windshiled wipers'