About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hour 3: Rush challenges MSNBC to go 30 days without mentioning him

May 19, 2009 4:08 pm ET

27 Comments

This hour of the Limbaugh Wire brought to you by Rush's 30-day challenge
By Greg Lewis and Karl Frisch

The third hour kicked off with Rush reading a laundry list of news articles. First up was an AP article about Democrats in Congress not wanting to fund the closure of Guantánamo Bay in January. Rush asked why Democrats would turn on Obama on this issue and wondered if it may have to do with bad polling on the issue. (Dear dittoheads, ignore the fact that this issue has polled well.)

Next up, he read about a Rasmussen poll on health care, and then a Reuters story about blue collar workers in the U.S. facing higher unemployment rates. After reading excerpts from the article, Limbaugh asked: How's that hope and change working out for you? He went on to say that the "little guy" was supposed to be the beneficiary of stimulus spending, but the "little guy" leads the economy in unemployment.

Rush then read from another AP article reporting that housing construction and permits "plunge[d] to record lows in April," and from a Washington Post article reporting that yesterday's market rally was led by the housing and banking sectors. The right-wing talker argued that these articles "contradict" each other. But do they really? The AP article suggested the bad news might indicate a bottom in the market, and the daily movements of the stock market are generally thought to be indicators of the economy down the road. But we don't dare challenge the knowledge of economist Limbaugh.

An AP article on students' anxiety because of the recession again brought out Rush's obnoxious side. He noted that the "hope and change" slogan isn't working out too well for students, but then added that it's a good thing for the college students and recent graduates described in the article who have to work two or three jobs because it's the best education they're likely getting.

Before the break, Rush read one more article about the city of San Francisco issuing a 33-cent tax on cigarettes to fund the clean-up of cigarette butts around the city. Rush dubbed this new San Francisco tax the "butt tax."

Following another set of commercials, Limbaugh declared that he wanted to issue a challenge to MSNBC. First, he noted that GOP chairman Michael Steele made a speech today in which he mentioned nearly every Republican except for Limbaugh and Dick Cheney. But Rush's point was how MSNBC was apparently incapable of going without mentioning Rush for any "appreciable length of time." He then challenged MSNBC to try "Rush withdrawal" and go 30 days without doing a single story or making a single mention of him.

Another break, another caller. This one was a 20-year-old woman who likened liberals in Washington to angry teenagers who react on emotion. The dittohead then noted how she'd been reading stories lately that describe how "the hip-hop movement is getting the youth movement going," adding: "[B]ut I feel like I can't be a part of that movement because their whole movement is all for Obama." To which Rush responded: "Not only that, you want to stay alive. I mean, street cred for hip-hoppers is a murder charge." Classy. (Although, it should be noted that Rush was probably referring to this recent story.)

Rush moved on to contrast a quote from Obama's Notre Dame commencement address with one of Obama's recent actions, which he claimed contradict each other. Rush quoted from Obama's speech: "In short, we must find a way to live together as one human family. ... Moreover, no one person, or religion, or nation can meet these challenges alone. Our very survival has never required greater cooperation and greater understanding among all people from all places than at this moment in history."

El Rushbo argued that this message conflicts with Obama's reported refusal to meet with the unpopular and ineffectual governor of Nevada, Jim Gibbons. He then spoke about Obama's remarks in February, in which he criticized executives at companies receiving bailout money for taking trips to Las Vegas, and Gibbons having blamed these remarks for hurting tourism in Vegas. However, Rush did not mention this side of the story:

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs has said Obama wasn't discouraging travel to Las Vegas and instead was referring specifically to companies getting public funds. Gibbs' comments were welcomed at the time by Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman and various tourism boosters.

Rush added in his commentary that Obama doesn't cooperate, "he kneecaps people to get them to cooperate."

Finally, Limbaugh ended his show with a caller who was really upset that taxes on tobacco products are being raised, which meant that he can no longer smoke the cigars he likes so much; he now has to start smoking lesser ones. Rush empathized with the caller after he went to commercial by lighting up a cigarette for himself in his studio, which we watched on the Dittocam. So much for his oft-touted "formerly nicotine-stained fingers."

Highlights from Hour 3

Outrageous remarks:

CALLER: I'm so focused on getting the youth movement going, and I read today on, you know, Yahoo -- they always have those stories that the hip-hop movement is getting the youth movement going. And I -- but I feel like I can't be a part of that movement because their whole movement is all for Obama. And they cling to --

LIMBAUGH: Not only that, you want to stay alive. I mean, street cred for hip-hoppers is a murder charge.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Duke Street King (May 19, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
      1 2
      My First time visiting MediaMatters, what does Limbaugh have to do with the media? He's an entertainer, no? To me it's like critiquing Letterman or Leno, none of the 3 are media, in the sense that their jokes or comments really don't matter.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 20, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
           
        If his comments don't matter, why do Republicans apologize for criticizing him?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (May 19, 2009 5:11 pm ET)
        1
      I am begging you MSNBC: PLEASE, PLEASE take old fathead up on his 'challenge'.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 19, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
      5  
      I challenge Rush to go one day without lying about something.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (May 19, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
        2  
        One day ?????? Come on he's El'Rushbo, why challenge him to something simple like going one day without lying. Lets really lay down the gauntlet, how about not lying when he opens his mouth?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (May 19, 2009 5:49 pm ET)
          3
        Nerzog, most things out of your mouth are either calling someone a name or a talking point from the Dems. You would not know the truth if it hit you across the head. I remember back when Limbaugh predicted that the Unions would get some of the ownership of the auto companies, you all called him a liar then. Guess what anyone that did is not eating crow. FYI, Obama just took ownership in GM, wow did not know the government was in the auto industry.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 19, 2009 7:04 pm ET)
          3  
          Do you believe Rush that Colin Powell only voted for Obama because he's black?
          Do you believe that there was a link between 9/11 and Iraq?
          Do you believe that Obama hates this country?
          Do you believe that "Arabs love dictators?"
          Do you believe that the hate crimes bill carves out an exception for perverts?
          Do you believe that Gitmo detainees will be let out in Montana?
          Do you believe that there was a political motive for swine flu?

          These are things Rush believes, and that's just the start of it. All demonstrable lies.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by vysotsky (May 20, 2009 4:21 am ET)
            3  
            Well, but in fairness, even in light of all those falsehoods you have to take Rush seriously when he says that street cred for hip-hoppers is a murder charge. I mean if anybody knows about how to get street cred in the hip-hop community it's Rush Limbaugh.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (May 20, 2009 9:53 am ET)
              3
            Fried

            Do you believe that Obama is not a Socialist?
            Do you believe that Obama likes distribution of wealth?
            Do you believe that Obama is going to close gitmo?
            Do you believe that Obama sat in a church for 20 years and did not hear what the preacher was saying?
            Do you believe that Obama thinks the Constitutions needs to be tweaked?
            Do you believe that Obama when he said that all 95% of Americans would get a tax cut?

            So far all of above are false, each one has been proven wrong.
            Obama Administrations has taken ownership of private business
            Obama has said several times that the rich need to distribute what they make.
            Obama cannot close Gitmo, no one will take the terrorist and now the congress will not give money to move the terrorist.
            Obama knows what that preacher said, don't fool yourself.
            Obama admitted in a interview that the constitution should be tweaked.
            Obama agrees we need to raise taxes on many, many goods many that will affect the middle class, so what he gives in one tax break he takes away in another.

            You all screamed when Bush was tapping foreign phone calls, but you are ok with his government telling you what cars can be made, what executives can make, who and whom gets ownership in a company. He is taking your freedoms away daily and your are all ok with this, wow, you have made, drank and even sold the cool-aid.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (May 20, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
              2  
              "but you are ok with his government telling you what cars can be made"

              Wow. Who's the talking-points parrot now?


              I guess it's either that, or shut down GM and Chrysler. If they want government money, they have to accept the strings that come with it. Your precious "market forces" killed these two companies... not the government.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by John Boyce (May 20, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
                 
              Your just another one who supports the "Greed Market".
              Report Abuse
            • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 20, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
                 
              If taking over a business makes you a Socialist, Bush is a Socialist too.

              Ideas that don't come true aren't lies, Mark. He wants to close Gitmo, he didn't lie about that. His "redistrubution" thing was only a tax increase.

              Bush didn't tap just foreign phone calls, Mark, that's been proven. Obama isn't saying what cars can be made, just what the standards should be. If you think any of this is unconstitutional, prove it.

              As far as the constitution being tweaked, how is that a lie?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 20, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
                 
              I answered some of your convoluted questions, care to answer mine?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by creeksneakers2 (May 19, 2009 8:34 pm ET)
          3  
          I don't remember anybody saying unions wouldn't get the auto companies. Anyway, Rush said that Obama would GIVE the auto companies to their unions. They weren't given. Unions gave up more in health and pension funds than they got in auto company stock, which isn't a very safe bet at that.

          Nearly every prediction Rush has made has turned out to be wrong. Write them down when he makes them. Otherwise it's easy to make 1000s of predictions and then call yourself a psychic if one comes out true. Like how about all through 2005 Rush went on and on about how the Democratic Party was imploding?

          Rush lies constantly. All last week Rush said Obama closed 3,000 Chrysler dealerships and 150,000 employees lost their jobs. Less than 800 dealerships were actually closed, not 3,000, and job losses were estimated at 38,000, not 150,000. Did Obama close the dealerships? Chrysler was closing Dodge dealerships over a year ago. They've long planned to cut more. This didn't start when Obama came along. Just one of Rush's lies.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by creeksneakers2 (May 19, 2009 8:53 pm ET)
               
            Here's a link from February, 2008

            http://www.autoobserver.com/2008/02/chrysler-plan-kills-models-consolidates-and-reduces-dealerships.html
            Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (May 20, 2009 11:42 am ET)
               
            Creek, they are still closing, lets give it a couple more weeks
            Report Abuse
            • Author by creeksneakers2 (May 20, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
              2  
              If they close 3,000 they won't have any dealerships left. Think they'll do that?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (May 19, 2009 9:29 pm ET)
          2  
          I find it hillarious watching you support a well documented liar. And the sanctimonious finger pointing - you are well documented here for throwing out the very same bombs you decry. What a hipocrite.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (May 20, 2009 9:20 am ET)
          3  
          The Democrats have talking points? I didn't think they were that organized.

          Please note that I did not say Rush always lies... only that he lies every day... and he does. If you deny this, your own credibility is ZERO.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ny2nc (May 20, 2009 12:34 pm ET)
               
            Well, there actually is talkingpointsmemo.com, but I don't know if that is strictly a "Democrats" talking points website.

            Darned if I can find nine hours a day of moderate, liberal or even extreme left-wing radio programming in my parts. No such trouble on the other end of the spectrum, though. :-(
            Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (May 19, 2009 8:30 pm ET)
           
        He gets by pretty well on Saturday and Sunday (unless one of the Sunday shows book him).
        Report Abuse
    • Author by peebs755 (May 19, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
         
      He wouldn't have a show.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TheThief672 (May 19, 2009 7:58 pm ET)
      3  
      It would please Rush not to have anyone reporting on his faulty facts, mis/dis-information....essentially, catching him on any of his broadcast lies. Sorry Rush an entire nation is aware of your repeated lies and messages of hate against democracy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mfinn7314 (May 19, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
      3  
      Nice but this doesn't go nearly far enough. Let's do 30 days without anyone mentioning Limbaugh and without Limbaugh talking publicly including on the air. A complete Limbaugh-free month. Then let's do it again. And again... and again...

      Of course the reality is Limbaugh loves the attention and directly or indirectly gets wealthier from it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (May 19, 2009 11:26 pm ET)
      3  
      Awwww....Is poor little Rush upset because somebody is criticizing him?????

      [Sniff}....Let's shed sore tears for the big baby.


      A typical bully whining. Think of what he's been saying about other people. Does the name Chelsea Clinton ring the bell?

      The Fat Man should remember about what a much greater man from Missouri said about the heat in the kitchen.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MrBrown (May 20, 2009 9:22 am ET)
      2  
      I challenge him to match the same number of days off the air.

      The man makes millions a year just to talk into a mic with a camera on him. I think he will be fine.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (May 20, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
        2  
        MR.BROWN, LIMBAUGH off the air would sure be nice, and would cut down on npise pollution.
        Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.