About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Wash. Times headlines "jeers" for Obama's commencement address, but not for Bush's

May 18, 2009 5:11 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: The Washington Times headlined its article on President Obama's May 17 commencement address "Notre Dame cheers, jeers Obama." The headlines of Times stories on commencement addresses by President Bush did not similarly highlight protesters at those events.

7 Comments

The Washington Times headlined its May 18 article on President Obama's May 17 commencement address "Notre Dame cheers, jeers Obama," highlighting what the article described as "a few" attendees who "vocally protested" and "perhaps a dozen graduates" who engaged in "silent protest" of the university's decision to invite Obama to speak and receive an honorary degree. In headlines of its reports on commencement addresses by President Bush, the Times did not similarly highlight protesters at those events.

In the May 18 article, Washington Times staff writer Stephen Dinan wrote of the protests during Obama's commencement address:

Mr. Obama received a raucously enthusiastic greeting from graduates of America's leading Roman Catholic university even as protesters outside -- and a few inside -- vocally objected to his pro-choice views, which stand in contrast with Catholic teaching.

[...]

His 31-minute speech was interrupted early by a man shouting "abortion is murder," but the student body shouted the man down, chanting Mr. Obama's campaign slogan, "Yes, we can." A few other interruptions followed, but Mr. Obama talked through them.

[...]

And as Mr. Obama spoke, on the floor of the Joyce Center in front of him, perhaps a dozen graduates had put on the tops of their mortarboard hats an image of a yellow cross with yellow infants' feet on each side as a silent protest.

Other students put the iconic Obama campaign "O" on their mortarboards, or wrote slogans of support for the president. Keeping with tradition at Notre Dame, the architecture students had on their mortarboards elaborate models of buildings such as the Washington Monument, Leaning Tower of Pisa or the Empire State Building.

By contrast, the Times headlined its May 22, 2001, report (retrieved from the Nexis database) on Bush's commencement address at Yale University "Self-deprecating Bush tells graduates of his debt to Yale." In the body of the article, the Times reported, "In a commencement speech to graduating seniors, some of whom booed him, Mr. Bush joked about his reputation as a partier and an intellectual lightweight," and further reported, "While the president was speaking, dozens of seniors held up yellow signs expressing their disapproval." The Associated Press reported that while Bush accepted an honorary degree, "hundreds of graduating students" were "booing and holding small protest signs." Several other newspapers' May 22, 2001, reports on Bush's Yale commencement address used headlines that highlighted the protests. The Washington Post used the headline "Bush Embraces Yale In Graduation Speech; President Gets Cool Reception at Alma Mater," USA Today used the headline "Yale crowd a tough one for Bush," and The New York Times used the headline, "Bush Returns to Yale, but Welcome Is Not All Warm."

Further, The Washington Times headlined a May 21, 2005, article on Bush's commencement address at the Christian-affiliated Calvin College "Bush praises faith-based activism." As the Times reported in its article, Bush's Calvin address was also protested:

The president's visit to the liberal arts college became controversial when a third of the college's faculty signed a letter published yesterday in the Grand Rapids Press that said: "As Christians, we are called to be peacemakers and to initiate war only as a last resort. We believe your administration has launched an unjust and unjustified war in Iraq."

Another letter signed by about 800 students, faculty and alumni ran Friday. It said: "In our view, the policies and actions of your administration, both domestically and internationally over the past four years, violate many deeply held principles of Calvin College."

Only a handful of students showed up to protest the president's address at the 4,000-student school. The students had also planned to wear armbands -- yellow for peace, green for the environment and pink for tolerance -- but, in a survey of the 875 graduates as they accepted their diplomas, just a few sported the bands.

Indeed, on May 17, 2005, the Times ran an article on the commencement address headlined "College ad to protest Bush visit: Professors criticize policies of commencement speaker."

Similarly, in a June 2, 2008, report, the Times published a portion of the Associated Press' write-up of Bush's commencement address at Furman University under the headline, "Bush sets goal for graduates." The AP reported, "President Bush, ignoring faculty members who stood in silent protest of his commencement speech, acknowledged Saturday that when he left college, thinking about how to be a 'model citizen' was the furthest thing from his mind." The AP added of the protesters:

Scores of Bush supporters lined his motorcade route and the crowd gave Bush a warm welcome as he strode into the university stadium for the outdoor commencement ceremony. But about 15 members of the faculty stood in silent protest during the president's speech. They wore white T-shirts emblazoned with "We Object" to show their opposition to Bush's policies on the Iraq war, global warming and other issues.

From the May 22, 2001, Washington Times article:

President Bush finally made his peace with Yale University yesterday, returning to this bastion of liberal elitism 33 years after graduating from the school where he never felt quite at home.

It was a bittersweet return for the president, whose conservatism is anathema to most of the Yale community, which cast more votes for Green Party candidate Ralph Nader than for Mr. Bush in November.

In a commencement speech to graduating seniors, some of whom booed him, Mr. Bush joked about his reputation as a partier and an intellectual lightweight. But there was also a reflective side to the speech, a sense that the president has reconciled himself to his alma mater after years of ambivalence.

[...]

While the president was speaking, dozens of seniors held up yellow signs expressing their disapproval. Some later said they preferred Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, who spoke at Yale on Sunday.

Yesterday's protest was organized in part by Jacob Remes, a 20-year-old junior who said Mr. Bush had not accomplished enough with his life to receive an honorary degree from Yale.

"He hasn't done very much," Mr. Remes told a gaggle of White House correspondents on the grassy quad just before the graduation ceremony. "He's only been president for a matter of months. Before that, he certainly hasn't done much with his life."

Mr. Remes added: "The things he has done, like repudiating Kyoto, like the energy plan, like the global gag rule on abortion, have been terrible. . . . I don't think that Yale should be honoring him."

Mr. Bush made no mention of protesters sprinkled throughout the crowd, whose boos were largely drowned out by applause. In fact, he spent the first half of the speech poking fun at his own shortcomings.

"To those of you who received honors, awards and distinctions, I say well done," said the president, dressed in a blue graduation gown with black stripes. "And to the C students, I say: You, too, can be president of the United States."

One of his twin daughters, Barbara, just completed her freshman year at Yale. Yale President Richard C. Levin yesterday lauded the president's "commitment to inclusiveness, combined with your pragmatism and common sense."

Mr. Bush became a bit emotional at the close of his speech.

"I hope that there will come a time for you to return to Yale," he said, "and feel as I do today. And I hope you won't wait as long."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by right-winger (May 18, 2009 7:39 pm ET)
      1 1
      I SEE THE RIGHT-WING MEDIA AT FOX AND CNN GOT EGG ON THERE FACES AGAIN AND I LOVED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ALL WEEK LONG THE MEDIA WAS TALKING ABOUT NOTRE DAME BECAUSE THEY JUST KNEW IT WAS GOING TO MAKE OBAMA LOOK BAD AGAIN. WHY DO YOU THING CNN AND FOXNEWS WENT LIVE WITH THE SPEECH. BUT AGAIN THEY GOT EGG ON THERE FACES AND THE ONLY ONE THAT LOOKED BAD WERE THE PROLIFE PROTERSTER. NOW LOOK AT CNN AND FOX NEWS TODAY NOT EVEN TALKING ABOUT THE NOTRE DAME SPEECH BECAUSE OBAMA WON THAT GAME YESTERDAY AND THEY CAN'T STAND SHOWING THINGS ON THERE SHOW THAT MAKE OBAMA LOOK GOOD.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by my4cents (May 18, 2009 8:43 pm ET)
      2  
      Few caveats to my post.
      1. I am neither a Christian nor a Muslim.
      2. I am against organized religion. I practice my religion the way I see fit.
      3. My post is not directly related to this article.

      That said,
      What is the difference between Catholics / Christians who protest the presence of a person whose beliefs they disagree with and Muslims who stone non-believers to death? Just that the other person does not die?

      It was not like Obama's reason for presence at ND was to promote Choice. He was invited to speak at graduation ceremony. He was invited because he was the President of the country and not because the university believed his personal views on religion.

      This is no different than the Republican Governor of TX threatening secession because the President that was giving him free money was a Democrat. And yet, when swine flu breaks he is expecting assistance from the same Democratic President.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (May 18, 2009 9:23 pm ET)
        2  
        Well, let me state, I am an atheist, who used to be Catholic.

        There is a huge difference between someone who kills someone because they are not of their religion, and standard protesting that went on at Notre Dame. The protesters were few, and they were loud at times, and some got arrested, peacefully. I don't agree with their entire protest (mostly because I'm sure these are some of the same folks who think everything Bush did was GREAT), but in this country, as you know, they can protest. That being said, show me a Presidential appearance, from any President, where there weren't some protesters who showed up. It's part of the job. No matter how well you're liked, or not liked, there are going to be folks that will protest you as President.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by political_left-religious_right (May 19, 2009 11:03 am ET)
             
          Well put. The media have portrayed this as though Obama invited himself (he didn't), that the protests were enormous (they weren't), and that protests are unusual (they're not, although it should be mentioned how much G.W. went out of his way to avoid them). The only time I ever saw a sitting president was in 1991, when G.H.W. Bush spoke at my wife's graduation ceremony. There were three separate groups of protesters; one silently turned their backs on him, one waved signs with sayings that I can't recall, and one was vocally trying to work the crowd without success. And this was Bush 41, not 43, and at a time when he was generally popular!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (May 19, 2009 1:35 pm ET)
             
          Agreed.
          My point, mostly, was that both groups were intolerant to varying degrees.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Johnniewalker (May 19, 2009 4:39 am ET)
           
        Please, please say that out loud, and preferably when people are around. If you are in school raise your hand and say that so an even larger group of people can ponder that thought.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (May 19, 2009 7:12 pm ET)
           
        "What is the difference between Catholics / Christians who protest the presence of a person whose beliefs they disagree with and Muslims who stone non-believers to death?"

        Ugh, one is constitutionally protected and one isn't. But you knew that, so I don't know where you were going.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.