About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity still playing "dumb" about Nugent's use of the "B" word on his show

May 13, 2009 8:08 am ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Discussing Perez Hilton's remarks about Carrie Prejean, Sean Hannity stated, "I would think that you wouldn't want somebody that calls a woman -- any woman -- a dumb 'b' ever on your show." However, Hannity previously aired footage of Ted Nugent calling Hillary Clinton a "worthless bitch," then referred to Nugent as a "friend and frequent guest on the program."

53 Comments

On the May 12 edition of his Fox News show, discussing his earlier interview with Miss California Carrie Prejean, Sean Hannity said: "[Blogger Perez Hilton] called her 'a dumb 'B.' I mean, how dare -- and not only that, he said he would've violently ripped off the crown off her head. I love Donald [Trump]; he's a friend of mine. I'm not sure why he said he would want [Hilton] back, or allow him back." Hannity added: "I would think that you wouldn't want somebody that calls a woman -- any woman -- a dumb 'b' ever on your show." However, on August 24, 2007, Hannity aired concert footage of rock musician and right-wing activist Ted Nugent referring to then-Sen. Hillary Clinton as a "worthless bitch" and calling then-Sen. Barack Obama a "piece of shit." After airing the clip, Hannity referred to Nugent as a "friend and frequent guest on the program."

In the video clip, Nugent holds up what appear to be two assault rifles, and says, "Obama, he's a piece of shit, and I told him to suck on my machine gun." He also says, "Hey, Hillary, you might want to ride one of these into the sunset, you worthless bitch." After airing the clip, Hannity stated: "That was friend and frequent guest on the program Ted Nugent expressing his feelings towards Democratic presidential contenders Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton." Moments later, Hannity compared Nugent's comments to a statement by Obama, which Hannity distorted by claiming Obama "accus[ed] our troops of killing civilians." Hannity then asked Democratic strategist Bob Beckel: "What's more offensive to you? Is it Barack Obama's statement about our troops or Ted Nugent?" In response, Beckel asked Hannity if he was "prepared to disavow this lowlife." Hannity replied: "No, I like Ted Nugent. He's a friend of mine." When Beckel later said that Nugent "ought to never come on your show again, and if you have him on, you ought to be ashamed of yourself," Hannity responded: "Not at all. We have you on."

Nugent subsequently appeared on the October 13, 2008, edition of Hannity & Colmes to promote his book Ted, White and Blue: The Nugent Manifesto.

On the April 21 edition of his show, Hannity asked Prejean: "What did you think when [Hilton] went on this rant and actually used the 'B' word? I mean, I can't think of anything more vicious, more mean, more insulting, more degrading, just because you have a different opinion." During the January 12 edition of his program, Hannity also said: "I don't like the lyrics that refer to women as 'B's' and 'ho's,' and we've had many discussions about this."

From the May 12 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: Yeah. And you answered nicely and you answered delicately.

PREJEAN: I did.

HANNITY: You said I know there are people that disagree, so then the question is why did this become such a big deal?

PREJEAN: Well, it was Perez Hilton's hidden agenda that he had.

HANNITY: What do you think that is?

PREJEAN: Well, he's a gay activist, and he's very famous for, you know, insulting, particularly women. He doesn't insult men very often, and this would not be happening right now had he just, you know, gone on his way and said, I don't believe in what she said, but that's her opinion.

But he decided to make that video, not even an hour after the pageant had ended, and that's when the firestorm had begun.

HANNITY: You know, I kind of knew this because I know Donald Trump and he really went to bat for you today --

PREJEAN: He did.

HANNITY: -- and he pointed out you had taken a lot of abuse. Why don't you bring people into exactly -- for example, Perez Hilton, actually used the word -- called you a dumb B-word. Said if you had won the crown, he was going to rip it off your head.

I mean, tell me about some of the other abuse that you experienced.

[...]

KELLY KILLOREN BENSIMON (author and model): One of the biggest points of this whole topic is that Perez Hilton really sensationalized that moment.

HANNITY: He called her "a dumb 'B.' "

BENSIMON: Right.

HANNITY: I mean, how dare -- and not only that, said he would've violently ripped off the crown off her head. I love Donald; he's a friend of mine. I'm not sure why he said he would want him back, or allow him back, 'cause I would think that you wouldn't somebody that calls a woman -- any woman -- a dumb "B" ever on your show.

BENSIMON: Well, he generated a lot of press.

HANNITY: Good point.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wesley (May 13, 2009 8:46 am ET)
      4 3
      While I believe in a lot of the principles that are promoted by Hannity...I am not a Hannity fan.

      He clings to a shallow, partisan rhetoric that serves little more purpose than giggling cheerleaders waving pompoms.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (May 13, 2009 10:06 am ET)
        3  
        It has to be a little disheartening to realize that Hannity is a leading spokesman for the folks who share your principles. It's been the hannitys, limpaughs, coulters, etc. who have created the vast political divide in this country that's a barrier to reasoned discourse. Without the heavy partisan promotion of these self-serving clowns, both the right and the left would tend to moderate, bringing the fringe players closer to the center, or at least relegating them to irrelevant obscurity. You'd have a much easier time arguing your principles without the defensive position into which these morons have forced the left. Why don't you folks vehemently and openly resist the hannicoulimbeck industry?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by WildcatProgressive (May 13, 2009 9:09 am ET)
      2  
      The only thing that saddens/disturbs me about Sean Hannity is that people will actually listen to what he says and take it as gospel.

      I also have the feeling that he actually believes what he is saying, and has no sense of how big a hypocrite he is.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wizbor4654 (May 13, 2009 9:29 am ET)
          13
        Neither does MM realize what a hypocrite they are with this report.

        Senator Byrd regularly used the "N" word. Why not he was a former Klu Klux Klan member. MM outraged? not.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mrhebert74 (May 13, 2009 9:44 am ET)
          3  
          Are you obtuse? Media Matters doesn't get "outraged" about things that Democratic senators said a long time ago, they report on conservative misinformation in the media. Get it? "Media Matters."
          For your fauxtrage on Senator Byrd's misdeeds of the past, you might want to look to politicsmattered.org, where I hear they also have regular updates on Chappaquiddick.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (May 13, 2009 10:07 am ET)
          4  
          Wiz, what a bor. I think if you look into your ancestors, you'll find some racist attitudes too. Byrd apologised a long time ago, and mention of him has no relationship to what this article is about.

          We're actually discussing Hannity and his double standard.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by neon desert (May 13, 2009 10:18 am ET)
            3  
            Wiz is simply re-establishing the baseline standard on which the rights "lowest common denominator" moral principle is based. If you deny them the priviledge of doing so Mary, the standard will evetually become to hard for them to live up to.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (May 13, 2009 11:51 am ET)
              4  
              That baseline being "never forgive, never forget". Except when the subject is them, then it's "I'm a christian, I'm not perfect (you perverse disgusting low life sinner!)"
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (May 13, 2009 4:13 pm ET)
                1  
                You nailed it perfectly. The whole idea of Christianity (or Islam, or Buddhism, etc.) is to strive to follow a spiritual path, not to throw stones at everyone else.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (May 13, 2009 11:41 am ET)
          2  
          It's rare to see a post so short and yet so extensively flawed at the same time.

          As noted, this is a media site. They don't do straight reporting on the comments of politicians from either party. As also noted, this was decades ago. The Chappaquiddick reference was appropriate.

          By your logic, neither side can ever make a note of anything. Every single member of the Republican party could make racist comments, and you could just blow it off by saying "You're hypocrites, what about Byrd?" Likewise, every single member of the Democratic party could do the same, and you wouldn't be able to say anything because of Trent Lott. I'm sure you can find a single anti-semitic, sexist, ageist, off-color or otherwise offensive remark from a member of either party at some point throughout their respective histories.

          It probably leaps to your mind that you don't agree with Trent Lott, and he doesn't speak for you. If that's the case, then obviously Byrd doesn't speak for anyone on the left either. Nobody here approved of his racist behavior, so it's perfectly legitimate to point out Hannity's partisan double-standard.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by anotheramerican (May 13, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
              2
            Brab,

            I think the point that was made is that if a Democrat makes a racist statement, MMFA either ignores it or tries to deflect it by pointing out any and all statements it can find about Republicans.

            However if a Republican makes a similar statement, it will be quickly posted.

            By being so patently one sided, MMFA is open to legitimate criticism for being hypocritical. Accept it. They are.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by CohibaMan (May 13, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
              3  
              So...

              What you're saying is that you'd like to see a "Fairness Doctrine" here on MMfA.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mrhebert74 (May 13, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
              3  
              Hi aa!
              The last on-record racist statement I could find of Byrd's occurred in 2001. Media Matters was founded in 2004, so wiz picked a pretty bad suggestion for where to look for outrage about a racist statement by a Democrat. But then again, it is pretty hard to find racist statements by Democrats.

              To the extent that a racist statement by a Democrat constituted "conservative misinformation in the U.S. media," (for instance, if a Democrat made such a statement to a TV host who failed to challenge it) I'd like to see it written up in MMFA.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by worrierking (May 13, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
                3  

                Here's a more recent on-record racist statement from non other than our good friend AnotherAmerican.

                " by anotheramerican (April 30, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
                rox,

                The part you are missing, is that this was a staged media event by the White House and forced the networks to give up $20+ million in advertising revenue so our NOTUS could continue campaigning.

                They had planned a flyover by Air Force One but cancelled it for some reason..."
                Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (May 13, 2009 6:10 pm ET)
              2  
              I find your inability to comprehend amazing.

              That wasn't the point being made. The example was Byrd, specifically. If MMfA is really not supposed to address any offensive comment of any sort because a single Democrat made racist comments years ago, then it's off-limits for any site to do so. That applies to conservative sites as well.

              Can you counter that?

              Do you have examples of MMfA defending racist comments by Democrats? As I said, that wasn't the point being made, but I'm curious anyway.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (May 13, 2009 11:43 pm ET)
              1  
              A racist statement? You mean like NOTUS? You have lost ALL credibility on this site, sir.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mrhebert74 (May 14, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
                   
                If only he had ever cared about credibility. He might not have become a wingnut in the first place.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 14, 2009 10:01 am ET)
                 
              AA,

              Does MMFA carry the quotes of Republicans in the media or how they are reported on? Big, big difference.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (May 15, 2009 4:32 am ET)
                 
              You making the same argument to MRC and AIM? I am betting that you ARENT. YOU are the hypocrite here. Byrd is NOT part of the media and Hannity IS. You really wont find ANYTHING done by a wingnut that you wont appologize for will you?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (May 13, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
          4  
          You realize, of course, that your post is completely irrelevant. You're totally ignoring the story and bringing up something utterly different; MMfA points out right-wing bias in the news and you're bringing up something totally unrelated.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (May 13, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
          4  
          Senator Byrd is not a member of the media.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mrhebert74 (May 13, 2009 5:25 pm ET)
            2  
            No, but MMFA could've highlighted FOX News interviewer Tony Snow's handling of the comments.

            IF THEY HAD A TIME MACHINE!

            MMFA was founded three years after Byrd said that.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (May 13, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
          2  
          Is Senator Byrd part of the media? Are you seriously saying that if MM criticizes Hannity for his obvious hypocrisy here they have an obligation to go back years and castigate a POLITICIAN NOT IN THE MEDIA also? Really? I dont guess it would do anygood to have you read the mission statement again.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 14, 2009 8:48 am ET)
             
          Were he to do so NOW, I can assure that not only would there be outrage on the left, but it would likely be the end of his long political career. As for what he may have done FORTY YEARS ago, he has been open and forthright in his regret and shame at having bee associated with that crowd. The fact is that all those guys vote republican now, AND YOU KNOW IT! So stop suggesting that he is somehow flawed because he was once like you. He no longer is, so it only reveals YOUR OWN flaws. (Why do conservatives ALWAYS insist on arguing this way?)

          As for MM's outrage? Sen. Byrd calling someone a n----- would not qualify as 'conservative misinformation.' MM's mission is not to report on every tasteless and ignorant thing uttered by everyone. (Again, why do conservatives ALWAYS insist on arguing this way?)
          Report Abuse
      • Author by whillenbrand (May 13, 2009 9:30 am ET)
        5  
        When you take a closer look at entire Hannity package you can see what this guy is all about. whether he believes his own rhetoric or not is less important then all the people who believes his propaganda. Take notice who the sponsors are. Most sell crap or services that are intended for less educated, lower income individuals who buy on impulse.
        Listen to his callers. Like most talk radio, callers do fit a format. They are lower income but will buy almost anything their favorite host tells them to buy. The shame is in the fact that Hannity and the others
        build wealth off these people by telling them excatly what they want to hear and believe then run a commercial for buying gold, or seeds for their "survival" garden. According to Hannity, he is a customer for every one of companies that run ads on his show. I wonder if that guy in Kentucky knows that his support helped buy Hannity a 8.5 million dollar home in Long Island and all the "lifestyle" accessories that go with it. Nothing wrong with success but not at the expense of lies and deception about our country.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by anotheramerican (May 13, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
            4
          whillenbrand,

          Why are liberals like you so condescending? What sources do you have that backs up your contention about conservative talk show listeners being lower income and less educated? Or are you another one of these liberals who can peer through the radio and discern income levels and education levels by listening to someone for a few seconds?

          I'm sure those poor and uneducated people all run out to buy gold and then head to dinner at RuthsChris Steakhouses while buying flowers online, with truffles no less, because they heard about it on Hannity. Sounds like something someone just hanging on would do don't you think?

          I just love it when the a liberal speaks as honestly as you showing the rest of us how silly you can be.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mrhebert74 (May 13, 2009 5:33 pm ET)
               
            Holy cow, aa, I agree with you on something. Most people I know who listen to these radio guys are in fact relatively successful, older men. They're not so successful as to be affected by the tax increases they oppose, but still, I wouldn't call them poor and uneducated.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 14, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
               
            Sources? Evidence? Here you go:

            Limbuaugh - Dropped out of college after one semester, failing every course. Thrice divorced. Drug abuser / recovering adict.

            Hannity - Two time college dropout.

            Beck - Dropped out of college after just one course. Alchohol abuser / recovering adict.

            Any questions?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by mrhebert74 (May 13, 2009 9:45 am ET)
      3  
      Hannity still playing "dumb..."

      Um, are we sure he's "playing?"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SDL (May 13, 2009 9:59 am ET)
        1  
        Hannity keeps telling himself over and over again:
        "Ted Nugent GOOD...Perez Hilton...BAD!"
        "Ted Nugent GOOD...Perez Hilton...BAD!"
        "Ted Nugent GOOD...Perez Hilton...BAD!"
        "Ted Nugent GOOD...Perez Hilton...BAD!"
        "Ted Nugent GOOD...Perez Hilton...BAD!"

        ad infinitum...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (May 13, 2009 10:09 am ET)
        1  
        He makes it seem so natural.

        Perhaps he should ask limpaugh about adopting the "talent on loan from God" phrase for himself.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 13, 2009 1:35 pm ET)
          1  
          I want to know the interest God is charging on that "loan." I don't think Limbaugh will be able to afford the vig.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (May 13, 2009 11:09 am ET)
      1  
      I'm sure Nugent isn't the only one. It seems like Hillary has been pretty much fair game for that for years. Pelosi too. And every other Dem woman.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (May 13, 2009 11:23 am ET)
        1  
        "For years," is right. It goes back at least as far as Eleanor Roosevelt.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (May 13, 2009 1:17 pm ET)
      2  
      Prejean should be thanking Perez Hilton for making her a martyr. That question is the best thing that ever happened to her.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (May 13, 2009 2:03 pm ET)
      1  
      Sean and his friend, Ted "Pantload" Nugent, will probably ask to be given some slack here. Sean doesn't mind someone on his show calling a Senator a "worthless b_tch", he's upset that someone called a pageant contestant a "dumb b_tch".

      Dimwits like Sean and the Pantload resent people questioning anyone's mental abilities. (Or in their cases lack of mental abilities).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by JimInTheBay (May 13, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
      2  
      Is this the same Ted Nugent who proudly said in an interview years ago that before he went in for his (military) pre-induction physical that he'd slept in his clothes for 2 weeks and crapped in his pants in order fail it? Way to avoid serving your country Ted.
      The more chicken-hawks like you pop-off the easier it is to dismiss you and your kind.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (May 13, 2009 7:45 pm ET)
        1  
        Here's a link explaining how low the Pantload was willing to go to avoid serving under the flag he now wraps himself in .
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jonesjax2374 (May 13, 2009 9:22 pm ET)
          1  
          Nugent. I vividly recall how thrilled we were in 9th Grade when CAT SCRATCH FEVAHHH came out. Always sad to find out your old rock heroes - or any hero - is across a divide from you politically. I suppose Lindberg fans are still disappointed. Hilary got called uglier things by Rush et al. Miss California is now a star. A lying, boob-implanted star. And once a pretty brunette with a dream! Miss Nevada has a point. Perez was tacky. Wonder how long we'll hear about her. Until she gets her own Fox Show I suppose. Thank god the girls have this FANTASTIC opportunity, eh? I'll tell you who's NOT a dumb "B" - the director who quit over this idiocy. Good for her. Doubt SHE'LL be on Hannity.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jonesjax2374 (May 13, 2009 9:23 pm ET)
               
            Whoops I totally lied. It was HIGH SCHOOL 11th Grade! OMG I'm old. And so is Ted.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (May 15, 2009 4:37 am ET)
               
            Yeah my friends all loved that album too. Personally I always thought he was a mediocre guitarist at BEST trying to pass off scales and excersices as solos.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by jonesjax2374 (May 13, 2009 9:35 pm ET)
             
          BTW - great link. LOL! I can't believe Miss Joe the Plumber is the new darling. Fame's a beotch, hunny.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by rkcomments (May 13, 2009 8:32 pm ET)
         
      I'm still waiting for this doofus to follow-through on his promise to be waterboarded for charity. Like all the other 'more patriot than thou' crowds on the Right, Hannity is too much of a weasel to follow-through on his grand talking points. What a loser.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cpinva (May 14, 2009 12:32 am ET)
         
      mr. hannity doesn't have to play dumb, he's naturally gifted.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (May 14, 2009 12:36 am ET)
      2  
      Sean Hannity is to political commentary what Ted Nugent is to Rock and Roll--loud and stupid.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by FNC Liberal (May 14, 2009 3:21 am ET)
         
      Sean is stupid in real life, and he curses too. I laugh everytime he says he's a 'christian.' He's not, especially the nasty things he's done in the past. Just ask people who have worked with him, they'll tell you.

      Nugent is a lunatic. He's reduce to performing at Tea Parties instead of stadiums. I hope his career completely fails.


      Report Abuse
    • Author by agarcia (May 14, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
        1
      What Ted Nugent did to Hillary can't even compare to what Obama supporters did to her during the primary. She was called the filthiest, most vile names I've ever heard. They wore T-SHIRTS with the four-letter word calling her a C _ _ T on it ( there are pictures to prove it). On Daily Kos, HuffPo, etc., I had to leave those blogs because they were so filled with filth and hatred toward Hillary. It's not a Hannity thing - or a Republican thing, it's a WOMAN thing. The media still makes snarky remarks about Hillary - who's about the hardest working person in Washington right now. Those feelings are still there underneath the surface of the Obama supporters - they're just hiding them, so stop being hypocrits!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mrhebert74 (May 14, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
        2 1
        Nioe try. The t-shirts from "Citizens United Not Timid" were the idea of a Republican. Do the pictures that prove "it" have, like, big arrows pointing to the people in the t-shirts with the words "Obama supporter?"
        As an Obama supporter and Hillary Clinton admirer it drives me crazy that some Clinton supporters felt the need to cry sexism (and anything else they could cry) when Obama won in the political arena. And I have a hard time thinking that Obama supporters (though we are a diverse group) could believe so strongly in so many progressive ideals, but in general hate women. That just doesn't pass the sniff test to me, despite what some people may have written on comments on dailykos and huffpost. Hint: if you don't want to be exposed to stupid comments, don't read the comments (they're written by members of the public, you know).
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Freword (May 14, 2009 3:06 pm ET)
             
          How could any one take listen Hannity at all He is so dumb
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mrhebert74 (May 14, 2009 6:11 pm ET)
             
          Let me be clear: I like Hillary Clinton. I think she would have been a good president. I would have voted for her if she was the Democratic nominee. Also, I hate sexism. I think it's wasteful, stupid, and demeaning to all of humanity, in the same way as homophobia and racism. And as an Obama supporter, I reject the idea that I and others like me are hypocrites with sexist feelings "underneath the surface," as the poster I responded to suggested. I think the charges of sexism are much more accurately directed at Ted Nugent than at me.

          This is in response to the thumbs-down sans explanation.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (May 15, 2009 4:43 am ET)
            1  
            I dont much care for Hillary. I dont mean personally but politically. My ONLY problem with her is she is too conservative for me. I would have voted for her without a single qualm had she gotten the nomination and I certainly never disrespected her in any way. I DID see some pretty harsh rhetoric from some of the Obama supporters but not THAT bad. Not like the teeshirt thing which WAS a republican gambit. I hope Obama does enough good with lefy policies we can be talking about Fiengold in 2016
            Report Abuse
    • Author by dryflyguy (May 14, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
         
      Speaking of Hannity being dumb, did anyone notice that his show ran a story last night about Oprah using a "Leer Jet." It was even in the graphic that ran with the story.
      Well, Mr. Hannity, you should spend less time worrying about mustard and more time spell-checking your own show. The correct spelling is "Learjet."

      Report Abuse
    • Author by shag11 (May 14, 2009 10:19 pm ET)
         
      Now let's give the scumbag Hannity the benefit of the doubt. He did say "dumb", and not "worthless" as Nugent said. Hannity is a lying, deceitful, unethical scumbag.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.