About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Scarborough falsely claimed Blair said "he probably would have done" EITs

May 12, 2009 12:14 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Joe Scarborough asserted that Dennis Blair said enhanced interrogation techniques "worked and he probably would have done it in 2002." In fact, Blair has stated, "I like to think I would not have approved those methods in the past."

5 Comments

MSNBC's Joe Scarborough claimed on May 12 that Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair came out and said enhanced interrogation techniques "worked and he probably would have done it in 2002." In fact, Blair wrote in an April 16 letter, "I like to think I would not have approved those methods in the past, but I do not fault those who made the decisions at that time," not that he "probably would have" used the techniques in 2002, as Scarborough claimed.

Moreover, Blair wrote in the letter, "[W]e will not use those techniques in the future." And in an April 21 statement, Blair said that the use of the techniques was not in the country's best interest: "The bottom line is these techniques have hurt our image around the world, the damage they have done to our interests far outweighed whatever benefit they gave us and they are not essential to our national security."

Media Matters for America has documented several other instances of the media misrepresenting Blair's letter.

From the May 12 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:

SCARBOROUGH: Yeah, I wasn't going to call in, but I've been watching the program, of course. I'm on assignment. Willie and I have a very, very important press conference to attend later on.

WILLIE GEIST (co-host): Yes.

SCARBOROUGH: I'm doing some intel on that right now. But I just wanted to say a couple of very quick things here.

First of all, the White House, when it comes to this issue, is not interested in reaching out. It's very interesting. We just heard a report from the White House saying that the White House doesn't care whether these techniques worked or not, but it's very interesting. The White House yesterday released a document from an auditor, inspector general, saying, well, you know, waterboarding and these other techniques didn't work.

So they will release these documents from lawyers in Washington, D.C., but they have classified CIA documents proving that all of these techniques worked; that we broke up Al Qaeda because of these techniques. They won't release that. And when his own intel chief Dennis Blair comes out and says that these enhanced techniques worked and he probably would have done it in 2002, they cherry-pick that information out.

And so the press just sits there acting as if, Liz [Cheney], as if your father is on some other planet for suggesting this, and, in part, it's because the White House is cherry-picking the intelligence that they're leaking out.

So they will leak evidence that hurts the Bush administration's position and your father's position, but they keep classified the documents that make your father's point.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (May 12, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
      1  
      It's a little funny and a little sad watching the Republicans flail about trying to defend their position on this issue.

      Just a few short years ago, they called anyone an "America Hater" who suggested that our troops might have committed atrocities in Iraq, or any time in history, for that matter.

      Now, these same Jingofascists are trying to convince us that mistreating prisoners is "The American Way", and that we and our allies have always done it. Go figure.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (May 12, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
      1  
      "it's because the White House is cherry-picking the intelligence that they're leaking out."

      Boy. It's a good thing the Bush White House never did that, huh? Oh wait...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (May 12, 2009 7:29 pm ET)
         
      i dont think ive ever seen scarborough kiss someones butt so much WHILE talking to them. he seemed so offended by how cheney has "been treated", and liz loved the whole monologue too. she actually told him, "keep going, youre doing great". im a pretty big fan of scarborough as a person (probably the only one here) because hes not a pompous jerk like most republicans, but his bigotry really bugs me sometimes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by irked (May 12, 2009 11:22 pm ET)
         
      ". . . (P)robably would have done . . "? What's the "probably" about? He was in the same boat as the American leadership and he either used torture or he didn't. There's no probably about it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by aocasio463507 (May 13, 2009 8:06 am ET)
         
      Its time for MSNBC to trade Joe and Mika to Fox News for a dollar.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.