About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Couric, Gibson falsely claim "no member" of Congress offered to take Guantánamo detainees

May 21, 2009 7:44 am ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Katie Couric and Charlie Gibson both falsely claimed that "no member" of Congress wanted detainees from Guantánamo Bay transferred to prisons in their districts. In fact, at least two have made such an offer.

25 Comments

During the May 20 broadcasts of the CBS Evening News and ABC's World News, anchors Katie Couric and Charlie Gibson, respectively, falsely claimed that "no member" of Congress wanted detainees being held at the detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, transferred to prisons in their districts. In fact, as Media Matters for America has noted, at least two congressional representatives have offered to hold detainees from Guantánamo Bay at prisons in their districts.

During the broadcast of the CBS Evening News, Couric stated, "The Senate today followed the House in blocking the president from closing the prison camp at Guantánamo Bay because no member wants any of the detainees there sent to his or her home state or district." Similarly, on World News, Gibson said of the detainees: "No member of Congress wants these guys transferred to prisons in their districts." Chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos responded, "That's right."

In a May 9 op-ed in The Washington Post, Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA) offered use of the Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse and Detention Center in Alexandria, Virginia. In the op-ed, Moran noted that "the '20th hijacker,' Zacarias Moussaoui, who participated in planning the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the Pentagon, was held and prosecuted in the Alexandria courthouse" and stated that "should President Obama determine that Alexandria needs to play a reasonably limited role in a nationwide effort to bring justice to the Guantanamo detainees and close this unfortunate chapter of American history, I am confident that Alexandrians will stand strong as they always have."

Rep. Jack Murtha (D-PA) has also said that he is willing to house detainees from Guantánamo Bay at a prison in his district if a maximum security prison were built, according to a January 21 FoxNews.com report:

Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pa., says he'd be willing to house prisoners from Guantanamo Bay in his congressional district if President Obama makes good on a plan to close the U.S. prison there.

[...]

Murtha only has a minimum security prison in his district. But he says he'd have no reservations about holding detainees there in a maximum security prison.

"Sure, I'd take 'em," said Murtha, an outspoken critic of the Iraq war. "They're no more dangerous in my district than in Guantanamo."

Murtha added that there was "no reason not to put 'em in prisons in the United States and handle them the way they would handle any other prisoners."

Additionally, as the blog Think Progress noted, during a May 20 speech on the Senate floor, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said:

And, yes, we have maximum security prisons in California eminently capable of holding these people as well, and from which people -- trust me -- do not escape. So, I believe that this has really been an exercise in fear-baiting. I hope it's not going to be successful.

On the CBS Evening News, chief White House correspondent Chip Reid aired a portion of Feinstein's floor speech in which she said that the United States Penitentiary Administrative Maximum Facility in Florence, Colorado -- the so-called "supermax" prison -- "has 490 beds. They are reserved for the worst of the worst." But Reid did not air her assertion that "maximum security prisons in California" are "eminently capable of holding these people as well."

From the May 20 broadcast of ABC's World News with Charles Gibson:

GIBSON: But, George, what's the problem here? We have, as Jake [Tapper, senior White House correspondent] mentioned and Senator Feinstein said on the Senate floor, we have terrorists in U.S. prisons, so why not the guys from Guantánamo?

STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, Charlie, I think this is one of the ultimate NIMBY issues. You're right on that point. On the other hand, the senators have not yet seen a plan. And you've got the FBI director out there saying he's not sure it's going to be safe, either. Senate sources I've talked to today and the administration believe there is a chance they're going to be able to get the Senate to agree to having some detainees come into prisons later this year, once the plan by the president is released. But there is no way they're going to approve release of any prisoners in the United States.

GIBSON: And when you say it's a NIMBY problem, you mean --

STEPHANOPOULOS and GIBSON [in unison]: Not in my back yard.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Absolutely right, Charlie.

GIBSON: No member of Congress wants these guys transferred to prisons in their districts.

STEPHANOPOULOS: That's right.

From the May 20 broadcast of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric:

COURIC: Well, if you're still counting, it happened on Day 121 of the Obama administration, right behind me at the Capitol: the new president's first major legislative defeat. The Senate today followed the House in blocking the president from closing the prison camp at Guantánamo Bay because no member wants any of the detainees there sent to his or her home state or district. The vote in the Senate wasn't even close, 90 to 6.

Chip Reid is at the White House, and Chip, all but six Democrats abandoned the president on this one.

REID: Well, that's right, Katie. Democrats weighed appeals from the president on the one hand against anger from their constituents on the other, and the president lost in a big way.

[...]

REID: The prison houses 240 suspected terrorists. If it's closed, many could be transferred to the U.S., including about 20 high-ranking members of Al Qaeda. But the president's supporters say critics are fearmongering.

SEN. DICK DURBIN (D-IL): The reality is, we are holding some of the most dangerous terrorists in the world right now in our federal prisons.

REID: Like the Supermax Prison in Colorado, which holds, among others, shoe bomber Richard Reid and Al Qaeda member Zacarias Moussaoui.

FEINSTEIN: It has 490 beds. They are reserved for the worst of the worst.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by ufleirx (May 21, 2009 8:20 am ET)
      2  
      To paraphrase Dan Akroyd, (Actually, I can't because of the profanity filter even though the line is a comedy classic from the 70's -- weren't we all more wholesome then? For the love of might, when did we all become such babies?)but insert that phrase here with Katie's name.

      How you ever got a job anchoring a major media new show -- what, Viacom -- oh now I get it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 21, 2009 9:42 am ET)
      4  
      I'm sorry. I just don't get the bedwetting hysteria over the prospect of putting these alleged "terrorists" in our domestic prisons.

      Do they have super powers, like Magneto? Do people think their compatriots are going to mount a rescue operation? Do they fear that housing these prisoners will make them a target for revenge by other terrorists? (As if the terrorists don't already know that the U.S. is actually in charge of Guantanamo).

      I think what we're seeing is the last remnants of post-9/11 hysteria and jingoism that gripped the country and allowed us to be duped into invading Iraq.

      Shame on the Democrats for caving in to blind fear and allowing themselves to be manipulated by Republican propaganda.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (May 21, 2009 1:51 pm ET)
           
        The Democrats originally rejected giving Obama money because the entire plan is not hashed out yet. That is reasonable.

        The Republicans smelled blood and are insinuating there are larger problems than there are within the Democrats. These terror suspects will end up in US jails. Republican Lindsey Graham (much to his credit) made me laugh the other day when it seems he felt it was necessary to mockingly remind all of the bed-wetters out there that these suspects aren't 10 feet tall and that we have housed prisoners like these before.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (May 21, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
             
          I hope you're right. I just wasn't very encouraged when Harry Reid answered the question by basically repeating the Republican talking point.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tinka (May 22, 2009 11:38 am ET)
               
            Harry Reid is a Wuss!

            The Story of Chicken Little:
            Narrator: Chicken Little was in the woods one day when an acorn fell on her head. It scared her so much she trembled all over. She shook so hard, half her feathers fell out.
            Chicken Little Harry Reid: "Help! Help! The sky is falling! I have to go tell the king!"
            Narrator: So she ran in great fright to tell the king. Along the way she met Henny Penny.
            Henny Penny Rep. Michele Bachmann: "Where are you going, Chicken Little Sen. Harry Reid?"
            Chicken Little Harry Reid: "Oh, help! The sky is falling!"
            Henny Penny Rep. Michele Bachmann: "How do you know?"
            Chicken Little Harry Reid: "I saw it with my own eyes, and heard it with my own ears, and part of it fell on my head!"
            Henny Penny Rep. Michele Bachmann: "This is terrible, just terrible! We'd better hurry up."
            Narrator: So they both ran away as fast as they could. Soon they met Ducky Lucky.
            Ducky Lucky Sen. Kit Bond: "Where are you going, Chicken Little Sen. Harry Reid and Henny Penny Rep. Michele Bachmann?"
            Chicken Little Harry Reid: & Henny Penny Rep. Michele Bachmann: "The sky is falling! The sky is falling! We're going to tell the king!"
            Ducky Lucky Sen. Kit Bond: "How do you know?"
            Chicken Little Harry Reid: "I saw it with my own eyes, and heard it with my own ears, and part of it fell on my head."
            Ducky Lucky Sen. Kit Bond: "Oh dear, oh dear! We'd better run!"
            Narrator: So they all ran down the road as fast as they could. Soon they met Goosey Loosey Rudy Giuliani walking down the roadside.
            Goosey Loosey Rudy Giuliani: "Hello there. Where are you all going in such a hurry?"
            Chicken Little Harry Reid: "We're running for our lives!"
            Henny Penny Rep. Michele Bachmann: "The sky is falling!"
            Ducky Lucky Sen. Kit Bond: "And we're running to tell the king!"
            Goosey Loosey Rudy Giuliani: "How do you know the sky is falling?"
            Chicken Little Sen. Harry Reid: "I saw it with my own eyes, and heard it with my own ears, and part of it fell on my head!"
            Goosey Loosey Rudy Giuliani: "Goodness! Then I'd better run with you."
            Narrator: And they all ran in great fright across a field. Before long they met Turkey Lurkey John Boehner strutting back and forth.
            Turkey Lurkey John Boehner: "Hello there, Chicken Little Sen. Harry Reid, Henny Penny Rep. Michele Bachmann, Ducky Lucky Sen. Kit Bond, and Goosey Loosey Rudy Giuliani. Where are you all going in such a hurry?"
            Chicken Little Sen. Harry Reid: "Help! Help!"
            Henny Penny Rep. Michele Bachmann: "We're running for our lives!"
            Ducky Lucky Sen. Kit Bond: "The sky is falling!"
            Goosey Loosey Rudy Giuliani: "And we're running to tell the king!"
            Turkey Lurkey John Boehner: "How do you know the sky is falling?"
            Chicken Little Sen. Harry Reid: "I saw it with my own eyes, and heard it with my own ears, and part of it fell on my head!"
            Turkey Lurkey John Boehner: "Oh dear! I always suspected the sky would fall someday. I'd better run with you."
            Narrator: So they ran with all their might, until they met Foxy Loxy.
            Foxy Loxy Dick Cheney: "Well, well. Where are you rushing on such a fine day?"
            Chicken Little Sen. Harry Reid: Henny Penny Rep. Michele Bachmann, Ducky Lucky Sen. Kit Bond, Goosey Loosey Rudy Giuliani, Turkey Lurkey John Boehner (together) "Help! Help!" It's not a fine day at all. The sky is falling, and we're running to tell the king!"
            Foxy Loxy Dick Cheney: "How do you know the sky is falling?"
            Chicken Little Sen. Harry Reid: "I saw it with my own eyes, and heard it with my own ears, and part of it fell on my head!"
            Foxy Loxy Dick Cheney: "I see. Well then, follow me, and I'll show you the way to the king."
            Narrator: So Foxy Loxy Dick Cheney led Chicken Little Sen. Harry Reid, Henny Penny Rep. Michele Bachmann, Ducky Lucky Sen. Kit Bond, Goosey Loosey Rudy Giuliani, and Turkey Lurkey John Boehner across a field and through the woods. He led them straight to his den, and they never saw the king to tell him that the sky is falling.
            -E. L Easton
            Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (May 21, 2009 9:57 am ET)
      2  
      Put them in with the regular prison population. They don't need any "special" treatment. I live 5 miles from a state pen. Put them in there. Hope they can defend themselves from the prison population.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (May 21, 2009 10:15 am ET)
        2  
        See, that's the strange thing, they think if they do get dropped into general population, that they're somehow going to 'radicalize' the rest of the inmates, or recruit people. I'm pretty sure they're not going to have much luck with the white supremacists in there, or the black population for the most part. Anyway, if these are such dangerous people, wouldn't you lock them up in a Supermax type of prison where they're on lock down 23 hours per day like other very dangerous criminals that we currently have?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (May 21, 2009 10:32 am ET)
          2  
          Mags, using common sense to fight off the terrified Republicans is of no use. We have been told that these are the "worst of the worst" being held in Gitmo but Bush released over 60 of these worsters back to their countries.
          The frightened Repubs should first demand to see what worst of the worst crimes these prisoners committed. And to suggest that our prison guards who watch over our own worst of the worst are incapable of handling the other worst of the worst is an insult to our hard working men and women who put their lives on the line daily.
          Actually one idiotic Repub Congressmen kept saying that they'd walk the street of your community. It goes back to the real dumbing down of the remaining 20% of the NO Party. These dittoheads still think they run this country.
          And the new math of the day....3=none.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (May 21, 2009 11:51 am ET)
          2  
          I'm afraid you're making much too much sense; the wingnut filters have activated and they can't understand what you're saying. Common sense and reality don't penetrate the layer of deliberate ignorance created by Fox/Rush/Republican talking points.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by right-winger (May 21, 2009 10:46 am ET)
        1
      HERE THEY GO AGAIN!!!! WEAK DEMS!!! HEY LET'S PLAY THE FEAR CARD AGAIN WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND WATCH WE WILL WIN AGAIN. WE GOT THE MEDIA TELLING OUR LIES FOR US AGAIN SO THEY CAN BRING OBAMA DOWN AND LOOK IT'S WORKING AND THE DEMS ARE RUNNING SCARED AGAIN. HEY IF OBAMA LOOKS GOOD AGAIN LIKE HE DID AT NOTRE DAME AGAINST CHENEY TODAY LOOK FOR THE MEDIA TOO DO A 1 DAY STORY ON IT BUT IF CHENEY COMES OUT LOOKING GOOD LOOK FOR THE MEDIA AND MOSTLY FOX AND CNN TO DO A OVER KILL UNLIKE THEY DID WHEN THEY HAD EGG ON THERE FACES AFTER THE NOTRE DAME SPEECH WHEN THEY JUST KNEW THAT CROWD WAS GOIN TO GO UGLY ON OBAMA.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 21, 2009 11:14 am ET)
      2  
      The thing I find so frustrating is that the Media Bobbleheads accept without question the bizarre notion that keeping these few people imprisoned forever somehow makes the world safe for Democracy.

      The Republicans have mythologized the threat to the point that half the country believes that, if you release one of these prisoners, HE will be the one who manages to sneak a nuke into Grand Central Station and blow up the Country.

      It's nonsense, of course, but they've sold it well.

      Essentially, the Republicans have resigned themselves to the view that imprisoning 50 innocent men is less evil than letting one guilty man go free.

      And they claim to be the party of "morality"?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ewl94232 (May 21, 2009 11:50 am ET)
        4
      Well, I'm glad this problem is resolved. We'll bring them here. Once on U.S. soil, their Constitutional rights will apply. No problem there, they'll have been convicted in military tribunals. They'll appeal those convictions, but that doesn't mean that they'll win. Even if they do, suppose they get their convictions overturned, they could just be deported. Unless no other country will take them. Then they will get to stay here. Since their convictions were overturned, possibly for lack of evidence or denial of due process, they'll just be a few more resident alliens. No problem there. Some may want to become farmers. Some may want to find work in the bio-tech industry or in the chemicals industry. That's not a problem. They can get together now and then and exchange reflections on their experiences. Some may want to study architecture or engineering. They'll all lead productive lives and make an important contribution to the diversity of our communities.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by newzhound (May 21, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
        3  
        If you are suggesting Gitmo is not "US soil," how could John McCain run for President of the United States? He was born on a foreign military base, wasn't he?

        And if - God forbid! - a prisoner killed a guard at Gitmo, does that mean we would not prosecute that person for murder because the crime did not happen on "US soil?"

        By international treaty - ratified by the US Senate and therefore the law of the United States - we can not and should not torture anyone. That is the real problem with bringing suspected terrorists to trial - the truth about their treatment will come out.

        And what about the people held at Gitmo for years who didn't do anything?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (May 21, 2009 1:01 pm ET)
        3  
        We'll bring them here. Once on U.S. soil, their Constitutional rights will apply.

        There it is. All along that was the reason for GITMO. To find a legal blackhole where the law doesnt apply. Where they have NO rights. Should a country that considers itself civilized act that way. Try to find an out where they can have an excuse to eschew the very values that MAKE us a good country? Honor is a gift a man gives himself and the same with a country. It is not without cost or risk. If it were that would be meaningless. If you are willing to toss out your values and honor when it is inconvienient when it involves a risk then you never had either values or honor in the firt place. I think my country is better than that that it is more honorable than that, stronger than that. The LAW MUST BE FOLLOWED in EVERY case. I cant say it better than Sir Thomas Moore in A Man for All Seasons

        Arrest him!



        -For what?
        -He's dangerous!



        -Libel. He's a spy!
        -That man's bad!



        -There's no law against that.
        -God's law!



        -Then God can arrest him.
        -While you talk, he's gone!



        Go he should, if he were the Devil,
        until he broke the law.



        -Now you give the Devil benefit of law!
        -Yes, what would you do?



        Cut a road through the law
        to get after the Devil?



        Yes. I'd cut down every law in England
        to do that.



        And when the last law was down,
        and the Devil turned on you...



        ...where would you hide, Roper,
        the laws all being flat?



        This country is planted with laws
        from coast to coast...



        ...Man's laws, not God's,
        and if you cut them down...



        ...and you're just the man to do it...



        ...do you really think you could stand
        upright in the wind that would blow then?



        Yes.



        I give the Devil benefit of law
        for my own safety's sake.

        Edward R Murrow once said that we are not from timid men and he was right. I think some of todays conservatives would embarass our anscestors
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (May 21, 2009 2:08 pm ET)
          1  
          I love that scene!

          A Man for All Seasons is one of my favorite movies, and it has almost no action... it's just people talking. That's why I think it's so brilliant.

          The Republicans seem to be coming from the timid little place where they think we can somehow remove all risk to ourselves and our troops abroad by incarcerating 200 suspects permanently without trial or hearing. No such world exists, no such guarantee can be made.

          They vilify Obama for wanting to give these suspects due process, risking the remote possibility that one of them may go free and harm an American soldier some day. Yet, these same people defend George Bush, who needlessly sent our troops over there to become targets in the first place. That thinking defies logic.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by anotheramerican (May 21, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
              1
            I agree with "A Man for All Seasons". I hear Tarantino is doing a remake. :-)

            This whole controversy is silly and deceptive. Obama and the Democrats can bring the detainees over here anytime and put them anyplace they desire.

            Why don't they? After all Obama PROMISED he would do it. He has the power. He controls the federal prisons. He controls the military. Why is he stalling? Why doesn't he keep one of his most vocal campaign promises instead of taking the PR hit?

            Ask yourself that before anymore ad nauseam attacks on the Republicans.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (May 21, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
                 
              He said he would do it within a year. What is your complaint. There are logistics involved and it isnt like there is nothing else on his plate. I just love the way the rightwing snivels that the President didnt solve all the worlds problems in four months after CHEERING while Bush was creating massive problems.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (May 21, 2009 5:59 pm ET)
                 
              Hey, I'm on board for a remake of A Man For All Seasons.

              Kevin Spacey could play the lead, with Tarantino as Henry and Cheech Marin as Cromwell.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by rsinebada7366 (May 22, 2009 1:38 pm ET)
                 
              Ahem? Excuse me....President Obama doesn't have money authorized to be spent in shutting down Gitmo. Ahem.....only Congress can appropriate the money. Ahem....he will have to wait until September or October for the regular appropriations to begin. He can have everything set up but he can't execute the plan until the money is there. Ahem....do you know nothing?
              Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (May 21, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
               
            I love it too. A man for all seasons, To Kill a Mockingbird, A majority of One. Why cant they make movies like them anymore? Darn, I must be getting old
            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (May 21, 2009 5:55 pm ET)
                 
              I haven't seen A Majority of One. I'll have to check it out; I'm a big Alec Guinness fan.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by shirley davis (May 21, 2009 7:11 pm ET)
         
      I don't understand what the congress is thinking.They say they don't want any terroist in ther states but Guantanomo can't remain forever.We created this problem and now President Obama has to deal with it.If some one has a great idea i am sure president Obama would listen.In the mean time be a part of the solution and not a part of the problem.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by postrero (May 21, 2009 9:15 pm ET)
         
      so is the honey moon over yet? Everyone clapped with approval when it closed now they want it back? Just keep to the original decision and keep them in federal prison. Dude in there ate a guys a brain and somehow he isn't as crazy as a terrorist? Do we FEAR "Muslim Extremists" that much? COWARDS become targets!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LisaLV711 (May 21, 2009 10:54 pm ET)
         
      I work directly across the street from our county jail because I work at the courthouse -- directly across the street from the county jail. See, it's faster to bring the "chained-gang" to court that way. So far, none have "gotten" loose. See, the really bad guys first are in the county system (the little house) before it's determined if the bad guys have the to the prison system (the big house). Between their arrest, initial arraignment, and preliminary hearings and finally trial, these "bad guys" are housed -- you guessed it -- at the county jail! And these are really, really bad guys.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by janiewoo2933 (May 22, 2009 11:29 am ET)
         
      Don't the Governors and the various Corrections Directors of Virginia and Pennsylania have to agee to do this? I think that Rep.
      Moran and Rep. Murtha spoke before consulting with the authorities who would make these decisions. I live in Virginia and unless they build one of hose 100 ft. underground Maximum Security Prisons like they have in some states then forget it. Besides these are
      FEDERAL PRISONERS who would have no business in a State Correctional Facility.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.